ryanfox02
Hello!
I selected answer choice C because if students from low-income families are not qualified, then the argument would fall apart because the colleges already cater to affluent families.
However, if the students are qualified, then the conclusion would indeed begin to cater more towards affluent families.
I agree that E weakens and strengthens the argument depending upon yes/no, but I still cannot see why C is incorrect.
Thank you in advance!
By reading your post ("
low-income families are not qualified") it seems that you meant that you selected option B and not C, isn't it? If so is the case, I would suggest that you use the same two path (yes/no) method you used for option E and see whether the conclusion holds for one and does not hold for the other.
Conclusion:
these colleges will soon cater solely to students with affluent family backgrounds.Are students from low and middle-income families are qualified to attend elite private colleges? YES - in this case the conclusion that
these colleges will soon cater solely to students with affluent family backgrounds holds good, because these students, even though being qualified, will not be able to afford the fees as argued in the passage.
Are students from low and middle-income families are qualified to attend elite private colleges? NO - in this case also the conclusion that
these colleges will soon cater solely to students with affluent family backgrounds holds good, although not because of the reason (financial) given in the passage, but for some other (qualification) reason.
So answering option B with yes and no does not change the conclusion, hence this option is not the correct answer.
Option B is a typical example of an "out of scope" trap used in "Evaluate Argument" type question.
Thank you for your response. I did mean to say I selected option B.
If the answer to B is no, wouldn't it change the conclusion? If the low and middle-income families were not qualified for the elite private colleges, colleges would already cater solely to students with affluent family backgrounds. There would be no need for the words "will soon" in the conclusion since this is already occurring.