Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 20:06 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 20:06
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
parag08
Joined: 02 Sep 2018
Last visit: 23 Sep 2025
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V85 DI82
GPA: 3.3
WE:General Management (Computer Software)
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q87 V85 DI82
Posts: 25
Kudos: 32
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
1111fate
Joined: 19 Oct 2021
Last visit: 16 Nov 2025
Posts: 81
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 688
Location: India
Posts: 81
Kudos: 63
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
MT___
Joined: 31 Oct 2023
Last visit: 26 Jan 2025
Posts: 29
Own Kudos:
20
 [1]
Given Kudos: 241
Posts: 29
Kudos: 20
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
anish0953
Joined: 20 May 2024
Last visit: 13 Mar 2025
Posts: 86
Own Kudos:
49
 [1]
Given Kudos: 103
Location: United Kingdom
Concentration: Leadership, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 9.2
WE:Business Development (Finance)
Products:
Posts: 86
Kudos: 49
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
An economist asserts that a free trade agreement will benefit Country A's automobile industry as long as the industry remains competitive globally; that the industry will remain competitive as long as it continues to innovate; and that it will continue to innovate as long as it receives sufficient investment.

If the assertions above are correct, which of the following further predictions can logically be derived from them?

(A) If the automobile industry in Country A does not receive sufficient investment, it will not continue to innovate.
(B) If the automobile industry in Country A continues to innovate, it will benefit from the free trade agreement.
(C) If there is a global recession, the automobile industry in Country A will cease to innovate.
(D) The automobile industry in Country A will receive sufficient investment indefinitely.
(E) Country A's economy will become the most dominant in the automobile sector globally.

Question updated at 19:00 on July 16 as the difference between 2 answer choices was too subtle

­
 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

­
­To derive a logical prediction from the economist's assertions, we need to follow the chain of conditions provided:

1. The automobile industry will benefit from the free trade agreement as long as it remains competitive globally.
2. The industry will remain competitive globally as long as it continues to innovate.
3. The industry will continue to innovate as long as it receives sufficient investment.

Let's break down each answer choice in the context of these assertions:

(A) **If the automobile industry in Country A receives sufficient investment, it will remain competitive globally.**

- This follows logically from the chain of assertions. Sufficient investment leads to innovation, which in turn ensures global competitiveness. This statement is correct based on the given conditions.

(B) **If the automobile industry in Country A continues to innovate, it will benefit from the free trade agreement.**

- This is also logically consistent. Innovation leads to competitiveness, which in turn leads to benefiting from the free trade agreement. This statement is correct based on the given conditions.

(C) **If there is a global recession, the automobile industry in Country A will cease to innovate.**

- The economist's assertions do not provide any information about the impact of a global recession on innovation. This statement cannot be logically derived from the given information.

(D) **The automobile industry in Country A will receive sufficient investment indefinitely.**

- The assertions do not guarantee indefinite investment. They only state that sufficient investment is necessary for innovation. This statement cannot be logically derived from the given information.

(E) **Country A's economy will become the most dominant in the automobile sector globally.**

- The assertions discuss maintaining competitiveness and benefiting from a free trade agreement but do not make any claims about becoming the most dominant globally. This statement cannot be logically derived from the given information.

Given the analysis, both (A) and (B) are logically derived from the assertions. However, the most direct prediction that follows from the chain of conditions is (A):

**(A) If the automobile industry in Country A receives sufficient investment, it will remain competitive globally.**­
User avatar
Akkiiii
Joined: 01 May 2022
Last visit: 16 Nov 2025
Posts: 109
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 855
Location: India
GPA: 4
Products:
Posts: 109
Kudos: 63
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
An economist asserts that a free trade agreement will benefit Country A's automobile industry as long as the industry remains competitive globally; that the industry will remain competitive as long as it continues to innovate; and that it will continue to innovate as long as it receives sufficient investment.

If the assertions above are correct, which of the following further predictions can logically be derived from them?

(A) If the automobile industry in Country A does not receive sufficient investment, it will not continue to innovate.
(B) If the automobile industry in Country A continues to innovate, it will benefit from the free trade agreement.
(C) If there is a global recession, the automobile industry in Country A will cease to innovate.
(D) The automobile industry in Country A will receive sufficient investment indefinitely.
(E) Country A's economy will become the most dominant in the automobile sector globally.

Question updated at 19:00 on July 16 as the difference between 2 answer choices was too subtle

­
 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

­


(A) If the automobile industry in Country A does not receive sufficient investment, it will not continue to innovate.
  
  If there is not enough investment, the industry won't have the resources needed for innovation.

(B) If the automobile industry in Country A continues to innovate, it will benefit from the free trade agreement.
  
  This does not necessarily follow from the logical chain mentioned above. 

(C) If there is a global recession, the automobile industry in Country A will cease to innovate.
  
  This does not directly link global economic conditions like recessions to the industry's innovation.

(D) The automobile industry in Country A will receive sufficient investment indefinitely.
  
  We cannot randomly assume this.

(E) Country A's economy will become the most dominant in the automobile sector globally.
  
  There is no direct link between the argument and this prediction. 


Option (A) logically follows from the economist's assertions about the conditions necessary for the automobile industry in Country A to remain competitive and innovate. 
User avatar
HarshaBujji
Joined: 29 Jun 2020
Last visit: 16 Nov 2025
Posts: 695
Own Kudos:
885
 [1]
Given Kudos: 247
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 695
Kudos: 885
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
An economist asserts that a free trade agreement will benefit Country A's automobile industry as long as the industry remains competitive globally; that the industry will remain competitive as long as it continues to innovate; and that it will continue to innovate as long as it receives sufficient investment.

If the assertions above are correct, which of the following further predictions can logically be derived from them?

(A) If the automobile industry in Country A does not receive sufficient investment, it will not continue to innovate.
(B) If the automobile industry in Country A continues to innovate, it will benefit from the free trade agreement.
(C) If there is a global recession, the automobile industry in Country A will cease to innovate.
(D) The automobile industry in Country A will receive sufficient investment indefinitely.
(E) Country A's economy will become the most dominant in the automobile sector globally.

Question updated at 19:00 on July 16 as the difference between 2 answer choices was too subtle

­
 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

­
All these are Cause Effect pairs.

FTA+ <---- Comptition <---- Innovation <----Invesments.

­

(A) If the automobile industry in Country A does not receive sufficient investment, it will not continue to innovate. Visiversa is not stated in the passage. There can be other factors that can lead to Innovation. 
(B) If the automobile industry in Country A continues to innovate, it will benefit from the free trade agreement.
If innovation --> Compition -->FTA+ , Hmm exactly that's what been asked for.
(C) If there is a global recession, the automobile industry in Country A will cease to innovate. OFS. 
(D) The automobile industry in Country A will receive sufficient investment indefinitely. Not sure, Can't be inferred. 
(E) Country A's economy will become the most dominant in the automobile sector globally.Not sure, Can't be inferred. 

Hence B is the best choice. 
IMO B
User avatar
LUBABAYIMER
Joined: 01 Jul 2024
Last visit: 23 Sep 2024
Posts: 54
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 54
Kudos: 16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) If the automobile industry in Country A does not receive sufficient investment, it will not continue to innovate.
The answer is A because if the industry receives enough investment, it will continue to innovate, and if it continues to innovate, it will remain competitive.
(B) If the automobile industry in Country A continues to innovate, it will benefit from the free trade agreement.
Sufficient investment must be found to continue innovation

(C) If there is a global recession, the automobile industry in Country A will cease to innovate.
The forecast is not about the international economy, but about the competitiveness of country A

(D) The automobile industry in Country A will receive sufficient investment indefinitely.
This is not related to the prediction at all

(E) Country A's economy will become the most dominant in the automobile sector globally.
This idea is not reasonable
therefore the answer is A
User avatar
prantorboni
Joined: 28 Nov 2020
Last visit: 03 Nov 2025
Posts: 147
Own Kudos:
150
 [1]
Given Kudos: 221
Products:
Posts: 147
Kudos: 150
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
­An economist asserts that a free trade agreement will benefit Country A's automobile industry as long as the industry remains competitive globally; that the industry will remain competitive as long as it continues to innovate; and that it will continue to innovate as long as it receives sufficient investment.

Reasoning: Innovation requires sufficient investment-competitiveness requires innovation and to gain benefit from competitiveness requires free trade agreement which actually aligns with answer choice B. 

We can eliminate the option A based on the fact that automobile industry will still continue to innovate without sufficient investment but the frequency of innovation will decrease which will challenge its competitiveness.

Answer: B. 
User avatar
CKHE
Joined: 11 Mar 2019
Last visit: 02 Jan 2025
Posts: 83
Own Kudos:
83
 [1]
Given Kudos: 199
Location: India
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V36
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V36
Posts: 83
Kudos: 83
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Summary: Sufficient investments in auto industry-> Innovation -> Competitive positioning globally -> benefits from free trade

If the assertions above are correct, which of the following further predictions can logically be derived from them?

(A) If the automobile industry in Country A does not receive sufficient investment, it will not continue to innovate. - The argument doesn't support this If A then B implies if not B then not A i.e if no innovation then not sufficient investment
(B) If the automobile industry in Country A continues to innovate, it will benefit from the free trade agreement.: Correct: If Country A continues to innovate the it remains competitive and if it remains competitive it will benefit from FTA
(C) If there is a global recession, the automobile industry in Country A will cease to innovate.: Out of scope
(D) The automobile industry in Country A will receive sufficient investment indefinitely.: Period of funding Can't be inferred
(E) Country A's economy will become the most dominant in the automobile sector globally. Market position can't be inferred

 
avatar
bronaugust
Joined: 06 Jun 2024
Last visit: 29 Aug 2024
Posts: 233
Own Kudos:
315
 [1]
Given Kudos: 33
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 233
Kudos: 315
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
An economist asserts that a free trade agreement will benefit Country A's automobile industry as long as the industry remains competitive globally; that the industry will remain competitive as long as it continues to innovate; and that it will continue to innovate as long as it receives sufficient investment.

If the assertions above are correct, which of the following further predictions can logically be derived from them?

(A) If the automobile industry in Country A does not receive sufficient investment, it will not continue to innovate.
(B) If the automobile industry in Country A continues to innovate, it will benefit from the free trade agreement.
(C) If there is a global recession, the automobile industry in Country A will cease to innovate.
(D) The automobile industry in Country A will receive sufficient investment indefinitely.
(E) Country A's economy will become the most dominant in the automobile sector globally.

Question updated at 19:00 on July 16 as the difference between 2 answer choices was too subtle

­
 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

­





 
Again, am I the only one sensing ambiguity in this question? Are there others who find this question (and especially the answer options) ambiguous as well?
User avatar
sayan640
Joined: 29 Oct 2015
Last visit: 10 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,180
Own Kudos:
813
 [1]
Given Kudos: 783
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V28
Products:
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V28
Posts: 1,180
Kudos: 813
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
An economist asserts that a free trade agreement will benefit Country A's automobile industry as long as the industry remains competitive globally; that the industry will remain competitive as long as it continues to innovate; and that it will continue to innovate as long as it receives sufficient investment.

If the assertions above are correct, which of the following further predictions can logically be derived from them?

(A) If the automobile industry in Country A does not receive sufficient investment, it will not continue to innovate.
(B) If the automobile industry in Country A continues to innovate, it will benefit from the free trade agreement.
(C) If there is a global recession, the automobile industry in Country A will cease to innovate.
(D) The automobile industry in Country A will receive sufficient investment indefinitely.
(E) Country A's economy will become the most dominant in the automobile sector globally.

B is my answer. The continuity is not taken care of by A.
C , D and E are irrelevant and can be rejected.
User avatar
Catman
Joined: 03 Aug 2017
Last visit: 12 Feb 2025
Posts: 320
Own Kudos:
328
 [1]
Given Kudos: 219
Products:
Posts: 320
Kudos: 328
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
As long as it receives sufficient investment - > As long as it continues to innovate-> As long as the industry remains competitive globally -> a free trade agreement will benefit Country A

If X, than Y
1. Not X, does not imply not Y.
2. X implies Y.

A) If the automobile industry in Country A does not receive sufficient investment, it will not continue to innovate.
Not X, does not imply not Y.

(B) If the automobile industry in Country A continues to innovate, it will benefit from the free trade agreement.
X implies Y. True.

(C) If there is a global recession, the automobile industry in Country A will cease to innovate.
Global recession condition is not given, we cannot infer anything based on this.

(D) The automobile industry in Country A will receive sufficient investment indefinitely.
We don't know that the automobile industry in Country A will receive sufficient investment indefinitely.  

(E) Country A's economy will become the most dominant in the automobile sector globally.­
We cannot conclude that the country will become the most dominant   in the automobile sector globally.­

IMO B.­
User avatar
Milkyway_28
Joined: 23 May 2024
Last visit: 19 Apr 2025
Posts: 50
Own Kudos:
56
 [1]
Given Kudos: 71
Location: Kazakhstan
Posts: 50
Kudos: 56
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
For this question, it really comes down to two answer choices. A or B. The difficulty here is how to distinguish between the two since they both are quite similar at first glance. 

They both follow the general sequence of things that were described in the question, so how can we distinguish between the two. Well a technique that can be used is to negate them both. Rather than look at the answer choices as "if this, happens then this will happen", reverse the wording so that it sounds like "if this doesn't happen, then this will not happen". Let's do this for these answer choices.

(A) "If the automobile industry in Country A does not receive sufficient investment, it will not continue to innovate"

Let's negate this. "The automobile industry in Country A will only innovate if it receives sufficient investment"

(B) "If the automobile industry in Country A continues to innovate, it will benefit from the free trade agreement"

"If the automobile industry does not continue to innovate, it will not benefit from the free trade agreement"

From the two negations, B seems to be undermined the most and therefore Answer is B.
Bunuel
An economist asserts that a free trade agreement will benefit Country A's automobile industry as long as the industry remains competitive globally; that the industry will remain competitive as long as it continues to innovate; and that it will continue to innovate as long as it receives sufficient investment.

If the assertions above are correct, which of the following further predictions can logically be derived from them?

(A) If the automobile industry in Country A does not receive sufficient investment, it will not continue to innovate.
(B) If the automobile industry in Country A continues to innovate, it will benefit from the free trade agreement.
(C) If there is a global recession, the automobile industry in Country A will cease to innovate.
(D) The automobile industry in Country A will receive sufficient investment indefinitely.
(E) Country A's economy will become the most dominant in the automobile sector globally.

Question updated at 19:00 on July 16 as the difference between 2 answer choices was too subtle

­
 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

­
­
User avatar
CKHE
Joined: 11 Mar 2019
Last visit: 02 Jan 2025
Posts: 83
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 199
Location: India
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V36
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V36
Posts: 83
Kudos: 83
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi bb

I haven't received kudos for this explanation. Kindly let me know what could I have done better.


Thanks


CKHE
Summary: Sufficient investments in auto industry-> Innovation -> Competitive positioning globally -> benefits from free trade

If the assertions above are correct, which of the following further predictions can logically be derived from them?

(A) If the automobile industry in Country A does not receive sufficient investment, it will not continue to innovate. - The argument doesn't support this If A then B implies if not B then not A i.e if no innovation then not sufficient investment
(B) If the automobile industry in Country A continues to innovate, it will benefit from the free trade agreement.: Correct: If Country A continues to innovate the it remains competitive and if it remains competitive it will benefit from FTA
(C) If there is a global recession, the automobile industry in Country A will cease to innovate.: Out of scope
(D) The automobile industry in Country A will receive sufficient investment indefinitely.: Period of funding Can't be inferred
(E) Country A's economy will become the most dominant in the automobile sector globally. Market position can't be inferred

 

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
bb
User avatar
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 42,384
Own Kudos:
82,110
 [1]
Given Kudos: 24,105
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 42,384
Kudos: 82,110
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
CKHE
Hi bb

I haven't received kudos for this explanation. Kindly let me know what could I have done better.


Thanks


CKHE
Summary: Sufficient investments in auto industry-> Innovation -> Competitive positioning globally -> benefits from free trade

If the assertions above are correct, which of the following further predictions can logically be derived from them?

(A) If the automobile industry in Country A does not receive sufficient investment, it will not continue to innovate. - The argument doesn't support this If A then B implies if not B then not A i.e if no innovation then not sufficient investment
(B) If the automobile industry in Country A continues to innovate, it will benefit from the free trade agreement.: Correct: If Country A continues to innovate the it remains competitive and if it remains competitive it will benefit from FTA
(C) If there is a global recession, the automobile industry in Country A will cease to innovate.: Out of scope
(D) The automobile industry in Country A will receive sufficient investment indefinitely.: Period of funding Can't be inferred
(E) Country A's economy will become the most dominant in the automobile sector globally. Market position can't be inferred


 
Posted from my mobile device
­
Hi. I was still in the process of checking and awarding Kudos - done.
P.S. Sometimes (most of the times), I am not quite done until a few mins AFTER 7 AM PST, so please do not modify your answers and give me 10 mins to complete the Kudos. 
Points will be awarded in about 7 mins at 7:15.
User avatar
CKHE
Joined: 11 Mar 2019
Last visit: 02 Jan 2025
Posts: 83
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 199
Location: India
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V36
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V36
Posts: 83
Kudos: 83
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bb
CKHE
Hi bb

I haven't received kudos for this explanation. Kindly let me know what could I have done better.


Thanks


CKHE
Summary: Sufficient investments in auto industry-> Innovation -> Competitive positioning globally -> benefits from free trade

If the assertions above are correct, which of the following further predictions can logically be derived from them?

(A) If the automobile industry in Country A does not receive sufficient investment, it will not continue to innovate. - The argument doesn't support this If A then B implies if not B then not A i.e if no innovation then not sufficient investment
(B) If the automobile industry in Country A continues to innovate, it will benefit from the free trade agreement.: Correct: If Country A continues to innovate the it remains competitive and if it remains competitive it will benefit from FTA
(C) If there is a global recession, the automobile industry in Country A will cease to innovate.: Out of scope
(D) The automobile industry in Country A will receive sufficient investment indefinitely.: Period of funding Can't be inferred
(E) Country A's economy will become the most dominant in the automobile sector globally. Market position can't be inferred


 
Posted from my mobile device
­
Hi. I was still in the process of checking and awarding Kudos - done.
P.S. Sometimes (most of the times), I am not quite done until a few mins AFTER 7 AM PST, so please do not modify your answers and give me 10 mins to complete the Kudos. 
Points will be awarded in about 7 mins at 7:15.

Thank you for the prompt response. Sorry for the rush.

Thanks.
User avatar
bb
User avatar
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 42,384
Own Kudos:
82,110
 [1]
Given Kudos: 24,105
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 42,384
Kudos: 82,110
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
b_sudharsan

Bunuel
An economist asserts that a free trade agreement will benefit Country A's automobile industry as long as the industry remains competitive globally; that the industry will remain competitive as long as it continues to innovate; and that it will continue to innovate as long as it receives sufficient investment.

If the assertions above are correct, which of the following further predictions can logically be derived from them?

(A) If the automobile industry in Country A does not receive sufficient investment, it will not continue to innovate.
(B) If the automobile industry in Country A continues to innovate, it will benefit from the free trade agreement.
(C) If there is a global recession, the automobile industry in Country A will cease to innovate.
(D) The automobile industry in Country A will receive sufficient investment indefinitely.
(E) Country A's economy will become the most dominant in the automobile sector globally.

Question updated at 19:00 on July 16 as the difference between 2 answer choices was too subtle

­
 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

­






 
Again, am I the only one sensing ambiguity in this question? Are there others who find this question (and especially the answer options) ambiguous as well?
­Hi b_sudharsan and welcome to GMAT Club! Great to have you and great to have people poking holes in arguments. Welcome feedback about the question. 
I felt that the current choices while presenting tempting options between A and B, to make the question more challenging, should still have one clear answer with 4 incorrect answers. 
You don't feel A is incorrect enough?

We know that if there is enough investment, the industry will continue to innovate. Guaranteed
If there is NOT enough investment, the next step is not that the industry is guaranteed to not innovate, the options could be not innovate but it could also be innovate or innovate partially, we just know that it is not guaranteed without investment. I agree that A could be made more clear by using a very hard qualifier such as "always" but I feel that would give it away quite easily 🤷‍♂️­
avatar
bronaugust
Joined: 06 Jun 2024
Last visit: 29 Aug 2024
Posts: 233
Own Kudos:
315
 [1]
Given Kudos: 33
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 233
Kudos: 315
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
bb

b_sudharsan

Bunuel
An economist asserts that a free trade agreement will benefit Country A's automobile industry as long as the industry remains competitive globally; that the industry will remain competitive as long as it continues to innovate; and that it will continue to innovate as long as it receives sufficient investment.

If the assertions above are correct, which of the following further predictions can logically be derived from them?

(A) If the automobile industry in Country A does not receive sufficient investment, it will not continue to innovate.
(B) If the automobile industry in Country A continues to innovate, it will benefit from the free trade agreement.
(C) If there is a global recession, the automobile industry in Country A will cease to innovate.
(D) The automobile industry in Country A will receive sufficient investment indefinitely.
(E) Country A's economy will become the most dominant in the automobile sector globally.

Question updated at 19:00 on July 16 as the difference between 2 answer choices was too subtle

­
 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

­








 
Again, am I the only one sensing ambiguity in this question? Are there others who find this question (and especially the answer options) ambiguous as well?
­Hi b_sudharsan and welcome to GMAT Club! Great to have you and great to have people poking holes in arguments. Welcome feedback about the question. 
I felt that the current choices while presenting tempting options between A and B, to make the question more challenging, should still have one clear answer with 4 incorrect answers. 
You don't feel A is incorrect enough?

We know that if there is enough investment, the industry will continue to innovate. Guaranteed
If there is NOT enough investment, the next step is not that the industry is guaranteed to not innovate, the options could be not innovate but it could also be innovate or innovate partially, we just know that it is not guaranteed without investment. I agree that A could be made more clear by using a very hard qualifier such as "always" but I feel that would give it away quite easily 🤷‍♂️­
­Hi, bb! 

It is a pleasure connecting with you! You are doing a stupendous job, and I heart GMAT Club. Totally! No second thoughts on that! 

I understand (B) makes complete sense. However, let me draw an analogy here.

If you told me, 'I will allow you to post as long as you follow the rules', would it be incorrect for me to logically infer, 'If I do not follow the rules, I will not be allowed to post.'?

'As long as' could mean 'on the condition that'. Of course, there is no question of partially posting or posting if I end up breaking the rules.

Getting back to the passage at hand, if the industry will continue to innovate on the condition that (as long as) it receives sufficient investment, obviously, if the condition is not met, the industry will/can not keep its side of the bargain, meaning it will/can not continue to innovate. This, therefore, becomes a logical inference. Partial innovation is still innovation, is it not?

But then again, I understand your point of making the answer options challenging. I should be elated if you identified a flaw in my argument (no pun intended)! :) 

I appreciate your response nonetheless.­
User avatar
bb
User avatar
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 42,384
Own Kudos:
82,110
 [1]
Given Kudos: 24,105
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 42,384
Kudos: 82,110
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
First of all thank you for following the rules 😂❤️👍

I will get a second opinion on this question from someone who is neutral to see if this question is indeed within the logic and if the answers are fair as I am biased at this point 😞

Posted from my mobile device
avatar
bronaugust
Joined: 06 Jun 2024
Last visit: 29 Aug 2024
Posts: 233
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 33
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 233
Kudos: 315
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bb
First of all thank you for following the rules 😂❤️👍

I will get a second opinion on this question from someone who is neutral to see if this question is indeed within the logic and if the answers are fair as I am biased at this point 😞

Posted from my mobile device
­Thank you for being amazing! :) Wish you a wonderful day ahead! 
   1   2   3   4   5   6   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts