GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 18 Aug 2018, 11:33

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# QOTD: Well-known businessman Arnold Bergeron

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

MBA Section Director
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 5121
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)

### Show Tags

30 Jan 2018, 06:23
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

65% (01:05) correct 35% (01:13) wrong based on 281 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Verbal Question of The Day: Day 211: Critical Reasoning

Subscribe to GMAT Question of the Day: E-mail | RSS

Journalist: Well-known businessman Arnold Bergeron has long been popular in the state, and he has often talked about running for governor, but he has never run. However, we have just learned that Bergeron has fulfilled the financial disclosure requirement for candidacy by submitting a detailed list of his current financial holdings to the election commission. So, it is very likely that Bergeron will be a candidate for governor this year.

The answer to which of the following questions would be most useful in evaluating the journalist's argument?

(A) Has anybody else who has fulfilled the financial disclosure requirement for the upcoming election reported greater financial holdings than Bergeron?

(B) Is submitting a list of holdings the only way to fulfill the election commission's financial disclosure requirements?

(C) Did the information recently obtained by the journalists come directly from the election commission?

(D) Have Bergeron's financial holdings increased in value in recent years?

(E) Had Bergeron also fulfilled the financial disclosure requirements for candidacy before any previous gubernatorial elections?

Every question of the day will be followed by an expert reply by GMATNinja in 12-15 hours. Stay tuned! Post your answers and explanations to earn kudos.

_________________
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 1909
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

### Show Tags

30 Jan 2018, 06:24
2
1
The journalist concludes that "it is very likely that Bergeron will be a candidate for governor this year." How does the journalist arrive at this conclusion?

• Arnold Bergeron (AB) is a well-known businessman who has long been popular in the state.
• AB has often talked about running for governor, but he has never actually run for governor.
• According to recent news, AB has fulfilled the financial disclosure requirement for candidacy.

In other words, AB has taken a step that WOULD be necessary if he actually wanted to become a candidate. But does this necessarily imply that Bergeron will very likely be a candidate for governor this year?

The answer to which of the following questions would be most useful in evaluating the journalist's argument?

Quote:
A. Has anybody else who has fulfilled the financial disclosure requirement for the upcoming election reported greater financial holdings than Bergeron?

In order to run for governor, a candidate would first have to submit a detailed list of his/her current financial holdings to the election commission. The requirement is that the candidate SUBMIT this information. The passage does NOT mention any requirements based on the CONTENTS of that financial information.

In other words, according to the passage, a potential candidate simply needs to submit the required information. It doesn't matter whether the candidate has greater financial holdings than the other potential candidates. Choice (A) is irrelevant and can be eliminated.

Quote:
B. Is submitting a list of holdings the only way to fulfill the election commission's financial disclosure requirements?

We already know that AB has fulfilled the election commission's financial disclosure requirements. Even if there are other ways to fulfill those requirements, it still seems as though AB has taken the first step towards running for governor. The answer to choice (B) might provide interesting information, but it would not help us evaluate the journalists' argument or conclusion. Eliminate (B).

Quote:
C. Did the information recently obtained by the journalists come directly from the election commission?

The passage tells us that the journalist has learned that AB has fulfilled the financial disclosure requirement for candidacy. Regardless of whether that knowledge came directly from the election commission or from a secondary or tertiary source makes little difference.

Sure, knowing whether the journalist got the information from an unreliable source could certainly affect the argument. But would we be able to determine the reliability of the source just by answering this question? For example, say that the answer to (C) were, "No, the information was obtained from the town council, which received its information directly from the election commission." Okay, we've answered the question, but do we have any grounds for questioning the accuracy of the information?

Certain answers to this question could impact the author's argument. But we are looking for the question whose answer would be "most useful", so let's see if we can do better.

Quote:
D. Have Bergeron's financial holdings increased in value in recent years?

As explained for choice (A), we are not aware of any requirements based on the details of a potential candidate's holdings. According to the passage, a potential candidate fulfills the election commission's financial disclosure requirements simply by submitting the required information. As far as we can tell, it makes no difference whether AB's financial holdings have increased, decreased, or stayed the same. Eliminate (D).

Quote:
E. Had Bergeron also fulfilled the financial disclosure requirements for candidacy before any previous gubernatorial elections?

AB has taken a step that WOULD be necessary if he actually wanted to become a candidate. Based on that information, the journalist concludes that AB is very likely be a candidate for governor this year.

But what if AB has taken this same step before other previous gubernatorial elections? We know that AB has never run before, so if the answer to (E) is "Yes," then AB has, in the past, completed this step without subsequently running for governor.

In other words, if the answer is "Yes," then AB has a history of completing this step without actually running for governor. So, taking that step would not be evidence that AB is actually going to run. Since the journalist's argument is based solely on that piece of evidence, this would hurt the argument.

If, however, this is the first time that AB has taken this step, then it is stronger evidence that AB will actually run.

Answering this question would be much more useful than answering the question listed in choice (C), so (E) is the best answer.
_________________

GMAT Club Verbal Expert | GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (Now hiring!) | GMAT blog | Food blog | Notoriously bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal
Reading Comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Sentence Correction

Series 1: Fundamentals of SC & CR | Series 2: Developing a Winning GMAT Mindset

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations
All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja and @GMATNinjaTwo in your post. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.

Sentence Correction articles & resources
How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources
All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for \$29.99 | Time management on verbal

Intern
Joined: 20 Jun 2017
Posts: 34
GMAT 1: 570 Q49 V19

### Show Tags

30 Jan 2018, 06:33
B
If submitting the list is the only criteria then the argument is strengthened.
If there are other criteria's as well then the argument is weakened.

Sent from my ONE E1003 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
Intern
Joined: 24 Nov 2015
Posts: 15

### Show Tags

30 Jan 2018, 06:37
pkshankar wrote:
B
If submitting the list is the only criteria then the argument is strengthened.
If there are other criteria's as well then the argument is weakened.

Sent from my ONE E1003 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app

It still doesn't confirm us whether he had submitted the list only for the purpose of participating in the elections. There might be another reason for the same. E on the other hand would give us profound example if something like this was done by him previously only to participate in an election. If yes, it will strengthen the argument. If no, it would mean that he submitted the list already during an election but not to participate in it --> weakening the argument.

Sent from my iPhone using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
BSchool Forum Moderator
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1102
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4

### Show Tags

30 Jan 2018, 08:27
Journalist: Well-known businessman Arnold Bergeron has long been popular in the state, and he has often talked about running for governor, but he has never run. However, we have just learned that Bergeron has fulfilled the financial disclosure requirement for candidacy by submitting a detailed list of his current financial holdings to the election commission. So, it is very likely that Bergeron will be a candidate for governor this year.

The answer to which of the following questions would be most useful in evaluating the journalist's argument?

A. Has anybody else who has fulfilled the financial disclosure requirement for the upcoming election reported greater financial holdings than Bergeron? -Anybody else is out of scope
B. Is submitting a list of holdings the only way to fulfill the election commission's financial disclosure requirements? -Even if there is any other way still the financial disclosure requirement has been completed.
C. Did the information recently obtained by the journalists come directly from the election commission? -Out of scope
D. Have Bergeron's financial holdings increased in value in recent years? -Out of scope
E. Had Bergeron also fulfilled the financial disclosure requirements for candidacy before any previous gubernatorial elections? -Correct. If he had fulfilled this requirement in previous elections as well then it would cast doubt on the appearance of Arnold as a candidate.
_________________

Kudos if my post helps!

Long And A Fruitful Journey - V21 to V41; If I can, So Can You!!

Preparing for RC my way

My study resources:
1. Useful Formulae, Concepts and Tricks-Quant
2. e-GMAT's ALL SC Compilation
3. LSAT RC compilation
4. Actual LSAT CR collection by Broal
5. QOTD RC (Carcass)
6. Challange OG RC
7. GMAT Prep Challenge RC

Intern
Joined: 19 Oct 2017
Posts: 30
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
GPA: 3.6
WE: Analyst (Commercial Banking)

### Show Tags

31 Jan 2018, 08:11
gmatexam439 wrote:
Journalist: Well-known businessman Arnold Bergeron has long been popular in the state, and he has often talked about running for governor, but he has never run. However, we have just learned that Bergeron has fulfilled the financial disclosure requirement for candidacy by submitting a detailed list of his current financial holdings to the election commission. So, it is very likely that Bergeron will be a candidate for governor this year.

The answer to which of the following questions would be most useful in evaluating the journalist's argument?

A. Has anybody else who has fulfilled the financial disclosure requirement for the upcoming election reported greater financial holdings than Bergeron? -Anybody else is out of scope
B. Is submitting a list of holdings the only way to fulfill the election commission's financial disclosure requirements? -Even if there is any other way still the financial disclosure requirement has been completed.
C. Did the information recently obtained by the journalists come directly from the election commission? -Out of scope
D. Have Bergeron's financial holdings increased in value in recent years? -Out of scope
E. Had Bergeron also fulfilled the financial disclosure requirements for candidacy before any previous gubernatorial elections? -Correct. If he had fulfilled this requirement in previous elections as well then it would cast doubt on the appearance of Arnold as a candidate.

How do I tackle answer choices like E? I didn't understand the word gubernatorial. I heard it for the first time. On the other hand I thought C is good because if the reporter has not heard from trusted or authentic source then argument weakens.

Sent from my Redmi Note 4 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
Intern
Joined: 02 Jun 2014
Posts: 19
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V41

### Show Tags

31 Jan 2018, 10:42
What info would it make it more likely/less likely that AB is running for office? We know from the past that there were instances when it seemed like he was going to run but end up not running.

Answer choices are between B and E. Everything else is not mentioned as evidence or does not affect the conclusion.

B. Is submitting a list of holdings the only way to fulfill the election commission's financial disclosure requirements?
If yes - then sure, he might be applying.
If not, and there are other ways to to fulfill the requirements, does it still make it less likely? If I can submit Form A and Form B, but I forgot to bring Form A and submit Form B instead, does that affect whether or not I'm applying? Nope - because I'm still applying

E. Had Bergeron also fulfilled the financial disclosure requirements for candidacy before any previous gubernatorial elections?
If yes - hold on... AB backed out in previous races... doing this again might show that hes not serious about contending this time around
If not - this is not like last time... maybe AB is serious this time
Re: QOTD: Well-known businessman Arnold Bergeron &nbs [#permalink] 31 Jan 2018, 10:42
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Events & Promotions

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.