AR15J
Measuring more than five feet tall and ten feet long, the Javan rhinoceros is often called the rarest large mammal on earth. Though the habitat of the Javan rhino once extended across southern Asia, now there are fewer than one hundred of the animals in Indonesia and fewer than a dozen in Vietnam. The decline of the species may have progressed too far to be reversed. For centuries, farmers who wished to cultivate the rhino’s habitat viewed the animals as crop-eating pests and shot them on sight; during the colonial period, hunters slaughtered thousands for their horns, as poachers still do today. The surviving Vietnamese herd has diminished to the point that it can no longer maintain the genetic variation necessary for long-term survival. The Indonesian herd cannot be used to supplement the Vietnamese population because, in the millions of years since Indonesia separated from the mainland, the two groups have evolved into separate sub-species. The Indonesian rhinos are protected on the Ujung Kulon peninsula, which is unsettled by humans, and still thought to have sufficient genetic diversity to survive. The lack of human disturbance, however, allows mature forests to replace the shrubby vegetation preferred by the animals. Human benevolence may prove little better for these rhinos than past human maltreatment.
For what purpose does the author include the last sentence of the passage?
a) To demonstrate that the Indonesian herd has better odds of surviving than the Vietnamese herd.
b) To support the contention that the Javan rhino species may not be able to recover from its current state.
c) To establish that farmers and hunters are no longer killing Javan rhinos.
d) To reinforce the idea that the Indonesian herd of the Javan rhino species will not survive.
e) To illustrate that human benevolence can be just as detrimental to the survival of a species as can human maltreatment.
B.
Here's my 2 cents.
I have highlighted some text in the passage to support the answer.
The last line is
The lack of human disturbance, however, allows mature forests to replace the shrubby vegetation preferred by the animals. Human benevolence may prove little better for these rhinos than past human maltreatment.
Let's analyze the options one by one.
A. To demonstrate that the Indonesian herd has better odds of surviving than the Vietnamese herd.
There is no comparison going on here, so this is eliminated.
B. To support the contention that the Javan rhino species may not be able to recover from its current state.
Correct. Look at the highlighted text, IMO that is the main point of the passage. The passage has already mentioned that the Vietnamese herd does not have the genetic diversity to survive. The line before the last line mentions that the preferred habitat by rhinos is getting replaced by dense forests due to lack of human interference. These points add up to the suggest that rhinos may not after all be able to survive.
C. To establish that farmers and hunters are no longer killing Javan rhinos.
Nothing mentioned about this, so eliminated.
D. To reinforce the idea that the Indonesian herd of the Javan rhino species will not survive.
This is tricky. Although this is more nicely narrowed down to the context of Indonesian rhinos(content about which is closely placed to the last line), this option goes too far in saying that "they will not survive". Only because of extreme language, this is wrong.
E. To illustrate that human benevolence can be just as detrimental to the survival of
a species as can human maltreatment.
This is also tricky. Although the last line does illustrate this for rhinos, it does not illustrate this for ANY SPECIES, as is indicated by the highlighted text - "a" species. Because of this, it's also wrong