winterschool wrote:
Q1. Delta green ground beetles sometimes remain motionless for hours at a stretch, although they are more active in wet years than in dry years. In 1989 an observer spotted ten delta green ground beetles in nine hours; in 1985 the same observer at the same location had counted 38 in about two hours. This difference probably does not reflect a drop in the population of these rare beetles over this period, however, because 1985 was a wet year and 1989 was relatively dry. Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports the conclusion drawn above? (A) Because of their excellent camouflage, delta green ground beetles are almost impossible to see if they are not moving. (B) The only habitat of delta green ground beetles is around pools formed by the collection of winter rains in low-lying areas. (C) Della green ground beetles move about very little to get food; most of their moving from one place to another is related to their reproductive behavior. (D) Della green ground beetles are so rare that, although the first specimen was found in 1878, a second was not found until 1974. (E) No predator relies on the delta green ground beetle for a major portion of its food supply. Difficulty - Hard
winterschool wrote:
Q2. Letter to the editor: Your article was unjustified in criticizing environmentalists for claiming that more wolves on Vancouver Island are killed by hunters than are born each year. You stated that this claim was disproven by recent studies that indicate that the total number of wolves on Vancouver Island has remained roughly constant for 20 years. But you failed to account for the fact that, fearing the extinction of this wolf population, environmentalists have been introducing new wolves into the Vancouver Island wolf population for 20 years. Which one of the following most accurately expresses the conclusion of the argument in the letter to the editor? (A) Environmentalists have been successfully maintaining the wolf population on Vancouver Island for 20 years. (B) As many wolves on Vancouver Island are killed by hunters as are born each year. (C) The population of wolves on Vancouver Island should be maintained by either reducing the number killed by hunters each year or introducing new wolves into the population. (D) The recent studies indicating that the total number of wolves on Vancouver Island has remained roughly constant for 20 years were flawed. (E) The stability in the size of the Vancouver Island wolf population does not warrant the article’s criticism of the environmentalists’ claim. Difficulty - Hard
CR Questions October - 17 :Q1. Historian: Newton developed mathematical concepts and techniques that are fundamental to modern calculus. Leibniz developed closely analogous concepts and techniques. It has traditionally been thought that these discoveries were independent. Researchers have, however, recently discovered notes of Leibniz’s that discuss one of Newton’s books on mathematics. Several scholars have argued that since
the book includes a presentation of Newton’s calculus concepts and techniques, and since the notes were written before Leibniz’s own development of calculus concepts and techniques, it is virtually certain
that the traditional view is false. A more cautious conclusion than this is called for, however. Leibniz’s notes are limited to early sections of Newton’s book, sections that precede the ones in which Newton’s calculus concepts and techniques are presented.
In the historian’s reasoning, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
(A) The first is a claim that the historian rejects; the second is a position that that claim has been used to support.
(B) The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion about which the historian expresses reservations; the second is that conclusion.
(C) The first provides evidence in support of a position that the historian defends; the second is that position.
(D) The first and the second each provide evidence in support of a position that the historian defends.
(E) The first has been used in support of a position that the historian rejects; the second is a conclusion that the historian draws from that position.
Q2. Scientists typically do their most creative work before the age of forty. It is commonly thought that this happens because aging by itself brings about a loss of creative capacity. However, studies show that
of scientists who produce highly creative work beyond the age of forty, a disproportionately large number entered their field at an older age than is usual. Since by the age of forty the large majority of scientists have been working in their field for at least fifteen years, the studies’ finding strongly suggests that the real reason why scientists over forty rarely produce highly creative work is not that they have aged but rather that
scientists over forty have generally spent too long in their field.
In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
(A) The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is at issue in the argument; the second is a conclusion drawn on the basis of that claim.
(B) The first is an objection that has been raised against a position defended in the argument; the second is that position.
(C) The first is evidence that has been used to support an explanation that the argument challenges; the second is that explanation.
(D) The first is evidence that has been used to support an explanation that the argument challenges; the second is a competing explanation that the argument favors.
(E) The first provides evidence to support an explanation that the argument favors; the second is that explanation.
Difficulty - Hard