Last visit was: 10 Jul 2025, 07:17 It is currently 10 Jul 2025, 07:17
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,480
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,480
Kudos: 30,101
 [314]
31
Kudos
Add Kudos
278
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
FieryLeo
Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Last visit: 02 Apr 2025
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
52
 [41]
Given Kudos: 5
Location: United Kingdom
WE:Corporate Finance (Energy)
Posts: 22
Kudos: 52
 [41]
21
Kudos
Add Kudos
20
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,480
Own Kudos:
30,101
 [29]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,480
Kudos: 30,101
 [29]
20
Kudos
Add Kudos
9
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 10 July 2025
Posts: 5,143
Own Kudos:
4,729
 [6]
Given Kudos: 38
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,143
Kudos: 4,729
 [6]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dear Friends,

Here is a detailed explanation to this question-
mikemcgarry
In the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778, the rearguard of the Frankish army, under the command of Roland, was obliterated due to an ambush by the Basque army, an event made famous in La Chanson de Roland.

(A) In the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778, the rearguard of the Frankish army, under the command of Roland, was obliterated due to an ambush by the Basque army, an event made famous in La Chanson de Roland

(B) In the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778, the Basque army ambushed the Frankish army, the rearguard of the Frankish army, under the command of Roland, was obliterated, and the event was made famous in La Chanson de Roland

(C) La Chanson de Roland made famous the obliteration, due to an ambush by the Basque army, of the rearguard of the Frankish army, under the command of Roland, at the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778

(D) In La Chanson de Roland, the Basque army ambushed the rearguard of the Frankish army, under the command of Roland, and obliterated them, and this event was famous at the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778

(E) In the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778, the rearguard of the Frankish army, under the command of Roland, ambushed and obliterated by the Basque army, an event made famous in La Chanson de Roland


This question discusses the legendary Battle of Roncevaux Pass, one of the only defeats of Charlemagne's long career, and it mentions that gorgeously beautiful medieval French poem, La Chanson de Roland.

This question, among other things, explores the "due to" structure. When is this structure correct or incorrect? You can see a full discussion of this point, as well as the OE for this difficult question, at this blog:
GMAT Sentence Correction: the “Due To” Mistake

Mike :-)

Meaning is crucial to solving this problem:
Understanding the intended meaning is key to solving this question; the intended meaning of this sentence is that at the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778, the rearguard of the Frankish army, which was under the command of Roland, was obliterated due to an ambush by the Basque army, and this obliteration was later made famous in La Chanson de Roland.

Concepts tested here: Meaning + Modifiers + Grammatical Construction + Verb Forms + Idioms

• In a “noun + comma + phrase” construction, the phrase must correctly modify the noun; this is one of the most frequently tested concepts on GMAT sentence correction.
• Semicolons and the “comma + conjunction” construction are used to link two independent clauses; commas are used to link an independent clause with a dependent one; comma cannot be used to join two independent clauses.
• Collective nouns are always singular.

A: This answer choice incorrectly uses "due to" to refer to the verb "was obliterated"; remember, "due to" is used to modify nouns, and "because of" is used to modify verbs and clauses. Further, Option A incorrectly modifies "an ambush by the Basque army" with "an event made famous in La Chanson de Roland", incorrectly implying that the ambush was made famous by La Chanson de Roland; the intended meaning is that the obliteration was made famous by La Chanson de Roland; remember, in a “noun + comma + phrase” construction, the phrase must correctly modify the noun.

B: This answer choice incorrectly uses a comma to join the independent clauses "the Basque army ambushed the Frankish army" and "the rearguard of the Frankish army...was obliterated"; remember, semicolons and the “comma + conjunction” construction are used to link two independent clauses; commas are used to link an independent clause with a dependent one; comma cannot be used to join two independent clauses.

C: Correct. This answer choice acts upon the subject noun "La Chanson de Roland" with the active verb "made famous" to produce a complete thought, leading to a complete sentence. Further, Option C uses the phrase "made famous the obliteration...at the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778", conveying the intended meaning - that the obliteration of the rearguard of the Frankish army happened at the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778, and this obliteration was made famous by the poem[/b][/i] La Chanson de Roland. Moreover, Option C avoids the modifier error seen in Option A, as it does not use the “noun + comma + phrase” construction. Additionally, Option C avoids the pronoun error seen in Option D, as it uses no pronouns. Besides, Option C avoids the grammatical construction error seen in Option B, as it includes only one independent clause. Option C also correctly uses "due to" to refer to the noun "obliteration.

D: This answer choice incorrectly refers to the singular noun phrase "rearguard of the Frankish army" with the plural pronoun "them"; remember, collective nouns are always singular. Further, Option D alters the meaning of the sentence through the clause "this event was famous at the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778"; the construction of this phrase illogically implies that within the poem La Chanson de Roland the obliteration of the rearguard of the Frankish army was famous when at the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778 occurred; the intended meaning is that the obliteration of the rearguard of the Frankish army happened at the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778, and this obliteration was made famous by the poem [/i] La Chanson de Roland.

E: This answer choice fails to form a complete sentence; as "ambushed", "obliterated", and "made famous" are all past participles acting as modifiers, there is no active verb to act upon the subject noun "the rearguard of the Frankish army".

Hence, C is the best answer choice.

To understand the concept of "Phrase Comma Subject" and "Subject Comma Phrase" on GMAT, you may want to watch the following video (~1 minute):



To understand the concept of "Comma Splices and Run Ons" on GMAT, you may want to watch the following video (~5 minutes):



All the best!
Experts' Global Team
General Discussion
User avatar
msk0657
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 26 Nov 2012
Last visit: 14 Feb 2020
Posts: 458
Own Kudos:
543
 [4]
Given Kudos: 46
Posts: 458
Kudos: 543
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
[quote="mikemcgarry"]In the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778, the rearguard of the Frankish army, under the command of Roland, was obliterated due to an ambush by the Basque army, an event made famous in La Chanson de Roland.

(A) In the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778, the rearguard of the Frankish army, under the command of Roland, was obliterated due to an ambush by the Basque army, an event made famous in La Chanson de Roland - Passive form

(B) In the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778, the Basque army ambushed the Frankish army, the rearguard of the Frankish army, under the command of Roland, was obliterated, and the event was made famous in La Chanson de Roland - - Passive form

(C) La Chanson de Roland made famous the obliteration, due to an ambush by the Basque army, of the rearguard of the Frankish army, under the command of Roland, at the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778 - due to is incorrect.

(D) In La Chanson de Roland, the Basque army ambushed the rearguard of the Frankish army, under the command of Roland, and obliterated them, and this event was famous at the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778 - correct

(E) In the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778, the rearguard of the Frankish army, under the command of Roland, ambushed and obliterated by the Basque army, an event made famous in La Chanson de Roland - Passive and non sensical.

IMO option D...Please let me know the correct answer in case if I missed anything.
avatar
gandhigauravz
Joined: 25 Nov 2012
Last visit: 07 Sep 2017
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
6
 [1]
Given Kudos: 125
Posts: 10
Kudos: 6
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
msk0657
mikemcgarry
In the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778, the rearguard of the Frankish army, under the command of Roland, was obliterated due to an ambush by the Basque army, an event made famous in La Chanson de Roland.

(A) In the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778, the rearguard of the Frankish army, under the command of Roland, was obliterated due to an ambush by the Basque army, an event made famous in La Chanson de Roland - Passive form

(B) In the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778, the Basque army ambushed the Frankish army, the rearguard of the Frankish army, under the command of Roland, was obliterated, and the event was made famous in La Chanson de Roland - - Passive form

(C) La Chanson de Roland made famous the obliteration, due to an ambush by the Basque army, of the rearguard of the Frankish army, under the command of Roland, at the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778 - due to is incorrect.

(D) In La Chanson de Roland, the Basque army ambushed the rearguard of the Frankish army, under the command of Roland, and obliterated them, and this event was famous at the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778 - correct

(E) In the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778, the rearguard of the Frankish army, under the command of Roland, ambushed and obliterated by the Basque army, an event made famous in La Chanson de Roland - Passive and non sensical.

IMO option D...Please let me know the correct answer in case if I missed anything.


'Them' in option D doesn't seem to have an antecedent. Hence, it cant be correct.
User avatar
zoezhuyan
Joined: 17 Sep 2016
Last visit: 11 Nov 2024
Posts: 429
Own Kudos:
92
 [1]
Given Kudos: 147
Posts: 429
Kudos: 92
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mikemcgarry
Choice (B) commits the mistake of false parallelism: it mechanically puts all the information into parallel, with no regard for logic.  Choice (B) is incorrect.
Mike :-)

Hi mike,
Do you mean that there should be "and" before "was obliterated" ?
correcting(B)
In the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778, the Basque army ambushed the Frankish army, the rearguard of the Frankish army, under the command of Roland, AND was obliterated, and the event was made famous in La Chanson de Roland

after adding "and", verb "ambushed" is parallel to verb "was obliterated"

waiting for your confirmation

have a nice day
>_~
User avatar
zoezhuyan
Joined: 17 Sep 2016
Last visit: 11 Nov 2024
Posts: 429
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 147
Posts: 429
Kudos: 92
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mikemcgarry
zoezhuyan
mikemcgarry
Choice (B) commits the mistake of false parallelism: it mechanically puts all the information into parallel, with no regard for logic.  Choice (B) is incorrect.
Mike :-)

Hi mike,
Do you mean that there should be "and" before "was obliterated" ?
correcting(B)
In the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778, the Basque army ambushed the Frankish army, the rearguard of the Frankish army, under the command of Roland, AND was obliterated, and the event was made famous in La Chanson de Roland

after adding "and", verb "ambushed" is parallel to verb "was obliterated"

waiting for your confirmation

have a nice day
>_~
Dear zoezhuyan,

My friend, how are you? I am happy to respond. :-)

No, my friend, that is NOT what I mean at all. First of all, adding an "and" right there is 100% grammatically incorrect. More importantly, you missed the bigger idea. False parallelism is the mistake of ignoring all the logical relationships and blindly putting every action in the sentence in parallel.
Consider this correct sentence:
Because A did X, B was able to do Y, allowing C to do Z.
In this hypothetical sentence, there are clear connections of logic and causality. All of this is lost when the sentence is re-written with false parallelism.
A did X, B was able to do Y, and C did Z.
Superficially, that looks like correct parallelism. It executes the mechanics of parallelism flawlessly. The trouble is: all the logical relationships have been lost. This is 100% grammatically correct and a logical train wreck. People who pay attention to the grammar of parallelism and ignore the logical of parallelism often make this mistake.

Similarly, the grammar of the parallelism is (B) is 100% correct:
In the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778, the Basque army ambushed the Frankish army, the rearguard of the Frankish army, under the command of Roland, was obliterated, and the event was made famous in La Chanson de Roland
Three individual actions are correct linked in parallel:
1) In the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778, the Basque army ambushed the Frankish army,
2) the rearguard of the Frankish army, under the command of Roland, was obliterated,
and

3) the event was made famous in La Chanson de Roland
Whenever we have three items in parallel, we only need the word "and" before the last of the three. This version is 100% grammatically correct and a complete disaster logically. Stating the three facts in side-by-side parallelism makes them seem like three interchangeable items. They are presented as if there are no important logical relationships between them. In this sense, (B) changes the meaning from the prompt, because the prompt, thought incorrect, makes clear that there are important logical connections between these events.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)

Thanks mike,
I got the main idea of false parallelism this time and where I made mistakes.

thanks so much

have a nice day
>_~
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,480
Own Kudos:
30,101
 [11]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,480
Kudos: 30,101
 [11]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
divyaverma
In the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778, the rearguard of the Frankish army, under the command of Roland, was obliterated due to an ambush by the Basque army, an event made famous in La Chanson de Roland.

(A) In the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778, the rearguard of the Frankish army, under the command of Roland, was obliterated due to an ambush by the Basque army, an event made famous in La Chanson de Roland
: we can't use "due to" to modify obliterated as obliterated is the action verb of rearguard, to modify action verb we need because not due to

(B) In the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778, the Basque army ambushed the Frankish army, the rearguard of the Frankish army, under the command of Roland, was obliterated, and the event was made famous in La Chanson de Roland
: option B is a run on sentence. Basque army was ambushed, the rearguard was obliterated.

(C) La Chanson de Roland made famous the obliteration, due to an ambush by the Basque army, of the rearguard of the Frankish army, under the command of Roland, at the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778
here due to is modifying the noun obliteration which is correct, though I have doubt on the usage of modifier "of the rearguard"

(D) In La Chanson de Roland, the Basque army ambushed the rearguard of the Frankish army, under the command of Roland, and obliterated them, and this event was famous at the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778
:This option has a meaning issue. The last clause this event was famous at the battle of Y makes it an event which happens at every battle and this one is particularly famous at the battle of Roncevaux.
Also the pronoun them has no clear antecedent as army is a singular subject.


(E) In the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778, the rearguard of the Frankish army, under the command of Roland, ambushed and obliterated by the Basque army, an event made famous in La Chanson de Roland
This one is totally nonsensical as the veb ambushed needs a direct object . Frankish army ambushed or was ambushed and obliterated by Basque army?
The meaning is not clear as Which army ambushed which one?


mikemcgarry - Could you please confirm my understanding here? and also please shed some light on the " of modifier" in option C
Dear divyaverma,
I'm happy to respond. :-)

What you say in (A) & (D) is perfectly correct.

I wouldn't call (B) a run-on: instead, I would say that it has parallelism issues. It puts two verbs in parallel, following a subject--that much is correct, but the third element is an independent clause. The structure is
[subject][verb #1], [verb #2], and [independent clause]
That's not a run-on. That's a parallelism trainwreck.

In (C), the section set off in commas, "due to an ambush by the Basque army," functions as an aside. An "aside" is term from theater, something a character says out of hearing of the other characters but two the audience: it's a way for the playwright to let us know what the character is thinking. In grammar, an "aside" is any element that is a freestanding interruption, and the grammar simply flows around it. Most often, a true aside would be set off by a pair of em-dashes, but since this aside, "due to an ambush by the Basque army," is connected grammatically to a word outside the aside, it's set off only by a pair of commas. The grammar of the sentence flows around it, as a river might flow around a rock. Thus, it's clear that "obliteration ... of the rearguard of the Frankish army" all work together. You have to interpret the grammar as if the aside weren't there.

Actually, in (E), I would say that choice commits the famous missing verb mistake. There is no absolutely full verb in this version. Here, "ambushed and obliterated" are participles: this is clear because they are followed by a "by" preposition, which indicates that they are passive: as past tense verbs, "ambushed and obliterated" would be active; they only way in which they could be passive is if they were participles. Nothing is ambiguous here: it's a flat-out missing verb mistake.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
User avatar
FieryLeo
Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Last visit: 02 Apr 2025
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
52
 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
Location: United Kingdom
WE:Corporate Finance (Energy)
Posts: 22
Kudos: 52
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks a ton mike for the explanation. Information on "aside" was new to me. Thanks for putting up here.

However I have few doubts which need confirmation.

Can I define the sentence as below :
(B) In the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778,
the Basque army ambushed the Frankish army, the rear-guard of the Frankish army, (Noun Modifier)
under the command of Roland, (Prepositional Modifier, modifying the Verb action ambushed)
was obliterated, (Verb without any subject)
and the event was made famous in La Chanson de Roland ( Independent Clause)

C) La Chanson de Roland made famous the obliteration, <due to an ambush by the Basque army>,( working as aside )
of the rearguard of the Frankish army,
under the command of Roland, at the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778

Can C be written as below -
Due to an ambush by the Basque army, La Chanson de Roland made famous the obliteration of the rearguard of the Frankish army,under the command of Roland,at the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778.
What is the role of comma here? can we omit comma from the whole sentence, will it still stand alike?
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,480
Own Kudos:
30,101
 [6]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,480
Kudos: 30,101
 [6]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
divyaverma
Thanks a ton mike for the explanation. Information on "aside" was new to me. Thanks for putting up here.

However I have few doubts which need confirmation.

Can I define the sentence as below :
(B) In the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778,
he Basque army ambushed the Frankish army, the rear-guard of the Frankish army, (Noun Modifier)
under the command of Roland, (Prepositional Modifier, modifying the Verb action ambushed)
was obliterated, (Verb without any subject)
and the event was made famous in La Chanson de Roland ( Independent Clause)

C) La Chanson de Roland made famous the obliteration, <due to an ambush by the Basque army>,( working as aside )
of the rearguard of the Frankish army,
under the command of Roland, at the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778

Can C be written as below -
Due to an ambush by the Basque army, La Chanson de Roland made famous the obliteration of the rearguard of the Frankish army, under the command of Roland,at the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778.
What is the role of comma here? can we omit comma from the whole sentence, will it still stand alike?
Dear divyaverma,

I'm happy to respond. :-) Your analysis of (B) is fine.

Your rewrite of (C) makes a big mistake, the "due to" mistake, which was the point of this practice SC.

You see, the word "due" is an adjective, and as such, it must modify a noun. Any "due to" phrase is a noun-modifying phrase. In the original version of (C), the OA, the word "due" modifies the noun "obliteration." This is perfectly correct. But in your rewrite, the noun modifying phrase "due to an ambush by the Basque army" is now touching the noun "La Chanson de Roland." Of course, "La Chanson de Roland" is an absolutely gorgeous piece of literature, but this poem is not "due to an ambush by the Basque army." People often make this kind of mistake because people erroneously think that "due to" and "because of" are interchangeable. They are not: a phrase beginning with "due to" is a noun-modifying phrase, whereas a phrase beginning with "because of" is a verb-modifying or clause-modifying phrase.

If we change "due to" to "because of" in your sentence, we get the following:
(C3) Because of an ambush by the Basque army, La Chanson de Roland made famous the obliteration of the rearguard of the Frankish army, under the command of Roland, at the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778.
This is 100% grammatically correct but logically flawed. The fact that the poem made something famous was not caused by an ambush. The obliteration was caused by the ambush, but not the act of something becoming famous.

Here's an alternate version that is correct and probably superior to the OA of this question:
(C4) Because of an ambush by the Basque army, the rearguard of the Frankish army, under the command of Roland, was obliterated at the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778, an event made famous by La Chanson de Roland.
This version takes the noun "obliteration" and changes it into a verb "was obliterated." In many ways, this is the central action of the sentence, so rhetorically it's good to make this the main verb of the sentence. The verb-modifying "because of" phrase correctly modifies this verb.

This is probably the version I would write if I wanted to communicate this information. When I wrote this SC question, I deliberately created an OA that was error-free but less than ideal. I did this precisely because the GMAT does this all the time.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
User avatar
FieryLeo
Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Last visit: 02 Apr 2025
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Location: United Kingdom
WE:Corporate Finance (Energy)
Posts: 22
Kudos: 52
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks mike , thats perfectly make sense.
User avatar
Mo2men
Joined: 26 Mar 2013
Last visit: 09 May 2023
Posts: 2,443
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 641
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Schools: Erasmus (II)
Products:
Schools: Erasmus (II)
Posts: 2,443
Kudos: 1,438
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mikemcgarry
(C) La Chanson de Roland made famous the obliteration, due to an ambush by the Basque army, of the rearguard of the Frankish army, under the command of Roland, at the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778



Dear Mike,

which one is rhetorically better:

La Chanson de Roland made famous the obliteration.

OR

La Chanson de Roland made the obliteration famous.

I prefer the second. The construction that I read it in many articles is 'Noun + make + Noun+ adjective'.

thanks
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,480
Own Kudos:
30,101
 [1]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,480
Kudos: 30,101
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Mo2men
mikemcgarry
(C) La Chanson de Roland made famous the obliteration, due to an ambush by the Basque army, of the rearguard of the Frankish army, under the command of Roland, at the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778

Dear Mike,

which one is rhetorically better:

La Chanson de Roland made famous the obliteration.

OR

La Chanson de Roland made the obliteration famous.

I prefer the second. The construction that I read it in many articles is 'Noun + make + Noun+ adjective'.

thanks
Dear Mo2men,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

Both constructions are fine and perfectly acceptable. The first might be a little more sophisticated, but we can't really say that one is preferable to the other in the abstract.

Here's the thing: after "made," we have, in some order, a noun and an adjective. If either one of those has a cartload of modifiers attach to it, it would make sense to put that one second.

La Chanson de Roland made famous the obliteration, due to an ambush by the Basque army, of the rearguard of the Frankish army, under the command of Roland. . . (big modifier attached to the noun "obliteration.")

La Chanson de Roland made the Roland's obliteration famous, not only in medieval literature and mythology, but also ... (big modifier attached to the adjective "famous.)

This structure is adjustable in word order, to accommodate other structures in the sentence. That is part of rhetoric, arranging each individual structure so that the entire sentence has the clearest logical flow.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
User avatar
vmelgargalan
Joined: 16 Jan 2017
Last visit: 15 Aug 2018
Posts: 54
Own Kudos:
20
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
GMAT 1: 620 Q46 V29
GMAT 1: 620 Q46 V29
Posts: 54
Kudos: 20
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I just feel like C cannot be the answer as it changes the meaning of the sentence. C is putting more emphasis on the poem rather than on the event, which option A seems to be doing. Woulnd't a high end difficulty question put emphasis on maintaining the meaning of the sentence?
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,480
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,480
Kudos: 30,101
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
vmelgargalan
I just feel like C cannot be the answer as it changes the meaning of the sentence. C is putting more emphasis on the poem rather than on the event, which option A seems to be doing. Woulnd't a high end difficulty question put emphasis on maintaining the meaning of the sentence?
Dear vmelgargalan,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

Choice (C) contains exactly the same factual information that the prompt contains. All the information is there--it's just in a different order. My friend, don't be fooled when the same basic pieces are moved around.
P is in a class that Q is teaching.
Q teaches the class that P is taking.

Same information, simply in a different order. Simply rearranging doesn't change the meaning.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
User avatar
Nightmare007
Joined: 26 Aug 2016
Last visit: 05 Aug 2020
Posts: 438
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 204
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, International Business
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V33
GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V38
GPA: 4
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V38
Posts: 438
Kudos: 428
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Mike,
As usual your posts are great.
Can you please tell me the "due to" is modifying the previous clause's "made famous" , won't this change the entire meaning in the question in which "due to",an adjective, is modifying "was obliterated". Am sorry because i am non-native i don't know much about that war.
That's the main reason why i chose A.
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,480
Own Kudos:
30,101
 [1]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,480
Kudos: 30,101
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Nightmare007
Hi Mike,
As usual your posts are great.
Can you please tell me the "due to" is modifying the previous clause's "made famous" , won't this change the entire meaning in the question in which "due to",an adjective, is modifying "was obliterated". Am sorry because i am non-native i don't know much about that war.
That's the main reason why i chose A.
Dear Nightmare007,

My friend, I'm happy to respond, but I am sorry to say that I am having trouble telling exactly what your question is.

Here's what I'll say. Here's (C), the OA.
La Chanson de Roland made famous the obliteration, due to an ambush by the Basque army, of the rearguard of the Frankish army, under the command of Roland, at the Battle of Roncevaux Pass in 778.
The "due to" phrase in this sentence correctly modifies the noun "obliteration." Yes, we could drop the "due to" phrase, and the remaining sentence would still make sense.

The word "due" is an adjective, and it is grammatically incorrect for any adjective to modify a verb. Using "due to" to modify verbs, actions, is an extremely common mistake in American English.

I am not sure whether I have answered your question. Please feel free to ask again if there's more you want to know.

Mike :-)
User avatar
manhasnoname
Joined: 21 Apr 2016
Last visit: 03 Feb 2025
Posts: 138
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 79
Products:
Posts: 138
Kudos: 72
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Idiomatically, isn't "in the battle" correct as opposed to "at the battle"? I did some googling and found hits on both the phrases. Could someone differentiate their usage?
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,480
Own Kudos:
30,101
 [3]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,480
Kudos: 30,101
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
manhasnoname
Idiomatically, isn't "in the battle" correct as opposed to "at the battle"? I did some googling and found hits on both the phrases. Could someone differentiate their usage?
Dear manhasnoname,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

Actually, both "in the battle" and "at the battle" are correct. They have extremely subtly different emphases--"in the battle" highlights the human experience of being there, while "at the battle" frames the battle more as a particular place & time. In a very person account of a soldier, it would be more likely to find "in the battle," where as in historical discussions of battles, especially ancient battles, "at the battle" is a little more common. The GMAT will NOT expect you to be familiar with such subtle distinctions. Just know that both are correct.

Does this make sense?

Mike :-)
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7349 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts