Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 22:21 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 22:21
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Sub 505 Level|   Long Passage|   Science|                           
avatar
gooddn
Joined: 14 May 2013
Last visit: 13 Mar 2014
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
168
 [163]
Given Kudos: 14
Location: Singapore
Concentration: Finance, Social Entrepreneurship
Schools: NUS '16
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V35
GPA: 2.9
WE:Other (Other)
Schools: NUS '16
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V35
Posts: 3
Kudos: 168
 [163]
33
Kudos
Add Kudos
130
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
avatar
raiprem123
Joined: 04 Mar 2013
Last visit: 16 Jan 2016
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
166
 [104]
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 11
Kudos: 166
 [104]
101
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,020
Own Kudos:
8,563
 [18]
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,020
Kudos: 8,563
 [18]
14
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
TheMechanic
Joined: 19 Oct 2012
Last visit: 05 Jul 2018
Posts: 219
Own Kudos:
583
 [2]
Given Kudos: 103
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V35
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V38
GPA: 3.81
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
roopika2990
I chose B for q18 ... can anyone explain why D is the right choice?

I guess I can help.

The choice B has several issues:
Re-Stating the question and dissecting choices bit by bit. :P

18. The author of the passage would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements about the Milankovitch theory?
(A) It is the only possible explanation for the ice ages.

No where it is claimed in the passage that theory presented is the only claim. In context of the last para it is clearly implied that it is one of the plausible theory explaining the ice-ages.

(B) It is too limited to provide a plausible explanation for the ice ages, despite recent research findings.

phrase "too limited" makes this option incorrect. Referring back to passage, in particular last line, " Yet the lack of information about other possible factors affecting global climate does not make them unimportant." - implies that author is kinda CONCERN about neglecting these factors even while author is identifying advantages of Milankovitch theory. This choice is too negative and changes the author stand point altogether.

(C) It cannot be tested and confirmed until further research on volcanic activity is done.
Directly contradicting author's view in the last para.

(D) It is one plausible explanation, though not the only one, for the ice ages.
Bingo!!! This basically implies that the presented theory by Milankovitch is one of the possible explanation but not the only one since there are other factors or theories(implied) which might have contributed to the ice age.
(E) It is not a plausible explanation for the ice ages, although it has opened up promising possibilities for future research.
Author concludes the passage indicating skepticism of ignoring factors like volcanic eruptions and duration of sunlight. He never recommends,explicitly, that an extended research is needed to prove something. Hence out!

Hope it helps :)
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,020
Own Kudos:
8,563
 [12]
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,020
Kudos: 8,563
 [12]
8
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
19 and 21? I'm on it!

19. It can be inferred from the passage that the isotope record taken from ocean sediments would be less useful to researchers if which of the following were true?
(A) It indicated that lighter isotopes of oxygen predominated at certain times.
(B) It had far more gaps in its sequence than the record taken from rocks on land.
(C) It indicated that climate shifts did not occur every 100,000 years.
(D) It indicated that the ratios of oxygen 16 and oxygen18 in ocean water were not consistent with those found in fresh water.
(E) It stretched back for only a million years.

We're looking for something that would make this method less useful to researchers. B is a problem because we're taking away one of the stated advantages of the method. (Specifically, this knocks out the second advantage described in paragraph 3.)

A) The lighter isotope (16) always predominates, so this can't be a problem! (The passage states that only a few molecules out of every thousand have the heavier 18.)
C) This might be a problem for Milankovitch's theory, but not for researchers. The method is still useful, whether it supports the theory or casts doubt on it.
D) If fresh water samples gave us totally different indications of when the ice ages occurred, that would be a problem. However, just seeing variation between fresh and salt water doesn't tell us anything. Maybe the ratios in fresh water are supposed to be different, so we can't really interpret this without more information.
E) A million years is a long time! How do we know it's long enough for what we want? Ice ages appear to occur about once every hundred thousand years, and the author feel comfortable announcing this pattern after looking back a few hundred thousand years, or a few ice ages. By this standard, going back a million years would seem to be more than enough.
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,020
Own Kudos:
8,563
 [5]
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,020
Kudos: 8,563
 [5]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
21. It can be inferred from the passage that precipitation formed from evaporated ocean water has
(A) the same isotopic ratio as ocean water
(B) less oxygen 18 than does ocean water
(C) less oxygen 18 than has the ice contained in continental ice sheets
(D) a different isotopic composition than has precipitation formed from water on land
(E) more oxygen 16 than has precipitation formed from fresh water

The support for B is right here: "When an ice age begins, the continental ice sheets grow, steadily reducing the amount of water evaporated from the ocean that will eventually return to it. Because heavier isotopes tend to be left behind when water evaporates from the ocean surfaces, the remaining ocean water becomes progressively enriched in oxygen 18."

Translation? When water evaporates, the heavier 18 gets left behind. When that evaporated water gets trapped in ice and doesn't return, the ocean gets steadily higher in oxygen 18. This can only happen if the missing water has less 16 than normal ocean water. (For a real-world connection, compare this to what happens with salt. When ocean water evaporates, the salt is left behind.)
avatar
bpdulog
Joined: 14 Aug 2012
Last visit: 19 Aug 2020
Posts: 51
Own Kudos:
18
 [2]
Given Kudos: 221
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 620 Q43 V33
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V38
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DmitryFarber
21. It can be inferred from the passage that precipitation formed from evaporated ocean water has
(A) the same isotopic ratio as ocean water
(B) less oxygen 18 than does ocean water
(C) less oxygen 18 than has the ice contained in continental ice sheets
(D) a different isotopic composition than has precipitation formed from water on land
(E) more oxygen 16 than has precipitation formed from fresh water

The support for B is right here: "When an ice age begins, the continental ice sheets grow, steadily reducing the amount of water evaporated from the ocean that will eventually return to it. Because heavier isotopes tend to be left behind when water evaporates from the ocean surfaces, the remaining ocean water becomes progressively enriched in oxygen 18."

Translation? When water evaporates, the heavier 18 gets left behind. When that evaporated water gets trapped in ice and doesn't return, the ocean gets steadily higher in oxygen 18. This can only happen if the missing water has less 16 than normal ocean water. (For a real-world connection, compare this to what happens with salt. When ocean water evaporates, the salt is left behind.)

Why is C incorrect here? Doesn't the oxygen 18 enriched water eventually turn into ice?
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,020
Own Kudos:
8,563
 [2]
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,020
Kudos: 8,563
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bpdulog There's no indication that the 18-enriched water turns to ice. It's in the ocean, and the passage doesn't say that the ocean freezes.

However, that doesn't matter anyway. The question is asking us to compare rain from evaporated ocean water with continental ice sheets. That rain is exactly what forms the ice sheets, so they should have roughly the same concentration of oxygen 18 (a very low one, if any at all!).
User avatar
Akshit03
Joined: 07 Jul 2018
Last visit: 30 Sep 2021
Posts: 31
Own Kudos:
12
 [2]
Given Kudos: 33
Posts: 31
Kudos: 12
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
9. The purpose of the last paragraph of the passage is to
(a) offer a note of caution
(b) introduce new evidence
(c) present two recent discoveries
(d) summarize material in the preceding paragraphs
(e) offer two explanations for a phenomenon

Why is B or C wrong?
B: it does introduce 2 evidence of new possibilities?
C: It does present 2 discoveries?
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,020
Own Kudos:
8,563
 [7]
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,020
Kudos: 8,563
 [7]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Akshit03 If you look carefully at the last paragraph, you'll see that no actual discoveries are cited. In fact, no evidence is presented at all. The author simply mentions some possible complicating factors (or even competing explanations) that we may need to consider. This is a common form of "disclaimer" in a science passage, since evidence in favor of one theory doesn't automatically rule out other possibilities.

However, there's another important point here. Even if the paragraph did cite discoveries or evidence, that wouldn't make B or C the right answer. The question is asking us for the purpose of the paragraph, not just a detail. The overall purpose of this passage is to warn us that while there is some support for the Milankovitch theory, we can't rule out other factors yet. This is a more important and larger overall point than simply looking at one or two pieces of evidence.
User avatar
nikitamaheshwari
Joined: 19 Jan 2020
Last visit: 12 Feb 2022
Posts: 77
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 131
Posts: 77
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
"When an ice age begins, the continental ice sheets grow, steadily reducing the amount of water evaporated from the ocean that will eventually return to it. Because heavier isotopes tend to be left behind when water evaporates from the ocean surfaces, the remaining ocean water becomes progressively enriched in oxygen 18."

Can someone please provide translation for this one? karishma GMATNinja
User avatar
kornn
Joined: 28 Jan 2017
Last visit: 18 Dec 2021
Posts: 357
Own Kudos:
93
 [1]
Given Kudos: 832
Posts: 357
Kudos: 93
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dear AjiteshArun IanStewart VeritasKarishma DmitryFarber GMATGuruNY VeritasPrepHailey MartyTargetTestPrep GMATNinja

Why is Q7 choice D. wrong?
Quote:
7. It can be inferred from the passage that calcium carbonate shells

(D) contain radioactive material that can be used to determine a sediment's isotopic composition.
According to the passage:
Quote:
Because of these advantages, sedimentary evidence can be dated with sufficient accuracy by radiometric methods to establish a precise chronology of the ice ages.
We know that oxygen in the shell is radioactive because it is used in RADIOMETRIC methods.

I also note that the "isotopic composition" part in choice D. also appears in the correct choice E. as well.
User avatar
IanStewart
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,145
Own Kudos:
10,985
 [5]
Given Kudos: 99
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,145
Kudos: 10,985
 [5]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
varotkorn

Why is Q7 choice D. wrong?
Quote:
7. It can be inferred from the passage that calcium carbonate shells

(D) contain radioactive material that can be used to determine a sediment's isotopic composition.
According to the passage:
Quote:
Because of these advantages, sedimentary evidence can be dated with sufficient accuracy by radiometric methods to establish a precise chronology of the ice ages.
We know that oxygen in the shell is radioactive because it is used in RADIOMETRIC methods.

Nowhere does the passage tell you that it is possible to "determine a sediment's isotopic composition", using radioactivity or otherwise. All you learn from the passage is that radiometric methods can be used to date sediment "with sufficient accuracy".
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,266
Own Kudos:
76,983
 [9]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,266
Kudos: 76,983
 [9]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nikitamaheshwari
"When an ice age begins, the continental ice sheets grow, steadily reducing the amount of water evaporated from the ocean that will eventually return to it. Because heavier isotopes tend to be left behind when water evaporates from the ocean surfaces, the remaining ocean water becomes progressively enriched in oxygen 18."

Can someone please provide translation for this one? karishma GMATNinja

Earth has a water cycle. Water evaporates from the ocean and falls as rain on land. It collects in the rivers and comes back to the ocean eventually.
When an ice age begins, continental ice sheets start expanding. From where does this ice come? It is formed by the water that evaporates from he ocean but does not return back to the ocean. After all, water is not created to make ice sheets. It is the same circulated water.

When an ice age begins, the continental ice sheets grow, - ice sheets grow
steadily reducing the amount of water evaporated from the ocean that will eventually return to it. - returning water is reduced
Because heavier isotopes tend to be left behind when water evaporates from the ocean surfaces, the remaining ocean water becomes progressively enriched in oxygen 18 - Heavier water does not evaporate. O16 water does evaporate. Since water is not returning, O16 water concentration keeps dropping.

varotkorn - Hope this is clear now.
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,266
Own Kudos:
76,983
 [4]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,266
Kudos: 76,983
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
varotkorn
Dear AjiteshArun IanStewart VeritasKarishma DmitryFarber GMATGuruNY VeritasPrepHailey MartyTargetTestPrep GMATNinja

Why is Q2 choice B. wrong?
Quote:

2. The author of the passage would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements about the Milankovitch theory?

(B) It is too limited to provide a plausible explanation for the ice ages, despite recent research findings.
According to the passage:
Quote:

However, it is important to note that other factors, such as volcanic particulates or variations in the amount of sunlight received by the Earth, could potentially have affected the climate...Yet the lack of information about other possible factors affecting global climate does not make them unimportant.
Why is it wrong to say that the Milankovitch theory is "too limited"?

Why is Q2 choice D. right?
Quote:

2. The author of the passage would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements about the Milankovitch theory?

(D) It IS one plausible explanation, though NOT the only one, for the ice ages.
The implication is that the theory IS NOT the only one. However, the passage doesn't support this.
According to the passage:
Quote:

However, it is important to note that other factors, such as volcanic particulates or variations in the amount of sunlight received by the Earth, COULD POTENTIALLY have affected the climate...Yet the LACK of information about other possible factors affecting global climate does not make them unimportant.
The passage says that there MAY BE other possible explanations, not that there IS (definitely) other explanations.


Note what the passage says:

These data have established a strong connection between variations in the Earth’s orbit and the periodicity of the ice ages.
However, it is important to note that other factors, such as volcanic particulates or variations in the amount of sunlight received by the Earth, could potentially have affected the climate. The advantage of the Milankovitch theory is that it is testable: changes in the Earth’s orbit can be calculated and dated by applying Newton’s laws of gravity to progressively earlier configurations of the bodies in the solar system. Yet the lack of information about other possible factors affecting global climate does not make them unimportant.

(B) It is too limited to provide a plausible explanation for the ice ages, despite recent research findings.

Does the author think that the M theory does not provide a plausible explanation? No. He says there is strong connection. All he says is that other factors could have an impact too.

(D) It is one plausible explanation, though not the only one, for the ice ages.

So yes, he think it is one plausible explanation. But other factors could have an impact too so there could be other explanations too.

Answer must be (D)
User avatar
homersimpsons
Joined: 26 Aug 2020
Last visit: 08 Aug 2022
Posts: 274
Own Kudos:
471
 [1]
Given Kudos: 114
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.15
WE:Accounting (Finance: Investment Banking)
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
OE
Q1. In the passage, the author is primarily interested in
A. suggesting an alternative to an outdated research method
B. introducing a new research method that calls an accepted theory into question
C. emphasizing the instability of data gathered from the application of a new scientific method
D. presenting a theory and describing a new method to test that theory
E. initiating a debate about a widely accepted theory
Main idea
This question concerns the main point of the passage. A careful examination of the overall structure of the passage will reveal the main point. In the first paragraph, the author briefly presents Milankovitch’s theory and explains why it could not be tested early on. In the second and third paragraphs, the author describes how a new method allows testing of the theory and shows how evidence from the testing supports the theory. While the final paragraph acknowledges that other factors should be considered, the author’s primary interest in this passage is in presenting Milankovitch’s theory and the recently discovered method for testing it.
A. A new research method is described, but no previous method is discussed.
B. As described in the passage, the new method tests and confirms the theory; there is no mention that the theory is accepted or that the method casts doubt on it.
C. Nothing in the passage suggests that “instability of data” is an issue.
D. Correct. The author presents Milankovitch’s theory and describes the oxygen isotope method of testing it.
E. The theory is nowhere said to be “widely accepted” and the author does not debate the theory.
The correct answer is D.

Q2. The author of the passage would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements about the Milankovitch theory?
A. It is the only possible explanation for the ice ages.
B. It is too limited to provide a plausible explanation for the ice ages, despite recent research findings.
C. It cannot be tested and confirmed until further research on volcanic activity is done.
D. It is one plausible explanation, though not the only one, for the ice ages.
E. It is not a plausible explanation for the ice ages, although it has opened up promising possibilities for future research.
Application
The author’s reaction to the statements about the Milankovitch theory must be based on how the author treats the theory in the passage. The first, second, and third paragraphs describe the theory and the use of a new research method to test the theory. The passage states that data from these tests have established a strong connection between variations in the Earth’s orbit and the periodicity of the ice ages, suggesting that the author of the passage believes the theory is plausible. In the final paragraph, the author points to other factors that might be involved, suggesting that the theory might not provide a complete explanation.
A. In the last paragraph, the author suggests that because there are still other untested factors that may have effects on climate, other explanations are possible.
B. Though in the last paragraph the author points to other factors that may be involved, these are not presented by the author as indicating limitations that diminish the plausibility of the theory—they are acknowledged merely as possibilities that are not now understood—and nothing else in the passage suggests that the theory is “too limited.”
C. The author shows how the theory has been tested; volcanic activity is not part of this theory.
D. Correct. The author’s presentation of the theory and the tests of the theory show that the author finds the theory plausible; the mention of other factors shows the author does not think that all other explanations have been ruled out, even if they are as yet untested.
E. The theory was a plausible explanation from its beginning, but it was not testable until recently; scientists would be unlikely to try to devise means to test a theory that did not strike them as antecedently plausible.
The correct answer is D.

Q3. It can be inferred from the passage that the isotope record taken from ocean sediments would be less useful to researchers if which of the following were true?
A. It indicated that lighter isotopes of oxygen predominated at certain times.
B. It had far more gaps in its sequence than the record taken from rocks on land.
C. It indicated that climate shifts did not occur every 100,000 years.
D. It indicated that the ratios of oxygen 16 and oxygen 18 in ocean water were not consistent with those found in fresh water.
E. It stretched back for only a million years.
Inference
To make an inference about the isotope record from ocean sediments, examine what the passage says about that record. The third paragraph discusses that record and lists its two advantages. First, it is a global record with remarkably little variation in samples from varied locations. Second, it is more continuous than the record from rocks. If either of these advantages were not true, then it is logical to infer that the record would be less useful.
A. According to lines 14–16, the lighter isotope does predominate; this is part of the record and does not affect its usefulness.
B. Correct. In lines 37–42, the author states that an advantage of the ocean record is that it is a more continuous record than that taken from rocks on land. If this were not true, the ocean record wouldbe less useful.
C. If the record were to show that the shifts did not occur every 100,000 years, Milankovitch’s theory would be weakened. This impact on the theory does not make the isotope record less useful to researchers. The record is useful precisely because it can offer evidence to confirm or refute such theories.
D. This inconsistency would not affect the usefulness of the ocean-water record. Researchers would simply need to accommodate the fresh-water inconsistency.
E. The record would still be useful. Lines 42–46 attest to the establishment of a pattern based on data from the past several hundred thousand years.
The correct answer is B.

Q4. According to the passage, which of the following is true of the ratios of oxygen isotopes in ocean sediments?
A. They indicate that sediments found during an ice age contain more calcium carbonate than sediments formed at other times.
B. They are less reliable than the evidence from rocks on land in determining the volume of land ice.
C. They can be used to deduce the relative volume of land ice that was present when the sediment was laid down.
D. They are more unpredictable during an ice age than in other climatic conditions.
E. They can be used to determine atmospheric conditions at various times in the past.
Supporting ideas
The phrase according to the passage suggests that the answer to the question is most likely stated in the passage. Lines 12–14 state that the relative volume of land ice can be deduced from the ratio of oxygen 18 to oxygen 16 in ocean sediments.
A. There is no evidence in the passage about this point.
B. The ocean record is described in lines 38–39 as more continuous, so it is unlikely to be less reliable. In any case, reliability is not discussed.
C. Correct. Lines 12–14 explain that the land-ice volume for a given period can be deduced from the ratio of two oxygen isotopes.
D. There is no evidence in the passage to support this statement.
E. The passage does not discuss the use of this record in determining past atmospheric conditions.
The correct answer is C.

Q5. It can be inferred from the passage that precipitation formed from evaporated ocean water has
A. the same isotopic ratio as ocean water
B. less oxygen 18 than does ocean water
C. less oxygen 18 than has the ice contained in continental ice sheets
D. a different isotopic composition than has precipitation formed from water on land
E. more oxygen 16 than has precipitation formed from fresh water
Inference
Any inference about precipitation from evaporated ocean water needs to be based on what the passage says. Lines 20–22 show that heavier isotopes tend to be left behind when water evaporates from the ocean surfaces. Therefore, the evaporated water would contain less oxygen 18 and the remaining ocean water would contain more. It is logical to infer that precipitation formed from this evaporated water would also contain less oxygen 18.A. Lines 20–24 explain that the water remaining in the ocean after evaporation has more oxygen 18.
B. Correct. Since the heavier isotopes tend to be left behind, there will be less oxygen 18 in the evaporated water and in the precipitation that forms from it.
C. The passage suggests that the ocean water evaporates and through subsequent precipitation helps form the ice sheets, so the amount of oxygen 18 in the ice sheets should be similar to the amount in the precipitation formed from the evaporated water.
D. The passage does not discuss precipitation formed from water on land.
E. The passage does not discuss precipitation formed from fresh water.
The correct answer is B.

Q7. It can be inferred from the passage that calcium carbonate shells
A. are not as susceptible to deterioration as rocks
B. are less common in sediments formed during an ice age
C. are found only in areas that were once covered by land ice
D. contain radioactive material that can be used to determine a sediment’s isotopic composition
E. reflect the isotopic composition of the water at the time the shells were formed
Inference
Any inference about calcium carbonate shells needs to be based on what the passage says about these shells. Lines 24–32 explain the role of these shells in forming sediments and establishing a chronology for ice ages. The shells were constructed with oxygen atoms drawn from the surrounding ocean. Lines 29–32 make it clear that if the sediments reveal a higher ratio of oxygen 18, it is because more oxygen 18 had been left behind when the ocean water evaporated and contributed to the growth of continental ice sheets. It can thus be inferred that the shells that make up those sediments must reflect the proportion of oxygen 18 found in the ocean water at the time they were formed.
A. The only mention of rocks in the passage is a comparison of “gappiness” of the rock and sedimentary specimen records in lines 38–39; this information does not allow any firm inference to be made with respect to relative susceptibility to deterioration, though a more continuous record might be the
result of less susceptibility to deterioration.
B. The passage does not make any reference to the relative abundance of these shells during ice ages; no such inference can be drawn.
C. The only information in the passage that might support this statement is found in lines 29–32, but that information, about the correlation between oxygen ratios in sediment specimens and land ice, describes a relation that implies nothing about distributions of such specimens.
D. Though the passage does indirectly indicate that the shells contained radioactive material, nothing in the passage suggests that radioactive material is used to determine isotopic composition.
E. Correct. The passage explains that oxygen atoms in the surrounding water are one of the building blocks of calcium carbonate shells. The isotopic composition of the surrounding water changes during the ice age cycles, so it is logical that the isotopic composition of the shells will change depending on when they were formed.
The correct answer is E.
avatar
Sujeet07
Joined: 02 Jan 2015
Last visit: 19 Oct 2020
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
62
 [1]
Given Kudos: 54
Posts: 10
Kudos: 62
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Reading Strategy.........

Milankovitch proposed in the early twentieth century that the ice ages were caused by variations in the Earth’s orbit around the Sun. For sometime this theory was considered untestable, largely because there was no sufficiently precise chronology of the ice ages with which the orbital variations could be matched.

To establish such a chronology it is necessary to determine the relative amounts of land ice that existed at various times in the Earth’s past. A recent discovery makes such a determination possible: relative land-ice volume for a given period can be deduced from the ratio of two oxygen isotopes, 16 and 18, found in ocean sediments. Almost all the oxygen in water is oxygen 16, but a few molecules out of every thousand incorporate the heavier isotope 18. When an ice age begins, the continental ice sheets grow, steadily reducing the amount of water evaporated from the ocean that will eventually return to it. Because heavier isotopes tend to be left behind when water evaporates from the ocean surfaces, the remaining ocean water becomes progressively enriched in oxygen 18. The degree of enrichment can be determined by analyzing ocean sediments of the period, because these sediments are composed of calcium carbonate shells of marine organisms, shells that were constructed with oxygen atoms drawn from the surrounding ocean. The higher the ratio of oxygen 18 to oxygen 16 in a sedimentary specimen, the more land ice there was when the sediment was laid down.

As an indicator of shifts in the Earth’s climate, the isotope record has two advantages. First, it is a global record: there is remarkably little variation in isotope ratios in sedimentary specimens taken from different continental locations. Second, it is a more continuous record than that taken from rocks on land. Because of these advantages, sedimentary evidence can be dated with sufficient accuracy by radiometric methods to establish a precise chronology of the ice ages. The dated isotope record shows that the fluctuations in global ice volume over the past several hundred thousand years have a pattern: an ice age occurs roughly once every 100,000 years. These data have established a strong connection between variations in the Earth’s orbit and the periodicity of the ice ages.

However, it is important to note that other factors, such as volcanic particulates or variations in the amount of sunlight received by the Earth, could potentially have affected the climate. The advantage of the Milankovitch theory is that it is testable: changes in the Earth’s orbit can be calculated and dated by applying Newton’s laws of gravity to progressively earlier configurations of the bodies in the solar system. Yet the lack of information about other possible factors affecting global climate does not make them unimportant.

Red - Main Idea and need to understand
Yellow - Skim it
Green - Skip or Skim (generally i do not prefer skipping any part , because we have know what is mentioned in that part of paragraph so that while solving question we know the exact place in the passage where we need to come back and read.)

1st Paragraph - Milankovitch proposed a theory-the ice ages were caused by variations in the Earth’s orbit around the Sun and sometime it is untestable.
2nd Paragraph - A recent discovery and its explanation
3rd Paragraph - Advantages
4th Paragraph - Others factor is also important to consider , but this theory is still important.
avatar
Himanshuv0
Joined: 27 Nov 2020
Last visit: 04 Dec 2022
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 60
Posts: 7
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In the Q5, option C was eliminated by stating that the subsequent precipitation helps in forming the ice sheet.
javascript:void(0)
I am not the infer this above statement from the passage. Can you help me with it?
User avatar
ReedArnoldMPREP
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 30 Apr 2021
Last visit: 20 Dec 2024
Posts: 521
Own Kudos:
536
 [1]
Given Kudos: 37
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V47
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V47
Posts: 521
Kudos: 536
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Himanshuv0
In the Q5, option C was eliminated by stating that the subsequent precipitation helps in forming the ice sheet.
javascript:void(0)
I am not the infer this above statement from the passage. Can you help me with it?

The passage states:

Quote:
When an ice age begins, the continental ice sheets grow, steadily reducing the amount of water evaporated from the ocean that will eventually return to it.

This tells us that water evaporates from the ocean, but during an ice age, the growth of the continental ice sheet FOR SOME REASON means less of that water returns to the ocean. The most likely reason is because much of that water stays in the continental ice sheet.

It is, I suppose, a little bit 'outside the passage' to assume that this is because that water *becomes* the ice sheet (that is, the passage neither directly nor implicitly discusses how a continental ice sheet is formed).

However, here's the good news. Even if you're not certain that much of the evaporated ocean ice freezes up and becomes part of the ice sheets, there's no justification for choosing answer C. Regardless of how the ice sheets are made, nothing in the passage implies that there is less O18 in ocean evaporated than there is the continental ice sheets.

So no matter what, we can eliminate C.

B, however, is logically inferred.

Quote:
Because heavier isotopes tend to be left behind when water evaporates from the ocean surfaces, the remaining ocean water becomes progressively enriched in oxygen 18.

This tells the water that does not get evaporated is 'enriched' (has more of) Oxygen 18. This means what is evaporated has relatively LESS O18.
avatar
ag153
Joined: 16 Feb 2017
Last visit: 15 May 2022
Posts: 88
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 56
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 3.69
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KarishmaB can you please breakdown Question 9? Why not E and B, C?
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
17289 posts
188 posts