Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 23:42 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 23:42
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Gauss
Joined: 15 Nov 2005
Last visit: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 100
Own Kudos:
433
 [37]
Location: Italy
Posts: 100
Kudos: 433
 [37]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
30
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,443
Own Kudos:
69,788
 [11]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,443
Kudos: 69,788
 [11]
10
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
u2lover
Joined: 14 May 2006
Last visit: 08 Oct 2007
Posts: 706
Own Kudos:
933
 [1]
Posts: 706
Kudos: 933
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
jaynayak
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Last visit: 07 Jul 2008
Posts: 894
Own Kudos:
Posts: 894
Kudos: 639
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
B looks best.

The editorial is basically arguing against the recommendation that the watch commanders role should be scrapped. The first bold statement is that recoomendation against which the argument is arguing.

The second bold face is a conclusion that the argument reaches for the recommendation.
User avatar
sharadGmat
Joined: 20 Feb 2006
Last visit: 01 Mar 2012
Posts: 177
Own Kudos:
Posts: 177
Kudos: 969
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. The first is a recommendation made by the editorial; the second acknowledges a potential objection against that recommendation.

Editorial is against first statement.. So wrong.

B. The first is a proposal against which the editorial is directed; the second is a judgment reached by the editorial concerning that proposal.

Correct..


C. The first provides evidence in support of a recommendation that the editorial supports; the second is the conclusion reached by the editorial.

First isn't evidence.. It's either a recommendation or proposal..

D. The first is a position that the editorial challenges; the second is a judgment that was made in support of that challenged position.

Second isn't in support of first.

E. The first is a recommendation that the editorial questions; the second provides evidence against that recommendation

Second isn't evidence.. It's more of a conclusion..
avatar
M3U
Joined: 03 Apr 2019
Last visit: 19 Jan 2021
Posts: 3
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I have difficulty eliminating D. The second BF does support the challenged position to the first.
avatar
M3U
Joined: 03 Apr 2019
Last visit: 19 Jan 2021
Posts: 3
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja
M3U
I have difficulty eliminating D. The second BF does support the challenged position to the first.
Take another look at (D):
Quote:
D. The first is a position that the editorial challenges; the second is a judgment that was made in support of that challenged position.
Now, let's see how each bold face portion aligns with this answer choice:

For (D) to be correct, the first should be "a position that the editorial challenges." The editorial definitely challenges the idea that "the watch commander’s approval should no longer be required." So far, so good!

Now, the second part should be "a judgment that was made in support of that challenged position." Here is where we run into a problem. "That challenged position" is that "the watch commander's approval should no longer be required." According to answer choice (D), the second boldface portion should support this position. The second boldface does not do this at all -- instead, it states that "this recommendation should be rejected as dangerous."

Because the second BF statement does not support the position that the editorial challenges, (D) is not the correct answer choice.

I hope that helps!

Thank you for that explanation. I can see why D is wrong now!
User avatar
kavach
Joined: 05 Mar 2017
Last visit: 06 Jul 2021
Posts: 178
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 687
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Marketing
GPA: 3.6
WE:Marketing (Hospitality and Tourism)
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. The first is a recommendation made by the editorial; the second acknowledges a potential objection against that recommendation.

Editorial is against first statement.. So wrong.

B. The first is a proposal against which the editorial is directed; the second is a judgment reached by the editorial concerning that proposal.

Correct..


C. The first provides evidence in support of a recommendation that the editorial supports; the second is the conclusion reached by the editorial.

First isn't evidence.. It's either a recommendation or proposal..

D. The first is a position that the editorial challenges; the second is a judgment that was made in support of that challenged position.

Second isn't in support of first.

E. The first is a recommendation that the editorial questions; the second provides evidence against that recommendation

Second isn't evidence.. It's more of a conclusion..
User avatar
YuktiMaheshwari
Joined: 05 Jan 2023
Last visit: 17 Nov 2024
Posts: 29
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 15
Posts: 29
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. The first is a recommendation made by the editorial; the second acknowledges a potential objection against that recommendation.

Recommendation is not made by editorial instead experts feel so.

B. The first is a proposal against which the editorial is directed; the second is a judgment reached by the editorial concerning that proposal.

Correct

C. The first provides evidence in support of a recommendation that the editorial supports; the second is the conclusion reached by the editorial.

Editorial is against this not in support of first statement.

D. The first is a position that the editorial challenges; the second is a judgment that was made in support of that challenged position.

Second half of statement is incorrect, its not in support of first position.

E. The first is a recommendation that the editorial questions; the second provides evidence against that recommendation

Second is not an evidence.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,832
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,832
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts