Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Aiming to score 760+? Attend this FREE session to learn how to Define your GMAT Strategy, Create your Study Plan and Master the Core Skills to excel on the GMAT.
In the late 1880s, the journalist Jacob Riis visited tenement dwelling
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Aug 2013, 06:40
3
30
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
95% (hard)
Question Stats:
42% (01:58) correct 58% (02:05) wrong based on 1207 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
In the late 1880s, the journalist Jacob Riis visited tenement dwellings in several impoverished New York City neighbourhoods to investigate housing conditions and photograph immigrant tenant's apartments, whose interiors were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors often serving as beds, and their walls often windowless and dilapidated with age and neglect.
(A) whose interiors were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors often serving as beds, and their walls often windowless and dilapidated with age and neglect
(B) whose interiors were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors were often serving as beds, and their walls were often lacking windows and dilapidated due to age and neglect
(C) whose interiors were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors were often serving as beds, and they had walls often windowless and dilapidated with age and neglect
(D) having interiors inhumanely overcrowded, their floors often serving for beds, and their walls were often windowless and dilapidated due to age and neglect
(E) having interiors that were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors often serving as beds, and their walls often lacked windows and were dilapidated on account of age and neglect
Re: In the late 1880s, the journalist Jacob Riis visited tenement dwelling
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Aug 2013, 10:32
17
5
A it is.
(A) whose interiors were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors often serving as beds, and their walls often windowless and dilapidated with age and neglect - correct (B) whose interiors were inhumanely overcrowded,their floors were often serving as beds, and their walls were often lacking windows and dilapidated due to age and neglect - the highlighted statement is an independent sentence and two independent sentence cannot be connected using just commas->creates a run on sentence. (C) whose interiors were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors were often serving as beds, and they had walls often windowless and dilapidated with age and neglect - same error as B (D) having interiors inhumanely overcrowded, their floors often serving for beds, and their walls were often windowless and dilapidated due to age and neglect - changes the meaning. From the sentence it seems as if Jacob Riis had interiors when he started to visit (E) having interiors that were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors often serving as beds, and their walls often lacked windows and were dilapidated on account of age and neglect - same as D
_________________
Re: In the late 1880s, the journalist Jacob Riis visited tenement dwelling
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Aug 2013, 18:16
7
4
In the late 1880s, the journalist Jacob Riis visited tenement dwellings in several impoverished New York City neighbourhoods to investigate housing conditions and photograph immigrant tenant's apartments, whose interiors were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors often serving as beds, and their walls often windowless and dilapidated with age and neglect.
(A) whose interiors were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors often serving as beds, and their walls often windowless and dilapidated with age and neglect Correct. Modifier is used correctly.
(B) whose interiors were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors were often serving as beds, and their walls were often lacking windows and dilapidated due to age and neglect Wrong. information about the floors and walls just provides additional info for inhumanely overcrowded apartments' interiors ==> modifier should be used.
(C) whose interiors were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors were often serving as beds, and they had walls often windowless and dilapidated with age and neglect Wrong. Same as B.
(D) having interiors inhumanely overcrowded, their floors often serving for beds, and their walls were often windowless and dilapidated due to age and neglect Wrong.Verb-ing modifier + comma ==> modify preceding clause. However, the underlined part just modifies "apartments".
(E) having interiors that were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors often serving as beds, and their walls often lacked windows and were dilapidated on account of age and neglect Wrong. Same as D. Verb-ing modifier + comma ==> modify preceding clause. That's wrong here.
Hope it helps.
_________________
Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.
"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."
Re: In the late 1880s, the journalist Jacob Riis visited tenement dwelling
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Aug 2013, 20:50
Quote:
(B) whose interiors were inhumanely overcrowded,their floors were often serving as beds, and their walls were often lacking windows and dilapidated due to age and neglect - the highlighted statement is an independent sentence and two independent sentence cannot be connected using just commas->creates a run on sentence.
Thanks for the comment. Until now, I was thinking that if there is a sub-ordinate conjunction or a FANBOYS with a comma, then it has to join two Independent Clauses. Obviously, the reverse is also true. Thanks for the comment.
Do you have any official examples that have similarly designed options?
Re: In the late 1880s, the journalist Jacob Riis visited tenement dwelling
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Aug 2013, 01:24
1
Hi gmatter0913,
below is one of the examples from verbal review
However much United States voters may agree that there is waste in government and that the government as a whole spends beyond its means，it is difficult to find broad support for a movement toward a minimal state．
(A) However much United States voters may agree that (B) Despite the agreement among United States voters to the fact (C) Although United States voters agree (D) Even though United States voters may agree (E)There is agreement among United States voters that
Some days back i have mentioned about run-on sentences in a post. You can find it here -
Re: In the late 1880s, the journalist Jacob Riis visited tenement dwelling
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Jul 2016, 02:21
swati007 wrote:
A it is.
(A) whose interiors were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors often serving as beds, and their walls often windowless and dilapidated with age and neglect - correct (B) whose interiors were inhumanely overcrowded,their floors were often serving as beds, and their walls were often lacking windows and dilapidated due to age and neglect - the highlighted statement is an independent sentence and two independent sentence cannot be connected using just commas->creates a run on sentence. (C) whose interiors were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors were often serving as beds, and they had walls often windowless and dilapidated with age and neglect - same error as B (D) having interiors inhumanely overcrowded, their floors often serving for beds, and their walls were often windowless and dilapidated due to age and neglect - changes the meaning. From the sentence it seems as if Jacob Riis had interiors when he started to visit (E) having interiors that were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors often serving as beds, and their walls often lacked windows and were dilapidated on account of age and neglect - same as D
just look for parallelism x,y and z
x=whose interior.....,their walls........ and their floors...
Re: In the late 1880s, the journalist Jacob Riis visited tenement dwelling
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Jul 2016, 04:28
pqhai wrote:
In the late 1880s, the journalist Jacob Riis visited tenement dwellings in several impoverished New York City neighbourhoods to investigate housing conditions and photograph immigrant tenant's apartments, whose interiors were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors often serving as beds, and their walls often windowless and dilapidated with age and neglect.
(A) whose interiors were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors often serving as beds, and their walls often windowless and dilapidated with age and neglect Correct. Modifier is used correctly.
(B) whose interiors were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors were often serving as beds, and their walls were often lacking windows and dilapidated due to age and neglect Wrong. information about the floors and walls just provides additional info for inhumanely overcrowded apartments' interiors ==> modifier should be used.
(C) whose interiors were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors were often serving as beds, and they had walls often windowless and dilapidated with age and neglect Wrong. Same as B.
(D) having interiors inhumanely overcrowded, their floors often serving for beds, and their walls were often windowless and dilapidated due to age and neglect Wrong.Verb-ing modifier + comma ==> modify preceding clause. However, the underlined part just modifies "apartments".
(E) having interiors that were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors often serving as beds, and their walls often lacked windows and were dilapidated on account of age and neglect Wrong. Same as D. Verb-ing modifier + comma ==> modify preceding clause. That's wrong here.
Hope it helps.
Just one question. In option A, isnt there a parallelism error-
whose interiors were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors often serving as beds, and their walls often windowless and dilapidated with age and neglect
Re: In the late 1880s, the journalist Jacob Riis visited tenement dwelling
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Jul 2016, 10:28
In the late 1880s, the journalist Jacob Riis visited tenement dwellings in several impoverished New York City neighbourhoods to investigate housing conditions and photograph immigrant tenant's apartments, whose interiors were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors often serving as beds, and their walls often windowless and dilapidated with age and neglect.
(A) whose interiors were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors often serving as beds, and their walls often windowless and dilapidated with age and neglect - Correct.
(B) whose interiors were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors were often serving as beds, and their walls were often lacking windows and dilapidated due to age and neglect (C) whose interiors were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors were often serving as beds, and they had walls often windowless and dilapidated with age and neglect (D) having interiors inhumanely overcrowded, their floors often serving for beds, and their walls were often windowless and dilapidated due to age and neglect (E) having interiors that were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors often serving as beds, and their walls often lacked windows and were dilapidated on account of age and neglect _________________
Good luck ========================================================================================= "If a street performer makes you stop walking, you owe him a buck" "If this post helps you on your GMAT journey, drop a +1 Kudo "
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Re: In the late 1880s, the journalist Jacob Riis visited tenement dwelling
[#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Jul 2016, 01:59
2
gaurav2187 wrote:
pqhai wrote:
In the late 1880s, the journalist Jacob Riis visited tenement dwellings in several impoverished New York City neighbourhoods to investigate housing conditions and photograph immigrant tenant's apartments, whose interiors were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors often serving as beds, and their walls often windowless and dilapidated with age and neglect.
(A) whose interiors were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors often serving as beds, and their walls often windowless and dilapidated with age and neglect Correct. Modifier is used correctly.
(B) whose interiors were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors were often serving as beds, and their walls were often lacking windows and dilapidated due to age and neglect Wrong. information about the floors and walls just provides additional info for inhumanely overcrowded apartments' interiors ==> modifier should be used.
(C) whose interiors were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors were often serving as beds, and they had walls often windowless and dilapidated with age and neglect Wrong. Same as B.
(D) having interiors inhumanely overcrowded, their floors often serving for beds, and their walls were often windowless and dilapidated due to age and neglect Wrong.Verb-ing modifier + comma ==> modify preceding clause. However, the underlined part just modifies "apartments".
(E) having interiors that were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors often serving as beds, and their walls often lacked windows and were dilapidated on account of age and neglect Wrong. Same as D. Verb-ing modifier + comma ==> modify preceding clause. That's wrong here.
Hope it helps.
Just one question. In option A, isnt there a parallelism error-
whose interiors were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors often serving as beds, and their walls often windowless and dilapidated with age and neglect
1 is in Verb-ed form other is in verb-ing form
The first modifier (relative clause modifier) is not supposed to be parallel to the second and the third (absolute phrases).
Relative phrase modifier: whose interiors were inhumanely overcrowded Absolute phrase 1: their floors often serving as beds Absolute phrase 2: their walls often windowless and dilapidated with age and neglect.
There is no bearing of "overcrowded" with "serving" since they are in two different elements which has no parallelity requirement.
The only parallelity requirement is within the absolute phrase 1 and the absolute phrase 2, and they are parallel (noun + noun modifier)
Absolute phrase 1: Noun = their floors, noun modifier (present participle) = (often) serving as beds Absolute phrase 2: Noun = their walls, noun modifier (adjectival) = windowless and dilapidated with age and neglect.
The only requirement here is that "their walls" and "their walls" be parallel. (Even the noun modifiers in two differnet absolute phrases need not be parallel.)
Re: In the late 1880s, the journalist Jacob Riis visited tenement dwelling
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Aug 2016, 11:25
Can something get dilapidated with age? I thought something can get dilapidated only due to something. I chose 'B', even though I understand that there is a parallelism error, because of the above logic, B seemed the most appropriate
Re: In the late 1880s, the journalist Jacob Riis visited tenement dwelling
[#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Aug 2016, 11:43
pqhai wrote:
In the late 1880s, the journalist Jacob Riis visited tenement dwellings in several impoverished New York City neighbourhoods to investigate housing conditions and photograph immigrant tenant's apartments, whose interiors were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors often serving as beds, and their walls often windowless and dilapidated with age and neglect.
(A) whose interiors were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors often serving as beds, and their walls often windowless and dilapidated with age and neglect Correct. Modifier is used correctly.
(B) whose interiors were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors were often serving as beds, and their walls were often lacking windows and dilapidated due to age and neglect Wrong. information about the floors and walls just provides additional info for inhumanely overcrowded apartments' interiors ==> modifier should be used.
(C) whose interiors were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors were often serving as beds, and they had walls often windowless and dilapidated with age and neglect Wrong. Same as B.
(D) having interiors inhumanely overcrowded, their floors often serving for beds, and their walls were often windowless and dilapidated due to age and neglect Wrong.Verb-ing modifier + comma ==> modify preceding clause. However, the underlined part just modifies "apartments".
(E) having interiors that were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors often serving as beds, and their walls often lacked windows and were dilapidated on account of age and neglect Wrong. Same as D. Verb-ing modifier + comma ==> modify preceding clause. That's wrong here.
Hope it helps.
Dear Concerned,
Can you please elaborate a little more on how modifiers related to 'floors' and 'windows' are providing additional info about apartment's interiors? Does 'their' in these modifiers refer to interiors? As in, "apartment's interior's floors often serving as beds" and "apartment's interior's walls often lacking windows and dilapidated due to age and neglect"? Is this correct? To me it seems these modifiers will make more sense if they modify 'apartment'.
Whose interiors were...., their floors were..., and their walls were -- this is not parallel. It should be written like this: Whose interiors were...., Whose floors were..., and Whose walls were
2. Wrong use of due to. Replacement of "due to" by "CAUSED BY" does not make sense.
their walls were dilapidated due to age. their walls were dilapidated CAUSED BY age
_________________
Be careful when you make general statements like this. Whose can refer to a house, but only if it shows possession. In this case, it does. But 'whose' is not always appropriate when talking about inanimate objects.
_________________
Re: In the late 1880s, the journalist Jacob Riis visited tenement dwelling
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Sep 2018, 00:39
sayantanc2k wrote:
gaurav2187 wrote:
pqhai wrote:
In the late 1880s, the journalist Jacob Riis visited tenement dwellings in several impoverished New York City neighbourhoods to investigate housing conditions and photograph immigrant tenant's apartments, whose interiors were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors often serving as beds, and their walls often windowless and dilapidated with age and neglect.
(A) whose interiors were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors often serving as beds, and their walls often windowless and dilapidated with age and neglect Correct. Modifier is used correctly.
(B) whose interiors were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors were often serving as beds, and their walls were often lacking windows and dilapidated due to age and neglect Wrong. information about the floors and walls just provides additional info for inhumanely overcrowded apartments' interiors ==> modifier should be used.
(C) whose interiors were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors were often serving as beds, and they had walls often windowless and dilapidated with age and neglect Wrong. Same as B.
(D) having interiors inhumanely overcrowded, their floors often serving for beds, and their walls were often windowless and dilapidated due to age and neglect Wrong.Verb-ing modifier + comma ==> modify preceding clause. However, the underlined part just modifies "apartments".
(E) having interiors that were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors often serving as beds, and their walls often lacked windows and were dilapidated on account of age and neglect Wrong. Same as D. Verb-ing modifier + comma ==> modify preceding clause. That's wrong here.
Hope it helps.
Just one question. In option A, isnt there a parallelism error-
whose interiors were inhumanely overcrowded, their floors often serving as beds, and their walls often windowless and dilapidated with age and neglect
1 is in Verb-ed form other is in verb-ing form
The first modifier (relative clause modifier) is not supposed to be parallel to the second and the third (absolute phrases).
Relative phrase modifier: whose interiors were inhumanely overcrowded Absolute phrase 1: their floors often serving as beds Absolute phrase 2: their walls often windowless and dilapidated with age and neglect.
There is no bearing of "overcrowded" with "serving" since they are in two different elements which has no parallelity requirement.
The only parallelity requirement is within the absolute phrase 1 and the absolute phrase 2, and they are parallel (noun + noun modifier)
Absolute phrase 1: Noun = their floors, noun modifier (present participle) = (often) serving as beds Absolute phrase 2: Noun = their walls, noun modifier (adjectival) = windowless and dilapidated with age and neglect.
The only requirement here is that "their walls" and "their walls" be parallel. (Even the noun modifiers in two differnet absolute phrases need not be parallel.)
Could you please share how do you usually recognize Absolute phrase in a sentence?
I thought that Absolute phrase has only 3 distinctive features: 1) the phrase structure can be: noun + participle (phrase) 2) or can be: noun + "that" clause 3) Absolute phrases modify the entire sentence
But here the Absolute phrases modify "tenant's apartments" but not the main noun of the sentence, and the structures are not very clear.
Re: In the late 1880s, the journalist Jacob Riis visited tenement dwelling
[#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Sep 2018, 09:23
Though this sentence is long and not necessarily in your favorite style, there is nothing grammatically wrong with it.
Stripped way down, the last part of this sentence would read: "The interiors were overcrowded, their floors serving as beds and their walls windowless." The last two phrases modify the interiors, giving more information about the insides of these apartments. Joined by "and," they must be parallel to each other.
It may seem odd, but here the word "serving" in the phrase "their floors often serving as beds" actually functions as an adjective. This is fairly common, however. For example, in the sentence "She ran for the bus, shouting, and finally caught it," the verbs "ran" and "caught" are parallel, while the word "shouting" functions as an adjective, describing what she was like while "she ran for the bus." Thus, each of these modifying phrases is noun + adjective, and they are parallel in construction.
Since there is nothing wrong with this sentence, just check each of the other choices to see if any of them is better stylistically.
Scan and Group the Answer Choices:
There is a clear and useful 3-2 split here. (A), (B) and (C) all begin "whose interiors were" and (D) and (E) both begin with "having interiors."
Eliminate Wrong Answer Choices:
(D) and (E) both begin with the word "having," which is incorrect, because it isn't clear who or what has these interiors. Is it the apartments, the immigrants, or Jacob Riis? Such ambiguity is unacceptable, which is enough reason to rule out these two choices. Further, (D) changes "dilapidated with age" to "dilapidated due to age," and (E) changes it to "dilapidated on account of age." Both are wordier than the original. In fact, the phrase "on account of" is usually wrong on the GMAT. So, both (D) and (E) are incorrect.
(B) makes several small changes from the original. First, it changes "floors often serving" to "floors were often serving." This small change has big implications. Without the word "were," the phrase "their floors often serving as beds" is a descriptive aside. With "were," this is an independent clause (it could stand on its own), so it would at the very least have to be parallel with the preceding clause, making a list with it. However, it isn't parallel; to be parallel, it would have to read, "whose floors served as beds." (B) also inserts the word "were" in the last clause, which creates exactly the same problem there. Finally, it unnecessarily changes the phrase "dilapidated with" to "dilapidated due to." "With" is fine, so there's no reason to make the phrase any longer. Because of these problems, (B) is incorrect.
(C) also creates an unparallel list. To be parallel, the second and third clause would have to begin "whose walls" and "whose floors."
Since each of the other choices introduces new errors, the sentence is correct as written and Answer Choice (A) is correct.
_________________
Everything will fall into place…
There is perfect timing for everything and everyone. Never doubt, But Work on improving yourself, Keep the faith and Stay ready. When it’s finally your turn, It will all make sense.
gmatclubot
Re: In the late 1880s, the journalist Jacob Riis visited tenement dwelling &nbs
[#permalink]
23 Sep 2018, 09:23
close
42% (01:58) correct 
