Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 25 May 2017, 05:34

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 10 Aug 2013
Posts: 15
Location: United States
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 2

Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Aug 2013, 04:40
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

48% (01:46) correct 52% (00:33) wrong based on 153 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low to attract the best Candidates to the job. The legislature’s move to raise the salary has done nothing to improve the situation, because it was coupled with a ban on receiving money for lectures and teaching engagements.
Pat: No, the raise in salary really does improve the situation. Since very few judges teach or give lectures, the ban will have little or no negative effect

Pat’s response to Mel is inadequate in that it

A. attempts to assess how a certain change will affect potential members of a group by providing evidence about its effect on the current members.
B. mistakenly takes the cause of a certain change to be an effect of that change
C. attempts to argue that a certain change will have a positive effect merely by pointing to the absence of negative effects
D. simply denies Mel’s claim without putting forward any evidence in support of that denial
E. assumes that changes that benefit the most able members of a group necessarily benefit all members of that group.

[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by pqhai on 24 Aug 2013, 22:10, edited 2 times in total.
Rename the topic.
If you have any questions
New!
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 1132
Location: United States
Followers: 278

Kudos [?]: 3111 [13] , given: 123

Re: Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Aug 2013, 22:33
13
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Hi Punyata
Welcome to gmat club I'm glad to help.

ANALYZE THE STIMULUS:

Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low to attract the best Candidates [potential candidates] to the job. The legislature’s move to raise the salary has done nothing to improve the situation, because it was coupled with a ban on receiving money for lectures and teaching engagements.
Pat: No, the raise in salary really does improve the situation. Since very few judges [current members] teach or give lectures, the ban will have little or no negative effect

Pat’s response to Mel is inadequate in that it

A. attempts to assess how a certain change will affect potential members of a group by providing evidence about its effect on the current members.
Correct. Mel talks about potential candidates, however Pat talks about current members

B. mistakenly takes the cause of a certain change to be an effect of that change
Wrong. The argument does NOT talk about the cause of a change (the legislature’s move to raise the salary).

C. attempts to argue that a certain change will have a positive effect merely by pointing to the absence of negative effects
Wrong. Pat just says the ban will have little or no negative effect. He does NOT talk anything about positive effect.

D. simply denies Mel’s claim without putting forward any evidence in support of that denial
Wrong. TEMPTING but wrong. Pat denies Mel’s claim WITH evidence in support. However, his evidence has problem itself.

E. assumes that changes that benefit the most able members of a group necessarily benefit all members of that group.
Wrong. TEMPTING but wrong. Pat said the change does NOT hurt (will have little or no negative effect) the current member. He did NOT say the change BENEFITS the current member. These logics are totally different..
For example: The new shopping outlet does not have negative effect to shopping malls in downtown. ==> It does not mean the new shopping outlet has positive effect to shopping malls in downtown.

TAKE AWAY:
Be aware of reverse logics
A does NOT hurt B ==> does not mean A supports B
A does NOT support B ==> does not mean A hurts B

Hope it helps.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Re: Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low   [#permalink] 24 Aug 2013, 22:33
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 A low-calorie, low-fat, high-protein diet has been shown to assist in 2 21 Oct 2015, 13:46
4 The southeast Asian country of Indonesia, which has always been a top 2 04 Sep 2014, 23:33
6 Q31)Linsey has been judged to be a bad songwriter simply 12 19 Jul 2012, 23:37
23 Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low 23 15 Sep 2016, 09:49
23 Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low 29 03 May 2017, 22:51
Display posts from previous: Sort by