Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 1811:00 AM PST
-12:00 PM PST
Join us in a live GMAT practice session and solve 30 challenging GMAT questions with other test takers in timed conditions, covering GMAT Quant, Data Sufficiency, Data Insights, Reading Comprehension, and Critical Reasoning questions.
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
Updated on: 11 Feb 2022, 06:02
Originally posted by GMATBLACKBELT on 02 Aug 2007, 15:14.
Last edited by Bunuel on 11 Feb 2022, 06:02, edited 5 times in total.
Last edited by Bunuel on 11 Feb 2022, 06:02, edited 5 times in total.
Kudos
Bookmarks
C
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
25%
(medium)
Question Stats:
71% (01:22) correct
29%
(01:28)
wrong
based on 5583
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
In June of 1987, The Bridge of Trinquetaille, Vincent van Gogh's view of an iron bridge over the Rhone sold for $20.2 million and it was the second highest price ever paid for a painting at auction.
(A) Rhone sold for $20.2 million and it was
(B) Rhone, which sold for $20.2 million, was
(C) Rhone, was sold for $20.2 million,
(D) Rhone was sold for $20.2 million, being
(E) Rhone, sold for $20.2 million, and was
(A) Rhone sold for $20.2 million and it was
(B) Rhone, which sold for $20.2 million, was
(C) Rhone, was sold for $20.2 million,
(D) Rhone was sold for $20.2 million, being
(E) Rhone, sold for $20.2 million, and was
https://www.nytimes.com/1987/06/30/arts/van-gogh-s-bridge-sells-in-london-for-20-million.html
The mood was oddly subdued in the jam-packed salesroom at Christie's tonight as ''The Bridge of Trinquetaille,'' Vincent van Gogh's view of an iron bridge over the Rhone, was sold to an anonymous telephone bidder for $20.2 million. It was the second highest price ever paid for a painting at auction, and members of the art trade were united in their agreement that the price was both impressive and fair.
The mood was oddly subdued in the jam-packed salesroom at Christie's tonight as ''The Bridge of Trinquetaille,'' Vincent van Gogh's view of an iron bridge over the Rhone, was sold to an anonymous telephone bidder for $20.2 million. It was the second highest price ever paid for a painting at auction, and members of the art trade were united in their agreement that the price was both impressive and fair.
26 Apr 2019, 21:08
Kudos
Bookmarks
GMATBLACKBELT
dcummins
dcummins , I agree that native speakers will mentally "override" what appear to be tiny differences about which noun (painting or Rhone) was sold for $20.2 million.
As a native speaker, I do not think about "incorrect comparisons" in this kind of sentence,
although I certainly can do so. Maybe the better phrase would be "incorrect equivalencies." A river is not a painting.
Because of grammar rules, Answers B and E state that the Rhone River sold for $20.2 million.
The sentences do not contain a traditional comparison such as "X is more than Y."
Answers B and E are constructed in ways that make the river the thing that gets sold.
The nouns are not equivalent. The painting was sold, not the Rhone River.
In this case, to see that B, D, and E do not convey the correct meaning,
it may easier to use the modifier rules, namely, rules about
-- which
-- appositives, and
-- past participles.
I can eliminate B, D, and E quickly based on these rules.
• Answer C correctly avoids using [comma + which].
-- COMMA + WHICH
As a general rule, which modifies (refers to) the immediately preceding noun or to a noun that is very close.
Because which modifies the immediately preceding noun, and because Rhone immediately precedes which, in Answer B (top of post), [the river] Rhone was sold for $20.2 million.
Modifiers of nouns usually should "touch" the noun that they modify.
(Exceptions are mentioned below. This construction is not an exception.)
• Appositives
-- Nonessential appositives that come in the middle of a sentence must be set off by TWO commas.
-- Answer C correctly contains a second comma after the word Rhone.
-- The second comma sets off the descriptive phrase (the appositive)
from the actual subject of the sentence. The subject is the painting titled The Bridge of Trinquetaille.
-- Without the second comma, we have nonsense. The subject is stranded behind the first comma and is not connected to the verb. Option D lacks the second comma.
-- In addition, Option C does not add the extra and probably incorrect word "being" into the second appositive phrase.
(I say "probably" incorrect because the issue isn't clear; present participles modify the previous clause, but technically no subject exists in the previous clause.)
• Past participles modify the immediately preceding noun
-- Option C correctly avoids a construction in which the past participle "sold" refers to "Rhone"
-- RULE for past participles on the GMAT:
If we have [comma + past participle] (verbED/SOLD), then
the past participle modifies only the immediately preceding noun or noun phrase.
Sold cannot "jump back" over a whole phrase to reach its subject, the painting.
In E sold incorrectly refers to the immediately preceding noun, Rhone.
Below** is a fuller description of the rules.
Option C, inserted into a shortened version of the sentence:
C) In 1987, The ABC Painting, van Gogh's view of XYZ over the Rhone, was sold for $20.2 million, the second highest price ever paid for a painting.
Answer (C) is the only option that correctly connects
the verb phrase was sold for $20.2 million
to the subject of the sentence, The ABC Painting.
because C does not use which, or a poor appositive construction, or a past participle.
I hope that analysis helps.
**More on [comma + which], appositives, and [comma + past participle (verbEd)]
• comma + WHICH
(1) as a general rule, [comma + which] modifies the immediately preceding noun or a noun that is very close
-- which clauses describe nouns (the which refers to that very noun), so we generally follow the "modifier touch" rule. The touch rule holds that the description of the noun should be next to the noun being described.
Correct: He hiked on the path, which cut through a meadow, to revisit the fishing pier at the lake.
The path cut through the meadow.
Wrong: He hiked on the path to revisit the fishing pier at the lake, which cut through a meadow.
The lake did not cut through the meadow.
Not applicable /Exceptions
-- The "which-touch" rule does not apply to OF which, FOR which, TO which, etc.
-- The most common exception to the which-touch rule on the GMAT is a noun followed by a prepositional phrase.
The modifier which can "reach back" over a prepositional phrase to modify another close noun.
Correct: He hiked on the path of hard dirt, which cut through a meadow, to revisit the fishing pier at the lake.
-- In this case, which still refers to path because "of hard dirt" also describes the path.
That prepositional phrase cannot be placed elsewhere in the sentence, so which "reaches back" to the logical noun path.
(2) [comma + which] cannot modify the entire previous clause.
-- [comma + which] also cannot modify (refer to) an idea or action or phenomenon.
When natives speak English, we often use "which" to refer to "the phenomenon I just mentioned," but on the GMAT, doing so is incorrect.
Wrong: Gang activity increased sharply in Japan , which worried members of the police force.
which cannot stand for that whole phenomenon gang activity increased in Japan
Correct: Gang activity increased sharply in Japan, an increase that worried members of the police force.
• Appositives
-- almost always immediately follow a noun, and
-- describe or rename that noun.
-- If the appositive phrase is nonessential, it is set off by commas.
-- Whatever is "fenced in" by one comma (beginning or end) or two commas (middle of sentence) can theoretically be removed.
This site, here has three good examples of the ways in which commas are placed. Scroll down to "Punctuate the Appositive Correctly."
-- Appositive at the beginning of the sentence? ONE comma at the end of the appositive phrase
-- Appositive at the end of the sentence? ONE comma before the beginning of the appositive phrase
-- Appositive in the middle of the sentence? TWO commas. One comma goes before the first word of the phrase. The other comma is placed after the last word of the phrase.
• comma + past participle (verbED)
-- GMAT follows an unusual rule. Most grammarians allow [comma + past participle] to modify the entire previous clause.
GMAT does not.
-- If we have [comma + past participle], the past participle modifies the immediately preceding noun.
Correct Archaeologists were excited to examine the ancient manuscripts, found accidentally by a sheep farmer.
-- Careful (not applicable here): IF the past participle anchors an introductory clause or phrase, then the past participle modifies the subject of the subsequent clause.
Correct: Exhausted by his long trek to the border, the refugee collapsed.
Exhausted modifies the refugee.
11 Feb 2022, 04:55
Kudos
Bookmarks
Dear Friends,
Here is a detailed explanation to this question-
Meaning is crucial to solving this problem:
Understanding the intended meaning is key to solving this question; the intended core meaning of this sentence is that in June of 1987, The Bridge of Trinquetaille was sold for $20.2 million, which was the second-highest price ever paid for a painting at auction.
Concepts tested here: Meaning + Grammatical Construction + Redundancy/Awkwardness
• Semicolons and the “comma + conjunction” construction are used to link two independent clauses; commas are used to link an independent clause with a dependent one; a comma cannot be used to join two independent clauses.
• Only similar elements can be listed together; in this case, the phrases involved have different roles in the correct meaning of the sentence.
• “being” is only to be used when it is part of a noun phrase or represents the passive continuous verb tense; the use of passive continuous must be justified in the context.
A: This answer choice incorrectly uses “and” rather than the “comma + conjunction” construction to join the independent clauses “In June of 1987, The Bridge of Trinquetaille...sold for $20.2 million” and “it was the second-highest price ever paid for a painting at auction”; please remember, semicolons and the “comma + conjunction” construction are used to link two independent clauses; commas are used to link an independent clause with a dependent one; a comma cannot be used to join two independent clauses.
B: This answer choice alters the meaning of the sentence through the clause "The Bridge of Trinquetaille...was the second-highest price ever paid for a painting at auction"; the construction of this phrase illogically implies that The Bridge of Trinquetaille itself...was the second-highest price ever paid for a painting at auction; the intended meaning is that The Bridge of Trinquetaille was sold for $20.2 million, and this price was the second-highest price ever paid for a painting at auction.
C: Correct. This answer choice correctly uses the clause "The Bridge of Trinquetaille...was sold for $20.2 million" and correctly modifies "$20.2 million" with the "second-highest price ever paid for a painting at auction", conveying the intended meaning - that The Bridge of Trinquetaille was sold for $20.2 million, and this price was the second-highest price ever paid for a painting at auction. Further, Option C avoids the grammatical construction error seen in Option A, as it only includes one independent clause. Besides, Option C is free of any awkwardness or redundancy.
D: Trap. This answer choice incorrectly utilizes the word “being”, leading to redundancy; “being” is only to be used when it is part of a noun phrase or represents the passive continuous verb tense.
E: This answer choice incorrectly gives a list-like treatment to phrases “sold for $20.2 million”, and “was the second-highest price ever paid for a painting at auction”, illogically implying that The Bridge of Trinquetaille itself...was the second-highest price ever paid for a painting at auction; the intended meaning is that The Bridge of Trinquetaille was sold for $20.2 million, and this price was the second-highest price ever paid for a painting at auction; please remember, only similar elements can be listed together; in this case, the phrases involved have different roles in the correct meaning of the sentence.
Hence, C is the best answer choice.
To understand the concept of "Usage of Periods and Semicolons" on GMAT, you may want to watch the following video (~1 minute):
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
Here is a detailed explanation to this question-
GMATBLACKBELT
Meaning is crucial to solving this problem:
Understanding the intended meaning is key to solving this question; the intended core meaning of this sentence is that in June of 1987, The Bridge of Trinquetaille was sold for $20.2 million, which was the second-highest price ever paid for a painting at auction.
Concepts tested here: Meaning + Grammatical Construction + Redundancy/Awkwardness
• Semicolons and the “comma + conjunction” construction are used to link two independent clauses; commas are used to link an independent clause with a dependent one; a comma cannot be used to join two independent clauses.
• Only similar elements can be listed together; in this case, the phrases involved have different roles in the correct meaning of the sentence.
• “being” is only to be used when it is part of a noun phrase or represents the passive continuous verb tense; the use of passive continuous must be justified in the context.
A: This answer choice incorrectly uses “and” rather than the “comma + conjunction” construction to join the independent clauses “In June of 1987, The Bridge of Trinquetaille...sold for $20.2 million” and “it was the second-highest price ever paid for a painting at auction”; please remember, semicolons and the “comma + conjunction” construction are used to link two independent clauses; commas are used to link an independent clause with a dependent one; a comma cannot be used to join two independent clauses.
B: This answer choice alters the meaning of the sentence through the clause "The Bridge of Trinquetaille...was the second-highest price ever paid for a painting at auction"; the construction of this phrase illogically implies that The Bridge of Trinquetaille itself...was the second-highest price ever paid for a painting at auction; the intended meaning is that The Bridge of Trinquetaille was sold for $20.2 million, and this price was the second-highest price ever paid for a painting at auction.
C: Correct. This answer choice correctly uses the clause "The Bridge of Trinquetaille...was sold for $20.2 million" and correctly modifies "$20.2 million" with the "second-highest price ever paid for a painting at auction", conveying the intended meaning - that The Bridge of Trinquetaille was sold for $20.2 million, and this price was the second-highest price ever paid for a painting at auction. Further, Option C avoids the grammatical construction error seen in Option A, as it only includes one independent clause. Besides, Option C is free of any awkwardness or redundancy.
D: Trap. This answer choice incorrectly utilizes the word “being”, leading to redundancy; “being” is only to be used when it is part of a noun phrase or represents the passive continuous verb tense.
E: This answer choice incorrectly gives a list-like treatment to phrases “sold for $20.2 million”, and “was the second-highest price ever paid for a painting at auction”, illogically implying that The Bridge of Trinquetaille itself...was the second-highest price ever paid for a painting at auction; the intended meaning is that The Bridge of Trinquetaille was sold for $20.2 million, and this price was the second-highest price ever paid for a painting at auction; please remember, only similar elements can be listed together; in this case, the phrases involved have different roles in the correct meaning of the sentence.
Hence, C is the best answer choice.
To understand the concept of "Usage of Periods and Semicolons" on GMAT, you may want to watch the following video (~1 minute):
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
sometimes i get confused when we must use comma and when not 
