Last visit was: 12 May 2025, 02:12 It is currently 12 May 2025, 02:12
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 11 May 2025
Posts: 15,065
Own Kudos:
44,835
 [8]
Given Kudos: 6,022
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 15,065
Kudos: 44,835
 [8]
Kudos
Add Kudos
8
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
bM22
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 May 2016
Last visit: 08 May 2024
Posts: 746
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,316
Location: India
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
kris19
Joined: 24 Sep 2014
Last visit: 19 Feb 2023
Posts: 77
Own Kudos:
121
 [2]
Given Kudos: 261
Concentration: General Management, Technology
Posts: 77
Kudos: 121
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
AnirudhaS
User avatar
LBS Moderator
Joined: 30 Oct 2019
Last visit: 25 Jun 2024
Posts: 814
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,576
Posts: 814
Kudos: 838
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Answers are in bold.

1. The author mentions armed robbery (line 13) primarily in order to
(A) provide an example of a type of offense with which offenders are rarely charged in juvenile court
(B) show how the prosecution can automatically decide a jurisdictional issue involving some juvenile offenders
(C) illustrate a type of offense that the new statute will make more difficult to prosecute
(D) explain why extenuating circumstances must be considered when assigning criminal responsibility to juvenile offenders
(E) emphasize the severity of the offenses that are typically considered only in cases tried in criminal court

Explanation of question 1
A - not true, this is not the intended meaning.
B - The armed robbery is meant as an example (see the usage of the word SAY). Therefore it is not written to show how the decision of prosecution is reached.
C - Sure it is a type of offence, but the statute would not make it more difficult to prosecute.
D - This is not the intended meaning. Extenuating circumstances was considered before.
E - This is spot on. The armed robbery is given as an example to show that it is sufficient grounds for charging the juvenile offended., and therefore must be tried in criminal court (as opposed to juvenile court).
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2. Which one of the following words employed by the author is most indicative of the author’s attitude toward the ability of prosecutors to bypass juvenile court review following the passage of the new statute?
(A) rightfully
(B) hope
(C) regrettably
(D) reluctant
(E) divests

Explanation of question 2
First we need to understand what was the author's standpoint. Author is against the court' statute as evidence from this - "Opponents have rightfully argued" Hence we know that author is generally against the view of the prosecution's ability to choose the court. The negative choices are -
C - Closest is regrettably. Author regrets this because he thinks there would not be a judicial review of this any time soon.
D - he was not reluctant. Out.
E - divest means getting rid of. This is not what author's attitude is.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

3. The passage suggests which one of the following about a sixteen-year old offender charged with armed robbery in the state of Arizona prior to 1996?
(A) The offender could be prosecuted either in juvenile or in criminal court.
(B) The prosecution did not have sufficient grounds to charge the offender with a more serious crime.
(C) The court would consider all extenuating circumstances relevant to his case.
(D) The prosecution could decide to bypass juvenile court review and try the offender in criminal court.
(E) The choice of courts did not rest entirely in the discretion of the prosecution.

Explanation of question 3
Two choices come close, viz C and E. Lets visit the choices
C - this is possible as stated here - "many of the extenuating circumstances that would have previously been considered by a juvenile court judge are now largely irrelevant."
E - this is also possible as stated here - "The choice of court, therefore, rests entirely in the discretion of the prosecution."
This is really close, and it would be minutely different in one of these two choices which would determine one choice over the other. However, one thing that I have learnt from GMAT RCs is that test-makers hate extreme words. The extreme word here is ALL in C. Whereas the passage states MANY OF THE. Therefore there is a subtle difference between these two words, hence a difference in meaning. Therefore, my final choice is E.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

4. The author’s main purpose in the passage is to
(A) defend a proposed statutory change against criticism
(B) explain the unforeseen consequences of a legal reform
(C) support a critical evaluation of a statute
(D) criticize the constitutionality of judicial discretion
(E) articulate opposing arguments and propose a reconciliation

Explanation of question 4
A - Author is himself criticizing, not defending.
B - The unforeseen consequences are not explained.
C - Yes, author is evaluating a statute in the state of Arizona (1996)
D - The author criticizes no doubt, but that is not the main idea of the passage.
E - He does not articulate opposing arguments. Arguments are on one side, not on both.
avatar
dreamscore800
Joined: 18 Sep 2019
Last visit: 10 Oct 2020
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 20
Posts: 10
Kudos: 30
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My Answers:

1. B (An offence for which the choice of court, rests entirely in the discretion of the prosecution)
2. C (The attitude of the author can be seen by his reaction in the last few lines of the paragraph)
3. C (Prior to the new lay, the court would consider all extenuating circumstances relevant to his case)
4. B ( Author try to explains the unforeseen consequences of a legal reform)
avatar
Yashika123
Joined: 15 Sep 2019
Last visit: 26 Sep 2020
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 7
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
1. The author mentions armed robbery (line 13) primarily in order to

(A) provide an example of a type of offense with which offenders are rarely charged in juvenile court(CORRECT) Because the author in lie 13 states that offense like armed robbery are rarely charged and then seen in criminal court when adult.

(B) show how the prosecution can automatically decide a jurisdictional issue involving some juvenile offenders
(C) illustrate a type of offense that the new statute will make more difficult to prosecute
(D) explain why extenuating circumstances must be considered when assigning criminal responsibility to juvenile offenders
(E) emphasize the severity of the offenses that are typically considered only in cases tried in criminal court

2. Which one of the following words employed by the author is most indicative of the author’s attitude toward the ability of prosecutors to bypass juvenile court review following the passage of the new statute?

(A) rightfully
(B) hope
(C) regrettably (CORRECT) NOT SURE
(D) reluctant COULD BE THIS
(E) divests

3. The passage suggests which one of the following about a sixteen-year old offender charged with armed robbery in the state of Arizona prior to 1996?

(A) The offender could be prosecuted either in juvenile or in criminal court.
(B) The prosecution did not have sufficient grounds to charge the offender with a more serious crime.
(C) The court would consider all extenuating circumstances relevant to his case.
(D) The prosecution could decide to bypass juvenile court review and try the offender in criminal court.(CORRECT) as stated in line 13
(E) The choice of courts did not rest entirely in the discretion of the prosecution.

4. The author’s main purpose in the passage is to

(A) defend a proposed statutory change against criticism
(B) explain the unforeseen consequences of a legal reform
(C) support a critical evaluation of a statute
(D) criticize the constitutionality of judicial discretion(CORRECT)
(E) articulate opposing arguments and propose a reconciliation
User avatar
adstudy
Joined: 11 Mar 2018
Last visit: 15 Dec 2023
Posts: 259
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 270
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37 (Online)
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37 (Online)
Posts: 259
Kudos: 398
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
1. The author mentions armed robbery (line 13) primarily in order to

(A) provide an example of a type of offense with which offenders are rarely charged in juvenile court [the part 'rarely charged' neither is mentioned nor can be inferred from the passage]
(B) show how the prosecution can automatically decide a jurisdictional issue involving some juvenile offenders
(C) illustrate a type of offense that the new statute will make more difficult to prosecute [the passage suggests the opposite. Passage says it will make it easy to prosecute atleast in juvenile courts ]
(D) explain why extenuating circumstances must be considered when assigning criminal responsibility to juvenile offenders [extenuating circumstances is only mentioned and not explained]
(E) emphasize the severity of the offenses that are typically considered only in cases tried in criminal court [the passage does not emphasize anything on the severity of the offenses]


Answer should be B, IMO. Elimination point marked against each option
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Which one of the following words employed by the author is most indicative of the author’s attitude toward the ability of prosecutors to bypass juvenile court review following the passage of the new statute?

(A) rightfully
(B) hope
(C) regrettably
(D) reluctant
(E) divests


Answer should be E, IMO.

A and B can be easily removed as they are positive views and author does not seem to be too positive on the topic discussed, and C and D seem to be too strong.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. The passage suggests which one of the following about a sixteen-year old offender charged with armed robbery in the state of Arizona prior to 1996?

