Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 12:15 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 12:15
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
 1   2   3   
555-605 Level|   Modifiers|   Parallelism|   Parallelism|   Use of Being|            
User avatar
KC
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2006
Last visit: 28 Dec 2006
Posts: 112
Own Kudos:
2,151
 [372]
Posts: 112
Kudos: 2,151
 [372]
Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, Updated on: 09 Aug 2021, 02:30
Originally posted by KC on 23 Oct 2006, 21:11.
Last edited by Bunuel on 09 Aug 2021, 02:30, edited 6 times in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the question.
38
Kudos
Add Kudos
331
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide
Show
History
A
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

75% (01:24) correct 25% (01:32) wrong based on 10978 sessions

History

Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, the first woman to draw a soldier's pension, joined the Continental Army in 1782 at the age of 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become too ill to serve.


(A) 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become

(B) 22, was injured three times, while being discharged in 1783 because she had become

(C) 22, and was injured three times, and discharged in 1783, being

(D) 22, injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she was

(E) 22, having been injured three times and discharged in 1783, being


Show Spoiler
Attachment:
01.jpg
01.jpg [ 179 KiB | Viewed 85917 times ]
Attachment:
02.jpg
02.jpg [ 114.86 KiB | Viewed 85831 times ]
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
A
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,786
 [128]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,786
 [128]
Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, 03 Apr 2018, 01:22
75
Kudos
Add Kudos
52
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
(A) 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become
Show more
I often hear people say that (A) isn’t parallel: “…Deborah Sampson… joined the Continental Army…, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783…” That’s actually completely fine: we have three parallel verbs, and they make perfect sense, since they are three actions that Sampson performed.

The objection is usually that the three verbs “aren’t in the same form” or “don’t sound the same.” Neither of those are legitimate objections. All that really matters is that they’re three verbs that logically are three actions performed by the subject of the clause. It’s not a problem that one is an action verb (“joined”) and the other two are states of being (“was injured” and “was discharged”).

The only other potential issue is the past perfect tense (“had become”) at the end of the sentence. We can only use past perfect tense to describe an action that happened in the past, but BEFORE some other past action, which is usually in simple past tense. And we have that: she “had become too ill too serve” before she “was discharged.”

So let’s keep (A).

Quote:
(B) 22, was injured three times, while being discharged in 1783 because she had become
Show more
My biggest issue is with the phrase “while being discharged in 1783.” Literally, that seems to be saying that she simultaneously was discharged and was injured three times in 1783. And that makes no sense – there’s no way that those things can happen at the same exact time.

Plus, I think we would need an “and” somewhere in here: there are several actions, and at least two of them (“joined the Continental Army” and “was injured three times”) already seem to be parallel. So the “and” is necessary.

That’s enough to eliminate (B).

Quote:
(C) 22, and was injured three times, and discharged in 1783, being
Show more
Now this is a weird mess. Sampson “joined the Continental Army… and was injured… and discharged…” Huh? First of all, those three actions (“joined”, “was injured”, and “was discharged”) are logically parallel to each other, so we only need one “and” – not two.

Second, it’s wrong to say that Sampson “discharged in 1783.” We could say that she WAS discharged from the Army, or I guess we could say that she “discharged a weapon” (a semi-obscure way to say that she fired it). But you wouldn’t just say that “Sampson… discharged.”

And “being” is also a mess. It seems to be trying to act as a modifier of some sort, but that’s rarely an acceptable use on the GMAT. (More on “being” here.)

So we have tons of reasons to ditch (C).

Quote:
(D) 22, injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she was
Show more
(D) isn’t too bad, but it doesn’t make sense to say that Sampson “injured three times.” You can say that she WAS injured three times, or maybe that she injured three enemy soldiers. But you can’t say that she “injured three times.”

And that’s enough to disqualify (D).

Quote:
(E) 22, having been injured three times and discharged in 1783, being
Show more
Whenever you see a “having + verb” construction on the GMAT, it generally needs to be the first of two past actions. So you could say something like “having studied all night, Souvik collapsed on the sofa and watched three consecutive Marvel films.” In other words, he studied first, and then collapsed. Fair enough.

But in (E), it sounds like Sampson was injured and discharged first, and THEN she joined the Army. And that makes no sense at all.

We also have a problem with “being”, which is apparently being used as a modifier in (E) – and that’s a use that we almost never see on correct GMAT questions. “Being” isn’t always wrong on the GMAT, but it’s probably wrong here.

But even if you really love “being” in (E) for some inexplicable reason, we still have lots of reasons to eliminate (E). And we’re left with (A).
User avatar
blueseas
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Last visit: 15 Jan 2019
Posts: 577
Own Kudos:
4,510
 [23]
Given Kudos: 197
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
Schools: PGDM (GM) '15 (A)
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.6
Schools: PGDM (GM) '15 (A)
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
Posts: 577
Kudos: 4,510
 [23]
Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, 21 Apr 2013, 12:44
14
Kudos
Add Kudos
9
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, the first woman to drawa soldier’s pension, joined the Continental Army in1782 at the age of 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become too ill to serve.
(A) 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become
(B) 22, was injured three times, while being discharged in 1783 because she had become
(C) 22 and was injured three times, and discharged in 1783, being
(D) 22, injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she was
(E) 22, having been injured three times and discharged in 1783, being

first of all i will say that verb-ed form is either acts as a verb or as a modifier

verb-ed -->this will act as a verb when subject itself does this (verb-ed thing) action ex: alex played well ....here played is acting as verb
verb-ed--->this will act as a modifier when this (verb-ed thing) is not done by the subject.

now coming to question
here the subject is Deborah Sampson
in the non underlined part it is written Deborah Sampson joined......here "joined" acts as a verb
in the underlined part it is written Deborah Sampson...was injured .....,and was discharged....so its list kind of thing x,y,and z therefore x,y,z should be parallel
..now----- joined ,was injured ,and was discharged are all verb so its parallel....
note if in place of was injured....only injured is written and in place of " was discharged "only discharged is written then in that case discharged and injured act as modifier as in option C,D,E.....HENCE it is not parallel to JOINED .....so it is wrong

now choosing answer
(A) 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become(parallel so correct)
(B) 22, was injured three times, while being discharged in 1783 because she had become( meaning is wrong ..in this it means she was injured and discharged simultaneously...which is not the intended meaning)
(C) 22 and was injured three times, and discharged in 1783, being(...here joined ,was injured are verb while discharged is modifier so non parallel therefore incorrect)
(D) 22, injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she was(again injured is not parallel.....so incorrect)
(E) 22, having been injured three times and discharged in 1783, being( againg discharged is modifier and not verb ,...and therefore not parallel....also it means having been injured and discharged ..both actions are occuring together which is not correct.

hope it helps..
SKM
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,195
Own Kudos:
4,765
 [2]
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,195
Kudos: 4,765
 [2]
Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, 12 Nov 2021, 06:30
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dear Friends,

Here is a detailed explanation to this question-
KC
Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, the first woman to draw a soldier's pension, joined the Continental Army in 1782 at the age of 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become too ill to serve.


(A) 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become

(B) 22, was injured three times, while being discharged in 1783 because she had become

(C) 22, and was injured three times, and discharged in 1783, being

(D) 22, injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she was

(E) 22, having been injured three times and discharged in 1783, being


Show Spoiler
Attachment:
01.jpg
Attachment:
02.jpg
Show more

Meaning is crucial to solving this problem:
Understanding the intended meaning is key to solving this question; the intended core meaning of this sentence is that Deborah Sampson joined the Continental Army in 1782 at the age of 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become too ill to serve.

Concepts tested here: Meaning + Tenses + Grammatical Construction

• If a list contains only two elements, they must be joined by a conjunction; the "comma + and construction" (oxford comma) is used for the last element in a list of three or more elements.
• The passive continuous tense is only used to refer to ongoing actions.
• The introduction of the present participle ("verb+ing"- “having” in this case) after comma generally leads to a cause-effect relationship.

A: Correct. This answer choice uses the phrase "was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783"; the construction of this phrase conveys the intended meaning - that Deborah Sampson joined the Continental Army in 1782 at the age of 22, and as two separate actions was injured three times, and discharged in 1783 because she had become too ill to serve. Further, Option A correctly uses the past perfect tense verb "had become" to refer to the earlier of two actions that concluded in the past - Sampson becoming too ill to serve and her being discharged. Additionally, in a list of three elements Option A correctly uses a comma to join the first and second. Moreover, Option A avoids the grammatical construction error seen in Option B, as it only has a list with three elements.

