1. The author mentions armed robbery (line 13) primarily in order to
(A) provide an example of a type of offense with which offenders are rarely charged in juvenile court
(B) show how the prosecution can automatically decide a jurisdictional issue involving some juvenile offenders
(C) illustrate a type of offense that the new statute will make more difficult to prosecute
(D) explain why extenuating circumstances must be considered when assigning criminal responsibility to juvenile offenders
(E) emphasize the severity of the offenses that are typically considered only in cases tried in criminal court
Correct Answer - B
Explanation - as mentioned in the passsage: "In fact, if prosecution finds sufficient grounds for charging a juvenile offender with, say, armed robbery, juvenile court review will be entirely bypassed and the offender (15) will automatically be tried in criminal court as an adult."
implies that if the prosecution is has sufficient evidence that the juvenile has comitted the crime, the review of the juvenile court can be bypassed and the case can be directly taken up in criminal court.
Option A - incorrect, as not discussed in the passage.
Option C - incorrect, the new statute will actually make it more direct.
Option D - incorrect, not what's discussed in the passage.
Option E - incorrect, true but main reason why author mentions is as explained above.
2. Which one of the following words employed by the author is most indicative of the author’s attitude toward the ability of prosecutors to bypass juvenile court review following the passage of the new statute?
(A) rightfully
(B) hope
(C) regrettably
(D) reluctant
(E) divests
Correct Answer - C
Explanation - most probably C, as authors mentions in the passage: "Regrettably, courts have been reluctant to question the constitutionality of such discretion, and little hope remains that they would (20) subject it to judicial review any time soon."
Author is not in favor of the statute, but regrettably, nothing is being done by the courts to question it, let alone ask for changing it.
Options A, B, D, E - automatically incorrect, as they dont potray the exact attitude.
3. The passage suggests which one of the following about a sixteen-year old offender charged with armed robbery in the state of Arizona prior to 1996?
(A) The offender could be prosecuted either in juvenile or in criminal court.
(B) The prosecution did not have sufficient grounds to charge the offender with a more serious crime.
(C) The court would consider all extenuating circumstances relevant to his case.
(D) The prosecution could decide to bypass juvenile court review and try the offender in criminal court.
(E) The choice of courts did not rest entirely in the discretion of the prosecution.
Correct Answer - C
Explanation -as mentioned in the passage: "Opponents have rightfully argued that by assigning automatic criminal responsibility to juveniles based solely on their age and the type of offense with which they are charged, many of the extenuating circumstances (10) that would have previously been considered by a juvenile court judge are now largely irrelevant. "
Implying that if a sixteen-year old offender charged with armed robbery in the state of Arizona prior to 1996, the court would have tried to lessen the sentence or the offence.
Option A - incorrect, not mentioned in the passage.
Option B,D- incorrect, something that would have happened after 1996.
Option E - true, but not related to the asked question.
4. The author’s main purpose in the passage is to
(A) defend a proposed statutory change against criticism
(B) explain the unforeseen consequences of a legal reform
(C) support a critical evaluation of a statute
(D) criticize the constitutionality of judicial discretion
(E) articulate opposing arguments and propose a reconciliation
Correct Answer - D
Explanation - throughout the passage, author's tone is that of criticism, and that he is not supportive of the new change in the juvenile hearing, as in the ending lines he mentions :" Regrettably, courts have been reluctant to question the constitutionality of such discretion, and little hope remains that they would (20) subject it to judicial review any time soon."
Option A, C - exactly opposite of what's mentioned.
Option B - no unforeseen consequences have been mentioned in the passage, just a constitutional change has been mentioned in detail.
Option E - out of scope w.r.t the passage.