Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 03:54 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 03:54
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
655-705 Level|   Coordinate Plane|   Geometry|                  
User avatar
ENEM
Joined: 16 Nov 2016
Last visit: 13 Jan 2020
Posts: 241
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 379
WE:Advertising (Advertising and PR)
Products:
Posts: 241
Kudos: 196
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
fskilnik
Joined: 12 Oct 2010
Last visit: 03 Jan 2025
Posts: 885
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 57
Status:GMATH founder
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 885
Kudos: 1,801
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
soapbolt
Joined: 05 Oct 2017
Last visit: 21 Apr 2019
Posts: 59
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 245
Location: India
Posts: 59
Kudos: 67
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
soapbolt
Joined: 05 Oct 2017
Last visit: 21 Apr 2019
Posts: 59
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 245
Location: India
Posts: 59
Kudos: 67
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ENEM
Bunuel

In the rectangular coordinate system above, if OP < PQ, is the area of region OPQ greater than 48 ?

(1) The coordinates of point P are (6,8). Now, if OP were equal to PQ then the triangle OPQ would be isosceles and OS would be equal to SQ and the area would be: 1/2*base*height=1/2(OS+SQ)*PS=1/2*(6+6)*8=48. Since OP<PQ then OS<SQ and the base OQ is more than 12, which makes the area more than 48. Sufficient.

(2) The coordinates of point Q are (13,0) --> we know the length of the base (OQ=13) but know nothing about the height (PS), which may be 1 or 100, so the area may or may not be more than 48. Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Hope it's clear.

Attachment:
Triangle.png

Hi Bunuel,

how do we know that OS<SQ? I mean how do we deduce that from OP<OQ


From the question we have OP < OQ .....(a)
also from Pythagoras theorem we have \(OP^2\) = \(PS^2\) +\(OS^2\) and \(OQ^2\) = \(PS^2\) +\(SQ^2\)
Putting these value in equation a we have
\(PS^2\) +\(OS^2\) < \(PS^2\) +\(SQ^2\)
=> OS<SQ

Hope its clear now
User avatar
dcummins
Joined: 14 Feb 2017
Last visit: 08 Oct 2025
Posts: 1,064
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 368
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 560 Q41 V26
GMAT 2: 550 Q43 V23
GMAT 3: 650 Q47 V33
GMAT 4: 650 Q44 V36
GMAT 5: 600 Q38 V35
GMAT 6: 710 Q47 V41
WE:Management Consulting (Consulting)
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
More simplified version of what Bunuel explained.

We MUST test OP = PQ because under this constraint we can see that the base equals 12 and thus the area =1/2 *12*8=48, but since OP is actually less than PQ, the base must be larger (can deduce through inequality theorem).
Attachments

Capture.JPG
Capture.JPG [ 26.83 KiB | Viewed 3225 times ]

User avatar
jabhatta2
Joined: 15 Dec 2016
Last visit: 21 Apr 2023
Posts: 1,294
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 188
Posts: 1,294
Kudos: 317
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel

In the rectangular coordinate system above, if OP < PQ, is the area of region OPQ greater than 48 ?

(1) The coordinates of point P are (6,8). Now, if OP were equal to PQ then the triangle OPQ would be isosceles and OS would be equal to SQ and the area would be: 1/2*base*height=1/2(OS+SQ)*PS=1/2*(6+6)*8=48. Since OP<PQ then OS<SQ and the base OQ is more than 12, which makes the area more than 48. Sufficient.

(2) The coordinates of point Q are (13,0) --> we know the length of the base (OQ=13) but know nothing about the height (PS), which may be 1 or 100, so the area may or may not be more than 48. Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Hope it's clear.

Attachment:
Triangle.png

Hi Bunuel VeritasKarishma - can i make the following general take-away ?

In any isosceles triangle
- Right angle isosceles like 45-45-90 or
- Non right angle isosceles triangle like 20-20-140

The perpendicular from the vertex to the base line (the height) in both types of isosceles triangles divides the base into two equal lengths ?
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,267
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,267
Kudos: 76,989
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jabhatta@umail.iu.edu
Bunuel

In the rectangular coordinate system above, if OP < PQ, is the area of region OPQ greater than 48 ?

