TheNightKing
Quote:
• Once again,
studying European women of the Renaissance is tacked onto the end of the sentence and is not a meaningful modifier.
-- comma + ING modifiers
typically modify the preceding clause. Not always. Sometimes they modify the immediately preceding noun. See
this official question, here.
-- comma + ING does not necessarily have to describe the
result of the previous clause, either. See
this official question, here.
generis, I hope you're doing good.
Any other examples or official examples where cooma +ING modifies the preceding noun and not the clause. Just trying to understand at a broader level.
And as always, Sorry for the tag.
Thank you!
TheNightKing , tentatively . . . I am 90% sure: yes, there are two other official examples. One is very old (-20 years). The other is sort of old (-10, I think).
I am not going to hunt for them because you do not need them.
You need to know only that [comma + __ING]
might refer to the immediately preceding noun.
The construction is
very rare.
I saw at least two huge "one-offs" in the official questions from 2019-2020.
The subject of this post is one of the one-offs.
The other one-off?
In SC #832 OG 2020, the word THIS is a standalone pronoun.
Usually GMAC requires "this," a determiner, to be followed by a noun: this tree, this house, this question.
You are not likely to see either one-off. But
if you do, now you know that both are possible.