For
Q5 even though I myself chose C over B, I can justify why B might be a better choice.
5. The passage suggests that, if classical republicanism had been the ideology of eighteenth-century America, which of the following would have resulted?
(B) Citizens and politicians would not have been encouraged to agitate for increased individual rights.(C) People would have been convinced that by pursuing their own interests they were contributing to the good of the group.Okay so basically the essence of republicanism is that people think of greater good of community over their own good. Sacrifice of self per se.
But I see that paragraph 1 never refuses that people do not think about individual rights. It in facts states that people do really think about individual rights. But the goal of fighting for their individual rights is that if they are free, they can help the community.
"To be completely virtuous, people had to be independent and free of the petty interests of the marketplace."Very subtle point.
Thus option B is wrong. Because even if they fight for their freedom, this fact doesn't imply that they are fighting for personal reasons. As stated, to be able to help others, one must be "free", "independent" .. for if you ain't free yourself, how are you gonna help the community? C on the other hand, to have that republicanism ideology, people must be clear in their mind that their fight for individual rights is "for the greater good of the community"-------> precisely what option C says.Oof, that was a tough one. I definitely had a big brain exercise trying to justify option B. Also, I know the OA so I am able to justify it. Totally different game to be 100% sure with such questions in your first go. It is very subtle but clearly the essence behind the writing.
Hope it helps. Kudos appreciated.