Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 06:27 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 06:27
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
   1   2 
655-705 Level|   Bold Face CR|                                       
User avatar
Nikhil30
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 03 Jan 2019
Last visit: 29 Sep 2021
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
42
Given Kudos: 13
Schools: Ross '23 (A)
Schools: Ross '23 (A)
Posts: 28
Kudos: 42
Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older 14 Jul 2021, 22:20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
seongbae
another vote for (B). i just looked at the second part...which is not quite a conclusion. the conclusion is "the new technologies allow Delta Products Inc less fuel to produce same output..." the second highlighted part provides content for the conclusion.
Show more

your answer is correct, but your conclusion is wrong.!!
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,108
Own Kudos:
32,884
Given Kudos: 700
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,108
Kudos: 32,884
Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older 20 Jul 2021, 02:51
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
perfectstranger
Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older technologies using fossil fuels to new technologies powered by electricity. The question has been raised whether it can be concluded that for a given level of output Delta's operation now causes less fossil fuel to be consumed than it did formerly. The answer, clearly, is yes, since the amount of fossil fuel used to generate the electricity needed to power the new technologies is less than the amount needed to power the older technologies, provided level of output is held constant

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

(A) The first identifies the content of the conclusion of the argument; the second provides support for that conclusion.
(B) The first provides support for the conclusion of the argument; the second identifies the content of that conclusion.
(C) The first states the conclusion of the argument; the second calls that conclusion into question.
(D) The first provides support for the conclusion of the argument; the second calls that conclusion into question.
(E) Each provides support for the conclusion of the argument.

Similar question from GMATPrep : [LINK]

Show Spoiler
Argument Evaluation

Situation
Delta switched from technologies using fossil fuels to ones using electricity. It has been asked whether this results in less fossil fuel used per level of output. The answer is that it does.

Reasoning
What roles do the two boldfaced portions play in the argument? The first boldfaced statement is simply asserted by the passage. But the second boldfaced statement, when it is first introduced, is not asserted to be true, but rather is identified as something that might be inferred from the first statement. By the end of the passage the argument concludes that the second statement is true.

(A) This option simply reverses the roles that the statements play in the argument.

(B) Correct. This option identifies the roles the boldfaced portions play.

(C) Nothing in the passage is intended to support the first statement; and the second statement is not supposed to call the first into question.

(D) This correctly identifies the role of the first statement, but the second boldfaced portion does not call the argument's conclusion into question—it is part of a sentence that refers to the question whether that conclusion can be drawn from the first statement.

(E) Again, this is only half right. The second boldfaced portion is not offered as support for the conclusion; if it were offered as such support, the argument would be guilty of circular reasoning, since the second boldfaced portion states exactly what the argument concludes.
Show more

Solution
Understand the passage
Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older technologies using fossil fuels to new technologies powered by electricity. 

    The author provides an observation to set the context of his argument.
    She talks about a company called Delta Products Inc. Until recently it had been using older technologies employing fossil fuels.
    Now the company has changed at least partly to using new technologies powered by electricity. 

The question has been raised whether it can be concluded that for a given level of output Delta's operation now causes less fossil fuel to be consumed than it did formerly.

    The author brings forth a question that has been raised on the outcome of the company’s decision to switch.
    The question is whether the switch has led to reduction in the consumption of fossil fuels for a certain level of production as compared to before the switch.

The answer, clearly, is yes,

    The author makes her conclusion while answering the question.
    She says that the switch has indeed led to a decrease in the amount of fossil fuels used fo a certain level of production.

since the amount of fossil fuel used to generate the electricity needed to power the new technologies is less than the amount needed to power the older technologies, provided level of output is held constant
 

    Here the author provides the reason behind his affirmative answer.
    She says the new technologies need a lower amount of fossil fuels to generate electricity for them.
    On the other hand, the older technologies had needed a higher amount of fossil fuels to produce a certain level of output
    The entire passage goes in the same direction.


Pre-thinking
1st Bold Face
Role = Observation/evidence
Relationship = Used to set the context for the argument .

2nd Bold Face
Role = question raised to reach the conclusion.
Relationship =seeks to judge the prudence of the move in the observation that sets the context.
Overall
Both go hand in hand in the same direction.

A.
The first identifies the content of the conclusion of the argument
No. This is just an observation to set the context of the conclusion;
the second provides support for that conclusion.
No. It is the explanation of the conclusion.
Thus, this is not the correct choice.

B
The first provides support for the conclusion of the argument;
Yes. It sets the context and, in that sense, provides the premise for the conclusion.
the second identifies the content of that conclusion.
Yes. It raises the question, the answer to which becomes the conclusion. So, it definitely calls up the content of the conclusion.
Thus, this is the correct answer choice.

C
The first states the conclusion of the argument;
No. This is not the conclusion of the argument
the second calls that conclusion into question.
No. It raises a question, the answer to which, is the conclusion. It does not challenge the conclusion
Thus, this is not the correct choice.

D
The first provides support for the conclusion of the argument;
Yes. It sets the context and, in that sense, provides the premise for the conclusion.
the second calls that conclusion into question.
No. It raises a question, the answer to which, is the conclusion. It does not challenge the conclusion
Thus, this is not the correct choice.

E
Each provides support for the conclusion of the argument
Only the first provides the premise for the conclusion. The second boldface actually builds up the content of the conclusion. It is a question and in part it contains the answer to the question itself.
Thus, this is not the correct choice.
User avatar
ayushgmatclub1
User avatar
Joined: 11 Jan 2018
Last visit: 08 May 2022
Posts: 57
Own Kudos:
18
Given Kudos: 337
Posts: 57
Kudos: 18
Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older 09 Aug 2021, 11:29
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can someone please explain how statement 1 is supporting the conclusion? Isn't it just a fact/information?
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,783
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,783
Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older 24 Aug 2021, 19:49
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ayushgmatclub1
Can someone please explain how statement 1 is supporting the conclusion? Isn't it just a fact/information?
Show more
Check out our earlier analysis of this issue and let us know whether that clears things up!
User avatar
Mansha1412
User avatar
Joined: 19 May 2021
Last visit: 27 Sep 2022
Posts: 14
Own Kudos:
1
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 14
Kudos: 1
Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older 08 Dec 2021, 12:27
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can you please throw some light that why and how option A is incorrect? VeritasKarishma
User avatar
ReedArnoldMPREP
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 30 Apr 2021
Last visit: 20 Dec 2024
Posts: 521
Own Kudos:
536
 [1]
Given Kudos: 37
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V47
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V47
Posts: 521
Kudos: 536
 [1]
Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older 08 Dec 2021, 13:29
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Mansha1412
Can you please throw some light that why and how option A is incorrect? VeritasKarishma
Show more

A) says that the second boldface 'provides support for that conclusion.' What does the second boldface say? Well it's the content of a question the passage is introducing: that maybe Delta's operation now causes less fossil fuel consumption per level of output. A 'premise' is something that supports the conclusion--this second boldfaced sentence isn't even something we know is true! It's what the passage is asking. How can the passage ask if something is true and then use it support a conclusion?

A also says the first bold identifies the 'content of the conclusion.' That presumably means "The first boldface identifies what the conclusion is about.' So is the conclusion about switching from fossil fuel technology to new technology? Is the argument trying to convince us that THIS is true, and giving support for why we should believe Delta Products has made that switch?

No. The switch is given as a fact. The question is if that switch allows us to conclude that Delta uses less fossil fuel per level of output than before. The author says we CAN conclude that, and gives a second premise why.

Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older technologies using fossil fuels to new technologies powered by electricity. The question has been raised whether it can be concluded that for a given level of output Delta's operation now causes less fossil fuel to be consumed than it did formerly. The answer, clearly, is yes, since the amount of fossil fuel used to generate the electricity needed to power the new technologies is less than the amount needed to power the older technologies, provided level of output is held constant

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

(A) The first identifies the content of the conclusion of the argument; the second provides support for that conclusion.
(B) The first provides support for the conclusion of the argument; the second identifies the content of that conclusion.
(C) The first states the conclusion of the argument; the second calls that conclusion into question.
(D) The first provides support for the conclusion of the argument; the second calls that conclusion into question.
(E) Each provides support for the conclusion of the argument.
User avatar
woohoo921
User avatar
Joined: 04 Jun 2020
Last visit: 17 Mar 2023
Posts: 516
Own Kudos:
142
Given Kudos: 623
Posts: 516
Kudos: 142
Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older 22 May 2022, 11:13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KarishmaB
siddhans
Why is it D...the second boldface calls the conclusion into question ..The reason I am saying this is because before the second boldaface it says : - " The question has been raised whether i ...... "

I think you meant to ask why the answer is not D.
The most important step in CR questions is 'identifying the conclusion'. What is the conclusion in this argument?
The conclusion is the author's opinion, the point that he/she is trying to make. The conclusion is that Delta's operation causes less fossil fuel to be consumed now.
The second boldface part is only "for a given level of output Delta's operation now causes less fossil fuel to be consumed than it did formerly" which is exactly what the conclusion is. It gives the content of the conclusion.
There are many ways of giving the content of the conclusion. Say the conclusion is 'X'. You can say:
So we can conclude X.
or
Can we conclude X? Yes we can.

A statement that calls the conclusion into question would give an argument that would be against the conclusion.
Show more

KarishmaB
A few questions:
1.) Would you be able to point to another Critical Reasoning question that is similar? I was a bit thrown off by the other way you mentioned in which the OG can set up a conclusion (Can we conclude X? Yes we can).

2.) Why is the first boldface not just considered background information. What exactly makes it a premise?

3.) Would the second boldface be correct if it read "the second statement calls the argument's MAIN conclusion into question"?

Thank you for always being so helpful and responsive. You are truly amazing :)
User avatar
KarishmaB
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
76,993
 [2]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 76,993
 [2]
Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older 23 May 2022, 20:55
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
woohoo921
KarishmaB
siddhans
Why is it D...the second boldface calls the conclusion into question ..The reason I am saying this is because before the second boldaface it says : - " The question has been raised whether i ...... "

I think you meant to ask why the answer is not D.
The most important step in CR questions is 'identifying the conclusion'. What is the conclusion in this argument?
The conclusion is the author's opinion, the point that he/she is trying to make. The conclusion is that Delta's operation causes less fossil fuel to be consumed now.
The second boldface part is only "for a given level of output Delta's operation now causes less fossil fuel to be consumed than it did formerly" which is exactly what the conclusion is. It gives the content of the conclusion.
There are many ways of giving the content of the conclusion. Say the conclusion is 'X'. You can say:
So we can conclude X.
or
Can we conclude X? Yes we can.

A statement that calls the conclusion into question would give an argument that would be against the conclusion.

KarishmaB
A few questions:
1.) Would you be able to point to another Critical Reasoning question that is similar? I was a bit thrown off by the other way you mentioned in which the OG can set up a conclusion (Can we conclude X? Yes we can).

2.) Why is the first boldface not just considered background information. What exactly makes it a premise?

3.) Would the second boldface be correct if it read "the second statement calls the argument's MAIN conclusion into question"?

Thank you for always being so helpful and responsive. You are truly amazing :)
Show more

Note the two arguments given below.

Argument 1:

D has recently switched at least partly from older technologies using fossil fuels to new technologies powered by electricity. The amount of fossil fuel used to generate the electricity needed to power the new technologies is less than the amount needed to power the older technologies, provided level of output is held constant.
Hence, for a given level of output Delta's operation now causes less fossil fuel to be consumed than it did formerly.


Argument 2:
D has recently switched at least partly from older technologies using fossil fuels to new technologies powered by electricity. The amount of fossil fuel used to generate the electricity needed to power the new technologies is less than the amount needed to power the older technologies, provided level of output is held constant.
The question has been raised whether it can be concluded that for a given level of output Delta's operation now causes less fossil fuel to be consumed than it did formerly. The answer, clearly, is yes.

Are they different? The author essentially puts the same points forward in both. He gives two premises and on the basis of those, he concludes that D now causes less fossil fuel consumption. It doesn't matter how he frames the conclusion. It can be framed in whatever way the author wants but we know exactly what info it gives. It tells us that he thinks that D's operation now causes less fossil fuel consumption.

The first BF is a premise because the conclusion is "Delta's operation now causes less fossil fuel to be consumed than it did formerly."
So one would ask "why do you think so?"
And the answer would be "because Delta recently switched at least partly from older technologies using fossil fuels to new technologies powered by electricity... " etc


The second BF does not call the main conclusion into question. What that means is that it weakens the main conclusion of the argument i.e. it makes us doubt the main conclusion. That is not correct. The second BF is the content of the main conclusion. It is framed as a question but that doesn't change anything. When we "question something," it means we are wondering whether it holds or not.
User avatar
Dinesh654
User avatar
Joined: 08 Jun 2021
Last visit: 11 Aug 2024
Posts: 155
Own Kudos:
9
Given Kudos: 217
Status:In learning mode...
Location: India
GMAT 1: 600 Q46 V27
Products:
My Reviews
GMAT 1: 600 Q46 V27
Posts: 155
Kudos: 9
Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older 19 Jul 2022, 05:24
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello experts,

I chose the right answer, which I like more than E, but I don't have clear reason to eliminate E, which says- each provide support for the conclusion of the argument.
BF-1 provide support because it sets the context of the argument, hence it is a required fact.

1. BF2 isn't also provide support in a sense? based on this BF, the conclusion exists (yes,). as rightly said by choice B, it also provide content of the conclusion, which is a question aswered by the conclusion. so BF2 is supportive to the conclusion.

2. It took me 4:30 mins to complete this, I found that I take 4+ mins to solve every hard BF question, because each one of them presents convoluted argument(which is why they are hard). typically I write symbols for each statement as (f-fact, O-opinion and s-support or a -against). take time to deconstruct the argument. i take longer to read argument by this way but elimination is quicker (helps in easy-med question). this one fails in harder BF question. Is there a better strategy?
User avatar
ChiranjeevSingh
User avatar
Joined: 22 Oct 2012
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 411
Own Kudos:
3,058
 [3]
Given Kudos: 154
Status:Private GMAT Tutor
Location: India
Concentration: Economics, Finance
Schools: IIMA  (A)
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V85 DI85
GMAT Focus 2: 735 Q90 V85 DI85
GMAT Focus 3: 735 Q88 V87 DI84
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V47
GRE 1: Q170 V168
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: IIMA  (A)
GMAT Focus 3: 735 Q88 V87 DI84
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V47
GRE 1: Q170 V168
Posts: 411
Kudos: 3,058
 [3]
Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older 24 Jul 2022, 21:41
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Understand the Passage


Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older technologies using fossil fuels to new technologies powered by electricity.A company, Delta Products Inc., has partly switched from older technologies (which used fossil fuels) to new technologies (which use electricity).

The question has been raised whether it can be concluded that for a given level of output Delta’s operation now causes less fossil fuel to be consumed than it did formerly.A question has been raised. The question is whether the company consumes less fossil fuel now than it did before, for the same level of output. (Here, you should take a pause and understand why such a question might be raised. The new technologies run on electricity. Then, why are we talking about fossil fuel consumption now? The underlying assumption/reasoning is that the production of electricity requires fossil fuels. So, even though the new technologies run on electricity, they also consume fossil fuel indirectly. Now, the question is whether new technologies consume less fossil fuels than older technologies.)

The answer, clearly, is yes. This part is the conclusion of the argument since the following statement supports this statement. The earlier two statements set the background for this conclusion. Of course, this statement makes sense only within the context of the previous statement. Without knowing what the question is, saying ‘the answer is yes’ will not make sense. In a way, the conclusion is that for a given level of output, Delta’s operation now causes less fossil fuel to be consumed than it did formerly.

since the amount of fossil fuel used to generate the electricity needed to power the new technologies is less than the amount needed to power the older technologies, provided level of output is held constant.This statement supports the conclusion (the reasoning indicator ‘since’ also suggests the same). It says that for a given level of output, the amount of fossil fuel needed to generate electricity to power new technologies is than the amount of fossil fuels needed to power the older technologies.

Predict an Answer


From the passage understanding above, we can note that BF1 is a fact and provides background to the argument. BF2 is an area on which a question has been raised, and the main conclusion of the argument agrees with BF2 (Rather, in a way, BF2 is the conclusion of the argument).

Option Analysis


(A) Incorrect. Both the first and the second parts of this option are wrong.

BF1 does not identify the content of the conclusion. It is just background information for the argument.

BF2 does not provide support for BF1. Rather, BF1 is not supported by anything in the argument. Also, BF2 doesn’t even support the conclusion of the argument. BF2 itself, in a way, is the conclusion of the argument.

(B) Correct. Both parts of this option are correct.

BF1 provides background information for the conclusion. In a way that the conclusion will not make sense without this background information, we can say that BF1 supports the conclusion.

BF2 is indeed the content of the conclusion. The conclusion is ‘the answer is yes’. However, what ‘the answer is yes’ means is given in BF2.

(C) Incorrect. Both the first and the second parts of this option are wrong.

BF1 is not the conclusion of the argument. BF2 doesn’t call BF1 into question. BF2 rather itself is equivalent to the conclusion of the argument.

(D) Incorrect. The first part of this option is correct, but the second part is incorrect.

The first part of this option is same as the first part of option B and is thus correct for the same reason mentioned in the analysis of option B.

Since BF2 doesn’t call the conclusion of the argument into question, the second part is incorrect.

(E) Incorrect. While BF1 does provide support for the conclusion of the argument (as explained in the analysis of option B), BF2 does not. Rather, BF2 is equivalent to the conclusion of the argument.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,783
 [2]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,783
 [2]
Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older 26 Jul 2022, 08:59
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dinesh654
Hello experts,

I chose the right answer, which I like more than E, but I don't have clear reason to eliminate E, which says- each provide support for the conclusion of the argument.
BF-1 provide support because it sets the context of the argument, hence it is a required fact.

1. BF2 isn't also provide support in a sense? based on this BF, the conclusion exists (yes,). as rightly said by choice B, it also provide content of the conclusion, which is a question aswered by the conclusion. so BF2 is supportive to the conclusion.

2. It took me 4:30 mins to complete this, I found that I take 4+ mins to solve every hard BF question, because each one of them presents convoluted argument(which is why they are hard). typically I write symbols for each statement as (f-fact, O-opinion and s-support or a -against). take time to deconstruct the argument. i take longer to read argument by this way but elimination is quicker (helps in easy-med question). this one fails in harder BF question. Is there a better strategy?
Show more
Support for a conclusion has to be some kind of evidence outside of the conclusion itself. So, "the content of a conclusion" cannot be the same as "support for a conclusion."

Here's the second boldface: "for a given level of output Delta's operation now causes less fossil fuel to be consumed than it did formerly." This isn't an outside piece of evidence that supports the conclusion -- it IS the content of the conclusion itself. This passage just phrases this content as a question, and then confirms it with a "yes."

Because the second boldface doesn't offer evidence outside of the conclusion, (E) is out.

For more on how to approach boldface CR questions, check out this video.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
mojizohan
User avatar
Joined: 18 Jul 2022
Last visit: 29 Aug 2024
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
1
Given Kudos: 190
Location: Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Schools: Booth '26 Columbia CBS'26 Fuqua '26 HBS '27 Haas '27 Kellog '27 Kellogg LBS Sloan '26 Said '27 Stern '26 Wharton Yale '26
GPA: 3.8
Schools: Booth '26 Columbia CBS'26 Fuqua '26 HBS '27 Haas '27 Kellog '27 Kellogg LBS Sloan '26 Said '27 Stern '26 Wharton Yale '26
Posts: 11
Kudos: 1
Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older Updated on: 13 Dec 2023, 11:36
Originally posted by mojizohan on 23 Nov 2022, 09:54.
Last edited by mojizohan on 13 Dec 2023, 11:36, edited 2 times in total.
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Here's a simple question for those who are trying to justify the the answer choice B:
if that first sentence is there to provide support for the conclusion, then removing it would weaken the conclusion right? But now remove the first part and read the argument again! No Weakening. None of the choices are correct IMO.
:heart :heart
User avatar
danymasri98
User avatar
Joined: 01 Nov 2022
Last visit: 10 Oct 2025
Posts: 42
Own Kudos:
15
 [2]
Given Kudos: 634
Location: Lebanon
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V37
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V37
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V37
Posts: 42
Kudos: 15
 [2]
Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older 12 Dec 2023, 14:18
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mojizohan
Here's a simple question for all of you who are trying to justify the the answer choice B:
if that first sentence is there to provide support for the conclusion, then removing it would weaken the conclusion right? But now remove the first part and read the argument again! No Weakening. None of the choices are correct IMO.

guys with all due respect, in NO WAY does the first part provide support for the conclusion. it's just silly, no one would've tried soo hard to convince everybody else that this question is correct had it not been from the OG. :heart :heart
Show more

By definition: "A writer making a logical argument uses foundational evidence called a premise to support a conclusion that they assert to be true."
So the first boldface does indeed support the conclusion since it is a premise.

To reply to your claim that removing the premise weakens the conclusion, I present to you the definition of a conclusion: “a sentence that is supported by another sentence."
In other words, "a conclusion is a conclusion only in so far as it is supported by another sentence". So if we remove the premise, as you say, then there is no weakening of the conclusion, since there will be no conclusion in the first place.

This question is pretty hard, so I had the same doubts as well. But after some research, I came up with this and am now convinced that B is correct.
User avatar
KarishmaB
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
76,993
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 76,993
Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older 11 Jan 2024, 05:54
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
perfectstranger
Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older technologies using fossil fuels to new technologies powered by electricity. The question has been raised whether it can be concluded that for a given level of output Delta's operation now causes less fossil fuel to be consumed than it did formerly. The answer, clearly, is yes, since the amount of fossil fuel used to generate the electricity needed to power the new technologies is less than the amount needed to power the older technologies, provided level of output is held constant

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

(A) The first identifies the content of the conclusion of the argument; the second provides support for that conclusion.
(B) The first provides support for the conclusion of the argument; the second identifies the content of that conclusion.
(C) The first states the conclusion of the argument; the second calls that conclusion into question.
(D) The first provides support for the conclusion of the argument; the second calls that conclusion into question.
(E) Each provides support for the conclusion of the argument.

Similar question from GMATPrep : [LINK]

Show Spoiler
Argument Evaluation

Situation
Delta switched from technologies using fossil fuels to ones using electricity. It has been asked whether this results in less fossil fuel used per level of output. The answer is that it does.

Reasoning
What roles do the two boldfaced portions play in the argument? The first boldfaced statement is simply asserted by the passage. But the second boldfaced statement, when it is first introduced, is not asserted to be true, but rather is identified as something that might be inferred from the first statement. By the end of the passage the argument concludes that the second statement is true.

(A) This option simply reverses the roles that the statements play in the argument.

(B) Correct. This option identifies the roles the boldfaced portions play.

(C) Nothing in the passage is intended to support the first statement; and the second statement is not supposed to call the first into question.

(D) This correctly identifies the role of the first statement, but the second boldfaced portion does not call the argument's conclusion into question—it is part of a sentence that refers to the question whether that conclusion can be drawn from the first statement.

(E) Again, this is only half right. The second boldfaced portion is not offered as support for the conclusion; if it were offered as such support, the argument would be guilty of circular reasoning, since the second boldfaced portion states exactly what the argument concludes.
Show more


Here is the video solution to this problem along with a discussion on how to handle Boldface questions: https://youtu.be/U57vXdqujkY
User avatar
Shaant
User avatar
Joined: 13 Jun 2023
Last visit: 16 Nov 2025
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older 08 Feb 2025, 19:48
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Karishma,

You've mentioned your answer as B here, but in your own video (on YT, I'm not allowed to post the link here), you've made a case of option E as the answer.

Don't you think this acts as a bias when you already know the answer.
KarishmaB
siddhans
Why is it D...the second boldface calls the conclusion into question ..The reason I am saying this is because before the second boldaface it says : - " The question has been raised whether i ...... "

I think you meant to ask why the answer is not D.
The most important step in CR questions is 'identifying the conclusion'. What is the conclusion in this argument?
The conclusion is the author's opinion, the point that he/she is trying to make. The conclusion is that Delta's operation causes less fossil fuel to be consumed now.
The second boldface part is only "for a given level of output Delta's operation now causes less fossil fuel to be consumed than it did formerly" which is exactly what the conclusion is. It gives the content of the conclusion.
There are many ways of giving the content of the conclusion. Say the conclusion is 'X'. You can say:
So we can conclude X.
or
Can we conclude X? Yes we can.

A statement that calls the conclusion into question would give an argument that would be against the conclusion.
Show more
User avatar
KarishmaB
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
76,993
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 76,993
Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older 09 Feb 2025, 04:01
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The two are different variations of the same question. Please note that BF2 are different and hence the answers are different.

And no, the idea is to independently evaluate the argument and get the answer, not try to prove that the answer is what is officially given. I wouldn't be serving much purpose if I were doing that.

Thankfully, for 99.9% of official questions, the answer is clearly what is officially given.

Shaant
Hi Karishma,

You've mentioned your answer as B here, but in your own video (on YT, I'm not allowed to post the link here), you've made a case of option E as the answer.

Don't you think this acts as a bias when you already know the answer.
KarishmaB
siddhans
Why is it D...the second boldface calls the conclusion into question ..The reason I am saying this is because before the second boldaface it says : - " The question has been raised whether i ...... "

I think you meant to ask why the answer is not D.
The most important step in CR questions is 'identifying the conclusion'. What is the conclusion in this argument?
The conclusion is the author's opinion, the point that he/she is trying to make. The conclusion is that Delta's operation causes less fossil fuel to be consumed now.
The second boldface part is only "for a given level of output Delta's operation now causes less fossil fuel to be consumed than it did formerly" which is exactly what the conclusion is. It gives the content of the conclusion.
There are many ways of giving the content of the conclusion. Say the conclusion is 'X'. You can say:
So we can conclude X.
or
Can we conclude X? Yes we can.

A statement that calls the conclusion into question would give an argument that would be against the conclusion.
Show more
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,108
Own Kudos:
32,884
Given Kudos: 700
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,108
Kudos: 32,884
Delta Products Inc. has recently switched at least partly from older 23 Oct 2025, 06:13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Boldface questions can feel like puzzles because you're not just understanding what's being said - you're analyzing the role each statement plays. Let me walk you through how to think about this one.

Let's map out the argument structure:

When you read this passage, notice the flow:
  1. Boldface 1: "Delta switched from fossil fuel tech to electric tech" - This is giving you a fact, the background context
  2. Then: "The question has been raised whether..." - Someone is asking about something
  3. Boldface 2: "...Delta now uses less fossil fuel" - This is the specific claim being questioned
  4. Author's response: "The answer, clearly, is yes, since..." - The author definitively says the claim is TRUE and explains why

Here's the critical insight you need to see:

When an author says "The question has been raised whether [claim]" and then answers "yes" with supporting reasoning, that claim becomes the conclusion the author is arguing for.

Think of it this way:
  • Boldface 1 = The factual premise that sets everything up. Without Delta making this switch, there'd be no argument to have.
  • Boldface 2 = The conclusion the author supports. It's presented as "a question," but the author's entire argument is designed to prove this is true.

So the roles are:
  • First boldface → provides support/context for the argument
  • Second boldface → identifies the content of the conclusion

That's exactly answer choice (B).

Why the others fail:
  • (A) & (C): The first boldface isn't the conclusion - it's just establishing what happened
  • (C) & (D): The second boldface doesn't question anything - the author explicitly supports it with "the answer, clearly, is yes"
  • (E): The second boldface is the conclusion itself, not support for it

Answer: B

Now here's what makes this really click: there's a systematic framework for identifying argument roles in all boldface questions. The complete solution breaks down the exact mapping technique, shows you the common structural patterns GMAT uses, and reveals the trap answer patterns you need to watch for.

You can check out the complete step-by-step solution with the boldface framework on Neuron by e-GMAT to master this question type systematically. You can also explore detailed solutions for other GMAT official questions with comprehensive explanations and practice tools here on Neuron.
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
miag
188 posts