Aug 20 08:00 PM PDT  09:00 PM PDT EMPOWERgmat is giving away the complete Official GMAT Exam Pack collection worth $100 with the 3 Month Pack ($299) Aug 20 09:00 PM PDT  10:00 PM PDT Take 20% off the plan of your choice, now through midnight on Tuesday, 8/20 Aug 22 09:00 PM PDT  10:00 PM PDT What you'll gain: Strategies and techniques for approaching featured GMAT topics, and much more. Thursday, August 22nd at 9 PM EDT Aug 24 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Learn reading strategies that can help even nonvoracious reader to master GMAT RC Aug 25 09:00 AM PDT  12:00 PM PDT Join a FREE 1day verbal workshop and learn how to ace the Verbal section with the best tips and strategies. Limited for the first 99 registrants. Register today! Aug 25 08:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT Exclusive offer! Get 400+ Practice Questions, 25 Video lessons and 6+ Webinars for FREE.
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Status: I don't stop when I'm Tired,I stop when I'm done
Joined: 11 May 2014
Posts: 527
Location: Bangladesh
Concentration: Finance, Leadership
GPA: 2.81
WE: Business Development (Real Estate)

If q, s, and t are all different numbers, is q < s < t ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 19 Jun 2017, 04:59
Question Stats:
55% (01:50) correct 45% (01:54) wrong based on 1969 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
If q, s, and t are all different numbers, is q < s < t ? (1) t  q = t  s + s  q (2) t > q
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________
Originally posted by AbdurRakib on 19 Jun 2017, 04:44.
Last edited by Bunuel on 19 Jun 2017, 04:59, edited 1 time in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the question.




Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 04 Dec 2015
Posts: 774

Re: If q, s, and t are all different numbers, is q < s < t ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Jun 2017, 13:27
AbdurRakib wrote: If q, s, and t are all different numbers, is q < s < t ?
(1) t  q = t  s + s  q
(2) t > q With less math: Start with statement 2. This is insufficient, since s could be greater than t, or s could be between q and t. Eliminate answers B and D.Statement 1: When you see x  y, think 'distance between x and y on the number line'. That's all that means. So, this statement says that t  q is equal to the distance between t and s, plus the distance between s and q. In other words, s has to be between t and q. Jot down some diagrams on your paper to convince yourself of that: in order for the distances to make sense, s has to be in the middle. Also, tq has to be positive, since it's the sum of two absolute values. So, t is greater than q. If t is greater than q and s is in the middle, you know that q < s < t. Sufficient.
_________________




Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 57089

If q, s, and t are all different numbers, is q < s < t ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Jun 2017, 05:28
If q, s, and t are all different numbers, is q < s < t ?(1) t  q = t  s + s  q Notice that the right hand side is positive (it's the sum of two absolute values, so two nonnegative values, in fact, in our case two positive values, since we know that the variables are distinct). Thus the left hand side must also be positive, which means that t > q. So, we can have 3 cases for s: a. sqtIn this case \(s < q < t\): \(t  s > 0\) and \(s  q < 0\), which would mean that \(t  s = t s\) and \(s  q = (s  q)\) (recall that x = x when x > 0 and x = x when x <= 0). So, \(t  s + s  q = (t s)  (s  q) = t  2s + q\). So, in his case we'd have \(t  q = t  2s + q\) or \(q=s\). But we are told that q, s, and t are all different numbers, so this case is out. b. qstIn this case \(q < s < t\): \(t  s > 0\) and \(s  q > 0\), which would mean that \(t  s = t s\) and \(s  q = s  q\). So, \(t  s + s  q = (t s) + (s  q) = t  q\). This matches the info given in the statement. c. qtsIn this case \(q < t < s\): \(t  s < 0\) and \(s  q > 0\), which would mean that \(t  s = (t s)\) and \(s  q = s  q\). So, \(t  s + s  q = (t s) + (s  q) = t + 2s  q\). So, in his case we'd have \(t  q = t + 2s  q\) or \(t=s\). But we are told that q, s, and t are all different numbers, so this case is out. Only q < s < t case is possible. Sufficient. (2) t > q. Not sufficient. Answer: A.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 14 Jul 2017
Posts: 9

If q, s, and t are all different numbers, is q < s < t ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Aug 2017, 06:38
Could someone please explain the little struggle I'm having with Option B)?
If we want to prove that q < s < t, that means that also q < t (regardless of the placement of s).
Now B tells us, that q > t, hence q < t can't be true at the same time? Can't I conclude that q < s < t doesn't hold when q > t and clearly answer the question with a no?
What mistake am I making here?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 57089

Re: If q, s, and t are all different numbers, is q < s < t ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Aug 2017, 07:08
Vezax27 wrote: Could someone please explain the little struggle I'm having with Option B)?
If we want to prove that q < s < t, that means that also q < t (regardless of the placement of s).
Now B tells us, that q > t, hence q < t can't be true at the same time? Can't I conclude that q < s < t doesn't hold when q > t and clearly answer the question with a no?
What mistake am I making here? We want to answer whether q < s < t and (2) says that t > q, NOT q > t.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 14 Jul 2017
Posts: 9

Re: If q, s, and t are all different numbers, is q < s < t ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Aug 2017, 07:10
Bunuel wrote: Vezax27 wrote: Could someone please explain the little struggle I'm having with Option B)?
If we want to prove that q < s < t, that means that also q < t (regardless of the placement of s).
Now B tells us, that q > t, hence q < t can't be true at the same time? Can't I conclude that q < s < t doesn't hold when q > t and clearly answer the question with a no?
What mistake am I making here? We want to answer whether q < s < t and (2) says that t > q, NOT q > t. Oh gosh, how stupid of me... Guess I need a break for the day



Target Test Prep Representative
Status: Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Posts: 7393
Location: United States (CA)

Re: If q, s, and t are all different numbers, is q < s < t ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Nov 2017, 12:48
AbdurRakib wrote: If q, s, and t are all different numbers, is q < s < t ?
(1) t  q = t  s + s  q
(2) t > q We need to determine whether q < s < t, given that q, s, and t are all different numbers. Statement One Alone: t  q = t  s + s  q Since q, s, and t are different numbers, both t  s and s  q are positive quantities, and their sum t  s + s  q will also be positive. This also makes the lefthand side t  q positive. Since t  q > 0, we have t > q. We know t > q, but we still have to determine whether s is between them. That is, is q < s < t? We have three scenarios to consider. (1) If q < s < t, then t > s and s > q, and then: t  q = t  s + s  q t  q = t  q We see that this equation holds true: t  q = t  s + s  q, and furthermore q < s < t. (2) If s < q < t, then t > s and q > s, and thus t s is positive while s  q is negative, and we have: t  s + s  q t  s + [(s  q)] t  s  s + q t  2s + q ≠ t  q Since t  2s + q ≠ t  q, the equation does not hold and we can’t have s < q < t. (3) If q < t < s, then s > t and s > q, and thus t  s is negative while s  q is positive, and we have: t  s + s  q (t  s) + s  q t + s + s  q t + 2s  q Since t + 2s  q ≠ t  q, we see that the equation does not hold, so we can’t have q < t < s. We see that only scenario 1 is true if t  q = t  s + s  q, and we do have q < s < t. Statement one alone is sufficient. Statement Two Alone: t > q We know t > q, but we still have to determine whether s is between them. It’s possible that q < s < t, but it is also possible that s < q < t or q < t < s. Since we don’t know anything about s, we can’t determine which case is valid. Statement two alone is not sufficient. Answer: A
_________________
5star rated online GMAT quant self study course See why Target Test Prep is the top rated GMAT quant course on GMAT Club. Read Our Reviews If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Kudos" button.



Director
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Posts: 829

Re: If q, s, and t are all different numbers, is q < s < t ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Dec 2017, 10:11
the fastest way to solve this is to draw the number line qts look at 1 absolute value is the length of the line section if s is in between, the answer is yes s can not be outside qt because if s is so, we can not have condition 1. remember /sq/= the line of sq. length sq can not be length of sq+length of ts.
that is all.



Intern
Joined: 15 Aug 2015
Posts: 49
Location: India
GPA: 3.21

Re: If q, s, and t are all different numbers, is q < s < t ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Dec 2017, 14:26
Bunuel wrote: If q, s, and t are all different numbers, is q < s < t ?
(1) t  q = t  s + s  q
Notice that the right hand side is positive (it's the sum of two absolute values, so two nonnegative values, in fact, in our case two positive values, since we know that the variables are distinct). Thus the left hand side must also be positive, which means that t > q. So, we can have 3 cases for s:
a. sqt In this case \(s < q < t\): \(t  s > 0\) and \(s  q < 0\), which would mean that \(t  s = t s\) and \(s  q = (s  q)\) (recall that x = x when x > 0 and x = x when x <= 0). So, \(t  s + s  q = (t s)  (s  q) = t  2s + q\).
So, in his case we'd have \(t  q = t  2s + q\) or \(q=s\). But we are told that q, s, and t are all different numbers, so this case is out.
b. qst In this case \(q < s < t\): \(t  s > 0\) and \(s  q > 0\), which would mean that \(t  s = t s\) and \(s  q = s  q\). So, \(t  s + s  q = (t s) + (s  q) = t  q\).
This matches the info given in the statement.
c. qts In this case \(q < t < s\): \(t  s < 0\) and \(s  q > 0\), which would mean that \(t  s = (t s)\) and \(s  q = s  q\). So, \(t  s + s  q = (t s) + (s  q) = t + 2s  q\).
So, in his case we'd have \(t  q = t + 2s  q\) or \(t=s\). But we are told that q, s, and t are all different numbers, so this case is out.
Only q < s < t case is possible. Sufficient.
(2) t > q. Not sufficient.
Answer: A. Bunnuel I tried it in this way . Is it right or wrong given If q, s, and t are all different numbers, is q < s < t ? or is 0<sq<tq? Since i am doing the same operation on all the parts on inequality it doesn't violates any rule i suppose ST 1 t  q = t  s + s  q Here tq is positive ( sum of two mod's) and also greater than sq as something is been added to s  q Now this equation can be solved in two ways only either same sign or opposite sign of mods same sign leads tq= ts +sq lhs=rhs therefore 0<sq<tq different signs lead to tq= ts s+q ,,,,,, not possible or tq = t+s+sq ,,,,,, again lhs is not equal to rhs . this means that the case sq<0<tq doesnt holds Hence st 1 is sufficient st 2 clearly not suficient hence a



Intern
Joined: 07 Mar 2018
Posts: 2

If q, s, and t are all different numbers, is q < s < t ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Mar 2018, 01:07
AbdurRakib wrote: If q, s, and t are all different numbers, is q < s < t ?
(1) t  q = t  s + s  q
(2) t > q This seems pretty easy and faster with picking numbers, try numbers in the given order 1,2,3 assigned for q,s,t respectively then try with a different order 1,3,2. In first case the equation in the first option will satisfy i.e LHS=RHS, while in the second case it will fail. Hence the the numbers should be in ascending order to satisfy the first option, so 1st option is suff. In second case no detail about s, so insuff. So answer is A.



Manager
Joined: 29 Jan 2015
Posts: 67
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.7
WE: Information Technology (Internet and New Media)

Re: If q, s, and t are all different numbers, is q < s < t ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Jun 2018, 06:12
Would anyone please explain this question by plugging in value ?
Thanks in advance.



Intern
Joined: 03 Jan 2016
Posts: 3

Re: If q, s, and t are all different numbers, is q < s < t ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Jul 2018, 09:57
Hi,
I have a quick question: Why is (i) is sufficient? Considering we have a total of four mutually exclusive cases with (i) and only one of them follows or is true and rest are not. This fact alone makes (i) insufficient? Please help. Thanks



VP
Joined: 09 Mar 2016
Posts: 1258

Re: If q, s, and t are all different numbers, is q < s < t ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Aug 2018, 05:09
Bunuel wrote: If q, s, and t are all different numbers, is q < s < t ?
(1) t  q = t  s + s  q
Notice that the right hand side is positive (it's the sum of two absolute values, so two nonnegative values, in fact, in our case two positive values, since we know that the variables are distinct). Thus the left hand side must also be positive, which means that t > q. So, we can have 3 cases for s:
a. sqt In this case \(s < q < t\): \(t  s > 0\) and \(s  q < 0\), which would mean that \(t  s = t s\) and \(s  q = (s  q)\) (recall that x = x when x > 0 and x = x when x <= 0). So, \(t  s + s  q = (t s)  (s  q) = t  2s + q\).
So, in his case we'd have \(t  q = t  2s + q\) or \(q=s\). But we are told that q, s, and t are all different numbers, so this case is out.
b. qst In this case \(q < s < t\): \(t  s > 0\) and \(s  q > 0\), which would mean that \(t  s = t s\) and \(s  q = s  q\). So, \(t  s + s  q = (t s) + (s  q) = t  q\).
This matches the info given in the statement.
c. qts In this case \(q < t < s\): \(t  s < 0\) and \(s  q > 0\), which would mean that \(t  s = (t s)\) and \(s  q = s  q\). So, \(t  s + s  q = (t s) + (s  q) = t + 2s  q\).
So, in his case we'd have \(t  q = t + 2s  q\) or \(t=s\). But we are told that q, s, and t are all different numbers, so this case is out.
Only q < s < t case is possible. Sufficient.
(2) t > q. Not sufficient.
Answer: A. Bunuel can you pls explain how from this \(t  q = t  2s + q\) you deduce that \(q=s\)



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 57089

Re: If q, s, and t are all different numbers, is q < s < t ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Aug 2018, 05:16
dave13 wrote: Bunuel wrote: If q, s, and t are all different numbers, is q < s < t ?
(1) t  q = t  s + s  q
Notice that the right hand side is positive (it's the sum of two absolute values, so two nonnegative values, in fact, in our case two positive values, since we know that the variables are distinct). Thus the left hand side must also be positive, which means that t > q. So, we can have 3 cases for s:
a. sqt In this case \(s < q < t\): \(t  s > 0\) and \(s  q < 0\), which would mean that \(t  s = t s\) and \(s  q = (s  q)\) (recall that x = x when x > 0 and x = x when x <= 0). So, \(t  s + s  q = (t s)  (s  q) = t  2s + q\).
So, in his case we'd have \(t  q = t  2s + q\) or \(q=s\). But we are told that q, s, and t are all different numbers, so this case is out.
b. qst In this case \(q < s < t\): \(t  s > 0\) and \(s  q > 0\), which would mean that \(t  s = t s\) and \(s  q = s  q\). So, \(t  s + s  q = (t s) + (s  q) = t  q\).
This matches the info given in the statement.
c. qts In this case \(q < t < s\): \(t  s < 0\) and \(s  q > 0\), which would mean that \(t  s = (t s)\) and \(s  q = s  q\). So, \(t  s + s  q = (t s) + (s  q) = t + 2s  q\).
So, in his case we'd have \(t  q = t + 2s  q\) or \(t=s\). But we are told that q, s, and t are all different numbers, so this case is out.
Only q < s < t case is possible. Sufficient.
(2) t > q. Not sufficient.
Answer: A. Bunuel can you pls explain how from this \(t  q = t  2s + q\) you deduce that \(q=s\) \(t  q = t  2s + q\); Cancel t: \( q =  2s + q\); Rearrange: \(2s= q + q\); \(2s=2q\); \(q=s\).
_________________



Thread Master  Part Time MBA Programs
Joined: 11 Jan 2018
Posts: 145

If q, s, and t are all different numbers, is q < s < t ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 15 Sep 2018, 14:09
msram45 wrote: AbdurRakib wrote: If q, s, and t are all different numbers, is q < s < t ?
(1) t  q = t  s + s  q
(2) t > q This seems pretty easy and faster with picking numbers, try numbers in the given order 1,2,3 assigned for q,s,t respectively then try with a different order 1,3,2. In first case the equation in the first option will satisfy i.e LHS=RHS, while in the second case it will fail. Hence the the numbers should be in ascending order to satisfy the first option, so 1st option is suff. In second case no detail about s, so insuff. So answer is A. You got the answer right, but your approach wouldn't qualify statement 1. Am I wrong to think that way? 1. one way: q= 1, s= 2, and t= 3 tq = lt  sl + ls  ql 31 = l3  2l + l2  1l 2 = l1l + l1l sufficient second way: q= 1, s = 3, and t = 2 tq = lt  sl + ls  ql 21 = l23l + l31l 1 = l1l + l2l 1 does not equal 3, therefore choosing q=1, s=3, and t=2 cannot be right numbers to verify. I get it that t has to be great than s since second way doesn't yield the equation right. But how do we ensure that this will always hold true for any numbers we use?
Originally posted by hanamana on 15 Sep 2018, 14:01.
Last edited by hanamana on 15 Sep 2018, 14:09, edited 1 time in total.



Thread Master  Part Time MBA Programs
Joined: 11 Jan 2018
Posts: 145

Re: If q, s, and t are all different numbers, is q < s < t ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Sep 2018, 14:07
ccooley wrote: AbdurRakib wrote: If q, s, and t are all different numbers, is q < s < t ?
(1) t  q = t  s + s  q
(2) t > q With less math: Start with statement 2. This is insufficient, since s could be greater than t, or s could be between q and t. Eliminate answers B and D.Statement 1: When you see x  y, think 'distance between x and y on the number line'. That's all that means. So, this statement says that t  q is equal to the distance between t and s, plus the distance between s and q. In other words, s has to be between t and q. Jot down some diagrams on your paper to convince yourself of that: in order for the distances to make sense, s has to be in the middle. Also, tq has to be positive, since it's the sum of two absolute values. So, t is greater than q. If t is greater than q and s is in the middle, you know that q < s < t. Sufficient. This is awesome. Made it so much easier to understand. Thank you.




Re: If q, s, and t are all different numbers, is q < s < t ?
[#permalink]
15 Sep 2018, 14:07






