Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 17:57 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 17:57
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
UfuomaOh
Joined: 14 Sep 2023
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 83
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
Products:
Posts: 83
Kudos: 50
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
A_Nishith
Joined: 29 Aug 2023
Last visit: 12 Nov 2025
Posts: 455
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 16
Posts: 455
Kudos: 199
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Lemniscate
Joined: 28 Jun 2025
Last visit: 09 Nov 2025
Posts: 80
Own Kudos:
Posts: 80
Kudos: 72
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
HK12!
Joined: 04 Jul 2023
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 27
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 18
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Sustainability
GMAT 1: 370 Q31 V12
GPA: 4
WE:Marketing (Other)
Products:
GMAT 1: 370 Q31 V12
Posts: 27
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
  • The first boldface is a recommendation about flexible scheduling to increase productivity, based on the goal of productivity.
  • The second boldface challenges that recommendation, showing that in team-based environments, fixed schedules may actually be better.
A. The first states a recommendation based on a widely accepted goal; the second presents a consideration that qualifies that recommendation.

And thus option A correctly states the same thing.
User avatar
jkkamau
Joined: 25 May 2020
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 132
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 122
Location: Kenya
Schools: Haas '25
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V46
GPA: 3.5
Products:
Schools: Haas '25
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V46
Posts: 132
Kudos: 107
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
1st boldface is a recommendation based on the productivity goal
2nd boldface challenges or qualifies the recommendation by introducing a unique exception
A. The first states a recommendation based on a widely accepted goal; the second presents a consideration that qualifies that recommendation. - Correct
B. The first expresses a general claim supported by some experts; the second presents the main conclusion of the argument. First is not a general claim
C. The first presents a popular approach that the argument seeks to defend; the second provides evidence in support of that approach. Second is not an evidence to support the recommendation but to challenge it
D. The first identifies a goal and a strategy for achieving it; the second challenges the validity of that goal. First is not a general strategy but a recommendation
E. The first presents a conclusion that the argument later supports with evidence; the second is a prediction based on that conclusion. The first is not a conclusion
Bunuel
Flexible scheduling allows employees to choose their work hours within certain limits and is widely believed to increase productivity. Some consultants argue that because a company’s goal is to maximize productivity, it should implement flexible schedules whenever possible. However, this recommendation may not always serve that goal. Companies that depend on close coordination among team members often require synchronized work hours to function efficiently. Without that, delays and communication breakdowns can occur, undermining team effectiveness. Therefore, the very goal of maximizing productivity may, in some cases, best be served by maintaining fixed work schedules.

In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A. The first states a recommendation based on a widely accepted goal; the second presents a consideration that qualifies that recommendation.
B. The first expresses a general claim supported by some experts; the second presents the main conclusion of the argument.
C. The first presents a popular approach that the argument seeks to defend; the second provides evidence in support of that approach.
D. The first identifies a goal and a strategy for achieving it; the second challenges the validity of that goal.
E. The first presents a conclusion that the argument later supports with evidence; the second is a prediction based on that conclusion.

 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

User avatar
GarvitGoel
Joined: 06 Aug 2024
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 69
Own Kudos:
Posts: 69
Kudos: 54
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Option A is the correct answer.

Before diving into the options let's understand the question first.

So the questions starts by telling us that by telling us a commonly believed information i.e. "Flexible scheduling allows employees to choose their work hours within certain limits and is widely believed to increase productivity". Then it tells us that some consultants also believe that as the company's purpose is to maximize the productivity it should also adopt for 'Flexible scheduling'. Then the passage tells us that the commonly believed information regarding the 'Flexible scheduling' is not always true and in the next line tells the the grounds on which it believes that 'Flexible scheduling is not always true' i.e. "Companies that depend on close coordination among team members often require synchronized work hours to function efficiently. Without that, delays and communication breakdowns can occur, undermining team effectiveness". Then ends the passage by saying "Therefore, the very goal of maximizing productivity may, in some cases, best be served by maintaining fixed work schedules".

Option A: "The first states a recommendation based on a widely accepted goal; the second presents a consideration that qualifies that recommendation". It exactly fits the bill as the first is the widely accepted recommendation and the second provides the additional information for that. Selected

Option B: "The first expresses a general claim supported by some experts; the second presents the main conclusion of the argument". It starts with right words but the information it says is too general to be true on which basis we can eliminate it

Option C: "The first presents a popular approach that the argument seeks to defend; the second provides evidence in support of that approach". The options starts with right information that first boldfaced present a popular approach but then it says that the argument depends that option which is wrong as the information mention after the first boldface till the end of the argument it shows the short coming of the approach. ELIMINATED

Option D: "The first identifies a goal and a strategy for achieving it; the second challenges the validity of that goal". It says that the first boldfaced identifies the goal and suggests the strategy for achieving it. This is incorrect as the first boldfaced is the conclusion which is incorrect as per the information as the first boldfaced provides a generally accepted results or information regarding 'Flexible scheduling'. Eliminated

Option E: "The first presents a conclusion that the argument later supports with evidence; the second is a prediction based on that conclusion". After reading the first few words of this option we can easy eliminate it because it states that the first boldfaced is the conclusion which is incorrect as per the information as the first boldfaced provides a generally accepted results or information regarding 'Flexible scheduling'. Eliminated


Bunuel
Flexible scheduling allows employees to choose their work hours within certain limits and is widely believed to increase productivity. Some consultants argue that because a company’s goal is to maximize productivity, it should implement flexible schedules whenever possible. However, this recommendation may not always serve that goal. Companies that depend on close coordination among team members often require synchronized work hours to function efficiently. Without that, delays and communication breakdowns can occur, undermining team effectiveness. Therefore, the very goal of maximizing productivity may, in some cases, best be served by maintaining fixed work schedules.

In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A. The first states a recommendation based on a widely accepted goal; the second presents a consideration that qualifies that recommendation.
B. The first expresses a general claim supported by some experts; the second presents the main conclusion of the argument.
C. The first presents a popular approach that the argument seeks to defend; the second provides evidence in support of that approach.
D. The first identifies a goal and a strategy for achieving it; the second challenges the validity of that goal.
E. The first presents a conclusion that the argument later supports with evidence; the second is a prediction based on that conclusion.

 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

User avatar
HK12!
Joined: 04 Jul 2023
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 27
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 18
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Sustainability
GMAT 1: 370 Q31 V12
GPA: 4
WE:Marketing (Other)
Products:
GMAT 1: 370 Q31 V12
Posts: 27
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Agree with your explanation. Also have the point regarding the correct choice option A.
Cana1766
Was confused between A and B.

In A, the first bold face was a recommendation from the consultants, and the second bold face qualifies that recommendation. Qualifies mean limit or make the recommendation more precise. As it says "the very goal of maximizing productivity may, in some cases," this is a qualifier. So this is right.

In B,it says the first bold face is a claim(but it's actually a recommendation). The second bold face is the main conclusion which is true. But science, the firstboldface is wrong. This is not the right anwer.

So the correct answer is A.

Bunuel
Flexible scheduling allows employees to choose their work hours within certain limits and is widely believed to increase productivity. Some consultants argue that because a company’s goal is to maximize productivity, it should implement flexible schedules whenever possible. However, this recommendation may not always serve that goal. Companies that depend on close coordination among team members often require synchronized work hours to function efficiently. Without that, delays and communication breakdowns can occur, undermining team effectiveness. Therefore, the very goal of maximizing productivity may, in some cases, best be served by maintaining fixed work schedules.

In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A. The first states a recommendation based on a widely accepted goal; the second presents a consideration that qualifies that recommendation.
B. The first expresses a general claim supported by some experts; the second presents the main conclusion of the argument.
C. The first presents a popular approach that the argument seeks to defend; the second provides evidence in support of that approach.
D. The first identifies a goal and a strategy for achieving it; the second challenges the validity of that goal.
E. The first presents a conclusion that the argument later supports with evidence; the second is a prediction based on that conclusion.

 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

User avatar
bb
User avatar
Founder
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 42,387
Own Kudos:
82,120
 [2]
Given Kudos: 24,110
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 42,387
Kudos: 82,120
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi hk12! Your reasoning about answer choice (A) hinges on the interpretation of the word "qualifies." You mentioned:

Quote:
Qualifies mean limit or make the recommendation more precise.


However, in GMAT terminology, "qualify" usually means to limit or soften, but not to directly oppose or reject.

Issues with (A):

The first boldface is a recommendation from consultants, and you're correct about that. It suggests companies should implement flexible schedules to maximize productivity.

However, the second boldface does not just soften or slightly limit the recommendation. Instead it says that in some cases doing the exact opposite (maintaining fixed schedules) better serves the goal of productivity. This doesn't refine or narrow the recommendation - this is a complete opposite. The meaning here is important.

if the second statement had said something such as "flexible schedules work well but only when implemented carefully," that would indeed be "qualifying" the first statement. However, it explicitly suggests an entirely opposite approach—fixed schedules instead of flexible ones—in some cases. Thus, this isn't a qualification but a counter-argument.


Regarding (B):
You mentioned you disagree with the use of "general claim" because you believe it's strictly a recommendation. In CR, the distinction between a claim and a recommendation slightly overlap. A recommendation (that one "should" do something) is a type of claim—it's a claim about what ought to be done.

"Some consultants argue that companies should implement flexible schedules" is indeed a general claim made by experts, a claim about what companies ought to do.

Thus, referring to a recommendation as a "general claim supported by some experts" is acceptable and totally OK within GMAT terminology.

Hope this helps clarify.


HK12!
Agree with your explanation. Also have the point regarding the correct choice option A.
Cana1766
Was confused between A and B.

In A, the first bold face was a recommendation from the consultants, and the second bold face qualifies that recommendation. Qualifies mean limit or make the recommendation more precise. As it says "the very goal of maximizing productivity may, in some cases," this is a qualifier. So this is right.

In B,it says the first bold face is a claim(but it's actually a recommendation). The second bold face is the main conclusion which is true. But science, the firstboldface is wrong. This is not the right anwer.

So the correct answer is A.

Bunuel
Flexible scheduling allows employees to choose their work hours within certain limits and is widely believed to increase productivity. Some consultants argue that because a company’s goal is to maximize productivity, it should implement flexible schedules whenever possible. However, this recommendation may not always serve that goal. Companies that depend on close coordination among team members often require synchronized work hours to function efficiently. Without that, delays and communication breakdowns can occur, undermining team effectiveness. Therefore, the very goal of maximizing productivity may, in some cases, best be served by maintaining fixed work schedules.

In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A. The first states a recommendation based on a widely accepted goal; the second presents a consideration that qualifies that recommendation.
B. The first expresses a general claim supported by some experts; the second presents the main conclusion of the argument.
C. The first presents a popular approach that the argument seeks to defend; the second provides evidence in support of that approach.
D. The first identifies a goal and a strategy for achieving it; the second challenges the validity of that goal.
E. The first presents a conclusion that the argument later supports with evidence; the second is a prediction based on that conclusion.

 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

User avatar
SRIVISHUDDHA22
Joined: 08 Jan 2025
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 88
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 278
Location: India
Schools: ISB '26
GPA: 9
Products:
Schools: ISB '26
Posts: 88
Kudos: 55
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Does'nt Qualify means to limit the consideration . The A option says that its not totally negating the first recommendation but suggesting a qualification in form of second recommendation which means considering an adjustment to the first recommendation .A line from paragraph which can corroborate this is " However, this recommendation may not always serve that goal" meaning in some case it may serve the goal but second recommendation shows a better alternative. Could you please through some light on options A & B in this context??

Thanks
Sri
Bunuel
Bunuel
Flexible scheduling allows employees to choose their work hours within certain limits and is widely believed to increase productivity. Some consultants argue that because a company’s goal is to maximize productivity, it should implement flexible schedules whenever possible. However, this recommendation may not always serve that goal. Companies that depend on close coordination among team members often require synchronized work hours to function efficiently. Without that, delays and communication breakdowns can occur, undermining team effectiveness. Therefore, the very goal of maximizing productivity may, in some cases, best be served by maintaining fixed work schedules.

In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A. The first states a recommendation based on a widely accepted goal; the second presents a consideration that qualifies that recommendation.
B. The first expresses a general claim supported by some experts; the second presents the main conclusion of the argument.
C. The first presents a popular approach that the argument seeks to defend; the second provides evidence in support of that approach.
D. The first identifies a goal and a strategy for achieving it; the second challenges the validity of that goal.
E. The first presents a conclusion that the argument later supports with evidence; the second is a prediction based on that conclusion.

­

GMAT Club Official Explanation:



The argument begins by presenting the view of some consultants who claim that flexible schedules should be used to maximize productivity. The author then challenges that recommendation, arguing that fixed schedules may better serve the same goal under certain circumstances. The first boldface is a general position offered by others, and the second boldface is the author’s main conclusion.

Correct answer: B

Incorrect options:

A. Incorrect. The second statement is not a qualification of the recommendation but a directly opposing conclusion.
C. Incorrect. The argument does not defend the first position, and the second statement is not evidence in support of it.
D. Incorrect. The first is a method proposed to achieve a goal, not the goal itself, and the second does not challenge the goal but offers a different approach.
E. Incorrect. The first is not a conclusion, and the second is not a prediction but a conclusion based on analysis.
User avatar
Swanoff
Joined: 04 Aug 2021
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
1
 [1]
Given Kudos: 87
Products:
Posts: 13
Kudos: 1
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Second doesn’t qualify the recommendation it is against
Cana1766
Was confused between A and B.

In A, the first bold face was a recommendation from the consultants, and the second bold face qualifies that recommendation. Qualifies mean limit or make the recommendation more precise. As it says "the very goal of maximizing productivity may, in some cases," this is a qualifier. So this is right.

In B,it says the first bold face is a claim(but it's actually a recommendation). The second bold face is the main conclusion which is true. But science, the firstboldface is wrong. This is not the right anwer.

So the correct answer is A.

Bunuel
Flexible scheduling allows employees to choose their work hours within certain limits and is widely believed to increase productivity. Some consultants argue that because a company’s goal is to maximize productivity, it should implement flexible schedules whenever possible. However, this recommendation may not always serve that goal. Companies that depend on close coordination among team members often require synchronized work hours to function efficiently. Without that, delays and communication breakdowns can occur, undermining team effectiveness. Therefore, the very goal of maximizing productivity may, in some cases, best be served by maintaining fixed work schedules.

In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A. The first states a recommendation based on a widely accepted goal; the second presents a consideration that qualifies that recommendation.
B. The first expresses a general claim supported by some experts; the second presents the main conclusion of the argument.
C. The first presents a popular approach that the argument seeks to defend; the second provides evidence in support of that approach.
D. The first identifies a goal and a strategy for achieving it; the second challenges the validity of that goal.
E. The first presents a conclusion that the argument later supports with evidence; the second is a prediction based on that conclusion.

 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

   1   2   3   4   5 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts