Last visit was: 14 Dec 2024, 05:35 It is currently 14 Dec 2024, 05:35
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
BillyZ
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Last visit: 20 Oct 2024
Posts: 1,158
Own Kudos:
21,376
 []
Given Kudos: 926
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V40 (Online)
GPA: 3.53
Products:
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
19
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 14 Dec 2024
Posts: 97,874
Own Kudos:
685,748
 []
Given Kudos: 88,270
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 97,874
Kudos: 685,748
 []
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
attari92
Joined: 25 Apr 2016
Last visit: 28 May 2019
Posts: 56
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 308
Posts: 56
Kudos: 41
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
sureshhbs
Joined: 28 Sep 2014
Last visit: 24 Mar 2021
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 43
Schools: HBS '19
Products:
Schools: HBS '19
Posts: 20
Kudos: 11
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
attari92
The question stem boils down to that integers 'p' and 'q' are prime and we need to figure out the value of 'p' given p<q.
statement 1. is explicitly not sufficient as (2+3),(2+5)....

statement 2. implies p=2 and q=3, so sufficient

But the question says it is p<Q. So p will be always 2
avatar
Lepe96
Joined: 17 Sep 2017
Last visit: 30 Jun 2020
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Italy
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.9
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
Posts: 30
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi actually It isn't clear why wouldn't it be sufficient that the 2 numbers are primes? I mean any product between 2 primes has 4 unique factors

In the e.g. given p,q primes so "pq" would have 4 factors namely 1,p,q,pq

So once we know that the sum is odd we can deduce that 1 of the 2 is even, and being p,q primes and knowing that p < q we can deduce that p=2

Please show me the flaw in my reasoning...
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 14 Dec 2024
Posts: 97,874
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 88,270
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 97,874
Kudos: 685,748
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Lepe96
Hi actually It isn't clear why wouldn't it be sufficient that the 2 numbers are primes? I mean any product between 2 primes has 4 unique factors

In the e.g. given p,q primes so "pq" would have 4 factors namely 1,p,q,pq

So once we know that the sum is odd we can deduce that 1 of the 2 is even, and being p,q primes and knowing that p < q we can deduce that p=2

Please show me the flaw in my reasoning...

Please read the post just above yours:

Given that pq has exactly 4. We can have the following two cases:

(i) \(p = 1\) and \(q = (prime)^3\) --> \(pq = 1*(prime)^3\) --> the number of factors = 3 + 1 = 4. For example, \(pq = 1*2^3 = 8\).
(ii) \(p = prime_1\) and \(q = prime_2\) --> \(pq = prime_1*prime_2\) --> the number of factors = (1 + 1)(1 + 1) = 4. For example, \(pq = 2*3 = 6\).

As we can see p is either 1 or some prime.

(1) The sum of p and q is an odd integer. For the sum of two integers to be odd one of them must be odd and another must be even. We cannot get the unique value of p. For example:
p = 1 and q = 2^3 = 8
p = 2 and q = 3.

Not sufficient.
Moderator:
Math Expert
97874 posts