Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 22:37 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 22:37
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
xxdw0007
Joined: 15 Nov 2023
Last visit: 23 Oct 2025
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 10
Location: China
Schools: Yale '27
GPA: 3.6
Schools: Yale '27
Posts: 13
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
DrMock
Joined: 08 Nov 2022
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 51
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 111
Location: India
GPA: 8.6
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Krunaal
User avatar
Tuck School Moderator
Joined: 15 Feb 2021
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 805
Own Kudos:
851
 [1]
Given Kudos: 251
Status:Under the Square and Compass
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 755 Q90 V90 DI82
GPA: 5.78
WE:Marketing (Consulting)
Products:
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
DrMock
Joined: 08 Nov 2022
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 51
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 111
Location: India
GPA: 8.6
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Krunaal thanks for the response and clarification. On point 2, I had come to that conclusion as well. I guess I'm having trouble seeing the combination approach as NOT sequential. It was written somewhere else I that the numerator can be calculated by "Choose any 4 pair and then select any one from each pair. 6C4*2C1*2C1*2C1*2C1 = 240". Isn't this sequential in a sense as well? Thanks for your patience on this!
Krunaal
DrMock
@Bunuel I'm a little confused here. Why is this not correct? 12C1*1*10C1*8C1 to pick one pair and two that are not pairs. (I pick one card from 12 and then only have one other card to pick so 1)*(I pick one from the remaining 10 cards)*(I pick 1 from the remaining 8 cards). Thank you!
Hi, a couple of errors in your approach,

1. We are looking for cases where we have at least 1 pair, so we will also need to include cases where we get two pairs; from your approach I assume you have incorrectly inferred that we only want one pair and the rest two should be different

2. If you're selecting cards one by one n times, you will also need to divide it by n! since you multiplied these selections and have arrangements of these selections which is not required

There are multiple correct approaches mentioned in the thread, would suggest you invest some time and go through them. Here's one good approach - https://gmatclub.com/forum/bill-has-a-s ... l#p1425104
User avatar
Krunaal
User avatar
Tuck School Moderator
Joined: 15 Feb 2021
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 805
Own Kudos:
851
 [1]
Given Kudos: 251
Status:Under the Square and Compass
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 755 Q90 V90 DI82
GPA: 5.78
WE:Marketing (Consulting)
Products:
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DrMock
Hi Krunaal thanks for the response and clarification. On point 2, I had come to that conclusion as well. I guess I'm having trouble seeing the combination approach as NOT sequential. It was written somewhere else I that the numerator can be calculated by "Choose any 4 pair and then select any one from each pair. 6C4*2C1*2C1*2C1*2C1 = 240". Isn't this sequential in a sense as well? Thanks for your patience on this!
"Choose any 4 pair and then select any one from each pair" => this involves two steps, we first select the 4 numbers out of 6 by 6C4, now those 4 numbers can each be either red or black, so 2*2*2*2 => \(6C4*2^4\)

It may feel sequential because there are two steps, but we are not selecting individual cards in a particular order, we’re just building up the combination logically. Step 1 only narrows down which values will appear, and step 2 selects one card for each value.
User avatar
DrMock
Joined: 08 Nov 2022
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 51
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 111
Location: India
GPA: 8.6
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Krunaal Just for my better understanding, could you please help write out the numerator in a permutation then dividing it by n! cases where 1) I'm taking one pair and two non-pairs 2) Two pairs. I'm getting the right answer, like you said, when I take the opposite case, divide by n! and subtract it from one, but not when I take the other two scenarios. Thanks for your help.
User avatar
CS17
Joined: 29 Jul 2025
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 13
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 13
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi, my approach to this was calculating ways in which I can choose 1 pair only + ways in which I can choose 2 pairs divided by ways in which I can choose 4 cards out of 12.

So essentially, [6C1 (for choosing that 1 pair) * 10C1 (for choosing 1 value from remaining 5 values, 2 colours each) * 8C1 (not choosing that 1 same value card) + 6C2 (for choosing 2 pairs out of 6)] / 12C4. Can you please help me understand where I am going wrong?
   1   2   3 
Moderators:
Math Expert
105356 posts
Tuck School Moderator
805 posts