Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 20:52 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 20:52
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
CM12
Joined: 11 May 2021
Last visit: 07 Apr 2024
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 124
Location: Canada
GMAT 1: 700 Q44 V42 (Online)
GMAT 1: 700 Q44 V42 (Online)
Posts: 15
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
TusharTandon
Joined: 25 Mar 2021
Last visit: 17 Jan 2024
Posts: 9
Given Kudos: 58
Posts: 9
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,289
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,179
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,289
Kudos: 49,292
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
yuktimahajan3
Joined: 18 Dec 2022
Last visit: 02 Jun 2025
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
1
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 3
Kudos: 1
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This is my first attempt, i'd like you feedback!

ESSAY

The argument above suggest that corporations should consider moving to Helios when seeking new business opportunities and a new location. It emphasises on how Helios is a great location as the unemployment rate has been lower than the regional average and how it is the industrial center. Furthermore the argument states that Helios wants to expand its economic base and thus wants to attract companies, those are focussing on the R&D. However the argument is unconvincing, given the flaws in the logic.

Firstly, the author states that Helios’s unemployment rate was lower that the regional average. But we don’t know exactly how low it was. No data that can strengthen this argument is provided. For example, the unemployment rate can be 20% lower than the regional average which is a remarkable difference but it can also be 1% lower than the regional average which is not a very prominent difference.

Secondly, the author discusses the unemployment rate as a prime focus for the corporations to choose Helios as the ideal city for their business. Taking such an important decision only considering the unemployment rate is not wise. There are several factors that a corporation has to take in account before seeking business oppurtunities like the target market, the distance of inputs, the cost of setting up etc. Therefore, the unemployment rate is not the only important factor.

Lastly, the author suggests that Helios is preferring companies only focused on the research and development of innovative technologies. There are various types of corporations having their niche in various sectors, and they might not benefit from establishing their business in Helios. Thus by only keeping in mind one type of corporation and then concluding is flawed.

To conclude, the given argument falls short in many aspect. The argument could have been more convincing if logical explanations and relevant data would have been provided but the the absence of these the argument remains flawed
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,289
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,179
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,289
Kudos: 49,292
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AWA Score: 5.5 - 6 out of 6

Coherence and connectivity: 5/5
This rating corresponds to the flow of ideas and expressions from one paragraph to another. The effective use of connectives and coherence of assertive language in arguing for/against the argument is analyzed. This is deemed as one of the most important parameters.

Paragraph structure and formation: 4.5/5
The structure and division of the attempt into appropriate paragraphs are evaluated. To score well on this parameter, it is important to organize the attempt into paragraphs. Preferable to follow the convention of leaving a line blank at the end of each paragraph, to make the software aware of the structure of the essay.

Vocabulary and word expression: 5.5/5
This parameter rates the submitted essay on the range of relevant vocabulary possessed by the candidate basis the word and expression usage. There are no extra- points for bombastic word usage. Simple is the best form of suave!

Good Luck

yuktimahajan3
This is my first attempt, i'd like you feedback!

ESSAY

The argument above suggest that corporations should consider moving to Helios when seeking new business opportunities and a new location. It emphasises on how Helios is a great location as the unemployment rate has been lower than the regional average and how it is the industrial center. Furthermore the argument states that Helios wants to expand its economic base and thus wants to attract companies, those are focussing on the R&D. However the argument is unconvincing, given the flaws in the logic.

Firstly, the author states that Helios’s unemployment rate was lower that the regional average. But we don’t know exactly how low it was. No data that can strengthen this argument is provided. For example, the unemployment rate can be 20% lower than the regional average which is a remarkable difference but it can also be 1% lower than the regional average which is not a very prominent difference.

Secondly, the author discusses the unemployment rate as a prime focus for the corporations to choose Helios as the ideal city for their business. Taking such an important decision only considering the unemployment rate is not wise. There are several factors that a corporation has to take in account before seeking business oppurtunities like the target market, the distance of inputs, the cost of setting up etc. Therefore, the unemployment rate is not the only important factor.

