Events & Promotions
| Last visit was: 06 Sep 2026, 12:12 |
It is currently 06 Sep 2026, 12:12 |
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Sep 0712:01 AM PDT
-11:59 PM PDT
On the 7th, GMAT Club Tests will be Free! Including all the Quizzes, Questions, and Tests. 12 AM - 11:59 PM PDT
Sep 0712:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
Tejas studied hard but kept repeating the same mistakes. After 3 attempts at 645, a focused 4-week strategy helped him identify and fix what was holding him back—leading to a 695 with just 12–15 hours of study per week.- Sep 07
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
A complete walkthrough of GMAT Club’s free 12-week GMAT study plan: what you study each week, how progress and goals are tracked, how the error log works, and how your practice unlocks paid tools at no cost. 
Sep 0201:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
Take 30% off all study plans with code COURSEWORK - Expires on Monday 9/7
Sep 0401:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
This Labor Day, turn your hard work into real score gains. From 615→715 in 15 days to 705 in 30 days, our students prove what's possible with personalized, expert guidance. Save up to 25% on 1-on-1 tutoring.
Sep 0410:00 AM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
We’ve worked incredibly hard to build TTP into the best test prep experience possible, and it would mean a lot to us to win Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep. If TTP has helped you, we’d be incredibly grateful for your vote.
Sep 0609:30 AM EDT
-12:30 PM EST
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful EA course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Perfect class schedule and easy course access for working professionals. Class starts Sundays Sept. 6, 2026.- Sep 09
07:00 AM PDT
-10:00 AM PDT
Meet AdComs and explore top Master’s programs - MiM, MiF, MSc, MSBA and more. - Application Fee Waivers - Free 1-Week of GMAT Club Tests: - Master's Application Toolkit - Grand Prize Giveaway - Sep 09
10:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Three MBA applications. Three rejections. No interview invites. A year later, Aman was admitted to Cambridge Judge, SMU, and IMD. In this episode of MBA Admit Stories, Aman shares how he rebuilt his MBA application... 
Sep 1008:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Sep 1507:00 PM EDT
-09:00 PM EST
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Sep 2108:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 21, 2026 - Oct. 9, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
16 Jul 2024, 13:32
Kudos
Bookmarks
An economist asserts that a free trade agreement will benefit Country A's automobile industry as long as the industry remains competitive globally; that the industry will remain competitive as long as it continues to innovate; and that it will continue to innovate as long as it receives sufficient investment.
Benefit-->Competetive Globally-->Innovate-(I)-->Sufficient investment.(SI)
If the assertions above are correct, which of the following further predictions can logically be derived from them?
(A) If the automobile industry in Country A receives sufficient investment, it will remain competitive globally.Failed due Reverse logic.
(B) If the automobile industry in Country A continues to innovate, it will benefit from the free trade agreement.Failed due Reverse logic.
(C) If there is a global recession, the automobile industry in Country A will cease to innovate.Correct.I-->SI which means,~SI-->~I
(D) The automobile industry in Country A will receive sufficient investment indefinitely.Not relevant.Future is not discussed here.
(E) Country A's economy will become the most dominant in the automobile sector globally.Not relevant.Future is not discussed here.
ANS-C
Benefit-->Competetive Globally-->Innovate-(I)-->Sufficient investment.(SI)
If the assertions above are correct, which of the following further predictions can logically be derived from them?
(A) If the automobile industry in Country A receives sufficient investment, it will remain competitive globally.Failed due Reverse logic.
(B) If the automobile industry in Country A continues to innovate, it will benefit from the free trade agreement.Failed due Reverse logic.
(C) If there is a global recession, the automobile industry in Country A will cease to innovate.Correct.I-->SI which means,~SI-->~I
(D) The automobile industry in Country A will receive sufficient investment indefinitely.Not relevant.Future is not discussed here.
(E) Country A's economy will become the most dominant in the automobile sector globally.Not relevant.Future is not discussed here.
ANS-C
16 Jul 2024, 13:36
Kudos
Bookmarks
After the opening day of the week,
We're back to business.
I feel the luck is going to shift to our Green team as we get closer to the end of the Champions.
Let's get started with our explanation for this topic:
Identify the Question:
We are dealing with a Inference question. Only Facts, No claims or conclusion here.
Deconstruct the Argument:
An economist asserts that a free trade agreement will benefit Country A's automobile industry as long as the industry remains competitive globally; - Conditional.
that the industry will remain competitive as long as it continues to innovate; - Conditional
and that it will continue to innovate as long as it receives sufficient investment. - Conditional
State the goal:
We are looking for statement which 100% Must be true.
Either the sentence says something in the negative form of a sentence or it combines 2/3 sentences together (synthesis)
while reading I recognized some inferences. Conditional relation: Country A stop being competitive -> no benefits any more from the Free trade agreement.
Sufficient Investment -> Innovate -> Competitive (GLOBALLY) -> Benefit from Free trade agreement
So if one of them break the relations doesn't hold anymore.
Elimination:
A) One word off - It will remain competitive in general. We can't actually know if it will remain competitive Globally becuase in the relations part they omitted it. - Eliminate.
B) One word off - Same as Answer choice A, We can't actually know if it will remain competitive Globally because of the omitting the "globally" word. - Eliminate.
C) Correct - Recession (synonym of Insufficient investment) tells us there will not be enough money to invest in and then the all relations break.
D) OutofScope - We don't know that. the argument didn't talk about that. - Eliminate.
E) OutofScope - We don't know that. the argument didn't talk about that. - Eliminate.
THE END
I hope you liked the explanation, I have tried my best here.
Let me know if you have any questions about this question or my explanation.
We're back to business.
I feel the luck is going to shift to our Green team as we get closer to the end of the Champions.
Let's get started with our explanation for this topic:
Identify the Question:
We are dealing with a Inference question. Only Facts, No claims or conclusion here.
Deconstruct the Argument:
An economist asserts that a free trade agreement will benefit Country A's automobile industry as long as the industry remains competitive globally; - Conditional.
that the industry will remain competitive as long as it continues to innovate; - Conditional
and that it will continue to innovate as long as it receives sufficient investment. - Conditional
State the goal:
We are looking for statement which 100% Must be true.
Either the sentence says something in the negative form of a sentence or it combines 2/3 sentences together (synthesis)
while reading I recognized some inferences. Conditional relation: Country A stop being competitive -> no benefits any more from the Free trade agreement.
Sufficient Investment -> Innovate -> Competitive (GLOBALLY) -> Benefit from Free trade agreement
So if one of them break the relations doesn't hold anymore.
Elimination:
A) One word off - It will remain competitive in general. We can't actually know if it will remain competitive Globally becuase in the relations part they omitted it. - Eliminate.
B) One word off - Same as Answer choice A, We can't actually know if it will remain competitive Globally because of the omitting the "globally" word. - Eliminate.
C) Correct - Recession (synonym of Insufficient investment) tells us there will not be enough money to invest in and then the all relations break.
D) OutofScope - We don't know that. the argument didn't talk about that. - Eliminate.
E) OutofScope - We don't know that. the argument didn't talk about that. - Eliminate.
THE END
I hope you liked the explanation, I have tried my best here.
Let me know if you have any questions about this question or my explanation.
16 Jul 2024, 13:50
Kudos
Bookmarks
Bunuel
Economist assets - a free trade agreement will benefit country A's automobile industry as long as industry remains competitive globally
that industry will remain competitive as long as it continues to innovate
that it will continue to innovate as long as it receives sufficient investment
Inference question:
(A) If the automobile industry in Country A receives sufficient investment, it will remain competitive globally.
-- If automobile industry receives sufficient investment, industry will remain competitive globally is a derived inference and looks good.
(B) If the automobile industry in Country A continues to innovate, it will benefit from the free trade agreement.
--it is a pronoun and refers to automobile industry , industry will benefit from free trade argreement . It twists the statement and hence out
(C) If there is a global recession, the automobile industry in Country A will cease to innovate.
--we are not told anyway how recession will impact, so out
(D) The automobile industry in Country A will receive sufficient investment indefinitely.
-- argument does not say industry will receive indefinitely so out
(E) Country A's economy will become the most dominant in the automobile sector globally.
-- nothing in argument infers that A's economy will become most dominant ...it just say free trade will benefit A's automobile industry. Hence out
A is the answer
Shwarma
Joined: 10 Sep 2023
Last visit: 25 May 2025
Posts: 173
Given Kudos: 65
Location: India
Schools: Tepper '27 Ross '27 Foster '27 Kellogg
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q82 V83 DI84 
GPA: 4
Products:
16 Jul 2024, 13:59
Kudos
Bookmarks
Option B
Clearly, the only two close options are A and B
I eliminated A
coz - If the automobile industry in Country A receives sufficient investment, it will remain competitive globally.
The relationship says --> if investment weel - then innovate -- then competitive
It will be competitive globally ONLY if there is free trade, which cannot be inferred from the logical relationship.
Which is why I eliminated it
Clearly, the only two close options are A and B
I eliminated A
coz - If the automobile industry in Country A receives sufficient investment, it will remain competitive globally.
The relationship says --> if investment weel - then innovate -- then competitive
It will be competitive globally ONLY if there is free trade, which cannot be inferred from the logical relationship.
Which is why I eliminated it
