GMATNinja
Javierbc
Question 27:
Why C is incorrect?
In the text:
Such ambiguities reveal the arbitrariness of this definition (USA definitinion)
Why cannot we deduce, that the clasical definition is less ambiguos?
Thanks.
Javier.
You are correct that the passage specifically states that the government's definition is ambiguous in many cases. However, can we say with certainty that the classical definition is
less ambiguous?
The passage simply does not support that claim. At the end of the second paragraph, the author states that the classical definition is "hard to sustain" because it potentially misclassifies services such as electric utilities and computer programming. This both implies that the classical definition is impractical and, in some cases, ambiguous. Because both definitions are ambiguous and the author never offers a direct comparison of the two on this point, we cannot say that the classical definition is less ambiguous than the government's definition.
A comparison of the practicality of the two definitions is much more clear: the first sentence of the second paragraph states that "the United States government's definition is more practical." From this, we can say that the classical definition is more difficult to apply (see
this post for more information). (B) is the correct choice for question #27.
I hope that helps!
Quote:
27. In comparing the United States government's definition of services with the classical definition, the author suggests that the classical definition is
(A) more pragmatic
(B) more difficult to apply
(C) less ambiguous
(D) more widely used
(E) more arbitrary
Hi
GMATNinja AjiteshArunClassical definition --> some issues
Government definition--> less issues than classical
It is given government definition was arbitrary
Why can't we conclude that classical definition is more arbitrary.
Arbitrary means something that is applied can be argued based on fundamentals on which the definition is based.
classical definition was more hard to apply because it was more arbitrary
Please help to get rid of option E.
More difficult to apply --> it doesn't mean it is difficult to apply, maybe it is easy to apply but end result may be wrong. It seems classical definition was more easy to apply because logic was simple: Apply XYZ if Z . How is it hard to apply? I think it is easy to apply but because results would be wrong because it was more arbitrary.
So I rejected C.
( Another such reference: It is easy to do hard question . It doesn't mean the answer is correct. Maybe for hard questions just guess blindly then it more easy to do hard question unless it is mentioned that " it is difficult to get hard questions correct".)
It seems this question is more of a meaning based . But I am still confused between C and E:(
Please share what am I doing wrong.