(1) The coordinates of point P are (6,8). Now, if OP were equal to PQ then the triangle OPQ would be isosceles and OS would be equal to SQ and the area would be: 1/2*base*height=1/2(OS+SQ)*PS=1/2*(6+6)*8=48. Since OP<PQ then OS<SQ and the base OQ is more than 12, which makes the area more than 48. Sufficient.

(2) The coordinates of point Q are (13,0) --> we know the length of the base (OQ=13) but know nothing about the height (PS), which may be 1 or 100, so the area may or may not be more than 48. Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Hope it's clear.

Attachment:
Triangle.png

Hi Bunuel VeritasKarishma - can i make the following general take-away ?

In any isosceles triangle
- Right angle isosceles like 45-45-90 or
- Non right angle isosceles triangle like 20-20-140

The perpendicular from the vertex to the base line (the height) in both types of isosceles triangles divides the base into two equal lengths ?

Yes, but only if the base is the non-equal side.
User avatar
CEdward
Joined: 11 Aug 2020
Last visit: 14 Apr 2022
Posts: 1,203
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 332
Posts: 1,203
Kudos: 272
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel

In the rectangular coordinate system above, if OP < PQ, is the area of region OPQ greater than 48 ?

(1) The coordinates of point P are (6,8). Now, if OP were equal to PQ then the triangle OPQ would be isosceles and OS would be equal to SQ and the area would be: 1/2*base*height=1/2(OS+SQ)*PS=1/2*(6+6)*8=48. Since OP<PQ then OS<SQ and the base OQ is more than 12, which makes the area more than 48. Sufficient.

(2) The coordinates of point Q are (13,0) --> we know the length of the base (OQ=13) but know nothing about the height (PS), which may be 1 or 100, so the area may or may not be more than 48. Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Hope it's clear.

Attachment:
Triangle.png

This is clever, but I am wondering why my approach was wrong?

Given P(6,8), we can calculate the distance OP --> √(6-0)^2 + (8-0)^2 --> OP = 10.

Since PQ > OP, we can do some test values

PQ = 11 --> Area = 44
PQ = 13 --> Area = 104/2 = 52

Insufficient.

Just wondering why that's not an equally valid approach?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,379
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,379
Kudos: 778,194
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
CEdward
Bunuel

In the rectangular coordinate system above, if OP < PQ, is the area of region OPQ greater than 48 ?

(1) The coordinates of point P are (6,8). Now, if OP were equal to PQ then the triangle OPQ would be isosceles and OS would be equal to SQ and the area would be: 1/2*base*height=1/2(OS+SQ)*PS=1/2*(6+6)*8=48. Since OP<PQ then OS<SQ and the base OQ is more than 12, which makes the area more than 48. Sufficient.

(2) The coordinates of point Q are (13,0) --> we know the length of the base (OQ=13) but know nothing about the height (PS), which may be 1 or 100, so the area may or may not be more than 48. Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Hope it's clear.

Attachment:
Triangle.png

This is clever, but I am wondering why my approach was wrong?

Given P(6,8), we can calculate the distance OP --> √(6-0)^2 + (8-0)^2 --> OP = 10.

Since PQ > OP, we can do some test values

PQ = 11 --> Area = 44
PQ = 13 --> Area = 104/2 = 52

Insufficient.

Just wondering why that's not an equally valid approach?

Not sure how you calculated the areas but in both cases the area is different and greater than 48.
User avatar
CEdward
Joined: 11 Aug 2020
Last visit: 14 Apr 2022
Posts: 1,203
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 332
Posts: 1,203
Kudos: 272
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
CEdward
Bunuel

In the rectangular coordinate system above, if OP < PQ, is the area of region OPQ greater than 48 ?

(1) The coordinates of point P are (6,8). Now, if OP were equal to PQ then the triangle OPQ would be isosceles and OS would be equal to SQ and the area would be: 1/2*base*height=1/2(OS+SQ)*PS=1/2*(6+6)*8=48. Since OP<PQ then OS<SQ and the base OQ is more than 12, which makes the area more than 48. Sufficient.

(2) The coordinates of point Q are (13,0) --> we know the length of the base (OQ=13) but know nothing about the height (PS), which may be 1 or 100, so the area may or may not be more than 48. Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Hope it's clear.

Attachment:
Triangle.png

This is clever, but I am wondering why my approach was wrong?

Given P(6,8), we can calculate the distance OP --> √(6-0)^2 + (8-0)^2 --> OP = 10.

Since PQ > OP, we can do some test values

PQ = 11 --> Area = 44
PQ = 13 --> Area = 104/2 = 52

Insufficient.

Just wondering why that's not an equally valid approach?

Not sure how you calculated the areas but in both cases the area is different and greater than 48.

So given a height of 8 ---> 8 x 11 /2 = 88 /2 = 44 <48 and 8 x 13 /2 = 104 / 2 = 52 > 48...two different solutions?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,379
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,379
Kudos: 778,194
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
CEdward
Bunuel
CEdward

In the rectangular coordinate system above, if OP < PQ, is the area of region OPQ greater than 48 ?

(1) The coordinates of point P are (6,8). Now, if OP were equal to PQ then the triangle OPQ would be isosceles and OS would be equal to SQ and the area would be: 1/2*base*height=1/2(OS+SQ)*PS=1/2*(6+6)*8=48. Since OP<PQ then OS<SQ and the base OQ is more than 12, which makes the area more than 48. Sufficient.

(2) The coordinates of point Q are (13,0) --> we know the length of the base (OQ=13) but know nothing about the height (PS), which may be 1 or 100, so the area may or may not be more than 48. Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Hope it's clear.


This is clever, but I am wondering why my approach was wrong?

Given P(6,8), we can calculate the distance OP --> √(6-0)^2 + (8-0)^2 --> OP = 10.

Since PQ > OP, we can do some test values

PQ = 11 --> Area = 44
PQ = 13 --> Area = 104/2 = 52

Insufficient.

Just wondering why that's not an equally valid approach?

Not sure how you calculated the areas but in both cases the area is different and greater than 48.

So given a height of 8 ---> 8 x 11 /2 = 88 /2 = 44 <48 and 8 x 13 /2 = 104 / 2 = 52 > 48...two different solutions?

The area of a triangle 1/2*height*base = 1/2*PS*OQ.

Height = PS = 8;
Base = OQ. (If PQ = 11, then \(OQ = 6 + \sqrt{57}\) and if PQ = 13, then \(OQ = 6 + \sqrt{105}\)).

You are calculating the area as 1/2*PS*PQ, which is wrong.
User avatar
Scuven
Joined: 26 Jun 2018
Last visit: 06 Mar 2023
Posts: 60
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 143
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V35
GMAT 2: 490 Q25 V32
GMAT 2: 490 Q25 V32
Posts: 60
Kudos: 29
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Isn't assuming that OQ is a base an improper assumption? brunel
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,844
Own Kudos:
8,945
 [1]
Given Kudos: 225
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,844
Kudos: 8,945
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Good Question +1

This question reminds me that GMAT is not only about math, Its MATH + LOGIC skills.

Let's try to analyze this question.

In the rectangular coordinate system above, if OP < PQ, is the area of region OPQ greater than 48?

(1) The coordinates of point P are (6,8)

Attachment:
gcpic.JPG
gcpic.JPG [ 19.48 KiB | Viewed 1788 times ]

If you drop a perpendicular from point P to the base OQ and meet at a point S and this line will divide the △ POQ into 2 triangles.

△1 would be a right-angled triangle with base OS and height PS.

By using the coordinates of point P (6,8 ), we can say that side OS = 6 and PS = 8.

Hence, Area of △1 = 1/2 * base * height = 1/2 * 6 * 8 = 24.

Now let us consider △2. It will also be a right-angled triangle with base SQ and height PS.

Since it is given in the question that the hypotenuse PQ > OP,

\(OS^2 + PS^2 = OP^2 \) in △1

\(SQ^2 + PS^2 = PQ^2 \) in △ 2

Comparing both equations, since PQ > OP, we can conclude that the base SQ > OS.

Since the height of 2 triangles, PS is the same. The base of △ 2 is greater than △ 1.

Area of △2 = 1/2 * base SQ * height PS

Area of △1 = 1/2 * base OS * height PS = 24.

Therefore, we conclude that the area of △2 is greater than △ 1 i.e 24.

So the combined area of 2 triangles should be greater than 24+24 i.e 48

This will answer the question stem. Hence, Statement 1 alone is sufficient.

(2) The coordinates of point Q are (13,0)

From the coordinates of Q, we can say that the base OQ=13 but we don't have any idea about the coordinates of P.
Coordinates of P will determine the height of the triangle. Since the height is unknown, we will not be able to figure out if the area of △ OPQ is greater than 48 or not.

Statement 2 alone is not sufficient.

Option A is the correct answer.

Thanks,
Clifin J Francis,
GMAT QUANT SME
User avatar
DUMDUM21
Joined: 12 Jan 2020
Last visit: 16 Jun 2025
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 19
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GPA: 3.6
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
won't this question be considered a part of geometry?
User avatar
pmahaja2
Joined: 20 Jun 2025
Last visit: 18 Sep 2025
Posts: 4
Given Kudos: 18
Posts: 4
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I arrived at the same answer. Even if it were to be on the x-axis, it can be (-1,0) and satisfy the conditions and have area<48. Believe the question is incorrect.

@bunnel
germanfellow
Although I understand the discussed solution I come to to a different solution due to a different interpretation of the question. Maybe some of you have a similar opinion...

In my opinion, the question at no point requires point Q to lie on the x-axis. The question only requires OP<PQ. Although the graph and question may be interpreted in a way that leads you to think that Q lies on the x-axis they certainly don't state this requirement explicitly.

If OP has a length of 10 and PQ has a length of 10+ but Q is located not on the x-axis but rather close to the origin the area of OPQ may be less than 48 despite having P located at (6,8)

I attached a graph of my example.

I know that the solutions manual offers the same solution as the forum agrees upon here. Is the solution manual wrong? Please point out any mistakes of mine.
User avatar
APram
Joined: 23 Jun 2024
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 671
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 240
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 605 Q86 V78 DI76
GPA: 3.608
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 605 Q86 V78 DI76
Posts: 671
Kudos: 263
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In this question we can't distort the question as in the question it states the word "above" which means question wants us to refer to image as provided and not assume anything else.
Anyway, these geometry questions are not a part of focus edition so it's not wise to put time to practice them.
pmahaja2
I arrived at the same answer. Even if it were to be on the x-axis, it can be (-1,0) and satisfy the conditions and have area<48. Believe the question is incorrect.

@bunnel
germanfellow
Although I understand the discussed solution I come to to a different solution due to a different interpretation of the question. Maybe some of you have a similar opinion...

In my opinion, the question at no point requires point Q to lie on the x-axis. The question only requires OP<PQ. Although the graph and question may be interpreted in a way that leads you to think that Q lies on the x-axis they certainly don't state this requirement explicitly.

If OP has a length of 10 and PQ has a length of 10+ but Q is located not on the x-axis but rather close to the origin the area of OPQ may be less than 48 despite having P located at (6,8)

I attached a graph of my example.

I know that the solutions manual offers the same solution as the forum agrees upon here. Is the solution manual wrong? Please point out any mistakes of mine.
User avatar
soumyab12
Joined: 16 Mar 2023
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 29
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 17
Posts: 29
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi, can such a question be tested in Focus edition?
Bunuel

In the rectangular coordinate system above, if OP < PQ, is the area of region OPQ greater than 48 ?

(1) The coordinates of point P are (6,8). Now, if OP were equal to PQ then the triangle OPQ would be isosceles and OS would be equal to SQ and the area would be: 1/2*base*height=1/2(OS+SQ)*PS=1/2*(6+6)*8=48. Since OP<PQ then OS<SQ and the base OQ is more than 12, which makes the area more than 48. Sufficient.

(2) The coordinates of point Q are (13,0) --> we know the length of the base (OQ=13) but know nothing about the height (PS), which may be 1 or 100, so the area may or may not be more than 48. Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Hope it's clear.

Attachment:
Triangle.png
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,379
Own Kudos:
778,194
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,379
Kudos: 778,194
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
soumyab12
Hi, can such a question be tested in Focus edition?

No. Especially in DS.
   1   2 
Moderators:
Math Expert
105379 posts
496 posts