It is currently 21 Jan 2018, 02:58

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Each employee of company Z is an employee of either division

  post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Oct 2005
Posts: 141

Kudos [?]: 150 [0], given: 0

Location: Boston,MA
Each employee of company Z is an employee of either division [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Dec 2007, 06:32
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

Each employee of company Z is an employee of either division X or division Y, but not both. If each division has some part time employees, is the ratio of the numbe of full-time employees to the number of part time employee greater for Division X than for COmpany Z

1. The ratio of the number of full time employee to the number of part time employee is less for Division Y than for company Z

2. More than half of the full time employees of company Z are employees of division X, and more than half of the part time employees of company Z are employees of division Y
_________________

--gregspirited

Kudos [?]: 150 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 12 Jul 2007
Posts: 857

Kudos [?]: 346 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Dec 2007, 09:44
I'm thinking A. I'll explain if that's correct

Kudos [?]: 346 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 20 Dec 2004
Posts: 251

Kudos [?]: 116 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Dec 2007, 10:42
I would say E. What is the OA ? This is a very good question.

Full Time employee in X = Fx
Full Time employee in Y = Fy

Part Time employee in X = Px
Part Time employee in Y = Py

Question =
Is (Fx+Fy)/(Px+Py) < (Fx/Px) ?

From 1) (Fy/Py) < (Fx +Fy)/(Px+Py)

From 2) Fx > Fy and Px < Py => that (Fy/Py) < (Fx/Px)

Using both (1) & (2) the condition can still not be established

Kudos [?]: 116 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 12 Jul 2007
Posts: 857

Kudos [?]: 346 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Dec 2007, 11:58
I see it as the ratio for the company being a weighted average of the two. If the ratio for Y is less than the average for the company, X must be higher than the company.

Kudos [?]: 346 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 20 Dec 2004
Posts: 251

Kudos [?]: 116 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Dec 2007, 12:53
To your point eschn3am:

If Dept. X has 5 full-time & 10 part-time & Dept. Y has 10 full-time & 15 part-time

then ratio of Dept. X = 1/2, ration of Dept. Y = 2/3

And ratio of company Z must be = (1/2 + 2/3)/2 = 7/12.

But the actual ratio for the company in my opinion is 15/25 = 3/5. Which is not actual to the average of the two individual ratios.

Am I wrong ?

Kudos [?]: 116 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 12 Jul 2007
Posts: 857

Kudos [?]: 346 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Dec 2007, 19:02
even if it doesn't average out perfectly, the ratio for the company will fall between the ratios for the two departments.

take 1/2, 2/3 and 3/5

15/30 vs 18/30 vs 20/30

so if the average is 18/30 for the company, and we know one department is less (in this case, 15/30) then the other department should be more (in this case, 20/30)

maybe my logic is flawed, but that's how I see it. I'm also interested in seeing an OA

Kudos [?]: 346 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Oct 2005
Posts: 141

Kudos [?]: 150 [0], given: 0

Location: Boston,MA
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Dec 2007, 19:35
OA is D guys. A GMATPrep question
_________________

--gregspirited

Kudos [?]: 150 [0], given: 0

Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 14202

Kudos [?]: 291 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Each employee of company Z is an employee of either division [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Dec 2017, 03:56
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

GMAT Books | GMAT Club Tests | Best Prices on GMAT Courses | GMAT Mobile App | Math Resources | Verbal Resources

Kudos [?]: 291 [0], given: 0

Re: Each employee of company Z is an employee of either division   [#permalink] 15 Dec 2017, 03:56
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Each employee of company Z is an employee of either division

  post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.