GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 22 Jan 2019, 02:37

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

## Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in January
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
Open Detailed Calendar
• ### The winners of the GMAT game show

January 22, 2019

January 22, 2019

10:00 PM PST

11:00 PM PST

In case you didn’t notice, we recently held the 1st ever GMAT game show and it was awesome! See who won a full GMAT course, and register to the next one.
• ### Key Strategies to Master GMAT SC

January 26, 2019

January 26, 2019

07:00 AM PST

09:00 AM PST

Attend this webinar to learn how to leverage Meaning and Logic to solve the most challenging Sentence Correction Questions.

# High levels of fertilizer and pesticides, needed when

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 60
High levels of fertilizer and pesticides, needed when  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Mar 2005, 22:50
5
15
00:00

Difficulty:

5% (low)

Question Stats:

81% (01:19) correct 19% (01:32) wrong based on 2154 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

High levels of fertilizer and pesticides, needed when farmers try to produce high yields of the same crop year after year, pollute water supplies. Experts therefore urge farmers to diversify their crops and to rotate their plantings yearly.

To receive governmental price-support benefits for a crop, farmers must have produced that same crop for the past several years.

The statement above, if true, best support which of the following conclusions?

(A) The rules for governmental support of farm prices work against efforts to reduce water pollution.

(B) The only solution to the problem of water pollution from fertilizers and pesticides is to take farmland out of production.

(C) Farmers can continue to make a profit by rotating diverse crops, thus reducing costs for chemicals, but not by planting the same crop each year.

(D) New farming techniques will be developed to make it possible for farmers to reduce the application of fertilizers and pesticides.

(E) Governmental price supports for farm products are set at levels that are not high enough to allow farmers to get out of debt.

Official Guide for GMAT Verbal Review, 2nd Edition

Practice Question
Question No.: CR07847
Page: 142
Difficulty:

_________________

Best regards,

VP
Joined: 30 Sep 2004
Posts: 1425
Location: Germany
Re: High levels of fertilizer and pesticides, needed when  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Mar 2005, 00:46
1
how can you deduce D ? the conclusion bases on the evidence. in the argument there is no hint that new farming techniques will be developed. in fact there are two kinds of evidence that support the conclusion. a important rule is that you sticky close to the argument and that you dont infer or deduce too much.
Manager
Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 60
Re: High levels of fertilizer and pesticides, needed when  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Mar 2005, 21:19
Hello Christoph,
Thank you for your response. I now see why (A) is correct, but let me respond to you the reason why I initially picked up (D).

In order to continue to receive the price-support benefits from the government, you need to keep producing the same crop. However, you will then conflict the water pollution.

Therefore, in order to achive both objectives(receive the governmental price-support & deal with less water pollution), the conclusion I took was to develop new farming techniques which is Choice (D).

What do you think of? Thank you for your kind response.

christoph wrote:
how can you deduce D ? the conclusion bases on the evidence. in the argument there is no hint that new farming techniques will be developed. in fact there are two kinds of evidence that support the conclusion. a important rule is that you sticky close to the argument and that you dont infer or deduce too much.

_________________

Best regards,

Director
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 787
Re: High levels of fertilizer and pesticides, needed when  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Mar 2005, 23:45
but...A also assumes that "several years" would mean..several past continuous years!..but is probably the best of the lot!

(I picked C..but then, there is nothing mentioned abt. revenues etc...as given in the OG explanation..)
Director
Joined: 25 Jan 2004
Posts: 683
Location: Milwaukee
Re: High levels of fertilizer and pesticides, needed when  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Mar 2005, 10:05
1
A: The rules for governmental support of farm prices work against efforts to reduce water pollution.
Correctly concludes based on info given

B: The only solution to the problem of water pollution from fertilizers and pesticides is to take farmland out of production.

only solution is too extreme and is not mentioned in the arguement

C: Farmers can continue to make a profit by rotating diverse crops, thus reducing costs for chemicals, but not by planting the same crop each year.

Infact farmers profit can be reduced because they can no longer plant to get "high yields of the same crop". Hence this is wrong

D: New farming techniques will be developed to make it possible for farmers to reduce the application of fertilizers and pesticides.
- Just a wishful thinking. Wishful thinkings are not allowed in CR

E: Governmental price supports for farm products are set at levels that are not high enough to allow farmers to get out of debt.
There is no mention of farmers debt anywhere. Hence out of context
_________________

Praveen

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 4960
Re: High levels of fertilizer and pesticides, needed when  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Nov 2006, 19:30
Looks like a straightforward (A) here. There is an inherent contradiction in the needs of the farmers and the pollution levels caused by pesticides.
Manager
Joined: 28 Sep 2011
Posts: 137
Re: High levels of fertilizer and pesticides, needed when  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Mar 2012, 14:45
1
I have chosen A for this question:

The passage has 2 paragraphs. The first states the need to diversify crops to reduce water pollution and the second states the rules for government support. The two statements clash because in order to receive government support, the farmers must produce the same crop for several years, but by doing so, there is water pollution.

A. This statement is a combination of both paragraphs and is the correct answer.

B. We don't know that "the only solution..." is true. It could be that there are many different solutions, so this may or may not be true. Therefore, it is incorrect.

C. How can we be sure that farmers will still be making a profit? It could be that the government support is the only thing that allows farmers to profit and without it, they are losing money even if we include the reduction in chemical costs. Therefore, this statement cannot be proven from the passage and is incorrect.

D. This statement brings in outside information - this is incorrect.

E. Again, this statement cannot be proven from the passage. It may or may not be true, therefore this statement is incorrect.
Intern
Joined: 11 Sep 2010
Posts: 19
GMAT 1: 660 Q50 V29
GMAT 2: 710 Q51 V34
GPA: 3.9
WE: Project Management (Computer Software)
Re: High levels of fertilizer and pesticides, needed when  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2012, 03:33
How can the solution be A!!?

The first paragraph says that water pollution occurs when farmers try to produce 'high' yields of crop year after year.
In second paragraph, though the rules for governmental support says farmer must have produced the same crop for several years, they never say farmer must have produced them in high yields!
Putting the two together, the governmental support rules do not work against efforts to reduce water pollution. A farmer can produce same crop, year after year, in normal yields and can get the support benefit without increasing any pollution. Option 'A' doesnt seem correct.

Thanks.
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 05 Jun 2012
Posts: 71
Location: United States
Schools: UCSD (Rady) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.7
WE: Education (Education)
Re: High levels of fertilizer and pesticides, needed when  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2012, 07:50
koolpaari wrote:
How can the solution be A!!?

The first paragraph says that water pollution occurs when farmers try to produce 'high' yields of crop year after year.
In second paragraph, though the rules for governmental support says farmer must have produced the same crop for several years, they never say farmer must have produced them in high yields!
Putting the two together, the governmental support rules do not work against efforts to reduce water pollution. A farmer can produce same crop, year after year, in normal yields and can get the support benefit without increasing any pollution. Option 'A' doesnt seem correct.

Thanks.

Interesting point! However, we also need to consider the second sentence in the context of the first. Let me rephrase the argument:

Experts urge farmers to diversify their crops and to rotate their plantings yearly because some farmers pollute the water when they plant the same crop every year. To receive governmental price-support benefits for a crop, farmers must have produced that same crop for the past several years.

See how I've combined two sentences into one here? Now it's clear why (A) is correct.

The trick I used, though, is that I didn't assume that all farmers try and produce high yield crops. And in fact, we don't need to assume that to arrive at conclusion (A). We just need to assume that some farmers try and produce high yield crops, which I would consider safe even if unstated. The "high yield" stipulation is, therefore, just a distraction.
_________________

Ryan Jacobs | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | San Francisco

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile

Intern
Joined: 11 Sep 2010
Posts: 19
GMAT 1: 660 Q50 V29
GMAT 2: 710 Q51 V34
GPA: 3.9
WE: Project Management (Computer Software)
Re: High levels of fertilizer and pesticides, needed when  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2012, 10:58
rjacobsMGMAT wrote:
koolpaari wrote:
How can the solution be A!!?

The first paragraph says that water pollution occurs when farmers try to produce 'high' yields of crop year after year.
In second paragraph, though the rules for governmental support says farmer must have produced the same crop for several years, they never say farmer must have produced them in high yields!
Putting the two together, the governmental support rules do not work against efforts to reduce water pollution. A farmer can produce same crop, year after year, in normal yields and can get the support benefit without increasing any pollution. Option 'A' doesnt seem correct.

Thanks.

Interesting point! However, we also need to consider the second sentence in the context of the first. Let me rephrase the argument:

Experts urge farmers to diversify their crops and to rotate their plantings yearly because some farmers pollute the water when they plant the same crop every year. To receive governmental price-support benefits for a crop, farmers must have produced that same crop for the past several years.

See how I've combined two sentences into one here? Now it's clear why (A) is correct.

The trick I used, though, is that I didn't assume that all farmers try and produce high yield crops. And in fact, we don't need to assume that to arrive at conclusion (A). We just need to assume that some farmers try and produce high yield crops, which I would consider safe even if unstated. The "high yield" stipulation is, therefore, just a distraction.

Thanks Ryan. The modified argument makes complete sense.
My exam is now less than 10 days away and I am still struggling a lot with inference questions. Distraction, like the one above, is the last thing I will need during the exam.
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 15 Apr 2013
Posts: 181
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Marketing
GMAT Date: 11-23-2015
GPA: 3.6
WE: Science (Other)
Re: High levels of fertilizer and pesticides, needed when  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 20 Jan 2014, 23:02
High levels of fertilizer and pesticides, needed when farmers try to produce high yields of the same crop year after year, pollute water supplies. Experts therefore urge farmers to diversify their crops and to rotate their plantings yearly.
To receive governmental price-supportbenefits for a crop, farmers must have produced that same crop for the past several years.
The statements above, if true, best support which of the following conclusions?

(Al The rules for governmental support of farm prices work against efforts to reduce water pollution.
(B) The only solution to the problemof water pollution from fertilizers and pesticides is to take farmland out of production.
(C) Farmers can continue to make a profit by rotating diverse crops, thus reducing costs for chemicals, but by planting the same crop each year.
(D) New farming techniques will be developed to make it possible for farmers to reduce the application of
fertilizers and pesticides.
(E) Governmental price supports for farm products are set at levels that are not high enough to allowfarmers
to get out of debt.

Please note that I have done a little modification in the answer choice C, in this case please provide your opinion can we consider C as correct answer.

Reasoning:
One may thing that farmers could have more than one crop and they can rotate the diversified "set of crops" that they have and in turn reduce fertiliser/pesticides. Because it is not mentioned that a farmer can only procure one crop/field, it may be possible that he may have a large area and where multiple crops caould be grown. By doing this they can still continue to grow a crop for more than 05 years and earn the government incentive too.

Originally posted by WillGetIt on 19 Jan 2014, 23:34.
Last edited by WillGetIt on 20 Jan 2014, 23:02, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Joined: 17 Mar 2014
Posts: 127
Location: United States
GPA: 3.97
Re: High levels of fertilizer and pesticides, needed when  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Oct 2014, 05:49
Taku wrote:
Official Guide for GMAT Verbal Review, 2nd Edition

Practice Question
Question No.: 64
Page: 142
Difficulty:

High levels of fertilizer and pesticides, needed when farmers try to produce high yields of the same crop year after year, pollute water supplies. Experts therefore urge farmers to diversify their crops and to rotate their plantings yearly.

To receive governmental price-support benefits for a crop, farmers must have produced that same crop for the past several years.

The statement above, if true, best support which of the following conclusions?

A: The rules for governmental support of farm prices work against efforts to reduce water pollution.
B: The only solution to the problem of water pollution from fertilizers and pesticides is to take farmland out of production.
C: Farmers can continue to make a profit by rotating diverse crops, thus reducing costs for chemicals, but not by planting the same crop each year.
D: New farming techniques will be developed to make it possible for farmers to reduce the application of fertilizers and pesticides.
E: Governmental price supports for farm products are set at levels that are not high enough to allow farmers to get out of debt.

Chose A, but was confused how can government policies not support "efforts against water pollution". But, for MBT just trust what is written and do not bring outside knowledge or logical thinking.
_________________

KUDOS!!!, I need them too

Intern
Joined: 11 Mar 2016
Posts: 4
Re: High levels of fertilizer and pesticides, needed when  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Sep 2016, 10:21
No doubt A is the best answer but A can't be 100% true.
A mentions 'rules' and it implies that all rules of government works against the water pollution
Manager
Status: On the journey of achieving
Affiliations: Senior Manager, CA by profession, CFA(USA) Level 2
Joined: 06 Feb 2016
Posts: 203
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Finance
GMAT 1: 560 Q44 V21
GPA: 3.82
WE: Other (Commercial Banking)
Re: High levels of fertilizer and pesticides, needed when  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Apr 2018, 01:10
Straightforward A...It is clearly mentioned in the stimulus that when farmer tries to produce high yield of same crop year on year basis, it encourages water pollution. Now in the last part of the stimulus it is clearly mentioned that in order to receive government support price benefits of a crop, one needs to produce same breed of crop every year. This means that this govt support plan would encourage water pollution as same breed of crop would be encouraged to cultivate for receiving the government benefit.
_________________

Never Settle for something less than what you deserve...........

I've failed over and over and over again in my life and that is why I succeed--Michael Jordan
Kudos drives a person to better himself every single time. So Pls give it generously
Wont give up till i hit a 700+

VP
Status: It's near - I can see.
Joined: 13 Apr 2013
Posts: 1365
Location: India
GMAT 1: 480 Q38 V22
GPA: 3.01
WE: Engineering (Consulting)
Re: High levels of fertilizer and pesticides, needed when  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Apr 2018, 06:33
Taku wrote:
Official Guide for GMAT Verbal Review, 2nd Edition

Practice Question
Question No.: 64
Page: 142
Difficulty:

High levels of fertilizer and pesticides, needed when farmers try to produce high yields of the same crop year after year, pollute water supplies. Experts therefore urge farmers to diversify their crops and to rotate their plantings yearly.

To receive governmental price-support benefits for a crop, farmers must have produced that same crop for the past several years.

The statement above, if true, best support which of the following conclusions?

(A) The rules for governmental support of farm prices work against efforts to reduce water pollution.

(B) The only solution to the problem of water pollution from fertilizers and pesticides is to take farmland out of production.

(C) Farmers can continue to make a profit by rotating diverse crops, thus reducing costs for chemicals, but not by planting the same crop each year.

(D) New farming techniques will be developed to make it possible for farmers to reduce the application of fertilizers and pesticides.

(E) Governmental price supports for farm products are set at levels that are not high enough to allow farmers to get out of debt.

Only answer choice (A) makes sense. Rest are Irrelevant.
_________________

"Do not watch clock; Do what it does. KEEP GOING."

Intern
Joined: 19 May 2016
Posts: 23
Location: Pakistan
Concentration: Marketing, Strategy
GPA: 3.1
Re: High levels of fertilizer and pesticides, needed when  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Oct 2018, 22:39
Hi, I got this question wrong.

Can anyone specify which question type this is? That would help in concluding the right answer.
Director
Joined: 19 Oct 2013
Posts: 509
Location: Kuwait
GPA: 3.2
WE: Engineering (Real Estate)
Re: High levels of fertilizer and pesticides, needed when  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Oct 2018, 22:49
anum23 it can be considered an inference.

Posted from my mobile device
Re: High levels of fertilizer and pesticides, needed when &nbs [#permalink] 13 Oct 2018, 22:49
Display posts from previous: Sort by