Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 22:54 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 22:54

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Difficulty: 505-555 Levelx   Evaluate Argumentx                  
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Feb 2004
Posts: 283
Own Kudos [?]: 1088 [55]
Given Kudos: 0
Location: Lungi
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Retired Moderator
Joined: 19 Mar 2014
Posts: 817
Own Kudos [?]: 969 [13]
Given Kudos: 199
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.5
Send PM
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14817
Own Kudos [?]: 64906 [11]
Given Kudos: 426
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
General Discussion
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 23 Feb 2013
Posts: 7
Own Kudos [?]: 6 [0]
Given Kudos: 3
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
Send PM
Re: In the aftermath of a worldwide stock-market crash, Country T claimed [#permalink]
Hi

I marked B here for the reason that if the country can identify the date of its next crash, it has identified the reasons for the crash successfully.
Whereas D only tells us to compare the severity of the countries.

Kindly explain.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Aug 2016
Posts: 450
Own Kudos [?]: 393 [1]
Given Kudos: 204
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, International Business
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V33
GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V38
GPA: 4
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: In the aftermath of a worldwide stock-market crash, Country T claimed [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Nice question fell for C. The number of shares won't matter, but the severity does. So answer should be D
Director
Director
Joined: 02 Oct 2017
Posts: 552
Own Kudos [?]: 481 [0]
Given Kudos: 14
Send PM
Re: In the aftermath of a worldwide stock-market crash, Country T claimed [#permalink]
D is best answer
As one needs to consider whether denationalisation has any impact on crash or not
So need to coNSider the cases where denationalisation has not occurred.

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Manager
Joined: 12 Jul 2017
Posts: 199
Own Kudos [?]: 212 [0]
Given Kudos: 442
Location: India
Schools: ISB '21 (A)
GMAT 1: 570 Q43 V26
GMAT 2: 690 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.8
Send PM
Re: In the aftermath of a worldwide stock-market crash, Country T claimed [#permalink]
If any expert can help out,

This question shows us that the decentralization caused the crash

When we look at the answer, can we say that the cause is strengthened when:
i) When cause did not exist event did not happen
ii) Some other cause did not lead to the event
iii) A similar correlation existed ( this is the reasoning used here)


Do we see a point here or I am wrong with my theory? Please help

Regards,
Rishav
Manager
Manager
Joined: 06 Feb 2017
Posts: 199
Own Kudos [?]: 18 [0]
Given Kudos: 92
Location: India
Send PM
Re: In the aftermath of a worldwide stock-market crash, Country T claimed [#permalink]
VeritasKarishma GMATNinja
ChiranjeevSingh
Can you explain why option C is incorrect?
Can't we say if our stocks sold before and after denationalisation same so it doesn't affected and if there was change during the same time so it have affected? what's wrong in reasoning?
Intern
Intern
Joined: 21 May 2018
Posts: 12
Own Kudos [?]: 6 [0]
Given Kudos: 109
Send PM
Re: In the aftermath of a worldwide stock-market crash, Country T claimed [#permalink]
Pulkitv wrote:
Hi

I marked B here for the reason that if the country can identify the date of its next crash, it has identified the reasons for the crash successfully.
Whereas D only tells us to compare the severity of the countries.

Kindly explain.


Can identifying the reasons for a phenomenon lead to predicting the date of the phenomenon? Think about it. If a certain event has been observed to happen every 15 days, without any gap or delay in the past, then we can still predict with greater accuracy that it will happen again in the next 15 days (by only using the past data as a pattern to predict the date of the next event--> notice the word "economic theory"). So you see, even without studying the reasons of the event, the prediction is possible (thus B is rejected).

On the other hand, if two countries are similar in terms of their economies and both of them suffered the crash, then we can check if denationalization was a factor in Country T or not. If the amount of severity suffered by other countries without denationalization was more that Country T, that means there was another factor (and not denationalization) that caused the crash to be severe. However, if the other countries suffered a significantly less severe crash, we can conclude that denationalization was the factor that caused the stock crash to be "more severe". Hence, option D.
VP
VP
Joined: 11 Aug 2020
Posts: 1262
Own Kudos [?]: 201 [0]
Given Kudos: 332
Send PM
Re: In the aftermath of a worldwide stock-market crash, Country T claimed [#permalink]
ydmuley wrote:
Let's read the question stem first, Question is asking about - would be most useful in an evaluation of Country T's assessment of the causes of the severity of its stock-market crash? - Which means this is an EVALUATE AN ARGUMENT question

Premise:

1. Worldwide Stock market crash
2. In aftermath of worldwide stock-market crash - Country T claimed - Severity of the crash was because of - accelerated process of DENATIONALIZATION many of its industries underwent shortly before the crash.

