Bhavanahiremath
The statement says - 'higher profit potential by making MP3 Players'. That doesnt directly mean 'more like to make money' or is it? If it said 'more like to make more money' then it would be more likely to be more accurate
Just asking because I eliminated this answer choice since it says 'make money' and not 'make more money'. Nowhere does the passage say that by manufacturing smartphones the manufacturer will not make any money at all. Please explain.
The argument is saying two things:
1. Developing a line of smartphones would require R&D and would tarde off with 5 other products.
2. A line of MP3 players is more profitable and is produced at low cost.
We need to Infer something out of this. Let's do it using POE.
(A) Developing a line of MP3 players would not trade off with the R&D efforts on an other products.
: Too extreme. How do we know it would not trade off. No such information is given and this cannot be inferred.(B) The manufacturer is more likely to make money by developing a line of MP3 players than it is by developing a line of smartphones.
: Yes, even if they both require same trade off with the 5 other products, we know the the latter is more profitable. Hence, the chances of making money in latter case is more. Hence, correct answer.
For those who are confused why we don't have more money here: Consider a scenario when we are using the same amount of Money for manufacturing the two products. While the former may not given any profit, the latter will for sure give some profit (if sold at the same price) as we know that the latter is manufactured at a lower cost.(C) Developing a line of smartphones would be a bad business decision for the manufacturer.
: Ohh. How can you say it is a bad business??(D) The manufacturer will make money if it develops a line of MP3 players.
: Will make money. Aren't we too confident here? I would always reject this option.(E) The only new product that would be profitable for the manufacturer is a line of MP3 players.
No Man, I have another product which could be more profitable. So, that will break your point. Hence, incorrect