Lastly, the author suggests that Helios is preferring companies only focused on the research and development of innovative technologies. There are various types of corporations having their niche in various sectors, and they might not benefit from establishing their business in Helios. Thus by only keeping in mind one type of corporation and then concluding is flawed.

To conclude, the given argument falls short in many aspect. The argument could have been more convincing if logical explanations and relevant data would have been provided but the the absence of these the argument remains flawed
User avatar
GMATking94
Joined: 16 Jan 2022
Last visit: 18 Apr 2025
Posts: 180
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 125
Status:Do or Die
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V37
GPA: 4
WE:Operations (Energy)
Products:
GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V37
Posts: 180
Kudos: 75
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sajjad1994 Please rate my AWA essay

Thanks!

The main conclusion of the argument is “Corporations should look to the city of Helios for setting up new business or moving to new location. This is based on the fact that Helios is the industrial center of the region having a lower unemployment rate compared to regional average. Further, the city is trying to expand its economic base by attracting new companies that focus on research and development. The above conclusion is flawed since it cannot cater to all companies rather a select few due to multiple reasons which are discussed below –

1. Firstly, Helios is a highly competitive market for office space and talent because it is the industrial center of the region. The new companies need to compete with established one’s which might raise questions regarding their profitability.

2. Secondly, the unemployment rate in Helios is lower than the regional average due to which it might be difficult for companies to hire new people. The already established corporations will have an upper hand in employee retention since they can pay high salary.

3. Thirdly, Helios is particularly interested in companies which focus on research and development. So, Helios must ensure that it has the required talent pool for the companies to hire from. If not, Helios should increase its spending on colleges/universities for the same before it invites such companies to set up their offices.

4. Fourthly, Helios’s highly competitive market can result in unfair practices during the selection process. Some companies might be allotted better location or tax benefits in comparison to others.

Based on the above analysis, we can infer that Helios can be an option for already established companies who are trying to expand their network. It is important to keep in mind that Helios’s competitive environment might be detrimental for companies who are starting up since they need to compete with the big players for market space and talent retention. Lastly, companies should research on the available talent pool in Helios since Helios has the lowest unemployment rate.
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,289
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,179
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,289
Kudos: 49,292
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATking94
Sajjad1994 Please rate my AWA essay

Thanks!

The main conclusion of the argument is “Corporations should look to the city of Helios for setting up new business or moving to new location. This is based on the fact that Helios is the industrial center of the region having a lower unemployment rate compared to regional average. Further, the city is trying to expand its economic base by attracting new companies that focus on research and development. The above conclusion is flawed since it cannot cater to all companies rather a select few due to multiple reasons which are discussed below –

1. Firstly, Helios is a highly competitive market for office space and talent because it is the industrial center of the region. The new companies need to compete with established one’s which might raise questions regarding their profitability.

2. Secondly, the unemployment rate in Helios is lower than the regional average due to which it might be difficult for companies to hire new people. The already established corporations will have an upper hand in employee retention since they can pay high salary.

3. Thirdly, Helios is particularly interested in companies which focus on research and development. So, Helios must ensure that it has the required talent pool for the companies to hire from. If not, Helios should increase its spending on colleges/universities for the same before it invites such companies to set up their offices.

4. Fourthly, Helios’s highly competitive market can result in unfair practices during the selection process. Some companies might be allotted better location or tax benefits in comparison to others.

Based on the above analysis, we can infer that Helios can be an option for already established companies who are trying to expand their network. It is important to keep in mind that Helios’s competitive environment might be detrimental for companies who are starting up since they need to compete with the big players for market space and talent retention. Lastly, companies should research on the available talent pool in Helios since Helios has the lowest unemployment rate.

AWA Score: 5 out of 6

Coherence and connectivity: 5/5
This rating corresponds to the flow of ideas and expressions from one paragraph to another. The effective use of connectives and coherence of assertive language in arguing for/against the argument is analyzed. This is deemed as one of the most important parameters.

Paragraph structure and formation: 3/5
The structure and division of the attempt into appropriate paragraphs are evaluated. To score well on this parameter, it is important to organize the attempt into paragraphs. Preferable to follow the convention of leaving a line blank at the end of each paragraph, to make the software aware of the structure of the essay.

Vocabulary and word expression: 4.5/5
This parameter rates the submitted essay on the range of relevant vocabulary possessed by the candidate basis the word and expression usage. There are no extra- points for bombastic word usage. Simple is the best form of suave!

1. Paragraphs are thin, add some more content and make a proper paragraph.
2. Remove numbering from paragraphs.
3. There are no main or minor conclusions, the conclusion is the conclusion and there are no types of conclusions.

If you follow above three guidlines this essay is a 5.5

Good Luck
User avatar
Chimoma
Joined: 17 Nov 2021
Last visit: 20 May 2025
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 11
Location: United States (TX)
GMAT 1: 690 Q44 V41
GPA: 3.96
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Please rate my essay.

The argument that corporations should look to the city of Helios when seeking new business opportunities or a new location omits some important concerns that need to be addressed to support the argument. The statements made concerning Helios’ unemployment rate, its status as the industrial center of the region, and its attempts to expand its economic base by attracting companies that focus on research and development do little to fully support the argument. This information alone does not compose a logical argument in favor of corporations seeking out the city of Helios for their needs, and it does not provide support for the main argument.

Most importantly, the argument does not address if other industries other than manufacturing are thriving in the city, if employees are available for employment, or if there are concerning reasons why Helios is looking to expand its economic base. First, the argument assumes that because the city has provided a large number of manufacturing jobs for the region it is a fitting city for corporations. However, the argument only provided information on the status of one industry in the region. There is no indication that the corporations that would be looking to move to Helios would be only a part of the manufacturing industry. Also, there is no evidence provided that the city has the capabilities to support a variety of corporations.

Second, the argument never addresses the ability of incoming corporations to hire employees. As stated in the article, Helios’s unemployment rate was lower than the regional average. If citizens of the city are not looking for work, this would mean corporations could have trouble hiring employees in this region. Also, there is no evidence that potential employees would have the necessary skills to perform well in the roles given by these corporations.

Finally, if the manufacturing industry is expected to experience a downturn in the next couple of years, this could be the reason why Helios is looking to expand its economic base. Furthermore, there is no clear evidence that the city will be successful in its attempt as there is no information given regarding the city’s ability to retain companies focused on research and development as well as other companies in different industries.

Because the argument leaves out several key issues, it is not sound or persuasive. If it included the items discussed above, the argument would have been more thorough and convincing. In order to assess the merits of a certain situation, it is essential to have full knowledge of all contributing factors.
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,289
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,179
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,289
Kudos: 49,292
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AWA Score: 6 out of 6

Coherence and connectivity: 5.5/6
The essay has a clear structure with well-developed paragraphs and smooth transitions between them. The ideas are logically connected and presented in a coherent manner, with each paragraph building on the previous one to develop a well-supported argument.

Word structure: 6/6
The essay uses a wide range of vocabulary appropriate to the topic and effectively conveys the author's ideas. The sentences are well-constructed, varied in length and structure, and demonstrate a sophisticated command of the English language.

Paragraph structure and formation: 6/6
The essay is well-organized into well-developed paragraphs, with each paragraph focusing on a specific aspect of the argument. The paragraphs are well-structured, with a clear topic sentence, supporting evidence, and a concluding sentence that ties back to the main argument.

Language and Grammar: 6/6
The language and grammar in the essay are excellent. The essay demonstrates a high level of proficiency in written English with accurate grammar, spelling, and punctuation. The author uses complex sentence structures, appropriate verb tense, and effectively uses a range of vocabulary.

Vocabulary and word expression: 6/6
The essay demonstrates a wide range of vocabulary appropriate to the topic and effectively conveys the author's ideas. The author uses advanced vocabulary, idiomatic expressions, and technical terms accurately and effectively to develop a well-supported argument.

