GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 18 Jun 2019, 20:14

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Psychologists have attributed the strange behaviour of teenagers to ev

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

 
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 22 May 2017
Posts: 34
Psychologists have attributed the strange behaviour of teenagers to ev  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 08 Jan 2019, 06:07
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

44% (00:59) correct 56% (01:24) wrong based on 66 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Psychologists have attributed the strange behaviour of teenagers to everything from having a rash behaviour, which has never been explained, to their irresponsibility.


A. having a rash behaviour, which has never been explained,

B. having a rash behaviour, which was never explained,

C. their rash behaviour, for which there has never been an explanation,

D. their rash behaviour, which was never been explained,

E. having rash behaviour, for which there has never been an explanation,

Originally posted by sumisachan on 08 Jan 2019, 06:03.
Last edited by Bunuel on 08 Jan 2019, 06:07, edited 1 time in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the question.
Director
Director
User avatar
D
Joined: 18 Jul 2018
Posts: 938
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Psychologists have attributed the strange behaviour of teenagers to ev  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jan 2019, 06:17
Correct Idiom is From X to Y. X and Y should be parallel.

D maintains the parallelism. Hence, D is the answer
_________________
Press +1 Kudo If my post helps!
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 22 May 2017
Posts: 34
Re: Psychologists have attributed the strange behaviour of teenagers to ev  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jan 2019, 06:52
Afc0892 wrote:
Correct Idiom is From X to Y. X and Y should be parallel.

D maintains the parallelism. Hence, D is the answer


Idiom is maintained in case of C as well. Why is C incorrect?
Director
Director
User avatar
D
Joined: 18 Jul 2018
Posts: 938
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Psychologists have attributed the strange behaviour of teenagers to ev  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jan 2019, 06:54
1
sumisachan wrote:
Afc0892 wrote:
Correct Idiom is From X to Y. X and Y should be parallel.

D maintains the parallelism. Hence, D is the answer


Idiom is maintained in case of C as well. Why is C incorrect?


C is wordy.

Posted from my mobile device
_________________
Press +1 Kudo If my post helps!
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
P
Joined: 17 Oct 2016
Posts: 259
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Healthcare
GMAT 1: 640 Q40 V38
GMAT 2: 680 Q48 V35
GPA: 3.05
WE: Pharmaceuticals (Health Care)
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Psychologists have attributed the strange behaviour of teenagers to ev  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jan 2019, 07:10
Iam sorry, but i dont get it.

Which was never been explained?

May I request an expert to opine?

aragonn generis
_________________
_____________________
Chasing the dragon
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 22 May 2017
Posts: 34
Re: Psychologists have attributed the strange behaviour of teenagers to ev  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jan 2019, 08:14
Bunuel request your help here.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 21 Aug 2018
Posts: 3
Re: Psychologists have attributed the strange behaviour of teenagers to ev  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jan 2019, 09:26
Hello,

IMO C should be the correct answer.

Option D changes meaning by saying "which was never been explained", this implies now there is an explanation.

Will wait for OA and expert's explanation.

Posted from my mobile device
Senior SC Moderator
avatar
V
Joined: 22 May 2016
Posts: 2899
Psychologists have attributed the strange behaviour of teenagers to ev  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jan 2019, 09:38
1
sumisachan wrote:
Psychologists have attributed the strange behaviour of teenagers to everything from having a rash behaviour, which has never been explained, to their irresponsibility.


A. having a rash behaviour, which has never been explained,

B. having a rash behaviour, which was never explained,

C. their rash behaviour, for which there has never been an explanation,

D. their rash behaviour, which was never been explained,

E. having rash behaviour, for which there has never been an explanation,

fitzpratik , I think there is a typo in in D.
Should be which Has never been explained.

"Was never been" is not grammatically correct, ever.
"Was been" is never correct. That construction joins simple third person past form of TO BE with past participle of TO BE.

The participle "been" takes have/has as its companion -- never IS, ARE, WAS, WERE, WOULD, COULD, etc.

The incorrect coupling of these two forms of TO BE (was been) creates a phrase so unintelligible that I cannot explain it.

sumisachan please check.

Please list the source of the question.?

And if there is indeed a typo in D, then both C and D are "correct."

This question is of poor quality. Don't worry about it.

Psychologists have attributed STRANGE behavior of teenagers to everything from their RASH behavior, which "Has" never been explained, to their iresponsibility. (If the meaning of that sentence does not strike as incoherent, then it is time to start rewriting, in your own words, the meaning of official practice questions or QOTDs.)

1) How do you explain strange behavior by referring to impulsive BEHAVIOR [which has never been explained??]

2) What does that lack of explanation have to do with anything? It's not logical.

3) STRANGE behavior might be attributed to rash impulses and irresponsibility, but those two characteristics are not theoretically coherent, either.

Rash impulses and irresponsibility ARE strange behavior.

I would have to argue long and hard that the first two are both significantly distinct from strange behavior and that they are also explanations for strange behavior.

The logic is unsatisfying at best, and circular at worst.

Nor would any self-respecting social scientist explain one behavior ("strange," whatever that word means") by referring to a similar category of behavior (strangely rash behavior).

One behavior does not explain another behavior in this context. The source of strange behavior cannot be rash behavior.

Bunuel , never mind.
_________________
SC Butler has resumed!
Get two SC questions to practice, whose links you can find by date, here.


Tell me, what is it you plan to do with your one wild and precious life? -- Mary Oliver
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
P
Joined: 17 Oct 2016
Posts: 259
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Healthcare
GMAT 1: 640 Q40 V38
GMAT 2: 680 Q48 V35
GPA: 3.05
WE: Pharmaceuticals (Health Care)
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Psychologists have attributed the strange behaviour of teenagers to ev  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jan 2019, 09:50
generis wrote:
sumisachan wrote:
Psychologists have attributed the strange behaviour of teenagers to everything from having a rash behaviour, which has never been explained, to their irresponsibility.


A. having a rash behaviour, which has never been explained,

B. having a rash behaviour, which was never explained,

C. their rash behaviour, for which there has never been an explanation,

D. their rash behaviour, which was never been explained,

E. having rash behaviour, for which there has never been an explanation,

fitzpratik , I think there is a typo in in D.
Should be which Has never been explained.

"Was never been" is not grammatically correct, ever.

sumisachan please check. Please list the source of the question.?

Bunuel , never mind.

Posted from my mobile device



generis thanks, Has does fit right into the answer option.
_________________
_____________________
Chasing the dragon
Senior SC Moderator
avatar
V
Joined: 22 May 2016
Posts: 2899
Psychologists have attributed the strange behaviour of teenagers to ev  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jan 2019, 10:04
fitzpratik wrote:
generis wrote:
sumisachan wrote:
Psychologists have attributed the strange behaviour of teenagers to everything from having a rash behaviour, which has never been explained, to their irresponsibility.


A. having a rash behaviour, which has never been explained,
B. having a rash behaviour, which was never explained,
C. their rash behaviour, for which there has never been an explanation,
D. their rash behaviour, which was never been explained,
E. having rash behaviour, for which there has never been an explanation,

fitzpratik , I think there is a typo in in D.
Should be which Has never been explained.

"Was never been" is not grammatically correct, ever.

sumisachan please check. Please list the source of the question.?

generis thanks, Has does fit right into the answer option.

fitzpratik
I edited my post above to include more comments.

C and D are both correct if D has a typo. I list more issues with the question in that edited response above.
_________________
SC Butler has resumed!
Get two SC questions to practice, whose links you can find by date, here.


Tell me, what is it you plan to do with your one wild and precious life? -- Mary Oliver
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 22 May 2017
Posts: 34
Re: Psychologists have attributed the strange behaviour of teenagers to ev  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Jan 2019, 01:08
generis wrote:
sumisachan wrote:
Psychologists have attributed the strange behaviour of teenagers to everything from having a rash behaviour, which has never been explained, to their irresponsibility.


A. having a rash behaviour, which has never been explained,

B. having a rash behaviour, which was never explained,

C. their rash behaviour, for which there has never been an explanation,

D. their rash behaviour, which was never been explained,

E. having rash behaviour, for which there has never been an explanation,

fitzpratik , I think there is a typo in in D.
Should be which Has never been explained.

"Was never been" is not grammatically correct, ever.
"Was been" is never correct. That construction joins simple third person past form of TO BE with past participle of TO BE.

The participle "been" takes have/has as its companion -- never IS, ARE, WAS, WERE, WOULD, COULD, etc.

The incorrect coupling of these two forms of TO BE (was been) creates a phrase so unintelligible that I cannot explain it.

sumisachan please check.

Please list the source of the question.?

And if there is indeed a typo in D, then both C and D are "correct."

This question is of poor quality. Don't worry about it.

Psychologists have attributed STRANGE behavior of teenagers to everything from their RASH behavior, which "Has" never been explained, to their iresponsibility. (If the meaning of that sentence does not strike as incoherent, then it is time to start rewriting, in your own words, the meaning of official practice questions or QOTDs.)

1) How do you explain strange behavior by referring to impulsive BEHAVIOR [which has never been explained??]

2) What does that lack of explanation have to do with anything? It's not logical.

3) STRANGE behavior might be attributed to rash impulses and irresponsibility, but those two characteristics are not theoretically coherent, either.

Rash impulses and irresponsibility ARE strange behavior.

I would have to argue long and hard that the first two are both significantly distinct from strange behavior and that they are also explanations for strange behavior.

The logic is unsatisfying at best, and circular at worst.

Nor would any self-respecting social scientist explain one behavior ("strange," whatever that word means") by referring to a similar category of behavior (strangely rash behavior).

One behavior does not explain another behavior in this context. The source of strange behavior cannot be rash behavior.

Bunuel , never mind.


generis, I took a mock and encountered this question. :(
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 27 Dec 2018
Posts: 41
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business
GPA: 3.48
WE: General Management (Manufacturing)
Re: Psychologists have attributed the strange behaviour of teenagers to ev  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Jan 2019, 02:21
from X to Y is the correct usage
which correctly refers to the rash behaviour
So D is the correct answer

Kudos please
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Psychologists have attributed the strange behaviour of teenagers to ev   [#permalink] 09 Jan 2019, 02:21
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Psychologists have attributed the strange behaviour of teenagers to ev

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne