Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Aiming to score 760+? Attend this FREE session to learn how to Define your GMAT Strategy, Create your Study Plan and Master the Core Skills to excel on the GMAT.
Judge Lois Forer's study asks why do some litigants have a preferred
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 25 Sep 2018, 01:28
1
5
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
35% (medium)
Question Stats:
66% (01:07) correct 34% (01:07) wrong based on 438 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Judge Lois Forer’s study asks why do some litigants have a preferred status over others in the use of a public resource, the courts, which in theory are available to all but in fact are unequally distributed among rich and poor.
(A) do some litigants have a preferred status over others in the use of a public resource, the courts, which in theory are available to all but in fact are unequally distributed among
(B) some litigants have a preferred status over others in the use of a public resource, the courts, which in theory are available to all but in fact are unequally distributed between
(C) do some litigants have a preferred status over another in the use of a public resource, the courts, in theory available to all but in fact are unequally distributed among
(D) some litigants have a preferred status to another in the use of a public resource, the courts, in theory available to all but in fact not equally distributed between
(E) does one litigant have a preferred status over the other in the use of a public resource, the courts, in theory available to all but in fact they are not equally distributed among
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4561
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Judge Lois Forer's study asks why do some litigants have a preferred
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Dec 2010, 05:22
4
1
Hirendhanak:
In direct speech:
Jack “hi, Jill, when do you plan to go up the hill?
In reported/indirect speech: Jack asks Jill when she plans to go up the hill.
Here the do has been removed and merged with the main verb as done in an affirmative statement.
Direct Speech: Jack asked Jill “Hi, when does your mother think of going back to her house? Reported / indirect speech:
Jack asked Jill when her mother thought of going back to her house.
There may be some exceptions, but by and large this is the general use of “do and does” in direct interrogative sentences.
For example, look at the following example which is just a reported speech and a statement.
He said that he always used to muse why do some people vote for corrupt parties. Here the use of the word do is a mistake. The correct form will be: He said that he always used to muse why some people vote/voted for corrupt parties.
Sorry, if I have dragged you too much
_________________
you can know a lot about something and not really understand it."-- a quote No one knows this better than a GMAT student does. Narendran +9198845 44509
Re: Judge Lois Forer's study asks why do some litigants have a preferred
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Nov 2009, 02:00
2
"asks" does not require "do" or "does". Eliminate A, C and E.
Between B and D, D contains two errors. "have a preferred status to another", here another cannot be used as a pronoun so it does not properly complete the comparison. Also "in theory" should contain a "which" before it because "which" will refer directly to the noun right before it, namely the courts.
Re: Judge Lois Forer's study asks why do some litigants have a preferred
[#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Nov 2009, 11:17
1
IMO B
B - main verb is 'have' - have a status over another ..... preferred modifies status - it is not the main verb
D - main verb is preferred - preferred status to another (meaning changes as it says status is preferred to something else like prefer icecreams to chocolates) .... Actually meaning is some people have preferred status over others' (status).
Hope it helps in some way ..... i couldnot better explain than this....
_________________
I do not suffer from insanity. I enjoy every minute of it.
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4561
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Judge Lois Forer's study asks why do some litigants have a preferred
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Dec 2010, 09:08
1
One small to Mr. Alit. By pre - empting the answer, it is not going to be interesting. I suggest that you float your question for a while and then come out with your reasoning. This will invite various dimensions and you will get deeper insight.
Coming to the passage, ‘why do’ or ‘why does’ is used in direct speech while the ‘do or does” will be dropped in reported or indirect speech. So we can drop A, C and E.
Another split is that we need to use ‘between’ because there are only two categories namely rich and poor. So choices using among rcan be eliminated. Between B and D, the decider is the user of the correct idiom, ‘status over’. ‘Status to’ is a wrong idiom . Hence D can be ignored, leaving only B as the royal answer.
_________________
you can know a lot about something and not really understand it."-- a quote No one knows this better than a GMAT student does. Narendran +9198845 44509
Re: Judge Lois Forer's study asks why do some litigants have a preferred
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Dec 2010, 00:16
daagh wrote:
One small to Mr. Alit. By pre - empting the answer, it is not going to be interesting. I suggest that you float your question for a while and then come out with your reasoning. This will invite various dimensions and you will get deeper insight.
Coming to the passage, ‘why do’ or ‘why does’ is used in direct speech while the ‘do or does” will be dropped in reported or indirect speech. So we can drop A, C and E.
Another split is that we need to use ‘between’ because there are only two categories namely rich and poor. So choices using among rcan be eliminated. Between B and D, the decider is the user of the correct idiom, ‘status over’. ‘Status to’ is a wrong idiom . Hence D can be ignored, leaving only B as the royal answer.
Coming to the passage, ‘why do’ or ‘why does’ is used in direct speech while the ‘do or does” will be dropped in reported or indirect speech. So we can drop A, C and E.
Can you simplify the above with an explanation and example
Re: Judge Lois Forer's study asks why do some litigants have a preferred
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Oct 2015, 22:28
1
The idiom needs prefer. Status is a noun so is not a part of an idiomatic expression.
"preferred" is not being used as a verb in any of the answer choices, so the idiom "prefer x to y" does not apply here..
"which" totally refers to "courts", as it should, and everything is fine. i couldn't tell what you thought the problem was with "which"..
_________________
Re: Judge Lois Forer's study asks why do some litigants have a preferred
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Jul 2016, 08:10
Judge Lois Forer's study asks why do some litigants have a preferred status over others in the use of a public resource, the courts, which in theory are available to all but in fact are unequally distributed among rich and poor.
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Re: Judge Lois Forer's study asks why do some litigants have a preferred
[#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Jul 2016, 01:02
rishabhdxt wrote:
Judge Lois Forer's study asks why do some litigants have a preferred status over others in the use of a public resource, the courts, which in theory are available to all but in fact are unequally distributed among rich and poor.
Is this not a subjuntive case. use of 'ask'.
Pls help
No, it does not require a subjunctive case. Here "ask" is used to put forward a question, not to demand something.
Moreover, "that" would be required after "ask", even if it were used as a bossy verb that requires subjunctive.
I asked him why he was late. (question: not a bossy verb, hence does not require subjunctive) I asked him to leave. (bossy verb, but without "that": subjunctive is not required). I asked that he leave. (bossy verb with "that": subjunctive required)
Re: Judge Lois Forer's study asks why do some litigants have a preferred
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Jul 2017, 03:33
1
A.among rich and poor - incorrect. among is used for more than 2. B. seems correct. C.among rich and poor - incorrect. among is used for more than 2. D. preferred status to another. It should be preferred status over another E. among rich and poor - incorrect. among is used for more than 2.
KocharRohit wrote:
1.Judge Lois Forer’s study asks why do some litigants have a preferred status over others in the use of a public resource, the courts, which in theory are available to all but in fact are unequally distributed among rich and poor.
(A) do some litigants have a preferred status over others in the use of a public resource, the courts, which in theory are available to all but in fact are unequally distributed among (B) some litigants have a preferred status over others in the use of a public resource, the courts, which in theory are available to all but in fact are unequally distributed between (C) do some litigants have a preferred status over another in the use of a public resource, the courts, in theory available to all but in fact are unequally distributed among (D) some litigants have a preferred status to another in the use of a public resource, the courts, in theory available to all but in fact not equally distributed between (E) does one litigant have a preferred status over the other in the use of a public resource, the courts, in theory available to all but in fact they are not equally distributed among
Re: Judge Lois Forer's study asks why do some litigants have a preferred
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Sep 2018, 01:32
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!
Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).
Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
close
66% (01:07) correct 