Conclusion:

DENATIONALIZATION - was the cause of the market crash in country T

As this is a evaluate question, we need to evaluate if Denationalization was the reason for the market crash as claimed by the country T. One of the correct answer choices should give us this option.

(A) Calculating the average loss experienced by individual traders in Country T during the crash 
- How would calculating loss by an individual trader answer or evaluate denationalization? Moreover name trader is just used to trap people having some financial background knowledge as they see similar terms and apply their studies or perceived knowledge over here, but remember in CR we need to look only for things which are discussed in this argument and deviate from bringing in our knowledge background to answer the questions. Option A is IRRELEVANT

(B) Using economic theory to predict the most likely date of the next crash in Country T 
- Again, how would predicting help us to answer the question - Is denationalization the reason for market crash? - Option B is IRRELEVANT

(C) Comparing the total number of shares sold during the worst days of the crash in Country T to the total number of shares sold in Country T just prior to the crash. 
- Total number of shares sold is not going to answer our question - Has denationalization caused the market crash?

(D) Comparing the severity of the crash in Country T to the severity of the crash in countries otherwise economically similar to Country T that have not experienced recent denationalization
- Now, comparing the impact of denationalization between two countries can give us a fair idea of whether denationalization can be the reason for stock-market crash as claimed by the country T - This looks a possible answer, lets check the last remaining answer choice - Option D is the CORRECT answer

(E) Comparing the long-term effects of the crash on the purchasing power of the currency of Country T to the immediate, more severe short-term effects of the crash on the purchasing power of the currency of Country T.
- This option is talking more about the possible steps to be taken post market crash but nowhere talk about the denationalization of companies - Hence, this option is OUT OF SCOPE


Hence, D is the correct answer


Is it just me or does D make the assumption that the cause of the crash was denationalization? What if denationalization had nothing to do with the crash?
VP
VP
Joined: 14 Aug 2019
Posts: 1378
Own Kudos [?]: 846 [0]
Given Kudos: 381
Location: Hong Kong
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GPA: 3.81
Send PM
Re: In the aftermath of a worldwide stock-market crash, Country T claimed [#permalink]
CEdward wrote:
ydmuley wrote:
Let's read the question stem first, Question is asking about - would be most useful in an evaluation of Country T's assessment of the causes of the severity of its stock-market crash? - Which means this is an EVALUATE AN ARGUMENT question

Premise:

1. Worldwide Stock market crash
2. In aftermath of worldwide stock-market crash - Country T claimed - Severity of the crash was because of - accelerated process of DENATIONALIZATION many of its industries underwent shortly before the crash.

Conclusion:

DENATIONALIZATION - was the cause of the market crash in country T

As this is a evaluate question, we need to evaluate if Denationalization was the reason for the market crash as claimed by the country T. One of the correct answer choices should give us this option.

(A) Calculating the average loss experienced by individual traders in Country T during the crash 
- How would calculating loss by an individual trader answer or evaluate denationalization? Moreover name trader is just used to trap people having some financial background knowledge as they see similar terms and apply their studies or perceived knowledge over here, but remember in CR we need to look only for things which are discussed in this argument and deviate from bringing in our knowledge background to answer the questions. Option A is IRRELEVANT

(B) Using economic theory to predict the most likely date of the next crash in Country T 
- Again, how would predicting help us to answer the question - Is denationalization the reason for market crash? - Option B is IRRELEVANT

(C) Comparing the total number of shares sold during the worst days of the crash in Country T to the total number of shares sold in Country T just prior to the crash. 
- Total number of shares sold is not going to answer our question - Has denationalization caused the market crash?

