Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 1811:00 AM PST
-12:00 PM PST
Join us in a live GMAT practice session and solve 30 challenging GMAT questions with other test takers in timed conditions, covering GMAT Quant, Data Sufficiency, Data Insights, Reading Comprehension, and Critical Reasoning questions.
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
04 Sep 2020, 20:00
Kudos
Bookmarks
E
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
75%
(hard)
Question Stats:
49% (01:48) correct
51%
(01:54)
wrong
based on 776
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Leonardo Da Vinci worked both for the Medici, whom he described as his downfall but also were his creators, and for Sforza, for whom he painted The Last Supper.
A. both for the Medici, whom he described as his downfall but also were his creators, and for
B. both for the Medici, whom he said were his downfall but also his creators, and
C. both for the Medici, which he said was his downfall but also his creators, and for
D. for both the Medici, about whom he described them as his downfall but also his creators, and for
E. for both the Medici, who he said were his downfall but also his creators, and
A. both for the Medici, whom he described as his downfall but also were his creators, and for
B. both for the Medici, whom he said were his downfall but also his creators, and
C. both for the Medici, which he said was his downfall but also his creators, and for
D. for both the Medici, about whom he described them as his downfall but also his creators, and for
E. for both the Medici, who he said were his downfall but also his creators, and
|
05 Sep 2020, 20:15
Kudos
Bookmarks
Quote:
Veritas Prep Official Explanation
The correct answer is E.
The issues among the answer choices include multiple parallelism problems, an agreement issue, and a case issue involving the pronoun for the Medici.
Answer E correctly uses the subject form “who” for the pronoun, since this pronoun does take a verb – the verb “were” later in the sentence. A pronoun that is the subject of any verb must always take the subject form. E also correctly uses the plural verb “were” to describe “the Medici”; without knowing who or what “the Medici” is/are, we can conclude that this subject must be plural, since the sentence later describes “the Medici” using the plural “his creators.” Additionally, E correctly parallels the compound structure “his downfall but also his creators.” Finally, E correctly parallels the “both… and” correlative conjunction structure.
Answer A at first correctly uses the object form “whom” to describe “the Medici,” since in this sentence the verb “described” refers to “he” (“Da Vinci”) and not “whom” (“the Medici”). However, the second part of this compound, “were his creators” fails, since this verb, “were,” needs to refer back to the same pronoun, but the object form “whom” cannot work as the subject of “were.” Furthermore, the structure “whom he described… but also were” is not parallel, since “described” is a verb on “he” but “were” is not a verb on “he.” Parallel elements must fill analogous roles within a sentence.
Answer B incorrectly uses the object form “whom” in a sentence in which the verb “were” is meant to refer back to that same pronoun. The object form of a pronoun is not allowed to be the subject of a verb. Furthermore, this answer does not correctly parallel the “both… and” correlative conjunction, since “both for… and” lacks a preposition after “and” to parallel the word “for.”
Answer C uses “which” in a manner that cannot produce a logical meaning. If “the Medici” are people (as, in fact, they are), then “which” should not refer to them and lacks any acceptable reference. If “the Medici” are not people, then it may be odd to refer to them as Da Vinci’s “creators.” Even if this point is arguable, this answer choice muddles its agreement. At first, using “was,” it describes “the Medici” as singular, but later, using “creators,” it describes “the Medici” as plural.
Answer D includes a nonsensical “about” that creates an error when combined with “described.” In the same way, this answer’s pairing of “whom” and “them,” both referring to “the Medici,” simply makes no sense. Essentially, Da Vinci “described the Medici about the Medici.” Furthermore, this answer fails to produce a parallel structure in its “for both… and for” butchery of the correlative conjunction at the end of the sentence.
It is worth noting that it was not strictly necessary to make a “who”/“whom” decision to correctly adjudicate this sentence. However, it is worth recognizing, at minimum, that this structure may not require (or even, in fact, allow) “whom.”
General Discussion
04 Sep 2020, 20:18
Kudos
Bookmarks
A. both for the Medici, whom he described as his downfall but also were his creators, and for
Wrong meaning:
He (described) vs also his creators were-reject
B. both for the Medici, whom he said were his downfall but also his creators, and
both for X and for Y
For is missing –reject because of no parallelism
C. both for the Medici, which he said was his downfall but also his creators, and for
Which is used wrongly for people –wrong
D. for both the Medici, about whom he described them as his downfall but also his creators, and for
both for X and for Y
Wrong parallelism
E. for both the Medici, who he said were his downfall but also his creators, and
his downfall vs also his creators ( noun parallelism and keep intended meaning ) -correct
Wrong meaning:
He (described) vs also his creators were-reject
B. both for the Medici, whom he said were his downfall but also his creators, and
both for X and for Y
For is missing –reject because of no parallelism
C. both for the Medici, which he said was his downfall but also his creators, and for
Which is used wrongly for people –wrong
D. for both the Medici, about whom he described them as his downfall but also his creators, and for
both for X and for Y
Wrong parallelism
E. for both the Medici, who he said were his downfall but also his creators, and
his downfall vs also his creators ( noun parallelism and keep intended meaning ) -correct
