Bunuel
An economist asserts that a free trade agreement will benefit Country A's automobile industry as long as the industry remains competitive globally; that the industry will remain competitive as long as it continues to innovate; and that it will continue to innovate as long as it receives sufficient investment.
If the assertions above are correct, which of the following further predictions can logically be derived from them?
(A) If the automobile industry in Country A does not receive sufficient investment, it will not continue to innovate.
(B) If the automobile industry in Country A continues to innovate, it will benefit from the free trade agreement.
(C) If there is a global recession, the automobile industry in Country A will cease to innovate.
(D) The automobile industry in Country A will receive sufficient investment indefinitely.
(E) Country A's economy will become the most dominant in the automobile sector globally.
Question updated at 19:00 on July 16 as the difference between 2 answer choices was too subtle
To derive a logical prediction from the economist's assertions, we need to follow the chain of conditions provided:
1. The automobile industry will benefit from the free trade agreement as long as it remains competitive globally.
2. The industry will remain competitive globally as long as it continues to innovate.
3. The industry will continue to innovate as long as it receives sufficient investment.
Let's break down each answer choice in the context of these assertions:
(A) **If the automobile industry in Country A receives sufficient investment, it will remain competitive globally.**
- This follows logically from the chain of assertions. Sufficient investment leads to innovation, which in turn ensures global competitiveness. This statement is correct based on the given conditions.
(B) **If the automobile industry in Country A continues to innovate, it will benefit from the free trade agreement.**
- This is also logically consistent. Innovation leads to competitiveness, which in turn leads to benefiting from the free trade agreement. This statement is correct based on the given conditions.
(C) **If there is a global recession, the automobile industry in Country A will cease to innovate.**
- The economist's assertions do not provide any information about the impact of a global recession on innovation. This statement cannot be logically derived from the given information.
(D) **The automobile industry in Country A will receive sufficient investment indefinitely.**
- The assertions do not guarantee indefinite investment. They only state that sufficient investment is necessary for innovation. This statement cannot be logically derived from the given information.
(E) **Country A's economy will become the most dominant in the automobile sector globally.**
- The assertions discuss maintaining competitiveness and benefiting from a free trade agreement but do not make any claims about becoming the most dominant globally. This statement cannot be logically derived from the given information.
Given the analysis, both (A) and (B) are logically derived from the assertions. However, the most direct prediction that follows from the chain of conditions is (A):
**(A) If the automobile industry in Country A receives sufficient investment, it will remain competitive globally.**