Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 14:56 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 14:56
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Sub 505 Level|   Short Passage|   Social Science|                  
User avatar
PrashantPonde
Joined: 27 Jun 2012
Last visit: 29 Jan 2025
Posts: 321
Own Kudos:
2,738
 [57]
Given Kudos: 185
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Posts: 321
Kudos: 2,738
 [57]
18
Kudos
Add Kudos
38
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Skywalker18
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Last visit: 15 Nov 2023
Posts: 2,039
Own Kudos:
9,962
 [12]
Given Kudos: 171
Status:Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
Posts: 2,039
Kudos: 9,962
 [12]
10
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
goforgmat
Joined: 09 Feb 2015
Last visit: 02 Nov 2019
Posts: 246
Own Kudos:
107
 [2]
Given Kudos: 232
Location: India
Concentration: Social Entrepreneurship, General Management
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V39
GPA: 2.8
Products:
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V39
Posts: 246
Kudos: 107
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sobby
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Nov 2014
Last visit: 24 Jan 2022
Posts: 444
Own Kudos:
391
 [1]
Given Kudos: 54
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.76
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
Posts: 444
Kudos: 391
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
6:48 sec(including reading) ..4 out of 5 were correct..missed the last one... :(

For last question,Most will be narrow down to A and E.

For last question why A is wrong: Govt try to attract newly formed high-technology manufacturing firms(1st line of 2nd paragraph).It is not benefiting existing one.
avatar
nikhilbhide
Joined: 03 Dec 2015
Last visit: 21 May 2018
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 10
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Why answer of first question (primary purpose of passage) is E and not C. What is the subtle difference between both of them? Pls explain
User avatar
aceGMAT21
Joined: 19 Aug 2017
Last visit: 01 May 2020
Posts: 83
Own Kudos:
239
 [4]
Given Kudos: 90
Status:Aiming MBA!!
Location: India
GMAT 1: 620 Q49 V25
GPA: 3.75
WE:Web Development (Consulting)
Products:
GMAT 1: 620 Q49 V25
Posts: 83
Kudos: 239
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nikhilbhide
Why answer of first question (primary purpose of passage) is E and not C. What is the subtle difference between both of them? Pls explain

Hi nikhilbhide,

To answer your question we first need to understand the structure of the passage.

1st PARA : During the 1960's and 1970's, local governments in the United States were looking for the primary economic development of their community/town. They opted a strategy -- this strategy was usually implemented at another community's expense.

2nd PARA : In the 1980's the strategy shifted from this zero-sum game to one called “high-technology development,” in which local governments competed to attract newly formed high-technology manufacturing firms.

3rd PARA : third strategy: the promotion of homegrown small businesses.

As can be understood from the above structure and reading the details of each para, the author is talking about 3 strategies out of which the first 2 did not worked well due to some limitations. The tone of author for the 3rd strategy is positive and optimistic. So, local governments have increasingly come to recognize the advantages of it.

Now, coming to the question,
1. The primary purpose of the passage is to

(C) acknowledge and counter adverse criticism of programs being used to stimulate local economic development
The author is simply reviewing and evaluating the 3 strategies as mentioned in the passage. Also, only the limitations are mentioned for the first 2 of the above mentioned strategies. There is no direct and adverse criticism which is countered by the author. Also, only the 3rd strategy is acknowledged by the author, because of the optimistic view of the author we can say this. So option C is incorrect.

(E) review and evaluate strategies and programs that have been used to stimulate economic development
Correct Answer. As discussed above.

Hope it clears your doubt. Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks.
-Varun
avatar
praveenmittal95605
Joined: 11 Feb 2017
Last visit: 10 Mar 2018
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 29
Location: India
Schools: SPJ PGPM"17
GMAT 1: 600 Q48 V25
GPA: 3.57
WE:Engineering (Computer Software)
Products:
Schools: SPJ PGPM"17
GMAT 1: 600 Q48 V25
Posts: 18
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Could you please share the explanation for Q 3 and 4
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,787
 [4]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,787
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
praveenmittal95605
Could you please share the explanation for Q 3 and 4
Quote:
3. The tone of the passage suggests that the author is most optimistic about the economic development potential of which of the following groups?

(A) Local governments
(B) High-technology promoters
(C) Local entrepreneurs
(D) Manufacturing-industry managers
(E) Economic development strategists
In the first paragraph, the author describes the shortcomings of the strategy used in the 60s and 70s (attracting manufacturing industries). In the second paragraph, the author describes the shortcomings of the strategy used in the 80s ("high-technology development"). Then in the third paragraph, the author discusses the advantages of a third strategy (the promotion of homegrown small businesses, which are created by local entrepreneurs).

To summarize, the author discusses the shortcomings of two strategies and then the advantages of a third strategy. "[Local entrepreneurs] are less likely to be enticed away by incentives offered by another community. Indigenous industry and talent are kept at home, creating an environment that both provides jobs and fosters further entrepreneurship." Thus the author seems most optimistic about the third strategy, which supports local entrepreneurs.

As for question 4, refer to the last paragraph:

Quote:
4. The passage does NOT state which of the following about local entrepreneurs?

(A) They are found nearly everywhere. The passage states that local entrepreneurs are "nearly ubiquitous", which means "found nearly everywhere." Eliminate (A).
(B) They encourage further entrepreneurship. "Indigenous industry and talent are kept at home, creating an environment that... fosters further entrepreneurship." - Eliminate (B).
(C) They attract out-of-town investors. This is not mentioned in the passage, so (C) looks good.
(D) They employ local workers. "Indigenous industry and talent are kept at home, creating an environment that... provides jobs" - This implies that jobs are created locally, so eliminate (D).
(E) They are established in their communities. The passage mentions that entrepreneurs have "roots in their communities," which implies that they are established in their communities. Eliminate (E).
User avatar
akshaykotha
Joined: 08 Feb 2018
Last visit: 22 Jan 2021
Posts: 66
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 100
Posts: 66
Kudos: 18
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
samratkokula
IMO ECCCA

can someone please explain question 5.. i choose A, as it looks to me that option E is not discussed in passage.

I think answer to Q5 has more meaning than expected.

If you refer the below part:
Quote:
Although this approach was preferable to victimizing other geographical areas by taking their jobs, it also had its shortcomings: high-tech manufacturing firms employ only a specially trained fraction of the manufacturing workforce, and there simply are not enough high-tech firms to satisfy all geographic areas.
The first sentence only says it was preferable and then mentions shortcomings. Not having enough high-tech firms implies one area cannot offer jobs because of the special training needed. That means, it doesn't advantage one local community at the expense of other community. The advantage of high-tech development is with respect to the main purpose of the passage. To corroborate this, the question stem mentions:
Quote:
The author of the passage mentions which of the following as an advantage of high-technology development?
avatar
debtanuB
Joined: 22 Feb 2017
Last visit: 09 Oct 2021
Posts: 29
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 141
Affiliations: National Institute of Technology, Durgapur
Location: India
GPA: 3.6
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Posts: 29
Kudos: 40
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja GMATNinjaTwo

for the 2nd question, I need you help..!!

I eliminated A,B, & D as it cannot be inferred from para 1. Between C & E, I choose E my reason-
Para 1 last line- "Through the transfer of jobs and related revenues that resulted from this practice, one town's triumph could become another town's tragedy." Made me think another town's tragedy=bad effect of industry(after being invited by the govt.)!!

Later on I read the 1st line of para 1- "During the 1960's and 1970's, the primary economic development strategy of local governments in the United States was to attract manufacturing industries." It made me think that maybe this is the right reason for choice C to be the right one. We can infer that industries were invited in an attempt by local govt. to improve their locality's economy. Though I'm not sure about this!?

Please help me out!!

Thanks & Regards~
User avatar
Businessconquerer
Joined: 17 Jul 2018
Last visit: 07 Jul 2025
Posts: 2,841
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 185
Products:
Posts: 2,841
Kudos: 1,182
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
SneakyTomboi
GMATNinja GMATNinjaTwo

for the 2nd question, I need you help..!!

I eliminated A,B, & D as it cannot be inferred from para 1. Between C & E, I choose E my reason-
Para 1 last line- "Through the transfer of jobs and related revenues that resulted from this practice, one town's triumph could become another town's tragedy." Made me think another town's tragedy=bad effect of industry(after being invited by the govt.)!!

Later on I read the 1st line of para 1- "During the 1960's and 1970's, the primary economic development strategy of local governments in the United States was to attract manufacturing industries." It made me think that maybe this is the right reason for choice C to be the right one. We can infer that industries were invited in an attempt by local govt. to improve their locality's economy. Though I'm not sure about this!?

Please help me out!!

Thanks & Regards~


You do not know that they interfered with the entrepreneurial ventures.
We just know that before 80's, which is in the first paragraph, that they did something good for one and something bad for others happened
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,787
 [2]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,787
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
SneakyTomboi
GMATNinja GMATNinjaTwo

for the 2nd question, I need you help..!!

I eliminated A,B, & D as it cannot be inferred from para 1. Between C & E, I choose E my reason-
Para 1 last line- "Through the transfer of jobs and related revenues that resulted from this practice, one town's triumph could become another town's tragedy." Made me think another town's tragedy=bad effect of industry(after being invited by the govt.)!!

Later on I read the 1st line of para 1- "During the 1960's and 1970's, the primary economic development strategy of local governments in the United States was to attract manufacturing industries." It made me think that maybe this is the right reason for choice C to be the right one. We can infer that industries were invited in an attempt by local govt. to improve their locality's economy. Though I'm not sure about this!?

Please help me out!!

Thanks & Regards~
The first paragraph implies that "jobs and related revenues" are moved from Town A to Town B when a manufacturing facility was lured to Town B from Town A (through tax incentives and slick promotional efforts). Now that Town B has the manufacturing facility, it will enjoy those "real economic benefits" (jobs and related revenues).

The areas in which the manufacturing industries are located (i.e. Town B) are the areas that enjoy those economic benefits. Meanwhile, the towns that LOSE the manufacturing facilities, etc., (i.e. Town A), LOSE jobs and related revenues. So Town B's triumph is Town A's tragedy.

As for (E), the passage doesn't say anything about negative consequences to local entrepreneurs once manufacturing industry comes to town. In other words, we have no reason to suspect that the movement of manufacturing from Town A to Town B will interfere with the local entrepreneurs in Town B -- or their entrepreneurial ventures.

The only "bad effect of industry" described in the passage is the loss of jobs and revenue in the former town when, for example, a manufacturing facility moves from one town to another.

I hope this helps!
User avatar
GMATmronevsall
Joined: 04 Jan 2019
Last visit: 08 Jan 2023
Posts: 36
Own Kudos:
41
 [2]
Given Kudos: 52
Posts: 36
Kudos: 41
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This is the first time i got 5/5 correct.
But after taking a look at stats I am no longer thrilled at all. :(
avatar
nkshmalik1
Joined: 01 Jan 2019
Last visit: 10 Nov 2022
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 142
Posts: 30
Kudos: 13
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can anyone elaborate q5?
Para 2 says "Although this approach was preferable to victimizing other geographical areas by taking their jobs", doesn't that mean the approach seems to be taking the jobs from one area victimizing other? It feels negative of this approach. Kindly help in understanding this.

Thanks
Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
TheGriffin
Joined: 28 Dec 2016
Last visit: 29 Jan 2024
Posts: 93
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 56
Schools: Rotman '24
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 600 Q46 V25
Products:
Schools: Rotman '24
GMAT 2: 600 Q46 V25
Posts: 93
Kudos: 28
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
got 4 on 5 correct , 7 mins flat . Made silly mistake in Q 5 and got it wrong
User avatar
testbug123
Joined: 23 Jul 2020
Last visit: 30 Apr 2025
Posts: 6
Given Kudos: 20
Posts: 6
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja could you please tell me how is Question 5 solved?
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,787
 [3]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,787
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post

Question 5


amartya2969
GMATNinja could you please tell me how is Question 5 solved?
Quote:
5. The author of the passage mentions which of the following as an advantage of high-technology development?
Question 5 asks us to identify an advantage of high-technology development (HTD) mentioned in the passage. This type of development is discussed in the second paragraph. Much of this paragraph is devoted to a discussion of the shortcomings of HTD, but the author briefly mentions what appears to be a potential advantage of HTD in the second sentence of the paragraph. He/she says “this approach was preferable to victimizing other geographical areas by taking their jobs....” With that in mind, let’s take a look at the answer choices.

Quote:
(A) It encourages the modernization of existing manufacturing facilities.
(A) is tempting. The term “high-technology development” seems to imply some level of modernization. However, in describing HTD, the author notes that local governments compete “to attract NEWLY formed high-technology manufacturing firms.” So, even if HTD encourages the modernization of EXISTING manufacturing facilities, this is not mentioned in the passage. Eliminate (A).

Quote:
(B) It promotes healthy competition between rival industries.
HTD does seem to promote competition, but not between rival industries. The passage mentions that it causes local governments, not industries, to compete. Eliminate (B).

Quote:
(C) It encourages the growth of related industries.
It’s totally possible that HTD encourages the growth of related industries. The problem is that the question asks for an advantage mentioned in the passage. The passage simply doesn’t talk about the effect of HTD on manufacturing-related industries. Eliminate (C).

Quote:
(D) It takes full advantage of the existing workforce.

HTD actually does the opposite of what is described in (D). According to the author, one of the shortcomings of HTD is that “high-tech manufacturing firms employ only a specially trained fraction of the manufacturing workforce.” So, HTD does not take full advantage of the existing workforce, and we can eliminate (D).

Quote:
(E) It does not advantage one local workforce at the expense of another.
Remember, the author mentioned that HTD “was preferable to victimizing other geographical areas by taking their jobs.” In other words, unlike the strategy discussed in the first paragraph, HTD did not aim to lure existing manufacturing facilities from one geography to another. Instead, by attempting to attract newly formed high-technology firms, HTD provided jobs to one area without stealing jobs from another area. This is exactly what is described by (E).

(E) is an advantage of HTD mentioned in the passage, and it is the correct answer for question 5.

I hope that helps!
avatar
VBudhew
Joined: 27 Jul 2020
Last visit: 06 Feb 2021
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 35
Posts: 23
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
What is the level of this RC???? 300-400????
User avatar
Taulark1
Joined: 06 Jan 2017
Last visit: 15 Mar 2025
Posts: 128
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 750
Posts: 128
Kudos: 43
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi GMATNinja,

"it also had its shortcomings: high-tech manufacturing firms employ only a specially trained fraction of the manufacturing workforce, and there simply are not enough high-tech firms to satisfy all geographic areas."

Is my interpretation correct ? -
Shortcoming ->High tech firms only employed specially trained fraction of the manufacturing workforce, so all the manufacturing workforce for the geographic areas couldn't get jobs. (Hence didn't satisfy all geographic areas).
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,787
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,787
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Taulark1
Hi GMATNinja,

"it also had its shortcomings: high-tech manufacturing firms employ only a specially trained fraction of the manufacturing workforce, and there simply are not enough high-tech firms to satisfy all geographic areas."

Is my interpretation correct ? -
Shortcoming ->High tech firms only employed specially trained fraction of the manufacturing workforce, so all the manufacturing workforce for the geographic areas couldn't get jobs. (Hence didn't satisfy all geographic areas).
The author lists two separate shortcomings of high-tech development in this sentence:

    1) It only employs specially trained employees, leaving the rest of the workforce out of luck.
    2) Separately, there aren't enough high-tech firms to help the economies of all geographic regions. This implies that even the specially trained employees are in danger, because there aren't enough companies to give them jobs.

The first shortcoming isn't necessarily causing the second shortcoming. Instead, they are both factors that weigh against high-tech development as a universally great strategy.

I hope that helps!
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
17304 posts
189 posts