Last visit was: 08 Jul 2025, 11:08 It is currently 08 Jul 2025, 11:08
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
seekmba
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Last visit: 25 Sep 2014
Posts: 626
Own Kudos:
3,543
 [129]
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 626
Kudos: 3,543
 [129]
11
Kudos
Add Kudos
117
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
avatar
sahilbhatia
Joined: 02 Dec 2017
Last visit: 01 Feb 2019
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
89
 [43]
Given Kudos: 29
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V38
GRE 1: Q167 V163
GPA: 4
WE:Manufacturing and Production (Consumer Packaged Goods)
Products:
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V38
GRE 1: Q167 V163
Posts: 7
Kudos: 89
 [43]
38
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
vannbj
Joined: 18 Sep 2009
Last visit: 04 Oct 2015
Posts: 249
Own Kudos:
267
 [14]
Given Kudos: 17
Status:Yeah well whatever.
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 660 Q42 V39
GMAT 2: 730 Q48 V42
GPA: 3.49
WE:Analyst (Insurance)
GMAT 2: 730 Q48 V42
Posts: 249
Kudos: 267
 [14]
11
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
ArjunJag1328
Joined: 24 Dec 2017
Last visit: 12 Jan 2025
Posts: 139
Own Kudos:
71
 [4]
Given Kudos: 48
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Real Estate
Schools: Johnson '21
Schools: Johnson '21
Posts: 139
Kudos: 71
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Conclusion: Pepper growers who switched to cocoa did not yield a substantial profit by doing so and therefore it would have been a better choice to continue with pepper. what weakens this statement?

(A) those growers could not have foreseen how high the price of pepper would go - Irrelevant
(B) the initial cost involved in switching from pepper to cocoa is substantial - Irrelevant
(C) supplies of pepper would not be as low as they are if those growers had not switched crops - If some of them had not switched, the price of pepper would have remained the same.
(D) cocoa crops are as susceptible to being reduced by bad weather as are pepper crops - Irrelevant
(E) as more growers turn to growing cocoa, cocoa supplies will increase and the price of cocoa will fall precipitously - Incorrect

Hence C
User avatar
disenapati
Joined: 04 Feb 2018
Last visit: 31 Jan 2019
Posts: 26
Own Kudos:
321
 [1]
Given Kudos: 20
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
Posts: 26
Kudos: 321
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
C is correct because -
(A) those growers could not have foreseen how high the price of pepper would go - talks about uncertainty factor, which can affect either ways. Luck based factors/reasons are generally not be considered
(B) the initial cost involved in switching from pepper to cocoa is substantial -- Article has no mention about costs. Irrelevant
(C) supplies of pepper would not be as low as they are if those growers had not switched crops - main cause - supply low so demand/price high, cause for low supply because of the switch from one crop to another (plus weather of course) - so this is the right choice
(D) cocoa crops are as susceptible to being reduced by bad weather as are pepper crops - No information so irrelevant
(E) as more growers turn to growing cocoa, cocoa supplies will increase and the price of cocoa will fall precipitously - this in fact is the opposite answer and a weakener
avatar
sowmiyav
Joined: 09 Nov 2018
Last visit: 05 Dec 2018
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
32
 [2]
Given Kudos: 9
Posts: 25
Kudos: 32
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
CONCLUSION of some observers :The switch by some growers from pepper to cocoa left those growers no better off than if none of them had switched.
PREMISE: Price of pepper has increased because of shortage in supply.
Reason for supply shortage: Partly because of bad weather
partly because some major pepper growers have switched to high-priced cocoa

The conclusion is unwarranted because, if the growers had not switched from pepper to cocoa, one of the reasons for supply shortage would not contribute. Hence, the price increase may not be as higher as it is now. This is clearly stated in option C

Reason for elimination of other options:
a) Irrelevant. Whether they are able to foresee is not going to weaken the conclusion.
b)Out of scope. Initial cost is not discussed in the passage
d) Irrelevant. We are not concerned whether cocoa is affected by bad weather as pepper crops. Irrespective of this factor, the price of cocoa is high and price of pepper is soaring
e)This is not going to affect the conclusion. The conclusion is about rise in price of pepper and has nothing to do with fall in price of cocoa. Even if this statement is negated, it will not affect the conclusion.
User avatar
Gmatprep550
Joined: 21 Jul 2018
Last visit: 08 Nov 2019
Posts: 146
Own Kudos:
71
 [3]
Given Kudos: 186
Products:
Posts: 146
Kudos: 71
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ArjunJag1328
Conclusion: Pepper growers who switched to cocoa did not yield a substantial profit by doing so and therefore it would have been a better choice to continue with pepper. what weakens this statement?

(A) those growers could not have foreseen how high the price of pepper would go - Irrelevant
(B) the initial cost involved in switching from pepper to cocoa is substantial - Irrelevant
(C) supplies of pepper would not be as low as they are if those growers had not switched crops - If some of them had not switched, the price of pepper would have remained the same.
(D) cocoa crops are as susceptible to being reduced by bad weather as are pepper crops - Irrelevant
(E) as more growers turn to growing cocoa, cocoa supplies will increase and the price of cocoa will fall precipitously - Incorrect

Hence C

I got the correct answer but was not able to get what question is, I got that from your post, Thanks for providing such nice explanation.
User avatar
Leonaann
Joined: 22 Sep 2018
Last visit: 02 Jan 2020
Posts: 46
Own Kudos:
54
 [1]
Given Kudos: 44
Posts: 46
Kudos: 54
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Could someone help to breakdown this question? I had chosen B as the answer.
User avatar
Wonderwoman31
Joined: 21 Apr 2018
Last visit: 22 Apr 2023
Posts: 59
Own Kudos:
44
 [1]
Given Kudos: 82
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
GMAT 2: 750 Q49 V42
GMAT 2: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 59
Kudos: 44
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Leonaann
Could someone help to breakdown this question? I had chosen B as the answer.

Hi,

Consider it as a weakener question and then try to solve it. let me know if you are still not able to solve it.
User avatar
SonGoku
Joined: 11 May 2018
Last visit: 25 Dec 2022
Posts: 121
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 287
Products:
Posts: 121
Kudos: 89
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Partly because of bad weather, but also partly because some major pepper growers have switched to high-priced cocoa, world production of pepper has been running well below worldwide sales for three years. Pepper is consequently in relatively short supply. The price of pepper has soared in response: it now equals that of cocoa.

Some observers have concluded that the rise in the price of pepper means that the switch by some growers from pepper to cocoa left those growers no better off than if none of them had switched; this conclusion, however, is unwarranted because it can be inferred to be likely that

I know the question looks clumsy,So lets breakdown

Researchers conclusion: some researchers concluded that switch by some growers from pepper to cocoa is no better than not switching..
Authors conclusion: researchers conclusion is baseless.
Quote:
(A) those growers could not have foreseen how high the price of pepper would go
nowhere it was mentioned in the passage that the growers switched just because of price.So we cannot assume something that is not mentioned in the argument.Eliminate A.
Quote:
(B) the initial cost involved in switching from pepper to cocoa is substantial
This is irrelevant.Okay. What if cocoa profits are so high that the initial cost is negligible? or we don't know how the profits will be(profits...or losses). Other than that the costs are not mentioned in the passage.
Quote:
(C) supplies of pepper would not be as low as they are if those growers had not switched crops
this is true. As there many have switched to cocoa.the supplies of pepper fall down and demand has grown because of which prices were increased.Keep this.
Quote:
(D) cocoa crops are as susceptible to being reduced by bad weather as are pepper crops
this supports researchers conclusion. we need to prove that researchers conclusion is unwarranted.so eliminate it.
Quote:
(E) as more growers turn to growing cocoa, cocoa supplies will increase and the price of cocoa will fall precipitously
we don't talk about cocoa supplies and cocoa prices.It's supporting researchers conclusion.
Eliminate it.
Answer is C
User avatar
SonGoku
Joined: 11 May 2018
Last visit: 25 Dec 2022
Posts: 121
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 287
Products:
Posts: 121
Kudos: 89
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Partly because of bad weather, but also partly because some major pepper growers have switched to high-priced cocoa, world production of pepper has been running well below worldwide sales for three years. Pepper is consequently in relatively short supply. The price of pepper has soared in response: it now equals that of cocoa.

Some observers have concluded that the rise in the price of pepper means that the switch by some growers from pepper to cocoa left those growers no better off than if none of them had switched; this conclusion, however, is unwarranted because it can be inferred to be likely that

I know the question looks clumsy,So lets breakdown

Researchers conclusion: some researchers concluded that switch by some growers from pepper to cocoa is no better than not switching..
Authors conclusion: researchers conclusion is baseless.
Quote:
(A) those growers could not have foreseen how high the price of pepper would go
nowhere it was mentioned in the passage that the growers switched just because of price.So we cannot assume something that is not mentioned in the argument.Eliminate A.
Quote:
(B) the initial cost involved in switching from pepper to cocoa is substantial
This is irrelevant.Okay. What if cocoa profits are so high that the initial cost is negligible? or we don't know how the profits will be(profits...or losses). Other than that the costs are not mentioned in the passage.
Quote:
(C) supplies of pepper would not be as low as they are if those growers had not switched crops
this is true. As there many have switched to cocoa.the supplies of pepper fall down and demand has grown because of which prices were increased.Keep this.
Quote:
(D) cocoa crops are as susceptible to being reduced by bad weather as are pepper crops
this supports researchers conclusion. we need to prove that researchers conclusion is unwarranted.so eliminate it.
Quote:
(E) as more growers turn to growing cocoa, cocoa supplies will increase and the price of cocoa will fall precipitously
we don't talk about cocoa supplies and cocoa prices.It's supporting researchers conclusion.
Eliminate it.
Answer is C
User avatar
BhishmaNaidu99
Joined: 22 Sep 2018
Last visit: 29 Jun 2020
Posts: 72
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 95
Posts: 72
Kudos: 85
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The argument says that the , raise in pepper has ultimately become no use for the farmers who has changed to cocoa.
To weaken the argument we must see for the option which directly or indirectly says , farmers would have not earned profits if they have not converted.

A. the statement repeats what happened in the argument, the farmers did not foreseen the scenario.
B. The initial cost of switching doest say how the farmers have been profited by changing.
C. Correct, this option says if the farmers continued the scenario of increasing price would not happen at all, so who changed has gained profit in those three years at least.
D. It is against the conclusion given above. if crop is susceptible then its no use in converting
E. This statement also goes against the conclusion , if its true , it says changing has made no good to the farmers .
User avatar
CEdward
Joined: 11 Aug 2020
Last visit: 14 Apr 2022
Posts: 1,212
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 332
Posts: 1,212
Kudos: 247
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Some observers have concluded that the rise in the price of pepper means that the switch by some growers from pepper to cocoa left those growers no better off than if none of them had switched; this conclusion, however, is unwarranted because it can be inferred to be likely that

(A) those growers could not have foreseen how high the price of pepper would go
-the key here what the author says at the end: “this conclusion, however, is UNWARRANTED because it can be inferred to be likely that” so we are looking for an explanation/reason why the conclusion: “Some observers have concluded that the rise in the price of pepper means that the switch by some growers from pepper to cocoa left those growers no better off than if none of them had switched” is not a good one

-Even if the growers did not have the foresight, that’s not a valid reason for us to deem the conclusion as unwarranted

(B) the initial cost involved in switching from pepper to cocoa is substantial

-We can’t infer anything about the initial cost involved…there’s no such information available about that.

(C) supplies of pepper would not be as low as they are if those growers had not switched crops

Correct. We learned from the argument that pepper price dropped for 2 reasons: weather and reduced supply. To say that the growers would be no better off implies that the growers didn’t have to switch and we would still see a price hike. BUT, the price hike wouldn’t have happened if the growers didn’t cut the supply to begin with.

(D) cocoa crops are as susceptible to being reduced by bad weather as are pepper crops

Nothing mentioned about susceptibility of cocoa crops to bad weather (or even pepper crops for that matter…we just know in general that pepper crops are affected by weather)

(E) as more growers turn to growing cocoa, cocoa supplies will increase and the price of cocoa will fall precipitously

Not enough info.
avatar
krittapat
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 23 Oct 2019
Last visit: 27 Jan 2023
Posts: 46
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3,514
Location: Thailand
Posts: 46
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
egmat GMATNinja KarishmaB mikemcgarry MartyTargetTestPrep
Could you please help explain why option (A) and (E) are incorrect?
Thanks for your help.
User avatar
ThatDudeKnows
Joined: 11 May 2022
Last visit: 27 Jun 2024
Posts: 1,070
Own Kudos:
903
 [1]
Given Kudos: 79
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,070
Kudos: 903
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
seekmba
Partly because of bad weather, but also partly because some major pepper growers have switched to high-priced cocoa, world production of pepper has been running well below worldwide sales for three years. Pepper is consequently in relatively short supply. The price of pepper has soared in response: it now equals that of cocoa.

Some observers have concluded that the rise in the price of pepper means that the switch by some growers from pepper to cocoa left those growers no better off than if none of them had switched; this conclusion, however, is unwarranted because it can be inferred to be likely that

(A) those growers could not have foreseen how high the price of pepper would go
(B) the initial cost involved in switching from pepper to cocoa is substantial
(C) supplies of pepper would not be as low as they are if those growers had not switched crops
(D) cocoa crops are as susceptible to being reduced by bad weather as are pepper crops
(E) as more growers turn to growing cocoa, cocoa supplies will increase and the price of cocoa will fall precipitously



Similar question: https://gmatclub.com/forum/partly-becau ... 89206.html


Bad weather + switch to cocoa --> pepper production lagged behind consumption --> lower pepper supply --> higher pepper price
Some observers think think switching from pepper to cocoa made growers no better off because the price of pepper went way up.
We are asked why these observers are wrong.

(A) those growers could not have foreseen how high the price of pepper would go
This may be true, but it doesn't impact whether they actually are or are not better off. Eliminate.
(B) the initial cost involved in switching from pepper to cocoa is substantial
This might help show why the observers are correct, which is the opposite of what we are asked to do. Eliminate.
(C) supplies of pepper would not be as low as they are if those growers had not switched crops
If everyone had stayed growing pepper, the supplies wouldn't have dropped and that would have kept prices up. The observers are saying those who left pepper made a mistake because they missed out on the higher pepper prices, but if they hadn't left in the first place, the price wouldn't have gone up. Keep it.
(D) cocoa crops are as susceptible to being reduced by bad weather as are pepper crops
Doesn't address that those who left pepper production missed out on higher pepper pricing. Eliminate.
(E) as more growers turn to growing cocoa, cocoa supplies will increase and the price of cocoa will fall precipitously
Predicts the future. Unless I don't see another decent option, I lean toward eliminating anything that predicts the future. Also is the opposite of what we want in that it amplifies the notion of missing out on pepper prices by also having to endure lower cocoa prices. Eliminate.

Answer choice C.­
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,441
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,441
Kudos: 952
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7349 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts