It is currently 18 Nov 2017, 02:04

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Concetta: Franchot was a great writer because she was ahead

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 01 May 2004
Posts: 335

Kudos [?]: 117 [0], given: 0

Location: USA

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2004, 14:56
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (01:01) wrong based on 1 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

99. Concetta: Franchot was a great writer because she was ahead of her time in understanding that industrialization was taking an unconscionable toll on the family structure of the working class.
Alicia: Franchot was not a great writer. The mark of a great writer is the ability to move people with the power of the written word, not the ability to be among the first to grasp a social issue. Besides, the social consequences of industrialization were widely understood in Franchotâ€™s day.
In her disagreement with Concetta, Alicia does which one of the following?
(A) accepts Concettaâ€™s criterion and then adds evidence to Concettaâ€™s case
(B) discredits Concettaâ€™s evidence and then generalizes from new evidence
(C) rejects Concettaâ€™s criterion and then disputes a specific claim
(D) disputes Concettaâ€™s conclusion and then presents facts in support of an alternative criterion
(E) attacks one of Concettaâ€™s claims and then criticizes the structure of her argument

Kudos [?]: 117 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 19 Jun 2003
Posts: 151

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2004, 15:07
boksana wrote:
99. Concetta: Franchot was a great writer because she was ahead of her time in understanding that industrialization was taking an unconscionable toll on the family structure of the working class.
Alicia: Franchot was not a great writer. The mark of a great writer is the ability to move people with the power of the written word, not the ability to be among the first to grasp a social issue. Besides, the social consequences of industrialization were widely understood in Franchotâ€™s day.
In her disagreement with Concetta, Alicia does which one of the following?
(A) accepts Concettaâ€™s criterion and then adds evidence to Concettaâ€™s case
(B) discredits Concettaâ€™s evidence and then generalizes from new evidence
(C) rejects Concettaâ€™s criterion and then disputes a specific claim
(D) disputes Concettaâ€™s conclusion and then presents facts in support of an alternative criterion
(E) attacks one of Concettaâ€™s claims and then criticizes the structure of her argument

Between, B and C, I will go with B as it sounds like she is making generalization by saying that "The mark of a great writer is the ability to move people with the power of the written word, not the ability to be ..."

I am not good with these sort of questions... So I might be wrong

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 839

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2004, 16:09
C should be it!

Alicia definitely rejects Concetta's criterion and ofcourse disputes the claim that Franchot was the among the first to know abt the affects of industrialization

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 01 May 2004
Posts: 335

Kudos [?]: 117 [0], given: 0

Location: USA

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2004, 16:21
Why is not D? What's wrong with D??

Kudos [?]: 117 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 19 Jun 2003
Posts: 151

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Jul 2004, 22:45
D says she presents facts..Could you say that she is presenting any fact/data?

""....The mark of a great writer is the ability to move people with the power of the written word, not the ability to be among the first to grasp a social issue. ...""

She is expressing her own opinion about the subject.So, that is why I eliminated D.

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Affiliations: CFA Level 2
Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 263

Kudos [?]: 161 [0], given: 0

Location: Hanoi

### Show Tags

18 Jul 2004, 21:27
1 min 30s and D.

"disputes Concettaâ€™s conclusion ": Franchot was not a great writer
"presents facts in support of an alternative criterion" : The mark of a great writer is the ability to move people with the power of the written word, not the ability to be among the first to grasp a social issue.

The fact that the social consequences of industrialization were widely understood in Franchotâ€™s day attacks Concetta's evidence
_________________

"Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you'r gonna get"

Kudos [?]: 161 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 20 Jun 2004
Posts: 170

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

Location: Noida, UP

### Show Tags

18 Jul 2004, 23:13
boksana wrote:

Alicia: ... The mark of a great writer is the ability to move people with the power of the written word, not the ability to be among the first to grasp a social issue. Besides, the social consequences of industrialization were widely understood in Franchotâ€™s day.

Here, she is 'refuting' Concettaâ€™s criterion

boksana wrote:

Alicia: ... Besides, the social consequences of industrialization were widely understood in Franchotâ€™s day.

Now, she is disputing the specific claim.

Should I say any more??
_________________

--

./abisurd
Not absurd

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jan 2004
Posts: 400

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Location: India

### Show Tags

20 Jul 2004, 03:36
Couldn't make out how any other choice other than (D) would fit the bill

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 01 May 2004
Posts: 335

Kudos [?]: 117 [0], given: 0

Location: USA

### Show Tags

20 Jul 2004, 07:04
OA is C

Kudos [?]: 117 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798

Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

20 Jul 2004, 07:53
Got it C. She just plainly rejects the conclusion, there is no dispute.

Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 0

20 Jul 2004, 07:53
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Concetta: Franchot was a great writer because she was ahead

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.