I personally do not think ESR's are helpful so I tend to ignore them (due to lack of information/precession, vague categories, not because I don't think it is important to review your tests)... as far as I understand, the ESR only includes stats for the counted (real, non-experimental questions), which makes it pretty vague even about how many questions one took in the first, second, third, or fourth quarter of the test. We don't know if the user got 50% of how many questions right/wrong.
Yes, the person made ONLY 9 mistakes and got a V31. They missed HALF!!!!! of the first 9 questions (whatever the hell that means per ESR). But that's a lot and the second quarter of the questions was pretty easy as we can see from the list. Had they missed them all upfront, they would have gotten V22
https://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-prep-so ... 46146.htmlIn other words, they did not do well. I do not see enough evidence to conclude that a test has become more of anything or less of anything. I just see someone who bombed the test.... missing half of the first quarter of the questions would ding them pretty good, esp if they got them in a row (and again, ESR is not telling us anything about that, which means - the figure is not drawn to scale)
mcelroytutoring
patto
The second one seems to be an old ESR, isnt it? It seems that on the verbal section there are 41 questions
Hi
patto, you are correct that the 2nd ESR I attached (V40) is an older one from the longer, 41-question Verbal section of the GMAT.
However, that fact shouldn't matter for comparison's sake, since even the old GMAT had exactly 30 counted questions on Verbal (the prior version of the exam had 11 experimental questions on Verbal instead of 6).