Hello Everyone!
Let's take a look at this question, one problem at a time, and narrow it down to find the correct answer! To get us started, here is the original question. I also highlighted the major differences between each option in orange:
Cost cutting and restructuring
has allowed the manufacturing company to lower its projected losses for the second quarter, and they are forecasting a profit before the end of the year.
A.
has allowed the manufacturing company to lower its projected losses for the second quarter, and
they are forecastingB.
has allowed for the manufacturing company to lower its projected losses in the second quarter and
to forecastC.
have allowed that the manufacturing company can lower the projected losses for the second quarter, and
to forecastD.
have allowed the manufacturing company to lower its projected second-quarter losses and
to forecastE.
have allowed for the manufacturing company to lower the projected losses in the second quarter, as well as
forecastingIt's clear after taking a quick glance at the options that we have two major issues:
1. has allowed vs. have allowed
2. to forecast vs. forecasting
Let's start with #1 on our list: has allowed vs. have allowed. The subject of this sentence is "Cost cutting and restructuring," which is a
plural subject that needs the
plural verb "have allowed." Let's see how each answer stacks up:
A.
has allowed the manufacturing company to lower its projected losses for the second quarter, and they are forecasting
B.
has allowed for the manufacturing company to lower its projected losses in the second quarter and to forecast
C.
have allowed that the manufacturing company can lower the projected losses for the second quarter, and to forecast
D.
have allowed the manufacturing company to lower its projected second-quarter losses and to forecast
E.
have allowed for the manufacturing company to lower the projected losses in the second quarter, as well as forecasting
We can eliminate options A and B because they use the a singular verb "has allowed," which doesn't match the plural subject.
Now that we're left with options C, D, and E, let's take a look at #2 on the list: to forecast vs. forecasting. We know that cost cutting and restructuring allowed two things to happen:
lower projected losses for the second quarter, and
forecast a profit before the end of the year. The best way to tackle this is to check each answer for parallel structure! Both versions of "lower" and "forecast" need to be worded using parallel format, so let's see how each option stacks up:
C. have allowed that the manufacturing company
can lower the projected losses for the second quarter, and
to forecast -->
WRONG / NOT PARALLELD. have allowed the manufacturing company
to lower its projected second-quarter losses and
to forecast -->
CORRECT / PARALLELE. have allowed for the manufacturing company
to lower the projected losses in the second quarter, as well as
forecasting -->
WRONG / NOT PARALLELThere you go -
option D is the correct answer because it uses the correct subject-verb agreement with "have allowed," and it uses parallel structure when saying "to lower" and "to forecast."
Don't study for the GMAT. Train for it.
_________________
"Students study. GMAT assassins train."
★★★★★ GMAT Club Verified Reviews for EMPOWERgmat & Special Discount
GMAT Club Verbal Advantage EMPOWERgmat Critical Reasoning Question Pack
close
89% (00:43) correct 