B: This answer choice alters the meaning of the sentence through the phrase "while being discharged"; the use of "while" illogically implies that Deborah Sampson was injured three times, at the time when she was being discharged; the intended meaning is that Deborah Sampson was injured three times, and a separate action she was discharged; please remember, "while" is used to refer to actions that take place simultaneously. Further, Option B incorrectly uses a comma to join two elements in a list - the actions "joined" and "was injured"; please remember, in a list with only two elements, the elements must be joined by a conjunction.

C: This answer choice incorrectly uses the passive continuous tense verb "being" to refer to the earlier of two actions that concluded in the past - Sampson becoming too ill to serve and her being discharged; please remember, the past perfect tense (marked by the use of helping verb "had") is used when a sentence contains two actions in the past; the helping verb "had" is used with the action in the "greater past", and the passive continuous tense is only used to refer to ongoing actions. Further, Option C incorrectly uses the "comma + conjunction ("and" in this sentence)" construction to join the first and second elements in a list with three elements; please remember, the "comma + and construction" (oxford comma) is used for the last element in a list of three or more elements, and the rest are joined by a comma.

D: This answer choice alters the meaning of the sentence through the phrase "injured three times"; the construction of this phrase leads to an incoherent meaning; the intended meaning is that Deborah Sampson joined the Continental Army in 1782 at the age of 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become too ill to serve. Further, Option D incorrectly uses the simple past tense verb "was" to refer to the earlier of two actions that concluded in the past - Sampson becoming too ill to serve and her being discharged; please remember, the past perfect tense (marked by the use of helping verb "had") is used when a sentence contains two actions in the past; the helping verb "had" is used with the action in the "greater past", and the simple past tense is used to refer to actions that concluded in the past.

E: This answer choice alters the meaning of the sentence through the phrase "having been injured three times and discharged in 1783"; the use of the "comma + present participle ("verb+ing" - "having" in this sentence) illogically implies that Deborah Sampson joined the Continental Army in 1782 at the age of 22 because she had been injured three times and discharged in 1783; the intended meaning is that Deborah Sampson joined the Continental Army in 1782 at the age of 22, and as two separate actions was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783; please remember, the introduction of the present participle ("verb+ing"- “having” in this case) after comma generally leads to a cause-effect relationship. Further, Option E incorrectly uses the passive continuous tense verb "being" to refer to the earlier of two actions that concluded in the past - Sampson becoming too ill to serve and her being discharged; please remember, the past perfect tense (marked by the use of helping verb "had") is used when a sentence contains two actions in the past; the helping verb "had" is used with the action in the "greater past", and the passive continuous tense is only used to refer to ongoing actions.

Hence, A is the best answer choice.

To understand the concept of "Simple Tenses" on GMAT, you may want to watch the following video (~1 minute):



To understand the concept of "Past Perfect Tense" on GMAT, you may want to watch the following video (~2 minutes):



All the best!
Experts' Global Team
General Discussion
avatar
gmate2010
avatar
Joined: 25 Aug 2009
Last visit: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 96
Own Kudos:
251
 [4]
Given Kudos: 12
Posts: 96
Kudos: 251
 [4]
Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, 31 Aug 2009, 21:27
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
|| lism is tested here..

Only A follows it, Hence, A.

joined ....was injured ..was discharged...

Always remember, what comes with the middle string in || lism , that should come in the final string..

Here, was is used with injured but not with joined..so, was should come with last string to follow || lism..
User avatar
thangvietname
User avatar
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Last visit: 28 Jun 2017
Posts: 522
Own Kudos:
561
Given Kudos: 916
Posts: 522
Kudos: 561
Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, 30 Mar 2013, 21:52
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I agree that "D" is incorrect because "injured" should be "was injuredd"

but in A "had done" happens before "joined". this is not logic

why A can be correct? pls explain.
User avatar
imhimanshu
User avatar
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Last visit: 08 Nov 2013
Posts: 220
Own Kudos:
6,135
 [6]
Given Kudos: 136
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
Posts: 220
Kudos: 6,135
 [6]
Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, 30 Mar 2013, 23:43
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
thangvietnam
I agree that "D" is incorrect because "injured" should be "was injuredd"

but in A "had done" happens before "joined". this is not logic

why A can be correct? pls explain.
Show more

No, thats not the case over here. It is of supreme importance to understand the meaning before diving into Grammar. Remember, Grammar is nothing but a set of rules to communicate the meaning in a better way

So, what does the sentence talks about i.e Meaning : The sentence talks about a Deborah Sampson and defines a list of 3 items about her. What are they-
1- joined the Continental Army in 1782 at the age of 22,
2- was injured three times, and
3 - was discharged in 1783 because she had become too
ill to serve.

Now, had becomhe is used for doing the sequencing with the action "DISCHARGED", not with the ACTION "joined". If you are still in doubt, check the clause(clause C1) - "because she had become too ill to serve." --> This clause is Subordinate to the Clause (clause C2)- "Deborah was discharged"
i.e Clause C1 is working as an adverbial modifier of the Clause C2

i.e it gives the explanation to why Debrah was discharged, - answer is - because she had become too ill. - this shows that she was ill from a distant past, and then some time in the past(ofcourse after the first event), she got discharged.

Hence, Had become is used to show sequencing with the verb discharged.

Another thought -
Had the sentence been;

was discharged in 1783 because she became too ill to serve. the meaning would have that both the events happened at the same time, and have the same importance.
User avatar
rajathpanta
User avatar
Joined: 13 Feb 2010
Last visit: 24 Apr 2015
Posts: 144
Own Kudos:
483
 [1]
Given Kudos: 282
Status:Prevent and prepare. Not repent and repair!!
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
Schools: AGSM '15 YLP '16 IIMC (PGPEX) Melbourne '15
GPA: 3.75
WE:Sales (Telecommunications)
Schools: AGSM '15 YLP '16 IIMC (PGPEX) Melbourne '15
Posts: 144
Kudos: 483
 [1]
Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, 20 Jul 2013, 03:09
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Maybe experts can pitch in.

Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, the first woman to draw a soldier’s pension, joined the Continental Army in 1782 at the age of 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become too ill to serve.

A. 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become- Verb sequencing is correct
B. 22, was injured three times, while being discharged in 1783 because she had become- Changes the original meaning when it says 'while being discharged'
C. 22, and was injured three times, and discharged in 1783, being- Being ill to serve becomes a modifer and it should be close to the noun. Also being changes the meaning
D. 22, injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she was- injured three times is a modifier or looks like. So hold it
E. 22, having been injured three times and discharged in 1783, being- Same as C
User avatar
aeglorre
User avatar
Joined: 12 Jan 2013
Last visit: 21 Sep 2014
Posts: 105
Own Kudos:
226
 [1]
Given Kudos: 47
Posts: 105
Kudos: 226
 [1]
Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, 05 Jan 2014, 14:37
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KC
Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, the first woman to draw a soldier’s pension, joined the Continental Army in 1782 at the age of 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become too ill to serve.

A. 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become
B. 22, was injured three times, while being discharged in 1783 because she had become
C. 22, and was injured three times, and discharged in 1783, being
D. 22, injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she was
E. 22, having been injured three times and discharged in 1783, being
Show more

We need correct parallelism. Injured and discharged need to be parallel

A) "was injured" and "AND was discharged" both use the same type of verb (past participle), preserving the same "form" of verbs is paramount for correct parallelism. Furthermore, the "and" before "discharged" indicates immediately that this option is correct because THREE verbs are being paralleled (joined.. was injured.. and was discharged..) all three have the same past participle. You ALWAYS have to add "and" to the third parallel when using >2 entities in your parallel structure.

B) "was injured" is not parallel to "while being discharged".. B is gone

C) "and" after injured is superflous, this creates redundancy when discharged brings up "and" again. Also, and prior to injured implies only joined and injured are parallel, but this is incorrect. C is gone

D) The past participle "injured" needs to have a was/were, depending on if the subject is singular or plural. Deborah is singular, so we need "was injured". Injured on its own creates a fragmented sentence. So D is wrong.

E) The first error that pops up is in fact not the the parallel, but the ending word "being". Being is often a red flag, in this case this present participle does not make sense since we are talking about a event that happened a long time ago and is not still going on. Other than that, "having been" does not nicely follow "joined" and thus the prallel structure is distorted. So E is gone.

A is the correct answer.
avatar
Mission2012
avatar
Joined: 06 Oct 2012
Last visit: 14 Jan 2015
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
16
Given Kudos: 5
Concentration: Strategy, Other
GMAT Date: 06-24-2013
Products:
My Reviews
Posts: 13
Kudos: 16
Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, 10 Apr 2014, 11:02
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, the first woman to draw a soldier’s pension, joined the Continental Army in 1782 at the age of 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become too ill to serve.

A. 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become
B. 22, was injured three times, while being discharged in 1783 because she had become
C. 22, and was injured three times, and discharged in 1783, being
D. 22, injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she was
E. 22, having been injured three times and discharged in 1783, being

No problem with the underlined part of the sentence.

My question is on the opening modifier.

Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff

How come a verb-ed modifier parallel to verb-ing modifier.
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,108
Own Kudos:
32,887
Given Kudos: 700
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,108
Kudos: 32,887
Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, 14 Apr 2014, 16:41
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Mission2012
Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, the first woman to draw a soldier’s pension, joined the Continental Army in 1782 at the age of 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become too ill to serve.

A. 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become
B. 22, was injured three times, while being discharged in 1783 because she had become
C. 22, and was injured three times, and discharged in 1783, being
D. 22, injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she was
E. 22, having been injured three times and discharged in 1783, being

No problem with the underlined part of the sentence.

My question is on the opening modifier.

Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff

How come a verb-ed modifier parallel to verb-ing modifier.
Show more

Hi @Mission2012,
First of all I am glad that you are viewing the sentence in its entirety and are not just focusing on the underlined portion of the sentence. Secondly, a verb-ing modifier and verb-ed modifier can definitely be parallel to each other. Please go through the article on this topic in the link below:
parallelism-imperfect-list-142791.html

Do let me know if you have any other questions.
Regards,
Payal
avatar
asagraw
avatar
Joined: 04 Feb 2014
Last visit: 20 Jul 2015
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
6
Given Kudos: 171
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, Social Entrepreneurship
Schools: Ross '17 ISB '16 Booth EMBA'17 INSEAD Jan '16 IIMB
GPA: 3.75
Schools: Ross '17 ISB '16 Booth EMBA'17 INSEAD Jan '16 IIMB
Posts: 2
Kudos: 6
Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, 24 Jul 2014, 11:26
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
egmat
Mission2012
Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, the first woman to draw a soldier’s pension, joined the Continental Army in 1782 at the age of 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become too ill to serve.

A. 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become
B. 22, was injured three times, while being discharged in 1783 because she had become
C. 22, and was injured three times, and discharged in 1783, being
D. 22, injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she was
E. 22, having been injured three times and discharged in 1783, being

No problem with the underlined part of the sentence.

My question is on the opening modifier.

Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff

How come a verb-ed modifier parallel to verb-ing modifier.

Hi @Mission2012,
First of all I am glad that you are viewing the sentence in its entirety and are not just focusing on the underlined portion of the sentence. Secondly, a verb-ing modifier and verb-ed modifier can definitely be parallel to each other. Please go through the article on this topic in the link below:
parallelism-imperfect-list-142791.html

Do let me know if you have any other questions.
Regards,
Payal
Show more

Hi Payal,

Though A is right choice and has a list, isn't this Q a case of single subject with many verbs?

e.g. She Joined the Army, was injured three times, and was discharged.

Could you please clarify if this is not a run on sentence? Thanks for your help.

Regards,
Ashish
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,108
Own Kudos:
32,887
 [3]
Given Kudos: 700
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,108
Kudos: 32,887
 [3]
Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, 24 Jul 2014, 12:59
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
asagraw
Hi Payal,

Though A is right choice and has a list, isn't this Q a case of single subject with many verbs?

e.g. She Joined the Army, was injured three times, and was discharged.

Could you please clarify if this is not a run on sentence? Thanks for your help.

Regards,
Ashish
Show more

Hi Ashsish,

Thanks for posting you question here. :-)

Yes, you are absolutely correct. This is certainly a question with single Subject that has multiple Verbs. And all the Verbs are part of a parallel list in which all the entities are perfectly connected to each other with the conjunction "and".

This is CERTAINLY NOT a run-on sentence. A sentence is called a run-on sentence when two Independent Clauses (ICs) are joined together just with a comma. For example: if we write this sentence in the following way, then it will be called a run-on sentence:

She joined the Army, she was injured three times.

Structurally this sentence is incorrect because a Comma CANNOT join two ICs.

You might have gotten confused about the run-on structure in this sentence because you probably thought that there are three clauses in this sentence because there are three verbs. But that's not the case. Every clause, be it Dependent or Independent, must have an exclusive SV pair. If a Subject has more than one Verb, then we still have ONE clause because the Verbs share the same Subject. In order to form two clauses, we need two exclusive SV pairs as we have in the run-on example sentence above.

Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
SJ
avatar
MarketingGuru
avatar
Joined: 04 Mar 2014
Last visit: 17 May 2015
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
1
Given Kudos: 8
Products:
My Reviews
Posts: 2
Kudos: 1
Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, 18 Jan 2015, 23:41
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This doubt could be fairly basic but I would really appreciate if someone could help me clear my concept. In the above question I understand that 3 verbs need to be parallel but why injured and discharged should appear with a helping verb while joined appears without a helping verb. How is parallelism maintained in this case. I really got confused with tense and verb basics.
User avatar
EducationAisle
User avatar
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
3,579
 [2]
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
 [2]
Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, 19 Jan 2015, 09:50
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MarketingGuru
This doubt could be fairly basic but I would really appreciate if someone could help me clear my concept. In the above question I understand that 3 verbs need to be parallel but why injured and discharged should appear with a helping verb while joined appears without a helping verb. How is parallelism maintained in this case. I really got confused with tense and verb basics.
Show more
Hi! Parallelism does not require that a helping verb can only be parallel with another helping verb. For example, following would be correct:

MarketingGuru was inclined to specialize in Marketing, but later majored in Strategy.

was, a helping verb, is parallel to the non-helping verb majored.

In the sentence under consideration, Deborah Sampson was injured three times is correct, because we actually cannot remove was, since the meaning would be non-sensical: Deborah Sampson injured three times would non-sensically mean that Deborah Sampson injured <someone> three times. This is clearly not the intended meaning.
User avatar
b2bt
User avatar
Joined: 25 Sep 2012
Last visit: 14 Apr 2024
Posts: 198
Own Kudos:
631
Given Kudos: 242
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
Schools: Weatherhead '18 (A$) Northeastern '18 (WL)
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 680 Q48 V34
Products:
My Reviews
Schools: Weatherhead '18 (A$) Northeastern '18 (WL)
GMAT 2: 680 Q48 V34
Posts: 198
Kudos: 631
Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, 06 Apr 2015, 02:58
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
egmat
asagraw
Hi Payal,

Though A is right choice and has a list, isn't this Q a case of single subject with many verbs?

e.g. She Joined the Army, was injured three times, and was discharged.

Could you please clarify if this is not a run on sentence? Thanks for your help.

Regards,
Ashish

Hi Ashsish,

Thanks for posting you question here. :-)

Yes, you are absolutely correct. This is certainly a question with single Subject that has multiple Verbs. And all the Verbs are part of a parallel list in which all the entities are perfectly connected to each other with the conjunction "and".

This is CERTAINLY NOT a run-on sentence. A sentence is called a run-on sentence when two Independent Clauses (ICs) are joined together just with a comma. For example: if we write this sentence in the following way, then it will be called a run-on sentence:

She joined the Army, she was injured three times.

Structurally this sentence is incorrect because a Comma CANNOT join two ICs.

You might have gotten confused about the run-on structure in this sentence because you probably thought that there are three clauses in this sentence because there are three verbs. But that's not the case. Every clause, be it Dependent or Independent, must have an exclusive SV pair. If a Subject has more than one Verb, then we still have ONE clause because the Verbs share the same Subject. In order to form two clauses, we need two exclusive SV pairs as we have in the run-on example sentence above.

Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
SJ
Show more

Is the use of past perfect mandatory? Is the below sentence correct?
I was discharged from hospital because I felt better.
or past perfect is needed?
User avatar
EducationAisle
User avatar
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
3,579
 [1]
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
 [1]
Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, 07 Apr 2015, 02:51
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
b2bt
Is the use of past perfect mandatory? Is the below sentence correct?
I was discharged from hospital because I felt better.
or past perfect is needed?
Show more
Hi b2bt, There is a slight difference between the current sentence and the one you have cited.

This is ok: I was discharged from hospital because I felt better. - Past

But this is not: I was discharged from hospital because I felt well for 10 days. - Past

What would be correct is: I was discharged from hospital because I had felt well for 10 days. – Past Perfect

Similarly, in the current sentence:

This is ok: Deborah Sampson was discharged because she was too ill to serve. - Past

But this is not: Deborah Sampson was discharged because she became too ill to serve. - Past

What would be correct is: Deborah Sampson was discharged because she had become too ill to serve. – Past Perfect

They key difference is obviously phrases such as for 10 days and become too ill, both of which indicate a process that started in the past and continued till the time that the other event in the past happened (the event of discharge in this case). This is when past perfect is used.

In any case, even if you thought that simple past was ok, and chose option D, hope it was clear that injured is used as a verb in option D, thereby suggesting that Deborah Sampson actually injured someone else; in reality, Deborah Sampson actually was injured. This meaning is not coming out in D.

p.s. Our book EducationAisle Sentence Correction Nirvana discusses Past perfect tense, its application and examples in significant detail. If someone is interested, PM me your email-id, I can mail the corresponding section.
User avatar
souvik101990
User avatar
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Last visit: 11 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,321
Own Kudos:
53,093
Given Kudos: 2,326
Location: United States (WA)
Concentration: Leadership, General Management
Schools: Ross '20 (M)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GMAT 2: 740 Q49 V42 (Online)
GMAT 3: 760 Q50 V42 (Online)
GPA: 3.8
WE:Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Products:
My Reviews
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: Ross '20 (M)
GMAT 3: 760 Q50 V42 (Online)
Posts: 4,321
Kudos: 53,093
Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, 11 Oct 2015, 23:07
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quoting Ron

Quote:
you can actually solve this problem on the basis of parallelism and verb form alone.
you have a SEQUENCE OF EVENTS, so they should be PARALLEL.
also, "was injured" and "was discharged" should be in the passive voice, since deborah sampson was the recipient (not the agent) of these actions.

so you need "joined..., was injured..., and was discharged...."
the only choice that does this is (a).
Show more
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,264
Own Kudos:
42,419
 [1]
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,264
Kudos: 42,419
 [1]
Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, 12 Feb 2016, 09:50
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become --- correct choice

(B) 22 was injured three times while being discharged in 1783 because she had become -- meaning changed; it implies that she was injured during her discharge

(C) 22 and was injured three times, and discharged in 1783, being -- and was and discharged – lapse in parallelism
(D) 22, injured three times and was discharged in 1783 because she was –lapse in parallelism, not clear whether she injured or she was injured. Injured and was discharged is ungrammatical.

(E) 22, having been injured three times and discharged in 1783, being -- having been …modifies her joining the army at 22, implying as though she joined the army because she was injured three times; being as a modifier is also incorrect.
User avatar
LogicGuru1
User avatar
Joined: 04 Jun 2016
Last visit: 28 May 2024
Posts: 469
Own Kudos:
2,595
 [1]
Given Kudos: 36
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V43
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V43
Posts: 469
Kudos: 2,595
 [1]
Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, 27 Jul 2016, 01:14
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This a perfect example to how little, one needs to do to get a correct answer in GMAT.
This sentence is laden with modifier and adjective phrases, which for all purposes can be removed and thus leaving us a clean easy sentence to analyse and correct.

Dressed as a man and using the name Robert Shuttieff,Deborah Sampson , the first woman to draw a soldier's pension, joined the Continental Army in 1782 at the age of 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become too ill to serve.

Now the sentence become
Deborah Sampson joined the Continental Army in 1782 at the age of 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become too ill to serve.

(A) 22, was injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she had become
Correct :- injured and discharge are parallel. "Had become" is correct because first she become ill and then after a few days/weeks was discharged. When we have two past actions use to "had" is correct for the older action and simple past is used for newer actions.

(B) 22, was injured three times, while being discharged in 1783 because she had become
Wrong:- Meaning change. She did not become ill while she was being discharged.

(C) 22 and was injured three times, and discharged in 1783, being
Wrong:- "being too ill to serve" is incorrect. Makes the voice passive.

(D) 22, injured three times, and was discharged in 1783 because she was
Wrong:- "injured three times" is incorrect. was injured three times should be correct.

(E) 22, having been injured three times and discharged in 1783, being
Wrong:- Tenses are all wrong; having, injured are not parallel. Sentence all sorts of problems.




z3nith
Dressed as a man and using the name Robert
Shurtleff, Deborah Sampson, the first woman to draw
a soldier’s pension, joined the Continental Army in
1782 at the age of 22, was injured three times, and
was discharged in 1783 because she had become too
ill to serve.
(A) 22, was injured three times, and was discharged
in 1783 because she had become
(B) 22, was injured three times, while being
discharged in 1783 because she had become
(C) 22 and was injured three times, and discharged
in 1783, being
(D) 22, injured three times, and was discharged in
1783 because she was
(E) 22, having been injured three times and
discharged in 1783, being

I am confused between A and E.
I am really not sure what does "having been injured" refers to ?
Show more
 1   2   3   
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
miag
189 posts