(A) The offender could be prosecuted either in juvenile or in criminal court.[No information on this can be obtained from the passage]
(B) The prosecution did not have sufficient grounds to charge the offender with a more serious crime.[No information on this, prior to 1996, can be obtained from the passage]
(C) The court would consider all extenuating circumstances relevant to his case.
(D) The prosecution could decide to bypass juvenile court review and try the offender in criminal court.[No information on this, prior to 1996, can be obtained from the passage, Maybe in some cases it could be bypassed and in others maybe not.]
(E) The choice of courts did not rest entirely in the discretion of the prosecution.[Prior to 1996, we cannot even infer whether discretion rested in the hands of the prosecution.]


Answer should be C, IMO. Elimination point marked against each option.

Option C can be directly inferred from the below part of the passage (Line 9 - 10 - 11) -
many of the extenuating circumstances that would have previously been considered by a juvenile court judge are now largely irrelevant.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. The author’s main purpose in the passage is to

(A) defend a proposed statutory change against criticism[Author has a very negative stand against statutory change. He is not defending]
(B) explain the unforeseen consequences of a legal reform [Nothing on unforseen consequences discussed here]
(C) support a critical evaluation of a statute [Author himself is critically evaluating and not supporting anybody's evaluation]
(D) criticize the constitutionality of judicial discretion
(E) articulate opposing arguments and propose a reconciliation[Author is evaluating and expressing his concerns but not articulating]


Answer should be D, IMO. Elimination point marked against each option.
User avatar
Gowtham91
User avatar
Oxford Saïd School Moderator
Joined: 17 May 2019
Last visit: 23 Mar 2025
Posts: 111
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 409
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 570 Q44 V23
GMAT 2: 610 Q48 V26
GMAT 2: 610 Q48 V26
Posts: 111
Kudos: 46
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Q1.
A. This is opposite of what author intends to say. As per him, this offense has to be prosecuted in Juvenile court.
B. Correct Author used this particular case as an example to show that the prosecution is discretionary.
C. Difficulty of prosecution is not in question.
D. No such explanation is given by the author.
E. This is again opposite of what author intends to say. Such cases typically belong to the jurisdiction of Juvenile court.

Q2.
A. This is true for author's attitude towards opponents view of the newly introduced statute.
B. This is true for author's attitude towards court's fighting against the statute.
C. Correct The author is regretting against the introduction of new statute. It is an unwelcome move by the Arizona state.
D. Same as B.
E. This is not a attitude of author, but rather the scope of the new statute.

Q3.
A. No. This is true post 1996 after the introduction of new statute.
B. Irrelevant.
C. Ths is true, but this is not the idea behind the given example. This is rather true in general.
D. Same as A.
E. Correct Can be inferred from - "The choice of court, therefore, rests entirely in
the discretion of the prosecution."

Q4.
A. The author is supporting the opponents of the statute and not defending.
B. The author explains the consequences, but then criticises the passing of new statute. Hence this is only partial scope.
C. Correct The author supports the opponents view.
D. True but shows only partial scope.
E. No opposing views are presented and reconciliation is not provided. The author's view is one sided.
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 11 May 2025
Posts: 15,065
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,022
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 15,065
Kudos: 44,835
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
OAs of this RC are as follow:

1. B
2. C
3. E
4. C

Gautam12121991 is on top here, AnirudhaS and kris19 are at second.
User avatar
Hoozan
Joined: 28 Sep 2018
Last visit: 12 Dec 2024
Posts: 690
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 248
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33 (Online)
GMAT 2: 700 Q49 V37
Products:
GMAT 2: 700 Q49 V37
Posts: 690
Kudos: 661
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sajjad1994 please could you provide the OE for Q3 and if possible the difficulty level of each question

Thank you!
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 11 May 2025
Posts: 15,065
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,022
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 15,065
Kudos: 44,835
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hoozan
Sajjad1994 please could you provide the OE for Q3 and if possible the difficulty level of each question

Thank you!

The difficulty level of each question is as follow:

Question #1: 700
Question #2: 650
Question #3: 700
Question #4: 750

Overall: 700

Thank you
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 11 May 2025
Posts: 15,065
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,022
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 15,065
Kudos: 44,835
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hoozan
Sajjad1994 please could you provide the OE for Q3 and if possible the difficulty level of each question

Thank you!

Official Explanation

3. The passage suggests which one of the following about a sixteen-year old offender charged with armed robbery in the state of Arizona prior to 1996?

Difficulty Level: 700

Explanation

This question asks us to infer what must be true about a sixteen-year old offender charged with armed robbery in the state of Arizona prior to 1996. While the author does not explicitly describe the legal framework for dealing with such an offender prior to 1996, a reasonable inference can still be made.

Answer choice (A) is incorrect, because prior to 1996 the juvenile court would have had jurisdiction over the juvenile offender (the statute stripped the court of such jurisdiction). We have no reason to believe that the offender could also be prosecuted in criminal court.

Answer choice (B) describes a hypothetical that cannot be proven with the information available.

Answer choice (C) contains an exaggeration. While the juvenile court is likely consider many of the extenuating circumstances that would be irrelevant in criminal court (lines 10-11), we cannot prove that it would consider all extenuating circumstances relevant to the offender’s case.

Answer choice (D) describes how the offender would be tried following the passage of the new statute, i.e. after 1996.

Answer choice (E) is the correct answer choice. In the fourth sentence, we learn that following the 1996 statute, “The choice of court […] rests entirely in the discretion of the prosecution” (lines 16-18). The author also observes that “courts have been reluctant to question the constitutionality of such discretion” (lines 18-20). We can therefore infer that prior to 1996 this was not the case, i.e. that the choice of courts did not rest entirely in the discretion of the prosecution.

Answer: E
User avatar
ShankSouljaBoi
Joined: 21 Jun 2017
Last visit: 17 Apr 2024
Posts: 622
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4,090
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 620 Q47 V30
GMAT 3: 650 Q48 V31
GPA: 3.1
WE:Corporate Finance (Non-Profit and Government)
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Question 3 , great trap the question is asking for legalities prior to 1996 , of which we have no clues about .
User avatar
ShankSouljaBoi
Joined: 21 Jun 2017
Last visit: 17 Apr 2024
Posts: 622
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4,090
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 620 Q47 V30
GMAT 3: 650 Q48 V31
GPA: 3.1
WE:Corporate Finance (Non-Profit and Government)
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi , please provide official solution to Q 4
The reason I chose B is that a statue has been brought forward and the passage of the author is primarily concerned to bring the unforeseen or unconsidered consequences of bringing in such a change.
User avatar
ShankSouljaBoi
Joined: 21 Jun 2017
Last visit: 17 Apr 2024
Posts: 622
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4,090
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 620 Q47 V30
GMAT 3: 650 Q48 V31
GPA: 3.1
WE:Corporate Finance (Non-Profit and Government)
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Sajjad1994 , MartyTargetTestPrep GMATninja2

What is the difference between primary purpose of the author and central idea of the passage.
Do we specifically have to look out for first and last passages---- as in primary purpose questions voicing out of the author's opinion is generally in the last or/and the first passage ?


For central idea question , a global question ..... we have to summarize from our notes and quick scan POE ?
Any falter in my approach, please guide !!!!

Best !!!
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 11 May 2025
Posts: 15,065
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,022
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 15,065
Kudos: 44,835
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ShankSouljaBoi
Hi , please provide official solution to Q 4
The reason I chose B is that a statue has been brought forward and the passage of the author is primarily concerned to bring the unforeseen or unconsidered consequences of bringing in such a change.

Official Explanation

4. The author’s main purpose in the passage is to

Difficulty Level: 700-750

Explanation

Answer choice (A) is incorrect, because the author does not defend the statute against criticism: on the contrary, she supports the criticism (line 6).

Answer choice (B) is attractive, but incorrect. The author alludes to the consequences of the newly introduced statute (lines 9-17), but we have no way of knowing if these consequences are necessarily unforeseen. This answer choice fails the Fact Test, and is therefore incorrect.

Answer choice (C) is the correct answer choice. The author begins by introducing a statute, which is immediately criticized (“opponents have rightfully argued that…”). The remainder of the passage explains why the opponents’ argument is a reasonable one.

Answer choice (D) is incorrect, because the constitutionality of judicial discretion is not under question. The author only questions the constitutionality of prosecutorial discretion (lines 16-20).

Answer choice (E) is incorrect, because the argument in favor of the new statute is never outlined, and no reconciliation between the two positions is provided.

Answer: C

Hope it helps
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,292
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,292
Kudos: 936
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7302 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
233 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
15065 posts