GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 22 Sep 2018, 19:44

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Historians and philosophers in the late nineteenth century argued that

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Retired Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4542
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Historians and philosophers in the late nineteenth century argued that  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 30 Aug 2018, 01:52
10
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

58% (01:09) correct 42% (01:05) wrong based on 584 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Historians and philosophers in the late nineteenth century argued that Plato’s work was perhaps the ultimate work of political philosophy, that it was the one paradigm of political discourse that there was no possibility to supersede.


(A) that it was the one paradigm of political discourse that there was no possibility to supersede

(B) the one paradigm of political discourse that could not be superseded

(C) for it was the one paradigm of political discourse, and that it was impossible to supersede

(D) a paradigm of political discourse that there was no possibility to supersede

(E) as being the one paradigm that could not be superseded in political discourse

_________________

you can know a lot about something and not really understand it."-- a quote
No one knows this better than a GMAT student does.
Narendran +9198845 44509


Originally posted by daagh on 08 Sep 2015, 07:49.
Last edited by Bunuel on 30 Aug 2018, 01:52, edited 2 times in total.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Dec 2009
Posts: 97
GMAT Date: 12-03-2014
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Historians and philosophers in the late nineteenth century argued that  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Sep 2015, 11:30
IMO : E
'one paradigm of political discourse' doesn't make sense
Only E conveys the meaning Clearly

one paradigm that could not be superseded in political discourse
though I'm not too sure of this...
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Jul 2014
Posts: 289
Schools: ISB '15
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.76
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Historians and philosophers in the late nineteenth century argued that  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Sep 2015, 12:54
1
IMO its E
no other choice brings comparison into picture except this
Retired Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4542
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Historians and philosophers in the late nineteenth century argued that  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 29 Sep 2015, 03:13
For those who feel that E would make the best, let me clarify that, as a basic concept, GMAT never likes to employ ‘being’ as a modifier. In this case, it clearly modifies Plato’s work. So it can be easily dislodged.
We need an appositive to describe Plato’s work and B is the neat and forthright appositive in the given contest.
_________________

you can know a lot about something and not really understand it."-- a quote
No one knows this better than a GMAT student does.
Narendran +9198845 44509


Originally posted by daagh on 26 Sep 2015, 01:36.
Last edited by daagh on 29 Sep 2015, 03:13, edited 1 time in total.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Dec 2013
Posts: 261
Re: Historians and philosophers in the late nineteenth century argued that  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Sep 2015, 02:52
The two sentence seperated by comma need a proper conjunction

Hence A and E are gone.

D is awkward as it is difficult to understand who actually is superseding.

C. The historians argued that XYZ and that (IT) was impossible to supersede.
(the IT has no reference)

B is correct. Althought I picked the option D as the first pick. Parallelism is very cunning.


daagh wrote:
Historians and philosophers in the late nineteenth century argued that Plato’s work was perhaps the ultimate work of political philosophy, that it was the one
paradigm of political discourse that there was no possibility to supersede.


(A) that it was the one paradigm of political discourse that there was no possibility to supersede

(B) the one paradigm of political discourse that could not be superseded

(C) for it was the one paradigm of political discourse, and that it was impossible to supersede

(D) a paradigm of political discourse that there was no possibility to supersede

(E) as being the one paradigm that could not be superseded in political discourse

_________________

Kudos to you, for helping me with some KUDOS.

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 06 Sep 2016
Posts: 136
Location: Italy
Schools: EDHEC (A)
GMAT 1: 650 Q43 V37
GPA: 3.2
WE: General Management (Human Resources)
Premium Member
Re: Historians and philosophers in the late nineteenth century argued that  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Feb 2018, 07:42
I was unsure between B and D, but eventually picked D.
Can someone please explain me why B is the correct one?
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 08 Mar 2017
Posts: 54
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
Schools: ISB '20, XLRI"20
GMAT 1: 600 Q40 V33
GPA: 2.79
WE: Project Management (Manufacturing)
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Historians and philosophers in the late nineteenth century argued that  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Feb 2018, 08:11
MvArrow wrote:
I was unsure between B and D, but eventually picked D.
Can someone please explain me why B is the correct one?


I think use of that is unnecessary, there act as dummy subject and coveys correct meaning. also use of that there is redundant in standard english i thik, Some moderator further can help.
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 49303
Re: Historians and philosophers in the late nineteenth century argued that  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Aug 2018, 01:10
2
daagh wrote:
Historians and philosophers in the late nineteenth century argued that Plato’s work was perhaps the ultimate work of political philosophy, that it was the one paradigm of political discourse that there was no possibility to supersede.


(A) that it was the one paradigm of political discourse that there was no possibility to supersede

(B) the one paradigm of political discourse that could not be superseded

(C) for it was the one paradigm of political discourse, and that it was impossible to supersede

(D) a paradigm of political discourse that there was no possibility to supersede

(E) as being the one paradigm that could not be superseded in political discourse


MANHATTAN REVIEW OFFICIAL EXPLANATION:



This question has to do with efficiency of language. What follows the comma is going to give you some peripheral information about the work. You don’t need to precede it by any unnecessary words or phrases such as ‘for’ or ‘as’. D changes the meaning by its use of ‘a paradigm’ rather then ‘the paradigm’. ‘A paradigm’ implies that there were others. The other options are wordier than B. Choice B is the correct answer.
_________________

New to the Math Forum?
Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread | All You Need for Quant | PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!!

Resources:
GMAT Math Book | Triangles | Polygons | Coordinate Geometry | Factorials | Circles | Number Theory | Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets | PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders | GMAT Prep Software Analysis | SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS) | Tricky questions from previous years.

Collection of Questions:
PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat

DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.


What are GMAT Club Tests?
Extra-hard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 30 May 2018
Posts: 25
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Marketing
GPA: 3.45
WE: Other (Retail)
CAT Tests
Re: Historians and philosophers in the late nineteenth century argued that  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Sep 2018, 23:03
daagh wrote:
For those who feel that E would make the best, let me clarify that, as a basic concept, GMAT never likes to employ ‘being’ as a modifier. In this case, it clearly modifies Plato’s work. So it can be easily dislodged.
We need an appositive to describe Plato’s work and B is the neat and forthright appositive in the given contest.
What is wrong with answer option C here ?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
P
Joined: 24 Jun 2012
Posts: 367
Location: Pakistan
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
GPA: 3.76
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Historians and philosophers in the late nineteenth century argued that  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Sep 2018, 00:29
Arpitkumar wrote:
daagh wrote:
For those who feel that E would make the best, let me clarify that, as a basic concept, GMAT never likes to employ ‘being’ as a modifier. In this case, it clearly modifies Plato’s work. So it can be easily dislodged.
We need an appositive to describe Plato’s work and B is the neat and forthright appositive in the given contest.
What is wrong with answer option C here ?


C is wrong because of many reasons, its not parallel and its not concise
(C) for it was the one paradigm of political discourse, and that it was impossible to supersede

here For means "because" and the use of this is unnecessary as we are simply defining "the ultimate work of political philosophy"
the underline part *and that* there is one *that* after and and thus we need another *that* after *for* to make it parallel
_________________

Push yourself again and again. Don't give an inch until the final buzzer sounds. -Larry Bird
Success isn't something that just happens - success is learned, success is practiced and then it is shared. -Sparky Anderson
-S

GMAT Club Bot
Re: Historians and philosophers in the late nineteenth century argued that &nbs [#permalink] 19 Sep 2018, 00:29
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Historians and philosophers in the late nineteenth century argued that

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.