(D) Comparing the severity of the crash in Country T to the severity of the crash in countries otherwise economically similar to Country T that have not experienced recent denationalization
- Now, comparing the impact of denationalization between two countries can give us a fair idea of whether denationalization can be the reason for stock-market crash as claimed by the country T - This looks a possible answer, lets check the last remaining answer choice - Option D is the CORRECT answer

(E) Comparing the long-term effects of the crash on the purchasing power of the currency of Country T to the immediate, more severe short-term effects of the crash on the purchasing power of the currency of Country T.
- This option is talking more about the possible steps to be taken post market crash but nowhere talk about the denationalization of companies - Hence, this option is OUT OF SCOPE


Hence, D is the correct answer


Is it just me or does D make the assumption that the cause of the crash was denationalization? What if denationalization had nothing to do with the crash?


That's what we need to evaluate.
yes denationalization was the cause: Then only T country is severely impacted, other countries of similar economy may not have high impact
No, Denationalization was not the cause: Then both countries of similar economy should have similar impact.

We get different response, one strengthening and another weakening, with Yes and NO , hence D is correct answer.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 27 Apr 2018
Posts: 16
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 188
Send PM
Re: In the aftermath of a worldwide stock-market crash, Country T claimed [#permalink]
Hello Experts,

I have some confusion with respect to the right answer and what is asked in the argument. Its been asked:
Which of the following, if it could be carried out, would be most useful in an evaluation of Country T's assessment of the causes of the severity of its stock-market crash?

(C) Comparing the total number of shares sold during the worst days of the crash in Country T to the total number of shares sold in Country T just prior to the crash. - Kind of gives the cause and from cause --> severity

(D) Comparing the severity of the crash in Country T to the severity of the crash in countries otherwise economically similar to Country T that have not experienced recent denationalization : this does gives us something to analyze but then comparing with other country? (Even though I choose this as my best option, but then there was this confusion because of the "cause")

Can anyone pls help
Intern
Intern
Joined: 02 Apr 2020
Posts: 30
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 85
Send PM
In the aftermath of a worldwide stock-market crash, Country T claimed [#permalink]
KarishmaB wrote:
batliwala wrote:
In the aftermath of a worldwide stock-market crash, Country T claimed that the severity of the stock-market crash it experienced resulted from the accelerated process of denationalization many of its industries underwent shortly before the crash.

Which of the following, if it could be carried out, would be most useful in an evaluation of Country T's assessment of the causes of the severity of its stock-market crash?


(A) Calculating the average loss experienced by individual traders in Country T during the crash

(B) Using economic theory to predict the most likely date of the next crash in Country T

(C) Comparing the total number of shares sold during the worst days of the crash in Country T to the total number of shares sold in Country T just prior to the crash.

(D) Comparing the severity of the crash in Country T to the severity of the crash in countries otherwise economically similar to Country T that have not experienced recent denationalization

(E) Comparing the long-term effects of the crash on the purchasing power of the currency of Country T to the immediate, more severe short-term effects of the crash on the purchasing power of the currency of Country T.

There was a worldwide stock market crash.
Country T experienced a severe crash.
Country T claims it is because of the accelerated process of denationalization many of its industries underwent shortly before the crash

What would be useful to evaluate Country T's assessment of the causes of the severity of its stock-market crash?
What would be useful to evaluate whether the denationalization (this is country T's assessment) was the cause of severe crash?

(A) Calculating the average loss experienced by individual traders in Country T during the crash

We already know the crash was severe. Avg loss of traders doesn't give us the reason of the severe crash.

(B) Using economic theory to predict the most likely date of the next crash in Country T

Irrelevant

(C) Comparing the total number of shares sold during the worst days of the crash in Country T to the total number of shares sold in Country T just prior to the crash.

Number of shares sold alone do not tell us anything. We need to know the number of shares bought, the price levels etc too. In any case, even if we have all that information, it will probably tell us how severe the crash was, not the reason for the crash. It will not tell us whether denationalisation was the reason for the severe crash.

(D) Comparing the severity of the crash in Country T to the severity of the crash in countries otherwise economically similar to Country T that have not experienced recent denationalization

Correct. So comparing T to other countries with similar economic situation but without denationalisation will tell us whether the severe crash of country T was because of denationalisation. If other countries with denationalisation but with similar economies have not seen severe crash, then it is likely that country T's severe crash is because of denationalisation. If other countries without denationalisation have also seen a sever crash, then some other factor seems to be likely.

(E) Comparing the long-term effects of the crash on the purchasing power of the currency of Country T to the immediate, more severe short-term effects of the crash on the purchasing power of the currency of Country T.

Effects of the crash are irrelevant. We need the reasons of the severe crash.

Answer (D)

Hello ma'am KarishmaB

Seems like some typo error in D option clarification. Can you please check?

What you have written: If other countries with denationalisation but with similar economies have not seen severe crash, then it is likely that country T's severe crash is because of denationalisation.

What it is as per me: If other countries with denationalisation but with similar economies have not seen severe crash, then it is likely that country T's severe crash is NOT because of denationalisation.

Sorry, if my understanding is wrong.

Thank You­
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14817
Own Kudos [?]: 64906 [1]
Given Kudos: 426
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
In the aftermath of a worldwide stock-market crash, Country T claimed [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
a123bansal wrote:
KarishmaB wrote:
batliwala wrote:
In the aftermath of a worldwide stock-market crash, Country T claimed that the severity of the stock-market crash it experienced resulted from the accelerated process of denationalization many of its industries underwent shortly before the crash.

Which of the following, if it could be carried out, would be most useful in an evaluation of Country T's assessment of the causes of the severity of its stock-market crash?


(A) Calculating the average loss experienced by individual traders in Country T during the crash

(B) Using economic theory to predict the most likely date of the next crash in Country T

(C) Comparing the total number of shares sold during the worst days of the crash in Country T to the total number of shares sold in Country T just prior to the crash.

(D) Comparing the severity of the crash in Country T to the severity of the crash in countries otherwise economically similar to Country T that have not experienced recent denationalization

(E) Comparing the long-term effects of the crash on the purchasing power of the currency of Country T to the immediate, more severe short-term effects of the crash on the purchasing power of the currency of Country T.
 

There was a worldwide stock market crash.
Country T experienced a severe crash.
Country T claims it is because of the accelerated process of denationalization many of its industries underwent shortly before the crash

What would be useful to evaluate Country T's assessment of the causes of the severity of its stock-market crash?
What would be useful to evaluate whether the denationalization (this is country T's assessment) was the cause of severe crash?

(A) Calculating the average loss experienced by individual traders in Country T during the crash

We already know the crash was severe. Avg loss of traders doesn't give us the reason of the severe crash.

(B) Using economic theory to predict the most likely date of the next crash in Country T

Irrelevant

(C) Comparing the total number of shares sold during the worst days of the crash in Country T to the total number of shares sold in Country T just prior to the crash.

Number of shares sold alone do not tell us anything. We need to know the number of shares bought, the price levels etc too. In any case, even if we have all that information, it will probably tell us how severe the crash was, not the reason for the crash. It will not tell us whether denationalisation was the reason for the severe crash.

(D) Comparing the severity of the crash in Country T to the severity of the crash in countries otherwise economically similar to Country T that have not experienced recent denationalization

Correct. So comparing T to other countries with similar economic situation but without denationalisation will tell us whether the severe crash of country T was because of denationalisation. If other countries with denationalisation but with similar economies have not seen severe crash, then it is likely that country T's severe crash is because of denationalisation. If other countries without denationalisation have also seen a sever crash, then some other factor seems to be likely.

(E) Comparing the long-term effects of the crash on the purchasing power of the currency of Country T to the immediate, more severe short-term effects of the crash on the purchasing power of the currency of Country T.

Effects of the crash are irrelevant. We need the reasons of the severe crash.

Answer (D)

Hello ma'am KarishmaB

Seems like some typo error in D option clarification. Can you please check?

What you have written: If other countries with denationalisation but with similar economies have not seen severe crash, then it is likely that country T's severe crash is because of denationalisation.

What it is as per me: If other countries with denationalisation but with similar economies have not seen severe crash, then it is likely that country T's severe crash is NOT because of denationalisation.

Sorry, if my understanding is wrong.

Thank You

There is a typo but it is this: If other countries withOUT denationalisation ...
We are comparing with other countries that did not undergo denationalisation in this option. If those countries did not see a severe crash, then country T's severe crash could have been because of denationalisation. Countries without denationalisation did not see a severe crash but country T did. Country T's severe crash could be because of denationalisation.­
GMAT Club Bot
In the aftermath of a worldwide stock-market crash, Country T claimed [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne