Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 19:57 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 19:57
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
feruz77
Joined: 08 Oct 2010
Last visit: 22 Dec 2021
Posts: 169
Own Kudos:
2,565
 [22]
Given Kudos: 974
Location: Uzbekistan
Concentration: Finance and accounting
Schools:Johnson, Fuqua, Simon, Mendoza
GPA: 4.0
WE 3: 10
Posts: 169
Kudos: 2,565
 [22]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
17
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ankitranjan
Joined: 08 Sep 2010
Last visit: 13 Dec 2012
Posts: 109
Own Kudos:
846
 [2]
Given Kudos: 21
Location: India
Concentration: Finance
WE 1: 6 Year, Telecom(GSM)
Posts: 109
Kudos: 846
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
intcan
Joined: 27 Oct 2010
Last visit: 03 Apr 2021
Posts: 71
Own Kudos:
34
 [5]
Given Kudos: 20
Posts: 71
Kudos: 34
 [5]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Warlock007
Joined: 08 Jan 2011
Last visit: 25 May 2012
Posts: 149
Own Kudos:
224
 [2]
Given Kudos: 46
Status:==GMAT Ninja==
Schools:ISB, IIMA ,SP Jain , XLRI
WE 1: Aditya Birla Group (sales)
WE 2: Saint Gobain Group (sales)
Posts: 149
Kudos: 224
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
feruz77
Immigration wages will be paid bi-weekly, monthly, or not at all after contracts are signed, depending on police presence.

(A) Immigration wages will be paid bi-weekly, monthly, or not at all after contracts are signed, depending on police presence.
(B) After contracts are signed, depending on police presence, immigration wages will be paid bi-weekly, monthly, or at all.
(C) After contracts are signed, police presence will determine if immigration wages will be paid bi-weekly, monthly, or at all.
(D) Police presence determines whether immigration wages, after contracts are signed, will be paid bi-weekly, monthly, or at all.
(E) Police presence, after contracts are signed, will determine whether immigration wages will be paid bi-weekly, monthly, or at all.


can anyone explain why other options are wrong :? :? :?
User avatar
dinesh86
Joined: 06 Nov 2012
Last visit: 31 Mar 2017
Posts: 100
Own Kudos:
463
 [1]
Given Kudos: 111
Status:Manager
Affiliations: Manager
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Sustainability
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q49 V33
GPA: 3
WE:Supply Chain Management (Energy)
GMAT 2: 680 Q49 V33
Posts: 100
Kudos: 463
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Please explain all options.....
User avatar
Gmat800Champ
Joined: 20 Apr 2018
Last visit: 02 Sep 2018
Posts: 35
Own Kudos:
25
 [1]
Given Kudos: 622
Posts: 35
Kudos: 25
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(D) Police presence determines whether immigration wages, after contracts are signed, will be paid bi-weekly, monthly, or at all.
(E) Police presence, after contracts are signed, will determine whether immigration wages will be paid bi-weekly, monthly, or at all.

Whether is used for choice not if, which is used only in case of conditionals.
D has correct modifier, so it wins over E.

feruz77
Immigration wages will be paid bi-weekly, monthly, or not at all after contracts are signed, depending on police presence.

(A) Immigration wages will be paid bi-weekly, monthly, or not at all after contracts are signed, depending on police presence.
(B) After contracts are signed, depending on police presence, immigration wages will be paid bi-weekly, monthly, or at all.
(C) After contracts are signed, police presence will determine if immigration wages will be paid bi-weekly, monthly, or at all.
(D) Police presence determines whether immigration wages, after contracts are signed, will be paid bi-weekly, monthly, or at all.
(E) Police presence, after contracts are signed, will determine whether immigration wages will be paid bi-weekly, monthly, or at all.
User avatar
thangvietnam
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Last visit: 09 Mar 2023
Posts: 768
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,198
Posts: 768
Kudos: 418
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
in d, i do not understand "at all" . pls. help .
User avatar
DharLog
Joined: 26 Jun 2017
Last visit: 04 Mar 2019
Posts: 314
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 334
Location: Russian Federation
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
WE:Information Technology (Other)
Posts: 314
Kudos: 342
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
feruz77
Immigration wages will be paid bi-weekly, monthly, or not at all after contracts are signed, depending on police presence.

(A) Immigration wages will be paid bi-weekly, monthly, or not at all after contracts are signed, depending on police presence.
(B) After contracts are signed, depending on police presence, immigration wages will be paid bi-weekly, monthly, or at all.
(C) After contracts are signed, police presence will determine if immigration wages will be paid bi-weekly, monthly, or at all.
(D) Police presence determines whether immigration wages, after contracts are signed, will be paid bi-weekly, monthly, or at all.
(E) Police presence, after contracts are signed, will determine whether immigration wages will be paid bi-weekly, monthly, or at all.

It is easy to eliminate A, B, C.
A. This sentence does not make any logical sense.
B. Same as A.
C. Sounds better than previous ones, but "if" does not pass in GMAT in not conditional sentences. We need "whether".

D, E - tricky.
It seems to me that E is about 1 case scenario ("will detemine"), maybe something unusual. For some particular case.
And D is something global ("determines"). It is one of police's usual jobs.
So D is a little more preferable.
Moreover. "After contracts are signed" - it is atrributed to "wages", so it's place in D is better.

We choose D.
User avatar
aggvipul
Joined: 15 Nov 2017
Last visit: 13 Apr 2022
Posts: 229
Own Kudos:
418
 [1]
Given Kudos: 28
Status:Current Student
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
WE:Operations (Retail: E-commerce)
Posts: 229
Kudos: 418
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO D
However, there is a correction required in question
In all the answer option stems "or at all" is given however the question asks for "not at all"
User avatar
shameekv1989
Joined: 14 Dec 2019
Last visit: 17 Jun 2021
Posts: 820
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 354
Location: Poland
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Strategy
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V27
GMAT 2: 660 Q49 V31
GMAT 3: 720 Q50 V38
GPA: 4
WE:Engineering (Consumer Electronics)
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Really!! What is this sentence exactly trying to convey? How can police presence determine the immigration wages? I just couldn't understand the meaning!!
avatar
elavendan1
Joined: 15 Jul 2014
Last visit: 20 Feb 2022
Posts: 88
Own Kudos:
108
 [2]
Given Kudos: 232
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
Posts: 88
Kudos: 108
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shameekv1989
Really!! What is this sentence exactly trying to convey? How can police presence determine the immigration wages? I just couldn't understand the meaning!!

Two things: Immigration wages paid vs not paid. They will be paid once the contracts are signed. But if police is present(while paying during fortnight/monthend), they will not be paid at all.
To start with, ellipsis comes into play here. Immigration wages will be paid <condition> ,or at all. Note here that the phrase at all is fairly equivalent to the uncertain period forever. For instance,
1.I wonder whether Australian bush fires come down at all.
2.Has the situation in China improved at all?

This is completely my understanding. Please correct me if I am wrong.

Now the answer choices.
(A) Immigration wages will be paid bi-weekly, monthly, or not at all after contracts are signed, depending on police presence. Misplaced modifier. Signing of the contracts is essential for other payments too. Eliminate
(B) After contracts are signed, depending on police presence, immigration wages will be paid bi-weekly, monthly, or at all. Essential modifier. Police presence is essential! Enclosing the phrase within commas make the phrase non-essential, so Eliminate
(C) After contracts are signed, police presence will determine if immigration wages will be paid bi-weekly, monthly, or at all. Poor conditional construction. Generally if is used to denote conditions. If the train comes [Simple Present] late, I will be late [Simple Future] to the meeting. This is the correct construction and option C uses Simple Future on both sides of the condition. Eliminate
(D) Police presence determines whether immigration wages, after contracts are signed, will be paid bi-weekly, monthly, or at all. No Error.
at all is in parallel with the list of times (bi-weekly,monthly). or is not to be confused with Whether...or. Here it is used as parallel connector. so Hold on.
(E) Police presence, after contracts are signed, will determine whether immigration wages will be paid bi-weekly, monthly, or at all.Essential modifier Signing contracts is required for getting the wages! So Eliminate.

Option D, it is. Hope this helps
User avatar
dips1122
Joined: 12 Oct 2019
Last visit: 24 Feb 2022
Posts: 73
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 92
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, General Management
GMAT 1: 720 Q48 V41
GMAT 2: 730 Q50 V39
GMAT 3: 760 Q50 V44
GPA: 4
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I am confused between C and D. I think the time frame is: contracts are signed->police presence will determine the payment. Also, what should be the differentiating factor b/w if and whether
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,844
Own Kudos:
8,945
 [2]
Given Kudos: 225
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,844
Kudos: 8,945
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dips1122
I am confused between C and D. I think the time frame is: contracts are signed->police presence will determine the payment. Also, what should be the differentiating factor b/w if and whether

Hi

You have got the chronology of events absolutely spot on.

The problem with option (C) is the usage of the word "if". "If" is used when we need to introduce a condition. For example:

Give me a call whether you are coming.

This is incorrect. The message to be conveyed is: In the event of you coming, give me a call. This is a typical condition and requires the usage of "if". The correct construction would be:

Give me a call if you are coming.

On the other hand, "whether" is used to indicate a choice among options. For example:

I don’t know if I should stay home or go out.

This is incorrect because, in this sentence, one is debating to choose between two options ("whether" can also be used to indicate a choice between more than two options). Hence, the correct usage would involve the use of "whether".

I don’t know whether I should stay home or go out.

In the sentence given in the question, clearly the payment frequency of wages (bi-weekly, monthly, not at all) is not a condition but one among a few choices. Hence we should use "whether" and not"if" as used in option (C).

Hope this helps.
avatar
f0restreal
Joined: 11 Jun 2021
Last visit: 04 Sep 2022
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 33
Status:Preparing for a second attempt
GMAT 1: 600 Q49 V22
GMAT 1: 600 Q49 V22
Posts: 15
Kudos: 11
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
feruz77
Immigration wages will be paid bi-weekly, monthly, or not at all after contracts are signed, depending on police presence.

(A) Immigration wages will be paid bi-weekly, monthly, or not at all after contracts are signed, depending on police presence.
(B) After contracts are signed, depending on police presence, immigration wages will be paid bi-weekly, monthly, or at all.
(C) After contracts are signed, police presence will determine if immigration wages will be paid bi-weekly, monthly, or at all.
(D) Police presence determines whether immigration wages, after contracts are signed, will be paid bi-weekly, monthly, or at all.
(E) Police presence, after contracts are signed, will determine whether immigration wages will be paid bi-weekly, monthly, or at all.


Going by the intended meaning of the problem statement, we must realize that no part of the sentence is an inessential modifier.
in both D & E we have one seemingly inessential modifier ...,after contracts are signed,...
A & B suggest ambiguous meaning

Hence answer is C

Please let me know if my approach has any mistake.
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,195
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,195
Kudos: 4,766
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
f0restreal
feruz77
Immigration wages will be paid bi-weekly, monthly, or not at all after contracts are signed, depending on police presence.

(A) Immigration wages will be paid bi-weekly, monthly, or not at all after contracts are signed, depending on police presence.
(B) After contracts are signed, depending on police presence, immigration wages will be paid bi-weekly, monthly, or at all.
(C) After contracts are signed, police presence will determine if immigration wages will be paid bi-weekly, monthly, or at all.
(D) Police presence determines whether immigration wages, after contracts are signed, will be paid bi-weekly, monthly, or at all.
(E) Police presence, after contracts are signed, will determine whether immigration wages will be paid bi-weekly, monthly, or at all.


Going by the intended meaning of the problem statement, we must realize that no part of the sentence is an inessential modifier.
in both D & E we have one seemingly inessential modifier ...,after contracts are signed,...
A & B suggest ambiguous meaning

Hence answer is C

Please let me know if my approach has any mistake.

Hello f0restreal,

We hope this finds you well.

Having gone through the question and your reasoning, we believe that we can point out one error in your approach. Option C incorrectly uses the simple future tense verb "will determine" for information that is permanent in nature. The intended meaning here is that police presence, as a rule, or habitually, determines something. Thus, it is best to use the simple present tense to convey this information, as Option D, the best answer choice, does. Further, Option C incorrectly uses "if" rather than "whether" to present alternatives -- immigration wages being paid bi-weekly, monthly, or not at all; please remember, “if” is used to refer to phrases that lead to a “then” clause and “whether" is used for showing alternatives; "whether" generally wins over "if" on GMAT. Due to these errors, Option C must be eliminated, outright.

Moreover, Option A features a meaning error in itself. The lack of a comma after "all" in the phrase "or not at all after contracts are signed" illogically implies that immigration wages will be paid bi-weekly or monthly, or specifically after the contracts are signed, they would not be paid at all. Thus, Option A itself does not accurately convey the meaning of the sentence, meaning that "after contracts are signed, being used as an inessential modifier is not necessarily an error.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
PyjamaScientist
User avatar
Admitted - Which School Forum Moderator
Joined: 25 Oct 2020
Last visit: 05 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,118
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 633
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42 (Online)
Products:
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42 (Online)
Posts: 1,118
Kudos: 1,307
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ExpertsGlobal5
f0restreal
feruz77
Immigration wages will be paid bi-weekly, monthly, or not at all after contracts are signed, depending on police presence.

(A) Immigration wages will be paid bi-weekly, monthly, or not at all after contracts are signed, depending on police presence.
(B) After contracts are signed, depending on police presence, immigration wages will be paid bi-weekly, monthly, or at all.
(C) After contracts are signed, police presence will determine if immigration wages will be paid bi-weekly, monthly, or at all.
(D) Police presence determines whether immigration wages, after contracts are signed, will be paid bi-weekly, monthly, or at all.
(E) Police presence, after contracts are signed, will determine whether immigration wages will be paid bi-weekly, monthly, or at all.


Going by the intended meaning of the problem statement, we must realize that no part of the sentence is an inessential modifier.
in both D & E we have one seemingly inessential modifier ...,after contracts are signed,...
A & B suggest ambiguous meaning

Hence answer is C

Please let me know if my approach has any mistake.

Hello f0restreal,

We hope this finds you well.

Having gone through the question and your reasoning, we believe that we can point out one error in your approach. Option C incorrectly uses the simple future tense verb "will determine" for information that is permanent in nature. The intended meaning here is that police presence, as a rule, or habitually, determines something. Thus, it is best to use the simple present tense to convey this information, as Option D, the best answer choice, does. Further, Option C incorrectly uses "if" rather than "whether" to present alternatives -- immigration wages being paid bi-weekly, monthly, or not at all; please remember, “if” is used to refer to phrases that lead to a “then” clause and “whether" is used for showing alternatives; "whether" generally wins over "if" on GMAT. Due to these errors, Option C must be eliminated, outright.

Moreover, Option A features a meaning error in itself. The lack of a comma after "all" in the phrase "or not at all after contracts are signed" illogically implies that immigration wages will be paid bi-weekly or monthly, or specifically after the contracts are signed, they would not be paid at all. Thus, Option A itself does not accurately convey the meaning of the sentence, meaning that "after contracts are signed, being used as an inessential modifier is not necessarily an error.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
How do you choose the correct answer between D and E?
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,831
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,831
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts