Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 01:14 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 01:14
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
rxs0005
Joined: 07 Jun 2004
Last visit: 21 Jun 2017
Posts: 436
Own Kudos:
3,203
 [37]
Given Kudos: 22
Location: PA
Posts: 436
Kudos: 3,203
 [37]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
31
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,379
Own Kudos:
778,165
 [7]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,379
Kudos: 778,165
 [7]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
rxs0005
Joined: 07 Jun 2004
Last visit: 21 Jun 2017
Posts: 436
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 22
Location: PA
Posts: 436
Kudos: 3,203
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,379
Own Kudos:
778,165
 [2]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,379
Kudos: 778,165
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rxs0005
Bunuel thanks

the way i approached this DS was

i see P / Q = R / S as a proportion

after S1 and S2 let us say p / q is

140 / 49 = 2.87

R / S can be any values that can lead to 2.87 so R by itself need not be a multiple of 5

what is the error in my reasoning so i went for E

First of all 140/49 does not equal to 2.87 it equals to 20/7 (it'll be a recurring decimal). So R/S=20/7 --> R is a multiple of 20 so it's a multiple of 5 too (note that we are told that all variables are positive integers).
User avatar
intcan
Joined: 27 Oct 2010
Last visit: 03 Apr 2021
Posts: 71
Own Kudos:
34
 [1]
Given Kudos: 20
Posts: 71
Kudos: 34
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(P / Q) * S = R

Stmt 1 says P = 140 * X

(140 * X / Q) * S = R

We do not know anything about Q. So Stmt 1 is insuff.

Stmt 2 says Q can be 7, 49 ... But we do not know anythng abt P. So Stmt 2 is insuff.

Combining both, we know R is +ve integer. So, Q has to be 7 and R is multiple of 5. C
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
rxs0005
If P, Q, R, and S are positive integers, and P / Q = R / S, is R divisible by 5 ?

(1) P is divisible by 140

(2) Q = 7^x , where x is a positive integer


Not convinced by the OA

If P, Q, R, and S are positive integers, and P/Q=R/S, is R divisible by 5?

Given: \(R=\frac{PS}{Q}\)

(1) P is divisible by 140 --> P is multiple of 5 --> now, if all 5-s from P and S (if there are any) are reduced by 5-s in Q then the answer will be No (for example P=140=5*28, S=1 and Q=5) but if the sum of powers of 5 in P and S is higher than the power of 5 in Q then not all 5-s will be reduced and R will be a multiple of 5 (for example P=140=5*28, S=1 and Q=1 or P=140*5=5^2*28, S=1 and Q=5). Not sufficient.

(2) Q= 7^x, where x is a positive integer. Clearly insufficient.

(1)+(2) Q is not a multiple of 5 at all thus 5-s in P won't be reduced so as \(R=\frac{PS}{Q}=5*integer\) then R is indeed a multiple of 5. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Q can also be 35..so then the 5 would also be reduced. So how do you know that R is then still a multiple of 5? what am I missing?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,379
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,379
Kudos: 778,165
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
BankerRUS
Bunuel
rxs0005
If P, Q, R, and S are positive integers, and P / Q = R / S, is R divisible by 5 ?

(1) P is divisible by 140

(2) Q = 7^x , where x is a positive integer


Not convinced by the OA

If P, Q, R, and S are positive integers, and P/Q=R/S, is R divisible by 5?

Given: \(R=\frac{PS}{Q}\)

(1) P is divisible by 140 --> P is multiple of 5 --> now, if all 5-s from P and S (if there are any) are reduced by 5-s in Q then the answer will be No (for example P=140=5*28, S=1 and Q=5) but if the sum of powers of 5 in P and S is higher than the power of 5 in Q then not all 5-s will be reduced and R will be a multiple of 5 (for example P=140=5*28, S=1 and Q=1 or P=140*5=5^2*28, S=1 and Q=5). Not sufficient.

(2) Q= 7^x, where x is a positive integer. Clearly insufficient.

(1)+(2) Q is not a multiple of 5 at all thus 5-s in P won't be reduced so as \(R=\frac{PS}{Q}=5*integer\) then R is indeed a multiple of 5. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Q can also be 35..so then the 5 would also be reduced. So how do you know that R is then still a multiple of 5? what am I missing?

Q cannot be 35 or any other multiple of 5, since it equals to \(7^{positive \ integer}\).

Hope it's clear.
User avatar
jlgdr
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Last visit: 24 Jul 2015
Posts: 1,311
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 355
Concentration: Finance
Posts: 1,311
Kudos: 2,863
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
rxs0005
If P, Q, R, and S are positive integers, and P / Q = R / S, is R divisible by 5 ?

(1) P is divisible by 140

(2) Q = 7^x , where x is a positive integer


Not convinced by the OA

If P, Q, R, and S are positive integers, and P/Q=R/S, is R divisible by 5?

Given: \(R=\frac{PS}{Q}\)

(1) P is divisible by 140 --> P is multiple of 5 --> now, if all 5-s from P and S (if there are any) are reduced by 5-s in Q then the answer will be No (for example P=140=5*28, S=1 and Q=5) but if the sum of powers of 5 in P and S is higher than the power of 5 in Q then not all 5-s will be reduced and R will be a multiple of 5 (for example P=140=5*28, S=1 and Q=1 or P=140*5=5^2*28, S=1 and Q=5). Not sufficient.

(2) Q= 7^x, where x is a positive integer. Clearly insufficient.

(1)+(2) Q is not a multiple of 5 at all thus 5-s in P won't be reduced so as \(R=\frac{PS}{Q}=5*integer\) then R is indeed a multiple of 5. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Bunuel sorry, I don't quite get it

So we have P,Q,R,S are positive integers and we're trying to figure out whether R = PS/Q is divisible by 5 or if PS / 5Q is an integer right?

So Statement 1

P is divisible by 130, but I don't know nothing about the other two only that they are integers

Not sufficients

Statement 2

Q= 7^X

Clearly Insuff

Both together

I have the quesiton: is 140S / 5Q an integer where Q = 7^X

Well x could be anything and hence not sufficient

E

But I'm pretty sure there's something I'm missing, would anybody please clarify what's wrong with this line of reasoning?

Cheers
J
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
76,986
 [3]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 76,986
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jlgdr

Both together

I have the quesiton: is 140S / 5Q an integer where Q = 7^X

Well x could be anything and hence not sufficient

E

But I'm pretty sure there's something I'm missing, would anybody please clarify what's wrong with this line of reasoning?

Cheers
J

Yeah, the concept here is quite basic but we often overlook it.

Think about it: Is \(3^5 * 7^6 * 11^3\) divisible by 13?
The answer is simply 'No'.

For the numerator to be divisible by the denominator, the denominator MUST BE a factor of the numerator.
3^5 is only five 3s.
7^6 is only six 7s.
11^3 is only three 11s.
In the entire numerator, there is no 13 so the numerator is not divisible by 13.

On the other hand, is \(3^5 * 7^6 * 11^3 * 13\) divisible by 13? Yes, it is. 13 gets cancelled and the quotient will be \(3^5 * 7^6 * 11^3\).

Is 2^X divisible by 3? No. No matter what X is, you will only have X number of 2s in the numerator and will never have a 3. So this will not be divisible by 3.

On the same lines, in this question,

Given that \(R = \frac{(140a)*S}{7^X}\) where R is an integer.
\(R = \frac{2^2 * 5*7*a*S}{7^X}\)


So whatever X is, 7^X will get cancelled out by the numerator and we will be left with something. That something will include 5 since only 7s will be cancelled out from the numerator. Hence R is divisible by 5.
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
76,986
 [1]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 76,986
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasPrepKarishma
jlgdr

Both together

I have the quesiton: is 140S / 5Q an integer where Q = 7^X

Well x could be anything and hence not sufficient

E

But I'm pretty sure there's something I'm missing, would anybody please clarify what's wrong with this line of reasoning?

Cheers
J

Yeah, the concept here is quite basic but we often overlook it.

Think about it: Is \(3^5 * 7^6 * 11^3\) divisible by 13?
The answer is simply 'No'.

For the numerator to be divisible by the denominator, the denominator MUST BE a factor of the numerator.
3^5 is only five 3s.
7^6 is only six 7s.
11^3 is only three 11s.
In the entire numerator, there is no 13 so the numerator is not divisible by 13.

On the other hand, is \(3^5 * 7^6 * 11^3 * 13\) divisible by 13? Yes, it is. 13 gets cancelled and the quotient will be \(3^5 * 7^6 * 11^3\).

Is 2^X divisible by 3? No. No matter what X is, you will only have X number of 2s in the numerator and will never have a 3. So this will not be divisible by 3.

On the same lines, in this question,

Given that \(R = \frac{(140a)*S}{7^X}\) where R is an integer.
\(R = \frac{2^2 * 5*7*a*S}{7^X}\)


So whatever X is, 7^X will get cancelled out by the numerator and we will be left with something. That something will include 5 since only 7s will be cancelled out from the numerator. Hence R is divisible by 5.

Responding to a pm:

"The second statement says that R is multiple of 5 for any x . So why are we combining the two statements ? Could you please help."

From the second statement alone, all we know is that Q is a power of 7. We have no idea about what R will be. Statement 1 tells us that P = 140 i.e. a multiple of 5. Hence we know that P must have 5 as a factor. Hence R will have a factor of 5 too.
User avatar
BillyZ
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Last visit: 03 May 2025
Posts: 1,143
Own Kudos:
22,214
 [2]
Given Kudos: 926
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V40 (Online)
GPA: 3.53
Products:
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rxs0005
If P, Q, R, and S are positive integers, and \(\frac{P}{Q} = \frac{R}{S}\), is R divisible by 5?

(1) P is divisible by 140

(2)\(Q = 7^x\), where x is a positive integer

OFFICIAL SOLUTION



Let's begin by analyzing the information given to us in the question:

If P, Q, R, and S are positive integers, and \(\frac{P}{Q} = \frac{R}{S}\), is R divisible by 5 ?

It is often helpful on the GMAT to rephrase equations so that there are no denominators. We can do this my cross-multiplying as follows:

\(\frac{P}{Q} = \frac{R}{S}\) → \(PS=RQ\)

Now let's analyze Statement (1) alone: P is divisible by 140.

Most GMAT divisibility problems can be solved by breaking numbers down to their prime factors (this is called a "prime factorization").

The prime factorization of 140 is: \(140=2*2*5*7\).

Thus, if P is divisible by 140, it is also divisible by all the prime factors of 140. We know that P is divisible by 2 twice, by 5, and by 7. However, this gives us no information about R so Statement (1) is not sufficient to answer the question.

Next, let's analyze Statement (2) alone: \(Q = 7^x\), where x is a positive integer.

From this, we can see that the prime factorization of Q looks something like this: \(Q=7*7*7......\) Therefore, we know that 7 is the only prime factor of Q. However, this gives us no information about R so Statement (2) is not sufficient to answer the question.

Finally, let's analyze both statements taken together:

From Statement (1), we know that P has 5 as one of its prime factors. Since 5 is a factor of P and since P is a factor of PS, then by definition, 5 is a factor of PS.

Recall that the question told us that \(PS=RQ\). From this, we can deduce that PS must have the same factors as QR. Since 5 is a factor of PS, 5 must also be a factor of QR.

From Statement (2), we know that 7 is the only prime factor of Q. Therefore, we know that 5 is NOT a factor of Q. However, we know that 5 must be a factor of QR. The only way this can be the case is if 5 is a factor of R.

Thus, by combining both statements we can answer the question: Is R divisible by 5? Yes, it must be divisible by 5. Since BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient, the correct answer is C.
User avatar
Madhavi1990
Joined: 15 Jan 2017
Last visit: 15 Jul 2021
Posts: 254
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 931
Posts: 254
Kudos: 93
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Did this by plugging values:

1) P/140 = no remainder. So P/Q = no remainder
And then we get PS = RQ --> so PS = R (140) (Lets say that Q is 140). Either way, we don't know anything about R. NS

2) Q =7^x --> cn be 7 to power 1, 2,3..least would be 7 to power 1.
P/7 = R/ S --> PS = RQ, again R is what? NS

1) + 2) --> 140 / 7 (coz P's least value is likely to be 140 and Q's least value is 7).

140/7 = R/S
S(140) = R(7)
S (4x5) = R (cancelling 7 on both sides)Therefore R is divisible by 5.
Ans C

Kudos please, if you found this useful!
User avatar
Salsanousi
Joined: 19 Oct 2013
Last visit: 29 Dec 2020
Posts: 393
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 117
Location: Kuwait
GPA: 3.2
WE:Engineering (Real Estate)
Posts: 393
Kudos: 351
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rxs0005
If P, Q, R, and S are positive integers, and P/Q = R/S, is R divisible by 5?

(1) P is divisible by 140

(2) Q = 7^x, where x is a positive integer

if we rewrite the equation to be P * S = R * Q

1) P is divisible by 140. P is a multiple of 140

140 * S = R * Q. Let S=1, let R = 140, and let Q = 1 then yes divisible. Let S = 1, let R = 1 and let Q = 140. No not divisible.

Insufficient

2) it provides information on Q only which is not enough to decide.

Combine both now

140 * S = R * \(7^x\)

20 * 7 * S = R * \(7^x\)

P can be 140,280,420 etc.. the 7 will always have a power of 1.

R is divisible by 5 sufficient.

C
User avatar
gurmukh
Joined: 18 Dec 2017
Last visit: 24 Jan 2025
Posts: 259
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 20
Posts: 259
Kudos: 260
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
R= PS/Q
From first statement
P is divisible by 140 but we don't know about Q whether it has 5 in it or not. So insufficient
From second statement Q does not have 5 in it but we don't know about P. So insufficient
Combining we are sure that R is a multiple of 5
Hence answer is option C

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,584
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,584
Kudos: 1,079
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105379 posts
496 posts