GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 24 Jun 2018, 19:01

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

QOTD: The pharmaceutical company conceded

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Expert Post
MBA Section Director
User avatar
V
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 5181
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
QOTD: The pharmaceutical company conceded [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Aug 2017, 11:30
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  35% (medium)

Question Stats:

63% (01:04) correct 37% (01:19) wrong based on 355 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Verbal Question of The Day: Day 80: Sentence Correction


Subscribe to GMAT Question of the Day: E-mail | RSS
For All QOTD Questions Click Here


The pharmaceutical company conceded that its blockbuster drug may have contributed to the recent outbreak of skin rashes experienced by its users and, having pulled the drug off the market, caused a sharp drop in the company’s share price.

(A) users and, having pulled the drug off the market, caused
(B) users and pulled the drug off the market, causing
(C) users and had pulled the drug off the market, causing
(D) users, pulled the drug off the market, and caused
(E) users and has pulled the drug off the market, which has caused

Every question of the day will be followed by an expert reply by GMATNinja in 12-15 hours. Stay tuned! Post your answers and explanations to earn kudos.

_________________

Have an MBA application Question? ASK ME ANYTHING!

My Stuff: Four Years to 760 | MBA Trends for Indian Applicants

My GMAT Resources
V30-V40: How to do it! | GMATPrep SC | GMATPrep CR | GMATPrep RC | Critical Reasoning Megathread | CR: Numbers and Statistics | CR: Weaken | CR: Strengthen | CR: Assumption | SC: Modifier | SC: Meaning | SC: SV Agreement | RC: Primary Purpose | PS/DS: Numbers and Inequalities | PS/DS: Combinatorics and Coordinates

My MBA Resources
Everything about the MBA Application | Over-Represented MBA woes | Fit Vs Rankings | Low GPA: What you can do | Letter of Recommendation: The Guide | Indian B Schools accepting GMAT score | Why MBA?

My Reviews
Veritas Prep Live Online

Expert Post
3 KUDOS received
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
P
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 1772
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: 340 Q170 V170
QOTD: The pharmaceutical company conceded [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Aug 2017, 11:31
3
2
This one is all about parallelism and meaning. Several of the answer choices sound pretty good, but only one of them actually makes sense if you’re strict and literal with the meaning of the sentence.

Quote:
(A) users and, having pulled the drug off the market, caused

I don’t love the sound of “having pulled the drug off the market”, but I can’t be certain that it’s wrong. “Having pulled the drug off the market” needs to precede some other action – and “caused a sharp drop in the share price” seems to work fine. So I guess that part is OK.

But the parallelism is a problem. The word “caused” follows the parallelism trigger “and”, so something has to be parallel with “caused” – I guess that’s either “contributed” or “conceded.”

Neither of those options makes a lot of sense, though. “The pharmaceutical company conceded that its blockbuster drug may have contributed to the recent outbreak… and caused a sharp drop in the company’s share price. Basically, that’s saying that the company directly caused the drop in the share price, and that’s not quite right – it was the combination of the skin rashes and pulling the drug off the market that caused the drop.

It makes even less sense for “caused” to be parallel to “contributed.” “The pharmaceutical company conceded that its blockbuster drug may have contributed to the recent outbreak… and caused a sharp drop in the company’s share price.” That’s saying that the drug itself “may have caused” the drop, and that’s not right, either – again, it was the combination of the skin rashes and pulling the drug off the market that caused the drop.

So (A) is out.

Quote:
(B) users and pulled the drug off the market, causing

This is much better! The company “conceded… and pulled the drug off the market.” “Causing” is an –ing modifier (more on those here, and it modifies that entire previous clause. That’s great: the entire story (pharma company’s drug causes rashes, so the firm pulls the drug off the market) is causing the drop in share prices. Keep (B).

Quote:
(C) users and had pulled the drug off the market, causing

Only difference here is the use of the past perfect “had pulled.” For this to be correct, the drug would have been pulled off the market first – before the actions in simple past tense (“conceded that its blockbuster drug may have caused skin rashes…”). And that makes no sense. (C) is gone.

Quote:
(D) users, pulled the drug off the market, and caused

Now everything is parallel! So we have “The pharmaceutical company conceded that its blockbuster drug may have contributed to the recent outbreak…, pulled the drug off the market, and caused a sharp drop…” That might sound OK, but it doesn’t actually make sense. Why would these three actions be parallel to each other? The pharma company didn’t directly cause the drop in the share prices – it’s the entire situation that caused it. (B) conveys this meaning much more clearly, so we can eliminate (D).

Quote:
(E) users and has pulled the drug off the market, which has caused

This one is nice, because it’s so clearly wrong. “Which has caused” seems to be modifying “the market”, and that makes no sense. I also can’t really understand why “has pulled” and “has caused” are suddenly in present perfect tense; the mix of verb tenses and modifiers in (B) is much better. (E) is out, and (B) wins.
_________________

GMAT Club Verbal Expert | GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (Now hiring!) | GMAT blog | Food blog | Notoriously bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal
Reading Comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Sentence Correction

YouTube LIVE verbal webinars
Series 1: Fundamentals of SC & CR | Series 2: Developing a Winning GMAT Mindset

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations
All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Need an expert reply?
Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja and @GMATNinjaTwo in your post. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.

Sentence Correction articles & resources
How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources
All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for $29.99 | Time management on verbal

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 02 Nov 2015
Posts: 171
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V29
Premium Member
Re: QOTD: The pharmaceutical company conceded [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Aug 2017, 11:46
After lots of brainstorming I came down to A.


Sent from my Lenovo TAB S8-50LC using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 06 Jul 2016
Posts: 421
Location: Singapore
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: QOTD: The pharmaceutical company conceded [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Aug 2017, 12:46
The Answer is B, for me at least.
Will post my explanation in the morning :)
_________________

Put in the work, and that dream score is yours!

Current Student
avatar
B
Joined: 22 Sep 2016
Posts: 198
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
GPA: 4
QOTD: The pharmaceutical company conceded [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 11 Aug 2017, 17:37
souvik101990 wrote:

Verbal Question of The Day: Day 80: Sentence Correction


Subscribe to GMAT Question of the Day: E-mail | RSS
For All QOTD Questions Click Here


The pharmaceutical company conceded that its blockbuster drug may have contributed to the recent outbreak of skin rashes experienced by its users and, having pulled the drug off the market, caused a sharp drop in the company’s share price.

(A) users and, having pulled the drug off the market, caused
(B) users and pulled the drug off the market, causing
(C) users and had pulled the drug off the market, causing
(D) users, pulled the drug off the market, and caused
(E) users and has pulled the drug off the market, which has caused

Every question of the day will be followed by an expert reply by GMATNinja in 12-15 hours. Stay tuned! Post your answers and explanations to earn kudos.


C should be the correct answer IMO.
1. "had pulled" is required to show that the action happened before "causing" the effect in the residual part of the sentence.
2. -ing modifier is aptly used to show the effect.

For others
(A) users and, having pulled the drug off the market, caused
(B) users and pulled the drug off the market, causing
(C) users and had pulled the drug off the market, causing
(D) users, pulled the drug off the market, and caused
(E) users and has pulled the drug off the market, which has caused

Please tell me, if I'm wrong. :)

Will I get kudos for this? :o
_________________

Desperately need 'KUDOS' !!


Originally posted by rekhabishop on 11 Aug 2017, 17:34.
Last edited by rekhabishop on 11 Aug 2017, 17:37, edited 1 time in total.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 23 Dec 2011
Posts: 26
Re: QOTD: The pharmaceutical company conceded [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Aug 2017, 17:36
The option is B for me. Conceded and pulled should be parallel. That is my understanding.


Sent from my iPhone using GMAT Club Forum
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 30 Mar 2016
Posts: 47
Re: QOTD: The pharmaceutical company conceded [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Aug 2017, 18:37
souvik101990 wrote:

Verbal Question of The Day: Day 80: Sentence Correction


Subscribe to GMAT Question of the Day: E-mail | RSS
For All QOTD Questions Click Here


The pharmaceutical company conceded that its blockbuster drug may have contributed to the recent outbreak of skin rashes experienced by its users and, having pulled the drug off the market, caused a sharp drop in the company’s share price.

(A) users and, having pulled the drug off the market, caused
(B) users and pulled the drug off the market, causing
(C) users and had pulled the drug off the market, causing
(D) users, pulled the drug off the market, and caused
(E) users and has pulled the drug off the market, which has caused

Every question of the day will be followed by an expert reply by GMATNinja in 12-15 hours. Stay tuned! Post your answers and explanations to earn kudos.


Action 1 = contributed

Action 2 = pulled.

These 2 actions are supposed to be parallel.

[V - ing] modifer = causing, which shows combined consequence/result of the 2 preceding actions.

So, IMO B is the correct choice.

Thanks for the question. Have a good weekend :)
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 27 Jun 2017
Posts: 5
Re: QOTD: The pharmaceutical company conceded [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Aug 2017, 02:03
The pharmaceutical company conceded that its blockbuster drug may have contributed to the recent outbreak of skin rashes experienced by its users and, having pulled the drug off the market, caused a sharp drop in the company???s share price.

(A) users and, having pulled the drug off the market, caused
(B) users and pulled the drug off the market, causing
(C) users and had pulled the drug off the market, causing
(D) users, pulled the drug off the market, and caused
(E) users and has pulled the drug off the market, which has caused
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 15 Nov 2015
Posts: 53
Location: India
GPA: 3.7
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: QOTD: The pharmaceutical company conceded [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Aug 2017, 06:26
IMO B

(A) users and, having pulled the drug off the market, caused - parallelism error
(B) users and pulled the drug off the market, causing - conceded & pulled are parallel
(C) users and had pulled the drug off the market, causing - parallelism
(D) users, pulled the drug off the market, and caused - parallelism
(E) users and has pulled the drug off the market, which has caused - parallelism
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 09 Aug 2017
Posts: 2
Re: QOTD: The pharmaceutical company conceded [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Aug 2017, 06:36
B

Sent from my ASUS_Z010DD using Tapatalk
1 KUDOS received
Wharton Thread Master
User avatar
D
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1022
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Re: QOTD: The pharmaceutical company conceded [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Aug 2017, 06:45
1
The pharmaceutical company conceded that its blockbuster drug may have contributed to the recent outbreak of skin rashes experienced by its users and, having pulled the drug off the market, caused a sharp drop in the company’s share price.

1. Here company did 2 things: accepted something and pulled the drug out of market. So "conceded" and "pulled" should be parallel.
2. We do not need a perfect tense since the actions are not done in a sequential order.
3. Since company did 2 actions, we need "and" in the sentence to join the two actions and link them with the company.
Thus, option "B" has to be correct.


(A) users and, having pulled the drug off the market, caused - the striked part in the sentence becomes non-essential information. Thus the meaning of the sentence is "company conceded something and caused the shares to drop". This is absurd. Company can't cause a drop in shares, the action of drug being pulled out of market led to drop in share price.
(B) users and pulled the drug off the market, causing -Correct as per aforesaid explanation
(C) users and had pulled the drug off the market, causing -We do not need a past perfect tense
(D) users, pulled the drug off the market, and caused -Same as option A
(E) users and has pulled the drug off the market, which has caused -which wrongly refers back to market. We need a participle which will explain the impact of removal of the drug from market on the share price. "has" is wrongly used. We do not need a present perfect tense. It should be simple past.
_________________

Kudos if my post helps!

Long And A Fruitful Journey - V21 to V41; If I can, So Can You!!


My study resources:
1. Useful Formulae, Concepts and Tricks-Quant
2. e-GMAT's ALL SC Compilation
3. LSAT RC compilation
4. Actual LSAT CR collection by Broal
5. QOTD RC (Carcass)
6. Challange OG RC
7. GMAT Prep Challenge RC

Re: QOTD: The pharmaceutical company conceded   [#permalink] 12 Aug 2017, 06:45
Display posts from previous: Sort by

QOTD: The pharmaceutical company conceded

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.