Hi
hk12! Your reasoning about answer choice (A) hinges on the interpretation of the word "qualifies." You mentioned:
Quote:
Qualifies mean limit or make the recommendation more precise.
However, in GMAT terminology, "qualify" usually means to limit or soften, but not to directly oppose or reject.
Issues with (A): The first boldface is a recommendation from consultants, and you're correct about that. It suggests companies should implement flexible schedules to maximize productivity.
However, the second boldface does not just soften or slightly limit the recommendation. Instead it says that in some cases doing the exact opposite (maintaining fixed schedules) better serves the goal of productivity. This doesn't refine or narrow the recommendation - this is a complete opposite. The meaning here is important.
if the second statement had said something such as "flexible schedules work well but only when implemented carefully," that would indeed be "qualifying" the first statement. However, it explicitly suggests an entirely opposite approach—fixed schedules instead of flexible ones—in some cases. Thus, this isn't a qualification but a counter-argument.
Regarding (B):You mentioned you disagree with the use of "general claim" because you believe it's strictly a recommendation. In CR, the distinction between a claim and a recommendation slightly overlap. A recommendation (that one "should" do something) is a type of claim—it's a claim about what ought to be done.
"Some consultants argue that companies should implement flexible schedules" is indeed a general claim made by experts, a claim about what companies ought to do.
Thus, referring to a recommendation as a "general claim supported by some experts" is acceptable and totally OK within GMAT terminology.
Hope this helps clarify.
HK12!
Agree with your explanation. Also have the point regarding the correct choice option A.
Cana1766
Was confused between A and B.
In A, the first bold face was a recommendation from the consultants, and the second bold face qualifies that recommendation. Qualifies mean limit or make the recommendation more precise. As it says "the
very goal of maximizing productivity may, in some cases," this is a qualifier. So this is right.
In B,it says the first bold face is a claim(but it's actually a recommendation). The second bold face is the main conclusion which is true. But science, the firstboldface is wrong. This is not the right anwer.
So the correct answer is A.Bunuel
Flexible scheduling allows employees to choose their work hours within certain limits and is widely believed to increase productivity. Some consultants argue that because a company’s goal is to maximize productivity, it should implement flexible schedules whenever possible. However, this recommendation may not always serve that goal. Companies that depend on close coordination among team members often require synchronized work hours to function efficiently. Without that, delays and communication breakdowns can occur, undermining team effectiveness. Therefore, the very goal of maximizing productivity may, in some cases, best be served by maintaining fixed work schedules.In the argument above, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?
A. The first states a recommendation based on a widely accepted goal; the second presents a consideration that qualifies that recommendation.
B. The first expresses a general claim supported by some experts; the second presents the main conclusion of the argument.
C. The first presents a popular approach that the argument seeks to defend; the second provides evidence in support of that approach.
D. The first identifies a goal and a strategy for achieving it; the second challenges the validity of that goal.
E. The first presents a conclusion that the argument later supports with evidence; the second is a prediction based on that conclusion.