Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 17:45 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 17:45
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Kinshook
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Jun 2019
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,793
Own Kudos:
5,508
 [1]
Given Kudos: 161
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
WE:Engineering (Transportation)
Products:
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
Posts: 5,793
Kudos: 5,508
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
manrasingh
Joined: 19 May 2023
Last visit: 13 Aug 2025
Posts: 77
Own Kudos:
34
 [1]
Given Kudos: 85
Location: India
Schools: ISB (S)
GMAT Focus 1: 685 Q86 V82 DI84
GPA: 7.7
Schools: ISB (S)
GMAT Focus 1: 685 Q86 V82 DI84
Posts: 77
Kudos: 34
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
captain0612
Joined: 10 Apr 2020
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 91
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 123
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 635 Q84 V83 DI77
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V35
GPA: 7
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 635 Q84 V83 DI77
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V35
Posts: 91
Kudos: 123
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Fido10
Joined: 12 Aug 2020
Last visit: 27 Aug 2024
Posts: 103
Own Kudos:
165
 [1]
Given Kudos: 298
Location: Morocco
Products:
Posts: 103
Kudos: 165
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
the assertion of Janet is that Something else must have led to the auroch’s extinction, and the best candidate is rinderpest which was inadvertently introduced into the auroch’s ecosystem through the import of domesticated cattle from Asia.


The auroch’s in Eastern Europe went extinct during a time period wherein trade between Asia and Easter Europe was weaker than it had been during earlier periods wherein they thrived.
it is said that the trade was weaker but not inexistant, so we still could've traded cattle that brought us the rinderpest

Most historians agree that Asian domesticated cattle were first imported to Eastern Europe in the late 1600s.
This is strenghtening Junko since the extinction occured in the first half of 1600s, and here it is stated by most historians that the cattle were first imported by late 1600s

Roughly half a dozen other species of cattle went extinct alongside the auroch.
Info is irrelevant, we're dealing with wether the rinderpest could be considered as a root cause of the extinction or not

Records from that era show that aurochs were very hard to hunt.
this is strenghthening Janet's reasoning. Since they are very hard to hunt, what may cause their extinction ??!! maybe a disease or an appocalypse !

Several wild animals larger than the aurochs also went extinct during the 1600s.
irreleva,t if other species were also extinct at the same period
User avatar
PK1
Joined: 11 Aug 2018
Last visit: 14 Jun 2025
Posts: 96
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 47
Products:
Posts: 96
Kudos: 143
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
­Janet: The wild auroch was a species of large wild cattle whose last known herd went extinct in Eastern Europe in the first half of the 1600s. As the records of the period show that their extinction occurred during a period of stagnation in local population growth, it is unlikely that they were hunted to extinction or died due to habitat displacement. Something else must have led to the auroch’s extinction, and the best candidate is rinderpest – a disease inadvertently introduced into the auroch’s ecosystem through the import of domesticated cattle from Asia.

Junko: That argument is unlikely to convince scholars on its own. Can you cite any other evidence in its favor?

Select Janet for the statement that, if true, best strengthens Janet’s assertion, and select Junko for the statement that, if true, best strengthens Junko’s disbelief regarding Janet’s assertions. Make only two selections, one in each column.

­
 


This question was provided by Experts' Global
for the GMAT Olympics 2024

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Admissions Consulting, and more

 

­
­
­Janet - Best Reason for auroch's extinction is rinderpest - a diease inadvertently introduced into the auroch's ecosystem through the import of domesticated cattle from Asia
why
because extinction occurred during a period of stagnation in local population growth, unlikely that they were hunted to extinction or died due to habitat displacment

Junko: Cite any other evidence as it is unlikley to convince scholars

A. The auroch’s in Eastern Europe went extinct during a time period wherein trade between Asia and Easter Europe was weaker than it had been during earlier periods wherein they thrived 
-- how does weak trade influence auroch's extinction is not clear and extinction happens at a time when it was weaker

B.Most historians agree that Asian domesticated cattle were first imported to Eastern Europe in the late 1600s.
-- This strengthens Junko's disbelief as Asian cattle started occupying auroch's habitat in late 1600s while Auroch's extinction happened in first half of 1600s

C.Roughly half a dozen other species of cattle went extinct alongside the auroch.
-- This supports the belief that something has killed not only auroch but also half a dozen other species.  So it is a widespread phenomenon and supports that argument that it is not due to hunting or habitat displacement. It supports Janet's argument

D.Records from that era show that aurochs were very hard to hunt
--  It talks about records that aurochs were hard to hunt but that does not mean they cannot be hunted down to extinction . Hence it is ambiguous and out

E.Several wild animals larger than the aurochs also went extinct during the 1600s.
-- it is a general statement and does not say whether they were extinct due to hunting or displacement or someother reason. Also 1600s is entire century but extinction happened in 1st half and hence out
User avatar
sohailasif786
Joined: 13 May 2024
Last visit: 07 Oct 2025
Posts: 43
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 43
Kudos: 50
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­ANS=DB
Attachment:
GMAT-Club-Forum-rhhz6t7d.png
GMAT-Club-Forum-rhhz6t7d.png [ 171.21 KiB | Viewed 177 times ]
User avatar
rg270903
Joined: 30 May 2024
Last visit: 18 Apr 2025
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 30
Kudos: 42
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The auroch’s in Eastern Europe went extinct during a time period wherein trade between Asia and Easter Europe was weaker than it had been during earlier periods wherein they thrived.
- This statement strengthens Junko's assertion. Trade between Asia and Eastern Europe being weaker during the aurochs' extinction period suggests it is less likely that domesticated cattle from Asia, and thus rinderpest, were introduced at that time.

Most historians agree that Asian domesticated cattle were first imported to Eastern Europe in the late 1600s.
- If Asian domesticated cattle were first imported to Eastern Europe in the late 1600s, this contradicts Janet's assertion that rinderpest from these cattle caused the aurochs' extinction in the first half of the 1600s. However, this statement is based on an agreement of most historians, hence, not the correct answer.

Roughly half a dozen other species of cattle went extinct alongside the auroch.
- The extinction of multiple cattle species alongside the auroch suggests a common cause, like rinderpest, rather than localized factors such as hunting or habitat loss. Thus, this strengthens Janet's reasoning.

Records from that era show that aurochs were very hard to hunt.
- Supports a supporting idea from Janet's prompt, however, not helpful in strengthening her main argument.

Several wild animals larger than the aurochs also went extinct during the 1600s.
- Very neutral, and deviates from both their points.
User avatar
BGbogoss
Joined: 27 Jan 2024
Last visit: 30 Sep 2025
Posts: 38
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 38
Kudos: 58
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Janet:

Several wild animals larger than the aurochs also went extinct during the 1600s.
This supports Janet’s assertion by suggesting that a widespread disease like rinderpest, which could affect multiple large species, might have been responsible for the auroch’s extinction.

Junko:

Most historians agree that Asian domesticated cattle were first imported to Eastern Europe in the late 1600s.
This supports Junko’s disbelief by contradicting Janet’s timeline, indicating that the introduction of rinderpest through Asian cattle couldn't have been the cause of the auroch’s extinction in the first half of the 1600s.

Discussion of the other answers:
The auroch’s in Eastern Europe went extinct during a time period wherein trade between Asia and Eastern Europe was weaker than it had been during earlier periods wherein they thrived.

This statement could support Junko's skepticism by suggesting that the likelihood of disease being introduced through trade with Asia was low during the period of the auroch's extinction, thus weakening Janet's argument about rinderpest.

Roughly half a dozen other species of cattle went extinct alongside the auroch.

This statement could support Janet’s argument by indicating that a widespread event (like an epidemic) might have caused multiple extinctions simultaneously. However, it doesn’t specifically link these extinctions to rinderpest or imported cattle.

Records from that era show that aurochs were very hard to hunt.

This statement supports Janet’s assertion by suggesting that hunting was unlikely to be the primary cause of extinction, aligning with her claim that something else, like disease, led to their extinction. It does not directly support the rinderpest theory but strengthens the argument against hunting as the cause.
User avatar
pianogirl
Joined: 28 Sep 2022
Last visit: 25 May 2025
Posts: 47
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 47
Kudos: 76
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Janet : Records from that era show that aurochs were very hard to hunt.
This statement supports Janet's assertion by suggesting that hunting alone was unlikely to have led to the extinction of aurochs, thereby bolstering the argument that an external factor like rinderpest (introduced through Asian domesticated cattle) played a role.

Junko : Most historians agree that Asian domesticated cattle were first imported to Eastern Europe in the late 1600s.

This statement supports Junko's disbelief by indicating that the timing of the introduction of Asian domesticated cattle does not align with the extinction of aurochs in the early 1600s. This challenges Janet's assertion that rinderpest introduced through these cattle was the primary cause of auroch extinction.


Roughly half a dozen other species of cattle went extinct alongside the auroch.

This statement supports Janet's assertion by suggesting that multiple species of cattle went extinct during the same period as the auroch, which could indicate a broader ecological impact or disease affecting cattle populations.


The aurochs in Eastern Europe went extinct during a time period wherein trade between Asia and Eastern Europe was weaker than it had been during earlier periods wherein they thrived.

This statement supports Junko's disbelief by suggesting that reduced trade with Asia during the extinction period challenges the idea that rinderpest, introduced through Asian cattle, was a significant factor in the extinction of aurochs. It indicates that environmental or other factors may have played a larger role.

Several wild animals larger than the aurochs also went extinct during the 1600s.

This statement provides additional context but does not directly support either Janet's assertion or Junko's disbelief regarding the extinction of aurochs. It suggests a broader ecological impact but doesn't provide conclusive evidence for or against either argument.
User avatar
FranCifu
Joined: 11 Jun 2024
Last visit: 24 Nov 2024
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 44
Kudos: 30
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­Janets assertion was that rinderpest, introduced with the cattle of Asia, was the cause for the extinction of the wild auroch, so this is what we need to stenghten.
Junko doubt this.

A --> strenghtener for Junko, since it proves that the introduction of the cattle was most likely not the cause.
B --> strenghtener for Janet, since it shows that it is likely that this disease was the cause
C --> irrelevant
D --> irrelevant
E --> irrelevant
User avatar
Shruuuu
Joined: 21 Nov 2023
Last visit: 10 Nov 2025
Posts: 70
Own Kudos:
95
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99
Location: India
Schools: ISB '27 (A)
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q83 V86 DI78
Products:
Schools: ISB '27 (A)
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q83 V86 DI78
Posts: 70
Kudos: 95
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­i) Janet's argument is only strengthened by Option D as it helps in strengthening the claim that aurochs were hard to hunt & hence, couldn't have been extinct due to hunting
Option B weakens the argument & the rest are out of scope

ii) Junko's argument is strengthened / could cast doubt on Janet's argument by stating Option B as if first import was in late 1600s, rinderpest couldn't have made the aurochs extinct in early 1600s 

IMO D & B
User avatar
boomer1ang
Joined: 13 Oct 2022
Last visit: 12 Oct 2025
Posts: 50
Own Kudos:
57
 [1]
Given Kudos: 49
Posts: 50
Kudos: 57
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Janets argument is auroch unlikely that they were hunted to extinction or died due to habitat displacement but due to disease due to imported cattle.
Junos is not convinced.
we have find strengthener for both.

1. The auroch’s in Eastern Europe went extinct during a time period wherein trade between Asia and Easter Europe was weaker than it had been during earlier periods wherein they thrived - weaker to janet if trade was weaker during the period.
2. Most historians agree that Asian domesticated cattle were first imported to Eastern Europe in the late 1600s. - strengthen juno since it argues against disease since first import happened after the extinction period. (correct of juno)
3. Roughly half a dozen other species of cattle went extinct alongside the auroch. - not relevant, talks about other species.
4. Records from that era show that aurochs were very hard to hunt. - support for janet, since eliminates hunting as probable cause.
5. Several wild animals larger than the aurochs also went extinct during the 1600s. - not relevant if other animals went extinct doesnt mean auroch went extinct.

Answer:
Janet: Records from that era show that aurochs were very hard to hunt.
Junko: Most historians agree that Asian domesticated cattle were first imported to Eastern Europe in the late 1600s.
User avatar
JDEWERPEF
Joined: 15 Jun 2024
Last visit: 04 May 2025
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
Posts: 21
Kudos: 35
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The auroch’s in Eastern Europe went extinct during a time period wherein trade between Asia and Easter Europe was weaker than it had been during earlier periods wherein they thrived.: Unreleated, they are talking about imported cattle, this could have happened independent of whether trade in general was soaring or otherwise.

Most historians agree that Asian domesticated cattle were first imported to Eastern Europe in the late 1600s.: a disease caused by asian cattle imports couldn´t have happened before those imports.: Junko

Roughly half a dozen other species of cattle went extinct alongside the auroch.: other species of local cattle going extinct with the auroch would indicate for a common cause as in rinderpest.: Janet

Records from that era show that aurochs were very hard to hunt.: we would need to assume that as they were hard to hunt no one hunted them.

Several wild animals larger than the aurochs also went extinct during the 1600s.: they could have gone extinct by other unrelated causes
User avatar
andreagonzalez2k
Joined: 15 Feb 2021
Last visit: 26 Jul 2025
Posts: 308
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
Posts: 308
Kudos: 497
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­Janet: rinderpest introduced through the import of domesticated cattle from Asia was the cause of the auroch extinction

Junko: rinderpest wasn't that cause


The auroch’s in Eastern Europe went extinct during a time period wherein trade between Asia and Easter Europe was weaker than it had been during earlier periods wherein they thrived.
INCORRECT
It strengthens Junko’s disbelief, but the next one is a better candidate.

Most historians agree that Asian domesticated cattle were first imported to Eastern Europe in the late 1600s.
JUNKO CORRECT
If Asian domesticated cattle were first imported to Eastern Europe in the late 1600s it can not be the cause of auroch extinction in the first half of the 1600s

Roughly half a dozen other species of cattle went extinct alongside the auroch.
JANET CORRECT
It various species of cattle went extinct maybe it has the same cause and rinderpest is a good candidate.


Records from that era show that aurochs were very hard to hunt.
INCORRECT
It limits the causes of the auroch extinction. But it does not aim to rinderpest as the cause. Maybe the cause is habitat displacement.

Several wild animals larger than the aurochs also went extinct during the 1600s.
INCORRECT
Rinderpest only affects to cattle, not other animals.
User avatar
jairovx
Joined: 30 Mar 2023
Last visit: 06 Oct 2024
Posts: 48
Own Kudos:
57
 [1]
Given Kudos: 23
Location: Peru
Posts: 48
Kudos: 57
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Janet's Assertion:
Janet argues that the aurochs' extinction was likely due to rinderpest, a disease introduced via domesticated cattle from Asia, rather than hunting or habitat displacement.

Junko's Disbelief:
Junko is skeptical and asks for more evidence to support Janet's argument.

Let's analyze the options:

A. The aurochs in Eastern Europe went extinct during a time period wherein trade between Asia and Eastern Europe was weaker than it had been during earlier periods wherein they thrived.

This option weakens Janet's argument because it suggests that the trade (and thus the potential introduction of rinderpest) was less likely during the period of the aurochs' extinction.

B. Most historians agree that Asian domesticated cattle were first imported to Eastern Europe in the late 1600s.

This option weakens Janet's argument because it implies that Asian cattle (and thus rinderpest) were not present in Eastern Europe until after the aurochs went extinct in the early 1600s.

C. Roughly half a dozen other species of cattle went extinct alongside the aurochs.

This option could support Janet's argument, as it suggests a widespread event (like a disease) that affected multiple species, not just the aurochs.

D. Records from that era show that aurochs were very hard to hunt.

This option strengthens Janet's argument by supporting the idea that hunting was not a significant factor in the aurochs' extinction.

E. Several wild animals larger than the aurochs also went extinct during the 1600s.

This option could indirectly support Janet's argument by suggesting a widespread environmental or ecological factor that affected large animals, potentially including a disease like rinderpest.

Conclusion:
Best statement to strengthen Janet's assertion:
D.

Best statement to strengthen Junko's disbelief:
B.
User avatar
sayan640
Joined: 29 Oct 2015
Last visit: 10 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,180
Own Kudos:
813
 [1]
Given Kudos: 783
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V28
Products:
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V28
Posts: 1,180
Kudos: 813
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Janet : - Records from that era show that aurochs were very hard to hunt.
Junko :- Most historians agree that Asian domesticated cattle were first imported to Eastern Europe in the late 1600s.
User avatar
temulenbatbayr90
Joined: 06 Sep 2022
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 45
Own Kudos:
53
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 45
Kudos: 53
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Janet's assertion is that aurochs went extinct because of the rinderpest importation from Asia, not other things.
So we need to find the answer that supports this assertion.
Junko's disbelief is that Janet's assertion is contradicted and another explanation should be provided.
So, we need to find the answer that provides the reason for the Junko's disbelief.
Thus,
For Janet.
Records from that era show that aurochs were very hard to hunt
This supports the idea that other things specially hunting is too difficult for extinction, thus making it more plausible answer.
For Junko.
Most historians agree that Asian domesticated cattle were first imported to Eastern Europe in the late
1600
This really challenges the Janet's idea because in the late 1600s these cattle were imported but the aurochs went extinct in early 1600s, thus it is correct answer for Junko
User avatar
aviraj1703
Joined: 27 May 2024
Last visit: 10 Mar 2025
Posts: 98
Own Kudos:
122
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 98
Kudos: 122
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
Bunuel
­Janet: The wild auroch was a species of large wild cattle whose last known herd went extinct in Eastern Europe in the first half of the 1600s. As the records of the period show that their extinction occurred during a period of stagnation in local population growth, it is unlikely that they were hunted to extinction or died due to habitat displacement. Something else must have led to the auroch’s extinction, and the best candidate is rinderpest – a disease inadvertently introduced into the auroch’s ecosystem through the import of domesticated cattle from Asia.

Junko: That argument is unlikely to convince scholars on its own. Can you cite any other evidence in its favor?

Select Janet for the statement that, if true, best strengthens Janet’s assertion, and select Junko for the statement that, if true, best strengthens Junko’s disbelief regarding Janet’s assertions. Make only two selections, one in each column.

­
 


This question was provided by Experts' Global
for the GMAT Olympics 2024

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Admissions Consulting, and more

 

­
­
­Janet's asserions: As hunting and habitat displacement were unlikely, the extinction of aurochs in first half of 1600s was due to a disease inadvertently introduced into the auroch’s ecosystem through the import of domesticated cattle from Asia.

Junko is asking for other evidence in that favour to believe it.

In 1st column we need to select the statement that agrees with unlikely events of hunting or likely events of disease spread among them.

In 2nd column we need to select the statement that is denying unlikely events of hunting or likely events of disease spread among them in first half of 1600s.

1st column - D: Records from that era show that aurochs were very hard to hunt.

2nd column - B: Most historians agree that Asian domesticated cattle were first imported to Eastern Europe in the late 1600s.
User avatar
bomberjack
Joined: 22 Nov 2023
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 67
Own Kudos:
73
 [1]
Given Kudos: 122
GMAT Focus 1: 635 Q84 V81 DI79
GMAT Focus 2: 675 Q88 V82 DI80
GMAT Focus 3: 715 Q88 V86 DI83
GMAT Focus 3: 715 Q88 V86 DI83
Posts: 67
Kudos: 73
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
Quote:
­Janet: The wild auroch was a species of large wild cattle whose last known herd went extinct in Eastern Europe in the first half of the 1600s. As the records of the period show that their extinction occurred during a period of stagnation in local population growth, it is unlikely that they were hunted to extinction or died due to habitat displacement. Something else must have led to the auroch’s extinction, and the best candidate is rinderpest – a disease inadvertently introduced into the auroch’s ecosystem through the import of domesticated cattle from Asia.

Junko: That argument is unlikely to convince scholars on its own. Can you cite any other evidence in its favor?

Select Janet for the statement that, if true, best strengthens Janet’s assertion, and select Junko for the statement that, if true, best strengthens Junko’s disbelief regarding Janet’s assertions. Make only two selections, one in each column.
The auroch’s in Eastern Europe went extinct during a time period wherein trade between Asia and Easter Europe was weaker than it had been during earlier periods wherein they thrived.
- We don't care about when it went extinct. Irrelevant.

Most historians agree that Asian domesticated cattle were first imported to Eastern Europe in the late 1600s.
- This strengthens Junko as this introduces a possibility of some other reason for extinction.

Roughly half a dozen other species of cattle went extinct alongside the auroch.
- Again, we don't care about extinctionion of others species. We're looking for why auroch went extinct.

Records from that era show that aurochs were very hard to hunt.
- This strengethens Janet's arhument directly.

Several wild animals larger than the aurochs also went extinct during the 1600s.
- Irrelevant. We need the why, not who.
User avatar
Gemmie
Joined: 19 Dec 2021
Last visit: 29 Jul 2025
Posts: 491
Own Kudos:
426
 [1]
Given Kudos: 76
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Technology, Economics
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V84 DI83
GPA: 3.55
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V84 DI83
Posts: 491
Kudos: 426
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­Janet: Janet's assertion is that the extinction of the aurochs was likely due to rinderpest introduced by domesticated cattle from Asia, not hunting or habitat displacement. 

=> Records from that era show that aurochs were very hard to hunt.

+ This statement indicates that hunting was not a significant factor in the extinction of aurochs.

+ By ruling out hunting as a major cause, it indirectly supports Janet’s claim that another factor, like a disease, could have been responsible for their extinction.


Junko: is skeptical of Janet's conclusion

=> Most historians agree that Asian domesticated cattle were first imported to Eastern Europe in the late 1600s.

+ This directly contradicts Janet's claim about the disease source (rinderpest from Asian cattle in the first half of the 1600s).­

+ If domesticated cattle weren't imported until after the extinction (late 1600s), they couldn't have introduced the disease in the first half of the 1600s as Janet proposes.­
   1   2   3   4   
Moderators:
Math Expert
105355 posts
496 posts