Last visit was: 20 Nov 2025, 03:51 It is currently 20 Nov 2025, 03:51
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
655-705 Level|   Assumption|      
User avatar
zest4mba
User avatar
Joined: 09 Feb 2010
Last visit: 09 May 2012
Posts: 36
Own Kudos:
912
 [20]
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 36
Kudos: 912
 [20]
Plant geneticists continue to modify and refine the DNA of Updated on: 26 Feb 2018, 03:35
Originally posted by zest4mba on 12 Aug 2010, 10:18.
Last edited by Mahmud6 on 26 Feb 2018, 03:35, edited 1 time in total.
Formatted
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
15
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide
Show
History
A
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

63% (01:51) correct 37% (02:00) wrong based on 781 sessions

History

Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Plant geneticists continue to modify and refine the DNA of agricultural products, altering genes that affect the abundance and taste of the crop. Eventually, the entire genome of every major food crop will be subject to such manipulation. Once these scientists have mastered the DNA of all major food crops, no obstacles to abundant, delicious vegetables and grains will remain.

The argument is based on which of the following assumptions?

A All obstacles to agricultural production are susceptible to genetic remedies.
B Obstacles to the agricultural production are susceptible only to genetic remedies.
C There is already a visible change in produce size at supermarkets, attributable to genetic manipulation of crops.
D Produce taste tests should be conducted to compare genetically modified produce and natural produce.
E Consumers have grown increasingly skeptical of the merits of genetically modified produce.
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
A
User avatar
seekmba
User avatar
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Last visit: 25 Sep 2014
Posts: 626
Own Kudos:
3,603
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 626
Kudos: 3,603
 [1]
Plant geneticists continue to modify and refine the DNA of 12 Aug 2010, 10:24
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The argument is talking about 2 obstacles: abundance and taste. How can 2 obstacles constitute as all obstacles susceptible to genetic remedies. I think thats a big leap in assumption.
User avatar
magnetictempest
User avatar
Joined: 24 Jun 2010
Last visit: 17 Jul 2011
Posts: 24
Own Kudos:
8
 [3]
Given Kudos: 3
Location: Toronto
Concentration: Marketing - Product Management
Schools:Berkeley Haas, UCLA Anderson, NYU Stern
Posts: 24
Kudos: 8
 [3]
Plant geneticists continue to modify and refine the DNA of 12 Aug 2010, 12:31
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
What tipped me off was this:
...no obstacles to abundant, delicious vegetables and grains will remain....

A. All obstacles to agricultural production are susceptible to genetic remedies.

For no obstacles to remain, then the genetic remedies must be able to eliminate all possible ones.
User avatar
rlevochkin
User avatar
Joined: 03 Nov 2005
Last visit: 01 Nov 2010
Posts: 148
Own Kudos:
116
 [2]
Given Kudos: 17
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 148
Kudos: 116
 [2]
Plant geneticists continue to modify and refine the DNA of 12 Aug 2010, 15:27
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. it is.

Let's neglect the assumption that all agricultural production issues can be solved genetically.

What if some problems with major ag crops cannot be solved genetically.
What if manipulation of abundance and taste are among those genetically unsolvable problems.
Then we cannot be so sure that no obstacle to abundance and taste of all major crops will remain.
User avatar
ingoditrust
User avatar
Joined: 14 Mar 2010
Last visit: 11 Apr 2012
Posts: 255
Own Kudos:
66
 [1]
Given Kudos: 3
Status:Fighting on
Concentration: Product management/entrepreneurship
Schools:UCLA (R1 interview-WL), UNC(R2--interview-ding) Oxford(R2-Admit), Kelley (R2- Admit $$), McCombs(R2)
GPA: 4.0
WE 1: SE - 1
WE 2: Engineer - 3
Posts: 255
Kudos: 66
 [1]
Plant geneticists continue to modify and refine the DNA of 12 Aug 2010, 17:42
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A and B are contenders and all others are completely place for fun.

Between A and B, pick A as we want all obstacles to be susceptible to genetic modification.

@magnetictempest,

Very well pointed out.
User avatar
agnok
User avatar
Joined: 17 Nov 2009
Last visit: 08 May 2011
Posts: 202
Own Kudos:
330
 [1]
Given Kudos: 17
Posts: 202
Kudos: 330
 [1]
Plant geneticists continue to modify and refine the DNA of 08 Sep 2010, 09:45
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
zest4mba
Plant geneticists continue to modify and refine the DNA of agricultural products, altering genes that affect the abundance and taste of the crop. Eventually, the entire genome of every major food crop will be subject to such manipulation. Once these scientists have mastered the DNA of all major food crops, no obstacles to abundant, delicious vegetables and grains will remain.

When you read the argument the assumption seems to pop out is that some how there is a solution through genetic modification for all issues -- "Once these scientists have mastered the DNA of all major food crops, no obstacles to abundant, delicious vegetables and grains will remain." This is one clue
The argument to the left is based on which of the following assumptions?
Choices
A All obstacles to agricultural production are susceptible to genetic remedies. Precisely what jumped out. This is a logic gap kind of argument where choice A fills the GAP : refer to MGMAT CR Guide Assumptions chapter
B Obstacles to the agricultural production are susceptible only to genetic remedies.
C There is already a visible change in produce size at supermarkets, attributable to genetic manipulation of crops.
D Produce taste tests should be conducted to compare genetically modified produce and natural produce.
E Consumers have grown increasingly skeptical of the merits of genetically modified produce.
Show more
User avatar
Marcab
User avatar
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Last visit: 22 Jan 2021
Posts: 850
Own Kudos:
4,853
 [2]
Given Kudos: 221
Status:Retaking after 7 years
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: Simon '15 (M$)
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
GPA: 3.75
Schools: Simon '15 (M$)
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
Posts: 850
Kudos: 4,853
 [2]
Plant geneticists continue to modify and refine the DNA of 14 Dec 2012, 00:36
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Archit143
Plant geneticists continue to modify and refine the DNA of agricultural products, altering genes that affect the abundance and taste of the crop. Eventually, the entire genome of every major food crop will be subject to such manipulation. Once these scientists have mastered the DNA of all major food crops, no obstacles to abundant, delicious vegetables and grains will remain.

The argument to the left is based on which of the following assumptions?

A
All obstacles to agricultural production are susceptible to genetic remedies.
B
Obstacles to the agricultural production are susceptible only to genetic remedies.
C
There is already a visible change in produce size at supermarkets, attributable to genetic manipulation of crops.
D
Produce taste tests should be conducted to compare genetically modified produce and natural produce.
E
Consumers have grown increasingly skeptical of the merits of genetically modified produce.

Source Grockit
Show more
I don't think taht we should even discuss about CDE.
A and B are contender.
Lets try B first.
B says-Obstacles to the agricultural production are susceptible only to genetic remedies. On negating, we come up with "Obstacles to the agricultural production are susceptible NOT only to genetic remedies". It implies that that there are other remedies also; consider that the other remedy be X.
Now if I say that obstacles to the agricultural production are susceptible to genetic remedies and X then how can we conclude that once these scientists have mastered the DNA, there would be no obstacles. May be that some obstacles are susceptible to only X.

Now try A-All obstacles to agricultural production are susceptible to genetic remedies.
The argument says that "once these scientists have mastered the DNA, there would be NO obstacles". So it is clear that A is the assumption here.
+1A
User avatar
sunny91
User avatar
Joined: 05 Dec 2014
Last visit: 04 May 2020
Posts: 176
Own Kudos:
64
Given Kudos: 289
Location: India
Schools: AIM Manila '20 Fisher '19 Rotman '20 Sauder '20 Schulich Jan 18 Intake Queen's 19 Ivey '19 Kelley '20 IIM-A"19 ESSEC '20 Insead Sept'18 Ross '20 IIMU PGPX
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.54
Schools: AIM Manila '20 Fisher '19 Rotman '20 Sauder '20 Schulich Jan 18 Intake Queen's 19 Ivey '19 Kelley '20 IIM-A"19 ESSEC '20 Insead Sept'18 Ross '20 IIMU PGPX
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
Posts: 176
Kudos: 64
Plant geneticists continue to modify and refine the DNA of 26 Nov 2017, 00:36
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Confused between A and B
Negating B stands as- Obstacles to the agricultural production are not susceptible only to genetic remedies. So, there could be something else. So, even if the scientists have mastered the DNA of all major food crops, no obstacles to abundant, delicious vegetables and grains will remain dont hold true. Negation breaks the argument.

Negating A-All obstacles to agricultural production are not susceptible to genetic remedies. So, a few are susceptible to something else. Negating A breaks the argument.
User avatar
sunny91
User avatar
Joined: 05 Dec 2014
Last visit: 04 May 2020
Posts: 176
Own Kudos:
64
Given Kudos: 289
Location: India
Schools: AIM Manila '20 Fisher '19 Rotman '20 Sauder '20 Schulich Jan 18 Intake Queen's 19 Ivey '19 Kelley '20 IIM-A"19 ESSEC '20 Insead Sept'18 Ross '20 IIMU PGPX
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.54
Schools: AIM Manila '20 Fisher '19 Rotman '20 Sauder '20 Schulich Jan 18 Intake Queen's 19 Ivey '19 Kelley '20 IIM-A"19 ESSEC '20 Insead Sept'18 Ross '20 IIMU PGPX
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
Posts: 176
Kudos: 64
Plant geneticists continue to modify and refine the DNA of 26 Nov 2017, 00:37
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
seekmba
The argument is talking about 2 obstacles: abundance and taste. How can 2 obstacles constitute as all obstacles susceptible to genetic remedies. I think thats a big leap in assumption.
Show more

Confused between A and B
Negating B stands as- Obstacles to the agricultural production are not susceptible only to genetic remedies. So, there could be something else. So, even if the scientists have mastered the DNA of all major food crops, no obstacles to abundant, delicious vegetables and grains will remain dont hold true. Negation breaks the argument.

Negating A-All obstacles to agricultural production are not susceptible to genetic remedies. So, a few are susceptible to something else. Negating A breaks the argument.
User avatar
A_Nishith
User avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2023
Last visit: 12 Nov 2025
Posts: 455
Own Kudos:
199
Given Kudos: 16
Posts: 455
Kudos: 199
Plant geneticists continue to modify and refine the DNA of 21 Sep 2024, 17:19
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Option A: All obstacles to agricultural production are susceptible to genetic remedies.
Explanation: This option is correct because the argument is assuming that once geneticists fully control the DNA of major food crops, all obstacles to abundance and taste will be removed. For that to be true, the argument must assume that all obstacles to agricultural production, whether related to growth, taste, or yield, can indeed be addressed by genetic modification.
Correct: This is the assumption underlying the conclusion.

Option B: Obstacles to agricultural production are susceptible only to genetic remedies.
Explanation: This option says that only genetic remedies can overcome the obstacles to agricultural production. However, the argument does not claim that other non-genetic remedies (e.g., improved farming techniques, fertilizers) would not work. The argument only focuses on genetic solutions but does not imply that they are the sole means of improvement.
Incorrect: This is too extreme and not necessary for the argument to hold.

Option C: There is already a visible change in produce size at supermarkets, attributable to genetic manipulation of crops.
Explanation: This statement brings in the idea of visible changes in produce size, which is unrelated to the core of the argument. The argument is about the potential for genetic manipulation to eventually overcome all obstacles to delicious, abundant crops, not about current results of genetic modifications.
Incorrect: This is irrelevant to the assumption behind the argument.

Option D: Produce taste tests should be conducted to compare genetically modified produce and natural produce.
Explanation: The argument makes no mention of needing to compare genetically modified produce with natural produce. It is not concerned with testing or comparing but is focused on the eventual outcome of genetic mastery.
Incorrect: This introduces a new idea unrelated to the assumption of the argument.

Option E: Consumers have grown increasingly skeptical of the merits of genetically modified produce.
Explanation: This introduces the idea of consumer skepticism, which is irrelevant to the assumption. The argument focuses on geneticists' ability to remove obstacles to crop abundance and taste, not on consumer attitudes.
Incorrect: This is unrelated to the assumption behind the argument.

Conclusion: Option A is the correct answer. The argument assumes that all obstacles to agricultural production are susceptible to genetic remedies, making this a necessary assumption for the argument to hold true.
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
miag
189 posts