Bunuel
Janet: The wild auroch was a species of large wild cattle whose last known herd went extinct in Eastern Europe in the first half of the 1600s. As the records of the period show that their extinction occurred during a period of stagnation in local population growth, it is unlikely that they were hunted to extinction or died due to habitat displacement. Something else must have led to the auroch’s extinction, and the best candidate is rinderpest – a disease inadvertently introduced into the auroch’s ecosystem through the import of domesticated cattle from Asia.
Junko: That argument is unlikely to convince scholars on its own. Can you cite any other evidence in its favor?
Select
Janet for the statement that, if true, best strengthens Janet’s assertion, and select
Junko for the statement that, if true, best strengthens Junko’s disbelief regarding Janet’s assertions. Make only two selections, one in each column.
Janet - Best Reason for auroch's extinction is rinderpest - a diease inadvertently introduced into the auroch's ecosystem through the import of domesticated cattle from Asia
why
because extinction occurred during a period of stagnation in local population growth, unlikely that they were hunted to extinction or died due to habitat displacment
Junko: Cite any other evidence as it is unlikley to convince scholars
A. The auroch’s in Eastern Europe went extinct during a time period wherein trade between Asia and Easter Europe was weaker than it had been during earlier periods wherein they thrived
-- how does weak trade influence auroch's extinction is not clear and extinction happens at a time when it was weaker
B.Most historians agree that Asian domesticated cattle were first imported to Eastern Europe in the late 1600s.
-- This strengthens Junko's disbelief as Asian cattle started occupying auroch's habitat in late 1600s while Auroch's extinction happened in first half of 1600s
C.Roughly half a dozen other species of cattle went extinct alongside the auroch.
-- This supports the belief that something has killed not only auroch but also half a dozen other species. So it is a widespread phenomenon and supports that argument that it is not due to hunting or habitat displacement. It supports Janet's argument
D.Records from that era show that aurochs were very hard to hunt
-- It talks about records that aurochs were hard to hunt but that does not mean they cannot be hunted down to extinction . Hence it is ambiguous and out
E.Several wild animals larger than the aurochs also went extinct during the 1600s.
-- it is a general statement and does not say whether they were extinct due to hunting or displacement or someother reason. Also 1600s is entire century but extinction happened in 1st half and hence out