honeyrai
Bunuel
GMATMadeeasy
How do you conclude A here can't make out or I am tired.; anyways, it is mental marathon

.. wonderful questions Bunuel. Any more link for inequality as I need some more practise .
We have \(-s<=r<=s\) --> \(-s<=s\). Now if \(s\) in negative, let's say \(-2\), then we would have \(-(-2)<=-2\) --> \(2<=-2\), which is not right. Hence \(s\) can not be negative. But \(s\) can be zero --> \(0<=0\), true.
You can't write it this way. -s<=r<=s means that either r lies between s & -s or r is equal to -s or r can be equal to s. But this certainly doesn't mean that you can equate -s<=s.
If I say that -4<=x<=4. This doesn't mean that I can write -4<=4.
But in any case the answer you've arrived at is correct. We can't derive anything out of the first statement as it says that -s<=r<=s. r can be anything -s or s or between -s & s.
First of all: you are excluding the possibility when -s=r=s=0.
-s<=r<=s, so -s can be equal to s, when s=0. In all other cases -s will be less than s, so there is nothing wrong in writing this as -s<=s.
Second of all: we CAN conclude one more thing from this statement: s is either positive or zero.
Here is what I wrote in my solution from page 3:
(1) -s<=r<=s, we can conclude two things from this statement:
A. s is either positive or zero, as -s<=s;
B. r is in the range (-s,s) inclusive, meaning that r can be -s as well as s.
But we don't know whether r=s or not. Not sufficient.
(2) |r|>=s, clearly insufficient.
(1)+(2) -s<=r<=s, s is not negative, |r|>=s --> r>=s or r<=-s. This doesn't imply that r=s, from this r can be -s as well.
Consider: s=5, r=5 --> -5<=5<=5 |5|>=5
s=5, r=-5 --> -5<=-5<=5 |-5|>=5
Both statements are true with these values. Hence insufficient.
Answer: E.
Hope it's clear.