It is currently 17 Oct 2017, 04:41

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older t

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Expert Post
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7670

Kudos [?]: 17326 [0], given: 232

Location: Pune, India
Re: Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older t [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Aug 2013, 21:54
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
nikhil007 wrote:
OA for this post is incorrect, it should be E.. Mods can you please rectify..look at Ron's explanation over here
http://www.beatthegmat.com/bold-face-qu ... 34190.html


Note that the original question is not the same as this one. The bold parts are different and hence the OA is different. In the previous comments, I have mentioned time and again that there are two different questions (where the bold sentences are different). The OA of the original question is (B) only.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Kudos [?]: 17326 [0], given: 232

e-GMAT Discount CodesKaplan GMAT Prep Discount CodesVeritas Prep GMAT Discount Codes
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 19 Nov 2012
Posts: 2

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Re: Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older t [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Sep 2013, 16:52
eybrj2 wrote:
Delta products, Inc., has recently switched at least partly from older technologies using fossil fuels to new technologies powered by electricity. The question has been raised whether it can be concluded that for a given level of output, Delta’s operation now causes less fossil fuel to be consumed than it did formerly. The answer, clearly, is yes, since the amount of fossil fuel used to generate the electricity needed to power the new technologies is less than the amount needed to power the older technologies, provided that the level of output is held constant.

In the argument given, the two boldface portions play which of the following roles?


A. The first identifies the content of the conclusion of the argument; the second
provides support for that conclusion.
B. The first provides support for the conclusion of the argument; the second
identifies the content of that conclusion.
C. The first states the position that the argument opposes; the second states the
conclusion of the argument.
D. Each provides evidence that calls the conclusion of the argument into question.
E. Each provides support for the conclusion of the argument.


What dose " the content of the conclusion of the argument" mean?
I don't get it. :cry:



I think there is something wrong here. The correct answer is not E. I had this problem given in my class and the conclusion was the answer choice B. Can some one please confirm the same?

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

1 KUDOS received
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 1127

Kudos [?]: 3475 [1], given: 123

Location: United States
Premium Member
Re: Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older t [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Sep 2013, 22:51
1
This post received
KUDOS
nyknicks wrote:
eybrj2 wrote:
Delta products, Inc., has recently switched at least partly from older technologies using fossil fuels to new technologies powered by electricity. The question has been raised whether it can be concluded that for a given level of output, Delta’s operation now causes less fossil fuel to be consumed than it did formerly. The answer, clearly, is yes, since the amount of fossil fuel used to generate the electricity needed to power the new technologies is less than the amount needed to power the older technologies, provided that the level of output is held constant.

In the argument given, the two boldface portions play which of the following roles?


A. The first identifies the content of the conclusion of the argument; the second
provides support for that conclusion.
B. The first provides support for the conclusion of the argument; the second
identifies the content of that conclusion.
C. The first states the position that the argument opposes; the second states the
conclusion of the argument.
D. Each provides evidence that calls the conclusion of the argument into question.
E. Each provides support for the conclusion of the argument.


What dose " the content of the conclusion of the argument" mean?
I don't get it. :cry:



I think there is something wrong here. The correct answer is not E. I had this problem given in my class and the conclusion was the answer choice B. Can some one please confirm the same?


Hi nyknicks

The correct answer of this question is E, not B.

I think you saw a "similar" question in your class.

This question also has other version in which B is correct answer.

Critical Reasoning - Question #97, Official Guide 12.

Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older technologies using fossil fuels to new technologies powered by electricity. The question has been raised whether it can be concluded that for a given level of output Delta's operation now causes less fossil fuel to be consumed than it did formerly. The answer, clearly, is yes, since the amount of fossil fuel used to generate the electricity needed to power the new technologies is less than the amount needed to power the older technologies, provided level of output is held constant

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?
(A) The first identifies the content of the conclusion of the argument; the second provides support for that conclusion.
(B) The first provides support for the conclusion of the argument; the second identifies the content of that conclusion. ==>OA is B
(C) The first states the conclusion of the argument; the second calls that conclusion into question.
(D) The first provides support for the conclusion of the argument; the second calls that conclusion into question.
(E) Each provides support for the conclusion of the argument.

Hope it's clear now.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Kudos [?]: 3475 [1], given: 123

Expert Post
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4417

Kudos [?]: 8420 [0], given: 102

Re: Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older t [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Sep 2013, 12:34
nyknicks wrote:
I think there is something wrong here. The correct answer is not E. I had this problem given in my class and the conclusion was the answer choice B. Can some one please confirm the same?

Dear nyknicks,
Yes, you are 100% right. I want to verify what pqhai said --- yes, this is OG12, CR #97, OA = (B). I edited the question at the head of this thread, so that the answer it gave would reflect the correct OA.
Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Kudos [?]: 8420 [0], given: 102

Expert Post
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4417

Kudos [?]: 8420 [0], given: 102

Re: Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older t [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Oct 2013, 11:39
Expert's post
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
madhul90 wrote:
So finally what is the answer :(.. Is it B or E? I feel it is E since like Mike says, both the statements support the conclusion.

Dear Madhu90,
I'm happy to respond. :-) If you get your hands on the OG12 (usually very easy to find in a good used bookstore) and look on p. 622, you will find the full explanation for this question, which includes the OA of (B). Choice (E) is a very good tempting answer, and I see you, among others have been tempted by it. Let's sort this out.

Here's the question, with choices (B) & (E). BTW, eybrj2 originally had the wrong second sentence in bold, which I believe contributed to a great deal of the confusion on this page.
Delta products, Inc., has recently switched at least partly from older technologies using fossil fuels to new technologies powered by electricity. The question has been raised whether it can be concluded that for a given level of output, Delta's operation now causes less fossil fuel to be consumed than it did formerly. The answer, clearly, is yes, since the amount of fossil fuel used to generate the electricity needed to power the new technologies is less than the amount needed to power the older technologies, provided that the level of output is held constant.

In the argument given, the two boldface portions play which of the following roles?
B. The first provides support for the conclusion of the argument; the second identifies the content of that conclusion.
E. Each provides support for the conclusion of the argument.

With the correct sentences in bold, it's probably clearer now that this second sentence, following the words "concluded that", must be equivalent to the conclusion, not just a support for the conclusion. In the context of that entire sentence, it's posed as a question ("The question has been raised ...."), so this would make it hard to call that second bold section a "conclusion", but it tells us the ideas that the argument has as its conclusion, so it provides the "content" of the conclusion.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Kudos [?]: 8420 [0], given: 102

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 28 Jul 2014
Posts: 1

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older t [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jul 2014, 02:59
Coming off the back of last weeks article about sanitizing my makeup I purged my collection and disposed of all my unused and old cosmetics. Needless to say, my collection is now substantially smaller. Not to worry, I suppose it gives me an excuse to branch out and experiment with some new products right? After my purge I ended up pondering how often I purchase cosmetics and then refuse to throw them out. Unfortunately you have caught me. That's right I am a functioning makeup hoarder! I once kept a tube of discontinued lipstick from my favourite brand for about seven years before I could bear to part with it. O_o can I detect product expiration here?

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 593

Kudos [?]: 457 [0], given: 200

Location: Germany
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 580 Q46 V24
GPA: 3.88
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older t [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Feb 2015, 08:05
was stucked between B and D.
First BF: Fact / Evidence / Support to the conclusion
Second BF: hmm... the word WETHER makes it NEUTRAL, because we don't know the answer yet.
Conclusion: clearly --> YES

(A) The first identifies the content of the conclusion of the argument; the second provides support for that conclusion.
(B) The first provides support for the conclusion of the argument; the second identifies the content of that conclusion - CORRECT

(C) The first states the conclusion of the argument; the second calls that conclusion into question.
(D) The first provides support for the conclusion of the argument; the second calls that conclusion into question. --> to call into question -means smth. negative for the conclusion, but the 2nd BF is not negative (to make a question has not the same impact as call into question on the GMAT , the word wether is neutral
(E)Each provides support for the conclusion of the argument - second BF is neutral - doesn't support the conclusion
_________________

When you’re up, your friends know who you are. When you’re down, you know who your friends are.

Share some Kudos, if my posts help you. Thank you !

800Score ONLY QUANT CAT1 51, CAT2 50, CAT3 50
GMAT PREP 670
MGMAT CAT 630
KAPLAN CAT 660

Kudos [?]: 457 [0], given: 200

1 KUDOS received
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 03 Feb 2013
Posts: 942

Kudos [?]: 1053 [1], given: 548

Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.88
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Reviews Badge
Re: Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older t [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jun 2015, 21:13
1
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
There are two versions of questions:

Version : 1

Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older technologies using fossil fuels to new technologies powered by electricity.
The question has been raised whether it can be concluded that for a given level of output Delta's operation now causes less fossil fuel to be consumed than it did formerly. The answer, clearly, is yes, since the amount of fossil fuel used to generate the electricity needed to power the new technologies is less than the amount needed to power the older technologies, provided level of output is held constant.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

(A) The first identifies the content of the conclusion of the argument; the second provides support for that conclusion.
(B) The first provides support for the conclusion of the argument; the second identifies the content of that conclusion.
(C) The first states the conclusion of the argument; the second calls that conclusion into question.
(D) The first provides support for the conclusion of the argument; the second calls that conclusion into question.
(E) Each provides support for the conclusion of the argument.

Solution:
1st Bold Faced
Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older technologies using fossil fuels to new technologies powered by electricity.
This is a fact and it also supports the conclusion.
What is the conclusion:
clearly, is yes (that for a given level of output Delta's operation now causes less fossil fuel to be consumed than it did formerly)
And
2nd Bold Faced
for a given level of output Delta's operation now causes less fossil fuel to be consumed than it did formerly
is part of the full conclusion.
The author infers that Yes, for a given level of output Delta's operation now causes less fossil fuel to be consumed than it did formerly

Now lets do POE:

(A) The first identifies the content of the conclusion of the argument; the second provides support for that conclusion.
First is a fact that supports the conclusion but not the "content of the conclusion"

(B) The first provides support for the conclusion of the argument; the second identifies the content of that conclusion.
Correct because of the above reasoning

(C) The first states the conclusion of the argument; the second calls that conclusion into question.
1st supports the the conclusion and doesn't state the conclusion of the argument
2nd states the conclusion and definitely doesn't calls that conclusion into conclusion

(D) The first provides support for the conclusion of the argument; the second calls that conclusion into question.
2nd states the conclusion and definitely doesn't calls that conclusion into conclusion

(E) Each provides support for the conclusion of the argument.
2nd states the conclusion, option B) is better than Option E)

Version 2:

Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older technologies using fossil fuels to new technologies powered by electricity.
The question has been raised whether it can be concluded that for a given level of output Delta's operation now causes less fossil fuel to be consumed than it did formerly. The answer, clearly, is yes, since the amount of fossil fuel used to generate the electricity needed to power the new technologies is less than the amount needed to power the older technologies, provided level of output is held constant.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

(A) The first identifies the content of the conclusion of the argument; the second provides support for that conclusion.
(B) The first provides support for the conclusion of the argument; the second identifies the content of that conclusion.
(C) The first states the conclusion of the argument; the second calls that conclusion into question.
(D) The first provides support for the conclusion of the argument; the second calls that conclusion into question.
(E) Each provides support for the conclusion of the argument.

As the analysis is same for both the version as premise is same, lets do the POE:

(A) The first identifies the content of the conclusion of the argument; the second provides support for that conclusion.
First is a fact that supports the conclusion but not the "content of the conclusion"

(B) The first provides support for the conclusion of the argument; the second identifies the content of that conclusion.
2nd BF doesn't identify the content of the conclusion. It supports the conclusion

(C) The first states the conclusion of the argument; the second calls that conclusion into question.
1st supports the the conclusion and doesn't states the conclusion of the argument
2nd also supports the argument and definitely doesn't calls that conclusion into conclusion

(D) The first provides support for the conclusion of the argument; the second calls that conclusion into question.
2nd also supports the argument and definitely doesn't calls that conclusion into conclusion

(E) Each provides support for the conclusion of the argument.
Correct as both the statements supports the argument
_________________

Thanks,
Kinjal
My Debrief : http://gmatclub.com/forum/hardwork-never-gets-unrewarded-for-ever-189267.html#p1449379
My Application Experience : http://gmatclub.com/forum/hardwork-never-gets-unrewarded-for-ever-189267-40.html#p1516961
Linkedin : https://www.linkedin.com/in/kinjal-das/

Please click on Kudos, if you think the post is helpful

Kudos [?]: 1053 [1], given: 548

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 24 Aug 2015
Posts: 3

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 29

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older t [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Nov 2015, 11:49
perfectstranger wrote:
Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older technologies using fossil fuels to new technologies powered by electricity.
The question has been raised whether it can be concluded that for a given level of output Delta's operation now causes less fossil fuel to be consumed than it did formerly. The answer, clearly, is yes, since the amount of fossil fuel used to generate the electricity needed to power the new technologies is less than the amount needed to power the older technologies, provided level of output is held constant

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?
(A) The first identifies the content of the conclusion of the argument; the second provides support for that conclusion.
(B) The first provides support for the conclusion of the argument; the second identifies the content of that conclusion.
(C) The first states the conclusion of the argument; the second calls that conclusion into question.
(D) The first provides support for the conclusion of the argument; the second calls that conclusion into question.
(E) Each provides support for the conclusion of the argument.


'D' would have been correct if the bold portion was this 'whether it can be concluded that for a given level of output Delta's operation now causes less fossil fuel to be consumed than it did formerly.'
_________________

Please Encourage with your Kudos!!

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 29

Current Student
avatar
B
Joined: 13 Feb 2011
Posts: 104

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 3385

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older t [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Feb 2016, 19:01
What if the second bold portion included the complete statement, i.e. "The question has been raised whether it can be concluded that for a given level of output Delta's operation now causes less fossil fuel to be consumed than it did formerly.", would the answer still be B or it'd now be D?

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 3385

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 26 Dec 2015
Posts: 254

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 1

Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
WE: Investment Banking (Venture Capital)
Re: Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older t [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Apr 2017, 13:17
Kind of tricky but not an impossible question.

First thing: IDENTIFY THE CONCLUSION.
- Notice: 2nd bold face kind of sets up the conclusion. What do I mean by that?

BF2, with its wording, "question has been raised whether it can be concluded..." Since you are given an answer right after, BF2 essentially asks as a marker. It screams: CONCLUSION IS COMING NEXT!

Conclusion: for a given level of output, Delta's operation now causes less FF to be consumed than it did formerly.

Now, what does BF1 play? BF1 basically states a fact. Delta recently did this. How does this relate to the Conclusion? It's a premise, so it supports the Conclusion.

Hence, you get B.

Don't believe me? Let's try POE:
A- BF1 does NOT ID the content of the conclusion. so what Delta switched from FF to electricity? there are a dozen different Conclusions I can make from that statement.
C- BF1 does NOT state Conclusion of the argument. A Conclusion marker comes further down the passage (explained above)
D- BF2 does NOT call Conclusion into question. Since "the answer, clearly, is yes"...it seems like it does not go against the Conclusion
E- BF2 does not necessarily provide SUPPORT for the Conclusion argument. It sets up the Conclusion. The 2nd BF is elaborating on a question, it's not a statement/fact.

Kudos please if it helped :)

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 1

Director
Director
avatar
S
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 892

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 859

Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older t [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jul 2017, 20:01
between B and E, I choose B because the conclusion cannot be "yes" alone. Moreover, the second indicates the main position of the author; therefore, the second should be the main conclusion. => B is correct

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 859

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Posts: 345

Kudos [?]: 65 [0], given: 64

WE: Engineering (Transportation)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older t [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Aug 2017, 00:38
1st boldface is a fact which later after reading out argument turn in support of main conclusion
after reading the full argument we know 2nd bold face is the conclusion that it now uses less fossil fuels.
therefore the answer is B
_________________

Give Kudos for correct answer and/or if you like the solution.

Kudos [?]: 65 [0], given: 64

Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 07 Jun 2017
Posts: 95

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 45

Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT 1: 660 Q46 V38
GPA: 3.6
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older t [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Aug 2017, 02:24
Only B, E can be taken into consider while all other option can be ruled out in first inspection.
B is a clear winner since, both are not supporting statement for the Conclusion
_________________

Regards,
Naveen
email: nkmungila@gmail.com
Please press kudos if you like this post

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 45

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 478

Kudos [?]: 121 [0], given: 126

Re: Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older t [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Sep 2017, 10:46
Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older technologies using fossil fuels to new technologies powered by electricity. The question has been raised whether it can be concluded that for a given level of output Delta's operation now causes less fossil fuel to be consumed than it did formerly. The answer, clearly, is yes, since the amount of fossil fuel used to generate the electricity needed to power the new technologies is less than the amount needed to power the older technologies, provided level of output is held constant

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

(A) The first identifies the content of the conclusion of the argument; the second provides support for that conclusion. -2nd is the conclusion.
(B) The first provides support for the conclusion of the argument; the second identifies the content of that conclusion. -Correct
(C) The first states the conclusion of the argument; the second calls that conclusion into question. -2nd is the conclusion.
(D) The first provides support for the conclusion of the argument; the second calls that conclusion into question. -2nd is the conclusion.
(E) Each provides support for the conclusion of the argument. -2nd is the conclusion.
_________________

Kudos if my post helps!

Helpful links:
1. e-GMAT's ALL SC Compilation

Kudos [?]: 121 [0], given: 126

Re: Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older t   [#permalink] 23 Sep 2017, 10:46

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 35 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older t

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.