Overall, the essay is well-written and effectively analyzes the argument presented in the prompt. The author effectively identifies weaknesses in the argument and provides clear and concise explanations for why the argument is not sound or persuasive. The essay demonstrates a high level of proficiency in written English and effectively uses a range of vocabulary and complex sentence structures to develop a well-supported argument.

Chimoma
Please rate my essay.

The argument that corporations should look to the city of Helios when seeking new business opportunities or a new location omits some important concerns that need to be addressed to support the argument. The statements made concerning Helios’ unemployment rate, its status as the industrial center of the region, and its attempts to expand its economic base by attracting companies that focus on research and development do little to fully support the argument. This information alone does not compose a logical argument in favor of corporations seeking out the city of Helios for their needs, and it does not provide support for the main argument.

Most importantly, the argument does not address if other industries other than manufacturing are thriving in the city, if employees are available for employment, or if there are concerning reasons why Helios is looking to expand its economic base. First, the argument assumes that because the city has provided a large number of manufacturing jobs for the region it is a fitting city for corporations. However, the argument only provided information on the status of one industry in the region. There is no indication that the corporations that would be looking to move to Helios would be only a part of the manufacturing industry. Also, there is no evidence provided that the city has the capabilities to support a variety of corporations.

Second, the argument never addresses the ability of incoming corporations to hire employees. As stated in the article, Helios’s unemployment rate was lower than the regional average. If citizens of the city are not looking for work, this would mean corporations could have trouble hiring employees in this region. Also, there is no evidence that potential employees would have the necessary skills to perform well in the roles given by these corporations.

Finally, if the manufacturing industry is expected to experience a downturn in the next couple of years, this could be the reason why Helios is looking to expand its economic base. Furthermore, there is no clear evidence that the city will be successful in its attempt as there is no information given regarding the city’s ability to retain companies focused on research and development as well as other companies in different industries.

Because the argument leaves out several key issues, it is not sound or persuasive. If it included the items discussed above, the argument would have been more thorough and convincing. In order to assess the merits of a certain situation, it is essential to have full knowledge of all contributing factors.
User avatar
rakshitkonchada
Joined: 30 Apr 2023
Last visit: 26 Oct 2025
Posts: 62
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 167
Location: India
Schools: ESSEC (II)
GMAT Focus 1: 675 Q84 V86 DI81
GPA: 9.2
Schools: ESSEC (II)
GMAT Focus 1: 675 Q84 V86 DI81
Posts: 62
Kudos: 16
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Please rate my essay

The argument claims that corporations should consider the city of Helios when seeking new business opportunities or a new location. The argument backs up this claim by stating that the city’s unemployment rate was lower than the regional average, that it’s the industrial sector of the region, and that it has provided more than its share of the region’s manufacturing jobs. The argument also talks about Helios attempting to expand its economic base by attracting companies that focus on research and development of innovative technologies. The argument fails to mention several key factors on the basis of which the corporation’s consideration could be evaluated. The argument also has underlying assumptions for which there is no clear evidence. Hence, the argument is weak and has several flaws.

First, the argument readily assumes that since Helios City has a lower unemployment rate and is the industrial center of the region, the city can be beneficial to all corporations. The argument didn’t specify any specific sectors that will benefit from the facilities. For example, a service-oriented company, such as a telecom company will have no added benefit to base its operations in the city. The service-oriented company cannot avail the benefits of the city being an industrial hub.

Second, the argument claims that unemployment is a factor in a company’s decision to choose a new location. The unemployment rate might not be a factor in deciding a new location, as the company’s new location can also depend on other superior factors such as the cost of operations in the city, logistics, and availability of resources. These factors are not addressed in the argument, therefore leaving the argument open for debate. Even though the unemployment rate is a factor, the argument couldn’t address the extent of it and how the low unemployment rate can actually help corporations.

Finally, the argument talks about the city’s attempt to expand its economic base by attracting companies that focus on research and development of innovative technologies, but it’s unclear how this attempt can benefit the corporations. The argument doesn’t talk in specifics about the types of technologies. The development might not benefit some corporations at all. Also, the innovative technologies are not limited to one city; it’s scalable to other cities, too. The reason that the city’s attempt to expand its economic base is not convincing why corporations would choose this city over others.

In conclusion, the argument is flawed for the above-mentioned reasons and is therefore unconvincing. It could be considerably strengthened if the author clearly mentioned all the relevant facts such as the type of industries that will be benefitting, how a low unemployment rate helps the corporations, and how the development of innovative technologies will help the corporations. In order to assess the merits of a particular situation, it is essential to have full knowledge of all contributing factors. Without this information, the argument remains unsubstantiated and open to debate.
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,289
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,179
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,289
Kudos: 49,292
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AWA Score: 5 out of 6

Coherence and Connectivity: 4.5/6
The essay generally maintains coherence and connectivity throughout. Each paragraph builds on the previous one, and there is a logical progression of ideas. However, some sentences could be more tightly connected to enhance overall coherence.

Word Structure: 5/6
The word structure is generally strong, with a variety of sentence structures used effectively. Some sentences could be more concise for greater clarity and impact.

Paragraph Structure and Formation: 5/6
Paragraph structure is mostly effective, with clear topic sentences and supporting details. However, a more explicit transition between the second and third paragraphs would improve the overall flow.

Language and Grammar: 5.5/6
The language used is clear and precise, contributing to the overall effectiveness of the essay. Grammar is strong, with few errors. However, a couple of sentences could be rephrased for smoother expression.

Vocabulary and Word Expression: 5/6
The vocabulary is appropriate for an analytical essay, and the writer effectively conveys their ideas. Introducing a bit more variety in vocabulary could enhance the overall richness of expression.

Overall, the essay demonstrates a strong understanding of the argument's weaknesses and provides a well-reasoned critique. Minor improvements in coherence, sentence structure, and vocabulary could further enhance the essay's effectiveness.

rakshitkonchada
Please rate my essay

The argument claims that corporations should consider the city of Helios when seeking new business opportunities or a new location. The argument backs up this claim by stating that the city’s unemployment rate was lower than the regional average, that it’s the industrial sector of the region, and that it has provided more than its share of the region’s manufacturing jobs. The argument also talks about Helios attempting to expand its economic base by attracting companies that focus on research and development of innovative technologies. The argument fails to mention several key factors on the basis of which the corporation’s consideration could be evaluated. The argument also has underlying assumptions for which there is no clear evidence. Hence, the argument is weak and has several flaws.

First, the argument readily assumes that since Helios City has a lower unemployment rate and is the industrial center of the region, the city can be beneficial to all corporations. The argument didn’t specify any specific sectors that will benefit from the facilities. For example, a service-oriented company, such as a telecom company will have no added benefit to base its operations in the city. The service-oriented company cannot avail the benefits of the city being an industrial hub.

Second, the argument claims that unemployment is a factor in a company’s decision to choose a new location. The unemployment rate might not be a factor in deciding a new location, as the company’s new location can also depend on other superior factors such as the cost of operations in the city, logistics, and availability of resources. These factors are not addressed in the argument, therefore leaving the argument open for debate. Even though the unemployment rate is a factor, the argument couldn’t address the extent of it and how the low unemployment rate can actually help corporations.

Finally, the argument talks about the city’s attempt to expand its economic base by attracting companies that focus on research and development of innovative technologies, but it’s unclear how this attempt can benefit the corporations. The argument doesn’t talk in specifics about the types of technologies. The development might not benefit some corporations at all. Also, the innovative technologies are not limited to one city; it’s scalable to other cities, too. The reason that the city’s attempt to expand its economic base is not convincing why corporations would choose this city over others.

In conclusion, the argument is flawed for the above-mentioned reasons and is therefore unconvincing. It could be considerably strengthened if the author clearly mentioned all the relevant facts such as the type of industries that will be benefitting, how a low unemployment rate helps the corporations, and how the development of innovative technologies will help the corporations. In order to assess the merits of a particular situation, it is essential to have full knowledge of all contributing factors. Without this information, the argument remains unsubstantiated and open to debate.
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts