Events & Promotions
| Last visit was: 31 Aug 2026, 13:38 |
It is currently 31 Aug 2026, 13:38 |
|
|
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
10:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
01:00 PM PDT
-02:00 PM PDT
11:00 AM PDT
-12:00 PM PDT
09:00 PM IST
-10:00 AM IST
12:00 PM EDT
-01:00 PM EDT
09:30 AM EDT
-12:30 PM EST
07:00 AM PDT
-10:00 AM PDT
| Rank | School | Final Score |
| 1 | University of Pennsylvania (Wharton) | 95.50 |
| 2 | Stanford University | 95.03 |
| 3 | Harvard University | 95.01 |
| 4 | University of Chicago (Booth) | 93.69 |
| 5 | Northwestern University (Kellogg) | 93.18 |
| 6 | MIT (Sloan) | 92.34 |
| 7 | Columbia University | 92.14 |
| 8 | NYU (Stern) | 91.67 |
| 9 | UC Berkeley (Haas) | 90.29 |
| 10 | Dartmouth (Tuck) | 90.12 |
| 11 | University of Michigan (Ross) | 88.21 |
| 12 | Yale University (SOM) | 88.15 |
| 13 | University of Virginia (Darden) | 87.58 |
| 14 | Duke University (Fuqua) | 86.75 |
| 15 | Carnegie Mellon (Tepper) | 81.47 |
| 16 | Cornell University (Johnson) | 81.40 |
| 17 | Vanderbilt University (Owen) | 80.65 |
| 18 | UT Austin (McCombs) | 80.55 |
| 19 | Emory University (Goizueta) | 79.91 |
| 20 | UCLA (Anderson) | 79.88 |
| 21 | USC (Marshall) | 79.45 |
| 22 | Georgia Tech (Scheller) | 78.92 |
| 23 | University of Georgia (Terry) | 78.64 |
| 24 | UNC (Kenan-Flagler) | 78.39 |
| 25 | Indiana University (Kelley) | 77.73 |
| Rank | School | GMAT (Classic) | Acceptance Rate |
| 1 | Stanford GSB | 738 | 6.8% |
| 2 | Wharton (UPenn) | 733 | 18.6% |
| 3 | Chicago Booth | 732 | 27.3% |
| 4 (tie) | Harvard Business School | 730 | Not reported |
| 4 (tie) | Northwestern Kellogg | 733 | 28.1% |
| 6 | MIT Sloan | 730 | 18.8% |
| 7 (tie) | Columbia Business School | 729 | 25.7% |
| 7 (tie) | NYU Stern | 733 | 23.6% |
| 9 | Dartmouth Tuck | 726 | 28.3% |
| 10 | UC Berkeley Haas | 729 | 21.4% |
| 11 (tie) | UVA Darden | 715 | 30.7% |
| 11 (tie) | Yale SOM | 725 | 28.5% |
| 13 | Michigan Ross | 720 | 30.2% |
| 14 | Duke Fuqua | 713 | 24.0% |
| 15 | Cornell Johnson | 710 | 29.3% |
| 16 (tie) | CMU Tepper | 705 | 24.3% |
| 16 (tie) | Vanderbilt Owen | 680 | 36.2% |
| 18 (tie) | UCLA Anderson | 716 | 31.0% |
| 18 (tie) | UT Austin McCombs | 704 | 32.7% |
| 20 | UW Foster | 704 | 33.6% |
| 21 (tie) | Indiana Kelley | 667 | 26.6% |
| 21 (tie) | UNC Kenan-Flagler | 696 | 37.9% |
| 23 (tie) | Emory Goizueta | 700 | 33.2% |
| 23 (tie) | UT Dallas Jindal | — | 35.5% |
| 25 (tie) | UGA Terry | — | 23.9% |
| 25 (tie) | USC Marshall | 716 | 31.4% |
| Rank 2026 | Institution | Country | Rank 2025 | YoY Change |
| 1 | MIT Sloan | US | 6 | +5 |
| 2 | INSEAD | France | 4 | +2 |
| 3 | Wharton | US | 1 | -2 |
| 4 | IESE Business School | Spain | 3 | -1 |
| 4 | London Business School | UK | 7 | +3 |
| 6 | HEC Paris | France | 9 | +3 |
| 7 | ESADE Business School | Spain | 8 | +1 |
| 8 | CEIBS | China | 12 | +4 |
| 9 | Berkeley Haas | US | 15 | +6 |
| 10 | Harvard Business School | US | 13 | +3 |
| 11 | Northwestern Kellogg | US | 10 | -1 |
| 12 | Nanyang Business School (NTU) | Singapore | 22 | +10 |
| 12 | Indian School of Business | India | 27 | +15 |
| 14 | Peking University Guanghua | China | 25 | +11 |
| 15 | Cornell Johnson | US | 13 | -2 |
| 16 | Duke Fuqua | US | 11 | -5 |
| 17 | Cambridge Judge | UK | 35 | +18 |
| 17 | Yale School of Management | US | 24 | +7 |
| 19 | Virginia Darden | US | 20 | +1 |
| 20 | Chicago Booth | US | 17 | -3 |
| 21 | IE Business School | Spain | 18 | -3 |
| 22 | ESCP Business School | France | 28 | +6 |
| 23 | NYU Stern | US | 31 | +8 |
| 24 | ESSEC Business School | France | 47 | +23 |
| 24 | HKUST Business School | Hong Kong | 36 | +12 |
| 26 | Dartmouth Tuck | US | 20 | -6 |
| 27 | IIM Ahmedabad | India | 31 | +4 |
| 27 | Oxford Saïd | UK | 26 | -1 |
| 29 | NUS Business School | Singapore | 37 | +8 |
| 30 | Fudan School of Management | China | 30 | 0 |
| 30 | IMD | Switzerland | 22 | -8 |
| 32 | UCLA Anderson | US | 19 | -13 |
| 33 | HKU Business School | Hong Kong | 41 | +8 |
| 34 | Michigan Ross | US | 29 | -5 |
| 34 | IIM Bangalore | India | 57 | +23 |
| 36 | Shanghai U College of Business | China | 15 | -21 |
| 37 | Washington University Olin | US | 42 | +5 |
| 38 | Rice Jones | US | 39 | +1 |
| 39 | Imperial Business School | UK | 38 | -1 |
| 40 | UNC Kenan-Flagler | US | 51 | +11 |
| 41 | emlyon Business School | France | 44 | +3 |
| 41 | CMU Tepper | US | 49 | +8 |
| 41 | Texas McCombs | US | 39 | -2 |
| 44 | Georgia Tech Scheller | US | 58 | +14 |
| 45 | Washington Foster | US | 34 | -11 |
| 46 | USC Marshall | US | 50 | +4 |
| 47 | EDHEC Business School | France | 64 | +17 |
| 48 | AGSM at UNSW | Australia | 67 | +19 |
| 49 | Alliance Manchester Business School | UK | 46 | -3 |
| 49 | Georgetown McDonough | US | 43 | -6 |
Top Gainers and Losers
Schools that showed remarkable / miserable performance on the ranking ladder this year.Schools Significantly Above or Below their Average Ranks
Staying consistently above or below your average performance indicates your inner strength or weakness and those from the finance world very well understand the significance of this metric. The schools listed below have been consistently performing better / worst for the last 5 years and it is an important metric to consider if these schools are on your application list.

Success stories and strategies from high-scoring candidates.