GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 18 Aug 2018, 18:45

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Editorial in Golbindian Newspaper: For almost three months,

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Director
User avatar
Affiliations: FRM Charter holder
Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Posts: 702
Schools: Stanford, Chicago Booth, Babson College
Editorial in Golbindian Newspaper: For almost three months,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 29 May 2018, 19:42
2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

81% (01:09) correct 19% (01:25) wrong based on 458 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Editorial in Golbindian Newspaper: For almost three months, opposition parties have been mounting daily street demonstrations in the capital in an effort to pressure the ruling party into calling an election. Though the demonstrations were well attended at first, attendance has declined steadily in recent weeks.

However, the decline in attendance does not indicate that popular support for the opposition's demands is dropping, since

A. the opposition's demands have not changed during the period when the street demonstrations have been mounted.

B. No foreign governments have expressed any support for the opposition's demands.

C. The state-controlled media have ceased any mention of the demonstrations, leaving many citizens outside the capital with no way of knowing that demonstrations continue.

D. There have not recently been any anti government demonstrations in cities other than the capital.

E. A recent sharp decrease in unemployment has led to increased popular support for the government.

Originally posted by aurobindo on 31 Jan 2007, 07:08.
Last edited by Vyshak on 29 May 2018, 19:42, edited 2 times in total.
Formatting
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Aug 2005
Posts: 378
Location: Boston, MA
Re: Editorial in Golbindian Newspaper: For almost three months,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Jan 2007, 13:22
C. Media stopped covering the demonstrations, so those who support the oppostion that live outside the capital think they are no longer going on. Less people to come and demonstrate.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Posts: 831
WE 1: 3.5 yrs IT
WE 2: 2.5 yrs Retail chain
Re: Editorial in Golbindian Newspaper: For almost three months,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Jun 2010, 00:47
How OA can C?

We need to show that though the attendance is declining, the support is not, whereas C is just weaking this:

C. The state-controlled media have ceased any mention of the demonstrations, leaving many citizens outside the capital with no way of knowing that demonstrations continue.

I am more inclined to D. Can someone explain why C?
_________________

Want to improve your CR: http://gmatclub.com/forum/cr-methods-an-approach-to-find-the-best-answers-93146.html
Tricky Quant problems: http://gmatclub.com/forum/50-tricky-questions-92834.html
Important Grammer Fundamentals: http://gmatclub.com/forum/key-fundamentals-of-grammer-our-crucial-learnings-on-sc-93659.html

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1258
Re: Editorial in Golbindian Newspaper: For almost three months,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jun 2010, 18:56
state controlled media is not telling about demonstrations and that is why attendance is going but support still exists.
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 02 Nov 2009
Posts: 133
Re: Editorial in Golbindian Newspaper: For almost three months,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Aug 2012, 14:31
please can an expert explain this

I was thinking E

it looks for a reason to show that the attendance decline does not mean decline in support

if a decrease in unemployment implies people have started getting jobs so they are busy working and cannot attend does not mean that people now dont show intrest

so it should be E

can anyone explain a general streagtegy for solving these problems
Manhattan Prep Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 08 May 2012
Posts: 51
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V47
Re: Editorial in Golbindian Newspaper: For almost three months,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Aug 2012, 15:15
3
venmic wrote:
please can an expert explain this

I was thinking E

it looks for a reason to show that the attendance decline does not mean decline in support

if a decrease in unemployment implies people have started getting jobs so they are busy working and cannot attend does not mean that people now dont show intrest

so it should be E

can anyone explain a general streagtegy for solving these problems


It helps to first classify the question type. I'd call this an "explain the discrepancy".

The quick summary is that the size of the demonstrations has been decreasing, but we're trying to explain why this might not mean a drop in public support for the opposition.

Be careful not to mix the two groups – there are the demonstrators themselves and then there is the public (meaning everyone in the country). If (E) is true, then yes, you are correct, some demonstrators might now have jobs and that could explain whey there are fewer demonstrators on the street. But notice what (E) says about the public: the decrease in unemployment "has led to increased popular support for the government."

We wanted to argue that support for the demonstrators had not declined, but if more people support the government then surely it has!

The decline in unemployment alone may help resolve the discrepancy, but if it's accompanied by an increase in support for the government that actually makes the discrepancy worse.

Cheers,
Mark
_________________


Mark Sullivan | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | Seattle, WA


Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile


Retired Moderator
User avatar
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1355
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Re: Editorial in Golbindian Newspaper: For almost three months,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Sep 2012, 11:18
1
+1 C

People don't attend the demostrations because they cannot know that there are demonstrations.
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Director
Director
User avatar
B
Status: I don't stop when I'm Tired,I stop when I'm done
Joined: 11 May 2014
Posts: 551
Location: Bangladesh
Concentration: Finance, Leadership
GPA: 2.81
WE: Business Development (Real Estate)
Re: Editorial in Golbindian Newspaper: For almost three months,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 08 Feb 2017, 13:18
aurobindo wrote:
Editorial in Golbindian Newspaper: For almost three months, opposition parties have been mounting daily street demonstrations in the capital in an effort to pressure the ruling party into calling an election. Though the demonstrations were well attended at first, attendance has declined steadily in recent weeks.
However, the decline in attendance does not indicate that popular support for the opposition’s demands is dropping, since
A. the opposition’s demands have not changed during the period when the
street demonstrations have been mounted.
B. No foreign governments have expressed any support for the opposition’s demands.
C. The state-controlled media have ceased any mention of the demonstrations, leaving many citizens outside the capital with no way of knowing that demonstrations continue.
D. There have not recently been any antigovernment demonstrations in cities other than the capital.
E. A recent sharp decrease in unemployment has led to increased popular
support for the government.


Correct Answer C

Answer Choice A is wrong because it actually demonstrated/restated a part of the premise of the argument.



Thanks
_________________

Md. Abdur Rakib

Please Press +1 Kudos,If it helps
Sentence Correction-Collection of Ron Purewal's "elliptical construction/analogies" for SC Challenges


Originally posted by AbdurRakib on 04 Jul 2016, 08:13.
Last edited by AbdurRakib on 08 Feb 2017, 13:18, edited 1 time in total.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 29 Oct 2016
Posts: 251
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 620 Q50 V24
GRE 1: Q167 V147
Re: Editorial in Golbindian Newspaper: For almost three months,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Feb 2017, 02:51
Hi experts,

Kindly request for help.I have question about option C.

How can this restriction reduce the number of people demonstrating against the government? It could help explain why the number doesn't rise but not why it decreases since people who have once joined are already known about the demonstration. IMHO,why some of those people are no longer at the demonstration can't be explained by this restriction.

What did I miss from the argument?
Thanks
Director
Director
User avatar
B
Status: I don't stop when I'm Tired,I stop when I'm done
Joined: 11 May 2014
Posts: 551
Location: Bangladesh
Concentration: Finance, Leadership
GPA: 2.81
WE: Business Development (Real Estate)
Re: Editorial in Golbindian Newspaper: For almost three months,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Feb 2017, 13:57
1
Top Contributor
sleepynut wrote:
Hi experts,

Kindly request for help.I have question about option C.

How can this restriction reduce the number of people demonstrating against the government? It could help explain why the number doesn't rise but not why it decreases since people who have once joined are already known about the demonstration. IMHO,why some of those people are no longer at the demonstration can't be explained by this restriction.

What did I miss from the argument?
Thanks


About Correct Answer C:

Due to State-controlled media's restriction ,People outside the capital are not well informed(or at-least discouraged )anymore about the demonstration's existence in the capital.May be ,more people could come to the daily street demonstration in the capital if the media didn't restrict .

Above information actually strengthen the idea that the demonstration is still popular even though participant people is decreasing.

Thanks
_________________

Md. Abdur Rakib

Please Press +1 Kudos,If it helps
Sentence Correction-Collection of Ron Purewal's "elliptical construction/analogies" for SC Challenges

Retired Moderator
User avatar
G
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3188
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Editorial in Golbindian Newspaper: For almost three months,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Feb 2017, 04:01
The OA is correct and explanations provided in the thread appear sufficient. If there are any specific questions, please click again on the "Request Expert Reply" button and post your queries – closing this request
SVP
SVP
avatar
P
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1851
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Editorial in Golbindian Newspaper: For almost three months,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Apr 2017, 14:45
C should be the answer.
E is out of scope since it talks about unemployment.
A is wrong because it talks about period when demonstration is mounting
B is out of scope because it talks about foreign governments.
D weakens the argument because it says demonstrations only occur at the capital, and now there is decline in attendances.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 02 Mar 2018
Posts: 70
Location: India
Schools: IIMA , IIMA PGPX"20
GMAT 1: 640 Q51 V26
GPA: 3.1
CAT Tests
Re: Editorial in Golbindian Newspaper: For almost three months,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Aug 2018, 18:02
We are told that the opposition party’s rallies were well attended initially. However, of late the rallies have faced declining attendance. Yet, the author believes that the drop in attendance does not prove the decline in public support. We need to prove the author’s belief to be correct.

Whether the demands have changed or not does not explain the degree of public support for the opposition’s demands.
Foreign governments are out of scope.
CORRECT. Since people are not aware of the continuing demonstrations, they have not been able to take part in them But this does not mean that people do not support the campaign anymore.
‘Demonstrations in other cities’ is irrelevant.
‘Unemployment’ is out of scope.
Re: Editorial in Golbindian Newspaper: For almost three months, &nbs [#permalink] 05 Aug 2018, 18:02
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Editorial in Golbindian Newspaper: For almost three months,

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.