GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 22 Sep 2018, 04:15

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Criminals released from prison on parole have generally been put under

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Current Student
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 5002
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Criminals released from prison on parole have generally been put under  [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Oct 2014, 01:57
8
38
00:00

Difficulty:

85% (hard)

Question Stats:

54% (01:56) correct 46% (03:30) wrong based on 1363 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Criminals released from prison on parole have generally been put under routine supervision. A recent program has allowed criminals to leave prison early under intensive supervision; they must obey curfews and in some cases they must be electronically monitored. The percentage of released criminals arrested while under supervision is the same for intensive supervision as for routine supervision, so intensive supervision is no more effective than routine supervision in preventing criminals from committing additional crimes.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument relies?

(A) The criminals under intensive supervision, but not those under routine supervision, were required to work or attend school during their supervision period.

(B) All of the criminals who were arrested while under routine supervision had been in prison more than once before being paroled and put under supervision.

(C) The proportion of arrests to crimes committed was not significantly higher for criminals under intensive supervision than those under routine supervision.

(D) Of the criminals arrested while under intensive supervision, some would not have committed crimes if they had been under routine supervision.

(E) The number of criminals put under routine supervision was not significantly greater than the number of criminals put under intensive supervision.

_________________
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 8287
Location: Pune, India
Re: Criminals released from prison on parole have generally been put under  [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 Oct 2014, 23:26
12
2
souvik101990 wrote:
Criminals released from prison on parole have generally been put under routine supervision. A recent program has allowed criminals to leave prison early under intensive supervision; they must obey curfews and in some cases they must be electronically monitored. The percentage of released criminals arrested while under supervision is the same for intensive supervision as for routine supervision, so intensive supervision is no more effective than routine supervision in preventing criminals from committing additional crimes.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument relies?

(A) The criminals under intensive supervision, but not those under routine supervision, were required to work or attend school during their supervision period.

(B) All of the criminals who were arrested while under routine supervision had been in prison more than once before being paroled and put under supervision.

(C) The proportion of arrests to crimes committed was not significantly higher for criminals under intensive supervision than those under routine supervision.

(D) Of the criminals arrested while under intensive supervision, some would not have committed crimes if they had been under routine supervision.

(E) The number of criminals put under routine supervision was not significantly greater than the number of criminals put under intensive supervision.

Responding to a pm:

Premises:
Criminals released on parole are put under routine supervision.
A recent program allows criminals to leave prison early under intensive supervision;
The percentage of re-arrests is same for intensive supervision as well as for routine supervision.

Conclusion:
intensive supervision is no more effective than routine supervision in preventing criminals from committing additional crimes

The key word is highlighted. We are saying that since both types of supervision result in the same percentage of re-arrests, it means both have the same success rate in preventing crimes. There is a gap in this logic. Based on the number of re-arrests (which is same for both), we are assuming the number of crimes committed are the same under both types of supervision. What if, number of crimes committed is much higher under routine supervision but re-arrests are rarer? Then can we say that both methods are equally effective in preventing crimes? No. So option (C) is an assumption. It says that the proportion of arrests to crimes committed was similar in both.

On the other hand, (E) doesn't affect our argument. The number put under each is of no consequence to us. We are comparing percentages. Since their percentages are similar, we can certainly compare their effectiveness even if the number of criminals is different.

_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor

GMAT self-study has never been more personalized or more fun. Try ORION Free!

General Discussion
Manager
Joined: 27 May 2014
Posts: 83
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
Schools: HKUST '15, ISB '15
GMAT Date: 12-26-2014
GPA: 3
Re: Criminals released from prison on parole have generally been put under  [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Oct 2014, 02:32
i found it pretty difficult.took lot more than stipulated time.hope i am correct.
_________________

Success has been and continues to be defined as Getting up one more time than you have been knocked down.

Manager
Joined: 10 Feb 2014
Posts: 108
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
Re: Criminals released from prison on parole have generally been put under  [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Oct 2014, 02:44
1
Okay...1:20 sec!! A good one to round up these criminals and the contest!! ...

Btw Souvik, if I am not wrong, today's is the last question of RAGCT?
Director
Joined: 05 Sep 2010
Posts: 753
Re: Criminals released from prison on parole have generally been put under  [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Oct 2014, 02:51
1
easy pick on this one . typical of gmat
CHEERS

souvik101990 wrote:
Criminals released from prison on parole have generally been put under routine supervision. A recent program has allowed criminals to leave prison early under intensive supervision; they must obey curfews and in some cases they must be electronically monitored. The percentage of released criminals arrested while under supervision is the same for intensive supervision as for routine supervision, so intensive supervision is no more effective than routine supervision in preventing criminals from committing additional crimes.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument relies?

(A) The criminals under intensive supervision, but not those under routine supervision, were required to work or attend school during their supervision period.

(B) All of the criminals who were arrested while under routine supervision had been in prison more than once before being paroled and put under supervision.

(C) The proportion of arrests to crimes committed was not significantly higher for criminals under intensive supervision than those under routine supervision.

(D) Of the criminals arrested while under intensive supervision, some would not have committed crimes if they had been under routine supervision.

(E) The number of criminals put under routine supervision was not significantly greater than the number of criminals put under intensive supervision.
Intern
Joined: 02 Jun 2014
Posts: 7
Location: United States
GMAT Date: 11-25-2014
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Consulting)
Re: Criminals released from prison on parole have generally been put under  [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Oct 2014, 06:49
Pre-thinking helped me to locate the answer...

Hope got it correct...
Board of Directors
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2683
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)
Re: Criminals released from prison on parole have generally been put under  [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Oct 2014, 08:47
raced against the timer and got it wrong I guess
Manager
Joined: 11 Aug 2011
Posts: 175
Location: United States
Concentration: Economics, Finance
GMAT Date: 10-16-2013
GPA: 3
WE: Analyst (Computer Software)
Re: Criminals released from prison on parole have generally been put under  [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Oct 2014, 09:00
Prethinking is the key to answering such questions.
_________________

Kudos me if you like my post !!!!

Intern
Joined: 29 Apr 2014
Posts: 14
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
GPA: 3.5
Re: Criminals released from prison on parole have generally been put under  [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Oct 2014, 09:22
phew! that was a tough one! Still not 100% sure though...waiting for the OE!
Intern
Joined: 06 Nov 2013
Posts: 28
Re: Criminals released from prison on parole have generally been put under  [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Oct 2014, 10:13
That took a while ! Is it something to do with comparing percentages to numbers?
_________________

'I read somewhere... how important it is in life not necessarily to be strong, but to feel strong... to measure yourself at least once.'

Intern
Joined: 26 Jun 2014
Posts: 14
Re: Criminals released from prison on parole have generally been put under  [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Oct 2014, 11:55
hope thiz time my answer is rite.....
waiting for OE....
Manager
Joined: 12 May 2013
Posts: 68
Re: Criminals released from prison on parole have generally been put under  [#permalink]

Show Tags

05 Oct 2014, 12:41
Took a lot of time to answer the question !
found it a bit tricky
Waiting for OA
Director
Joined: 03 Feb 2013
Posts: 888
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.88
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Re: Criminals released from prison on parole have generally been put under  [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Oct 2014, 08:49
Tried to solve it again and there I did the mistake.

The percentage of released criminals arrested while under supervision is the same for intensive supervision as for routine supervision, so intensive supervision is no more effective than routine supervision in preventing criminals from committing additional crimes

Leap of faith from arrested to committing crimes. Option C) bridges the gap.
_________________

Thanks,
Kinjal

My Application Experience : http://gmatclub.com/forum/hardwork-never-gets-unrewarded-for-ever-189267-40.html#p1516961

Retired Moderator
Status: On a mountain of skulls, in the castle of pain, I sit on a throne of blood.
Joined: 30 Jul 2013
Posts: 339
Re: Criminals released from prison on parole have generally been put under  [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Oct 2014, 10:34
Almost forgot to answer this question. Hope I wasnt too late
Intern
Joined: 23 Aug 2014
Posts: 18
Re: Criminals released from prison on parole have generally been put under  [#permalink]

Show Tags

06 Oct 2014, 21:20
a very tricky question but i managed to get the answer slightly under a minute... phew :D
Intern
Joined: 09 Jul 2014
Posts: 34
Re: Criminals released from prison on parole have generally been put under  [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 Oct 2014, 02:15
souvik101990 : its a very good question .. +kudos to u .
but i took 2 min to answer this one is it too much time consumption for these type qstn ?
Also please post the OA with OE.

thanks
Manager
Joined: 18 Jun 2014
Posts: 74
Location: India
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40
GPA: 3.8
WE: Management Consulting (Insurance)
Re: Criminals released from prison on parole have generally been put under  [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 Oct 2014, 04:11
I am really stuck between C and E. can my any GC friend sail please me out of this question's maze.
_________________

The Mind is everything . What you think you become. - Lord Buddha

Consider giving KUDOS if you appreciate my post !!

Current Student
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 5002
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Re: Criminals released from prison on parole have generally been put under  [#permalink]

Show Tags

09 Oct 2014, 03:19
RAGCT Winners announced!
_________________
Current Student
Joined: 06 Mar 2014
Posts: 252
Location: India
GMAT Date: 04-30-2015
Re: Criminals released from prison on parole have generally been put under  [#permalink]

Show Tags

02 Nov 2014, 21:13
2
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
souvik101990 wrote:
Criminals released from prison on parole have generally been put under routine supervision. A recent program has allowed criminals to leave prison early under intensive supervision; they must obey curfews and in some cases they must be electronically monitored. The percentage of released criminals arrested while under supervision is the same for intensive supervision as for routine supervision, so intensive supervision is no more effective than routine supervision in preventing criminals from committing additional crimes.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument relies?

(A) The criminals under intensive supervision, but not those under routine supervision, were required to work or attend school during their supervision period.

(B) All of the criminals who were arrested while under routine supervision had been in prison more than once before being paroled and put under supervision.

(C) The proportion of arrests to crimes committed was not significantly higher for criminals under intensive supervision than those under routine supervision.

(D) Of the criminals arrested while under intensive supervision, some would not have committed crimes if they had been under routine supervision.

(E) The number of criminals put under routine supervision was not significantly greater than the number of criminals put under intensive supervision.

Responding to a pm:

Premises:
Criminals released on parole are put under routine supervision.
A recent program allows criminals to leave prison early under intensive supervision;
The percentage of re-arrests is same for intensive supervision as well as for routine supervision.

Conclusion:
intensive supervision is no more effective than routine supervision in preventing criminals from committing additional crimes

The key word is highlighted. We are saying that since both types of supervision result in the same percentage of re-arrests, it means both have the same success rate in preventing crimes. There is a gap in this logic. Based on the number of re-arrests (which is same for both), we are assuming the number of crimes committed are the same under both types of supervision. What if, number of crimes committed is much higher under routine supervision but re-arrests are rarer? Then can we say that both methods are equally effective in preventing crimes? No. So option (C) is an assumption. It says that the proportion of arrests to crimes committed was similar in both.

On the other hand, (E) doesn't affect our argument. The number put under each is of no consequence to us. We are comparing percentages. Since their percentages are similar, we can certainly compare their effectiveness even if the number of criminals is different.

VeritasPrepKarishma,

Just need a bit of clarity on the highlighted portion: It says that we are assuming that no. of crimes committed are same under both types of supervision.
Please correct me, if i am wrong but are we not assuming that the PROPORTION of re-arrests to crimes committed is same for both types of supervision.

$$Re-arrests/Crimes Committed$$ for Intense Supervision = $$Re-arrests/Crimes Committed$$ for Routine Supervision

We are given that the Percentage of re-arrests is same under both types of supervision but that doesn't mean that the number of re-arrests is same, right?
And by that logic, we can conclude that the two ratios must be equal, hence the same proportion but not necessarily have the same numbers.
For ex: re-arrests to no. of crimes committed proportion for both routine and intense supervision respectively-:
$$3/5 = 6/10$$
So, here the number of crimes committed are different, yet the two ratios are equal.

Thank you.
Current Student
Joined: 08 Feb 2013
Posts: 21
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
GPA: 3.83
Re: Criminals released from prison on parole have generally been put under  [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Feb 2015, 09:16
1
Criminals released from prison on parole have generally been put under routine supervision. A recent program has allowed criminals to leave prison early under intensive supervision; they must obey curfews and in some cases they must be electronically monitored. The percentage of released criminals arrested while under supervision is the same for intensive supervision as for routine supervision, so intensive supervision is no more effective than routine supervision in preventing criminals from committing additional crimes.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument relies?

(A) The criminals under intensive supervision, but not those under routine supervision, were required to work or attend school during their supervision period.

(B) All of the criminals who were arrested while under routine supervision had been in prison more than once before being paroled and put under supervision.

(C) The proportion of arrests to crimes committed was not significantly higher for criminals under intensive supervision than those under routine supervision.

(D) Of the criminals arrested while under intensive supervision, some would not have committed crimes if they had been under routine supervision.

(E) The number of criminals put under routine supervision was not significantly greater than the number of criminals put under intensive supervision.

I have doubt regarding option D, it says that "of the criminals arrested while under intensive supervision, some would not have commited crime if they had been under routine supervision", if we negate it , it becomes, "of the criminals arrested while under intensive supervision, some would have commited crime if they had been under routine supervision". I was wondering doesn't it kills the conclusion that intensive supervision is no more effective
Re: Criminals released from prison on parole have generally been put under &nbs [#permalink] 03 Feb 2015, 09:16

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 38 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Events & Promotions

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.