Hey
oasis90,
Here's my 2 cents about this.
I dont think the selection of B over C has so much to do with the 'terminology (extreme or not)' as with the logical structure of the part of passage that mentions about the
'unexceptional kidney' of the camels.
Here's the part of the passage:
"Camels, on the other hand, rely more on simple endurance. They cannot store water, and their reliance on an entirely unexceptional kidney results in a rate of water loss through renal function significantly higher than that of desert rats. As a result, camels must tolerate losses in body water of up to thirty percent of their body weight."Choice C (wrong because):
1)
'Camels, on the other hand':
'On the other hand', shows that what comes next is going to be a compared with what has already been mentioned- The Rats. Please note that the 'kidneys of marine vertebrates' hasn't even been introduced yet.
2)
entirely unexceptional kidney results in a rate of water loss through renal function significantly higher than that of desert rats:
What we found in 1) above is evident here. The comparison is between Camel and Rat and not between Camel and Marine vertebrates.
Choice B (correct because):
1)
'unexceptional kidney results in a rate of water loss... As a result, camels must tolerate losses in body water'All the kidney does is 'results in water loss'. I clearly doesnt help! This is exactly what is given in B.
Now, a bit about your logic. I agree that this 'extreme terminology' logic works very good in CR (only in the answer choices-NEVER apply this in the passage), and in fact over 90% of the times, it helps you eliminate wrongs answers. But, in RC, i believe, rather than relying on the meaning of the terms, we should rely more on the
tone of the author- this is one thing in GMAT RC that can prove to be the most beneficial if mastered, especially in the Inference questions.
If you go by getting the meanings of the words such as extremely, entirely etc in RC, you may fall into trouble as the author could use them the way he wants, for instance, sarcastically! Eventually, the
intended meaning of a term used in a passage could be diametrically opposite to its literal meaning.
Hope it makes sense.