GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 16 Jul 2018, 11:33

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1285
In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Jul 2008, 19:30
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where laws require a different kind of safety belt. It is clear from this that the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for safety belt design to protect automobile passengers better.
Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT:
(A) Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts than are people in the United States.
(B) Unlike United States drivers, European drivers receive training in how best to react in the event of an accident to minimize injuries to themselves and to their passengers.
(C) Cars built for the European market tend to have more sturdy construction than do cars built for the United States market.
(D) Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe.
(E) States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average severity of injuries suffered by passengers in automobile accidents.

--== Message from GMAT Club Team ==--

This is not a quality discussion. It has been retired.

If you would like to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum. Thank you!

To review the GMAT Club's Forums Posting Guidelines, please follow these links: Quantitative | Verbal Please note - we may remove posts that do not follow our posting guidelines. Thank you.

_________________

cheers
Its Now Or Never

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Apr 2008
Posts: 393
Re: CR-weakens [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Jul 2008, 19:50
spriya wrote:
In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where laws require a different kind of safety belt. It is clear from this that the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for safety belt design to protect automobile passengers better.
Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT:
(A) Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts than are people in the United States.
(B) Unlike United States drivers, European drivers receive training in how best to react in the event of an accident to minimize injuries to themselves and to their passengers.
(C) Cars built for the European market tend to have more sturdy construction than do cars built for the United States market.
(D) Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe.
(E) States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average severity of injuries suffered by passengers in automobile accidents.


IMO E)
1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Mar 2006
Posts: 475
Re: CR-weakens [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Jul 2008, 20:16
1
spriya wrote:
In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where laws require a different kind of safety belt. It is clear from this that the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for safety belt design to protect automobile passengers better.
Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT:
(A) Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts than are people in the United States.
(B) Unlike United States drivers, European drivers receive training in how best to react in the event of an accident to minimize injuries to themselves and to their passengers.
(C) Cars built for the European market tend to have more sturdy construction than do cars built for the United States market.
(D) Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe.
(E) States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average severity of injuries suffered by passengers in automobile accidents.


This seems like a weaken question. But it has except in the question, so the answer will either strengthen the arguement or just irrelevant.
The argument says the safety belt is responsible for less severity of accident injuries in Europe, therefore US needs to adopt the same method.
Choice A weakens the argument, even though the US will adopt more stringent safety belt design, if people are not likely to wear it, then it will not reduce the severity of accident injury.
Choice B weakens the argument, by using a third reason. It is not really the safety belt, it is the training that make European driver able to minimize injury
Choice C weakens the argument, again by using a third reason. It is not really the safety belt, it is the car itself is much safer in Europe.
Choice E weakens the argument, by proving that even used the safety belt did not reduce the accident severity of injuries.

Choice D is the correct answer here. Even though passengers in US are more likely to involve in accident, does not tell you anything about the severity of injuries.
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1285
Re: CR-weakens [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Aug 2008, 21:28
eileen1017 wrote:
spriya wrote:
In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where laws require a different kind of safety belt. It is clear from this that the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for safety belt design to protect automobile passengers better.
Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT:
(A) Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts than are people in the United States.
(B) Unlike United States drivers, European drivers receive training in how best to react in the event of an accident to minimize injuries to themselves and to their passengers.
(C) Cars built for the European market tend to have more sturdy construction than do cars built for the United States market.
(D) Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe.
(E) States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average severity of injuries suffered by passengers in automobile accidents.


This seems like a weaken question. But it has except in the question, so the answer will either strengthen the arguement or just irrelevant.
The argument says the safety belt is responsible for less severity of accident injuries in Europe, therefore US needs to adopt the same method.
Choice A weakens the argument, even though the US will adopt more stringent safety belt design, if people are not likely to wear it, then it will not reduce the severity of accident injury.
Choice B weakens the argument, by using a third reason. It is not really the safety belt, it is the training that make European driver able to minimize injury
Choice C weakens the argument, again by using a third reason. It is not really the safety belt, it is the car itself is much safer in Europe.
Choice E weakens the argument, by proving that even used the safety belt did not reduce the accident severity of injuries.

Choice D is the correct answer here. Even though passengers in US are more likely to involve in accident, does not tell you anything about the severity of injuries.


good explanation : its just we got the eliminate the others ,D does not weaken the argument neither does it strengthen the argument.

+1 for u

--== Message from GMAT Club Team ==--

This is not a quality discussion. It has been retired.

If you would like to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum. Thank you!

To review the GMAT Club's Forums Posting Guidelines, please follow these links: Quantitative | Verbal Please note - we may remove posts that do not follow our posting guidelines. Thank you.

_________________

cheers
Its Now Or Never

Re: CR-weakens   [#permalink] 01 Aug 2008, 21:28
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.