OFFICIAL EXPLANATIONProject SC Butler: Day 223: Sentence Correction (SC2)
Quote:
Federal judges are sentencing white-collar criminals to prison with
more and more frequency and the sentencing, even though still shorter than the average for crimes such as armed robbery, have increased in length.
A) more and more frequency and
the sentencing, even though still shorter than the average for crimes such as armed robbery,
have increased
Sentencing is singular and does not agree with the plural have increased.
The mere act of [i]sentencing itself does not increase in length. See Splits below.B)
more and more frequency and the
sentencing, though still shorter than the average for such crimes as armed robbery,
has increasedMore and more is colloquial and not likely to be seen on the GMAT.
Sentencing itself has not increased in length. Similar to option A.C)
higher frequency and the sentences, even though still shorter than the average fro cirmes such as armed robbery,
are increasedHigher frequency is inelegant. Higher frequency is used to describe things such as radio waves.
Are increased is in passive voice. We use passive voice to downplay agency. But the judges are the agents and they are important.
Most importantly, compare to option E, which is much better because it uses past perfect to bridge the past and present.
See Splits below.D) greater frequency and the
sentencing, although still shorter than the average for such crimes as armed robbery,
has been increasingThe sentencing has not increased in length, similar to options A and B.E) greater frequency and the sentences, though still shorter than the average for such crimes as armed robbery, have increased
I've got a few white-collar criminals I'd like to send to these judges before those very criminals replace the judges. Just sayin'.
This question reminds us to be mindful of the difference between a dedicated noun such as "a sentence" and a verb-like noun (a gerund, a verbING) such as "sentencing."
Meaning?
Judges are imposing longer sentences on white-collar criminals, although those sentences are still shorter than the average length of sentences for crimes such as armed robbery.SPLITS• SPLIT #1: Which has increased in length, the sentence or the sentencing?BASIC IDEA:
The judges' acts of sentencing have not increased in length!
(What, the judges are sitting there for days, thinking, announcing prison terms, and banging their gavels?)
The
sentences (length of time the robber will spend in prison) have increased.
ANALYSIS:
In this question, the word
sentence is a dedicated noun.
A
sentence means "the
time that a prisoner serves as punishment."
Sentencing, on the other hand, is a gerund (a verbING).
Sentencing is the ___ING form of the verb
to sentence. Sentencing is a noun derived from a verb, a fact that makes them action nouns similar to
laughing, running, crying, and
imagining.
Gerunds (verbINGs) are nouns that mean
performing the action of the verb (
laughing means doing the action of the verb
to laugh).
The verb
to sentence means to "declare the punishment decided for (an offender),"
hereWhen the judges are sentencing, they are performing the action of the verb
to sentence. They are announcing how much time the robber will spend in prison.
The judicial sentencing of white-collar criminals -- the act itself -- has not increased.
The judges are sending white-collar criminals away for a longer period of time.
The judges are giving out longer sentences.
From the prompt and context, we know that
The time that robbers spend in prison -- the sentences -- have increased.
Options A, B, and D erroneously suggest that the time that judges spend sentencing has increased rather than that the sentences themselves have increased.
Eliminate A, D, and E
• Split # 2: increased vs. are increasedOption C pairs
sentences with
are increased.
Although the construction is not grammatically incorrect, it is strained and not as good as
have increased in option E.
Are increased is in a passive voice and does not connote a sense of having started in the (recent) past and having continued until now.
HAS/HAVE + verbED is called "past perfect."
We use it to bridge the past and present.
If something started before now and continues, we want to use
have increased to reflect this timing.
At some time before now, judges started cracking down on white-collar criminals,
and as a result [past → present] sentences have increased in length.
Option E is better than option C.
Eliminate option C
The best answer is E.COMMENTSprakhar992 , welcome to SC Butler.
If you read my official explanation here and the question still does not make sense to you, please try to frame specific questions.
itoyj and
hero_with_1000_faces , good to "see" you, as always.
This question is not easy.
The sentence is long, the choices are fairly close to one another,
and it can be very hard to remember that ___ING words are verb-like nouns.
The judges are doing something.
How do you "increase the length" of an action?
(In this context, even that question sounds bizarre.)
Kudos or smiley faces to aspirants who participated.